Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51631
|
| Title: | 開放收養家庭經驗初探-正向經驗的啟發
A Research on Inspiration of Positive Experiences for Open Adoption Families |
| Authors: | 韓婷婷
Han,Ting Ting |
| Contributors: | 謝美娥
韓婷婷
Han,Ting Ting |
| Keywords: | 開放收養
兒童福利服務
收養服務
open adoption
children welfare service
adoption service |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2011-10-11 17:03:15 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究採用質性深度訪談方法探討開放收養家庭經驗，分析收養家庭與出養家庭互動的過程與感受，並彙整成功開放收養的因素，探討開放收養家庭之需求。透過本研究希望瞭解：第一，本土開放收養家庭的經驗，瞭解收養家庭與出養家庭接觸的過程及感受；第二，歸納成功開放收養的因素，提出對收養服務之具體建議；第三，彙整開放收養家庭需求，提供未來收養服務及實務工作相關參考。本研究與兒童福利聯盟收出養組合作，選取符合開放收養定義之收養人參與研究，並將研究結果形成建議，提供收出養實務工作及潛在收養人參考。
依據研究目的，研究者邀請北部地區八個開放收養家庭（共計十位收養人）進行一對一的深度訪談，研究結果如下列幾點：
一、「開放收養」對收出養三方皆有正面影響，有助於創造收出養雙方家庭正向的互動經驗，提升養父母對出養家庭的同理心、促使生父母對出養決定放心，並讓被收養者清楚知道自己並未被遺棄，建立對身世的正面記憶。
二、收養人開放收養的動機包括下述五項：讓孩子知道自己是被愛的、對原生家庭有同理心、視為孩子應得的機會、認為孩子有需要、及期待更了解孩子。
三、在開放收養接觸經驗方面，收養人對開放見面展現高度接納、包容、同理及瞭解，肯定開放收養之優勢與結果。
四、影響成功開放收養的因素可歸納如下述：（一）「內部動力因素」：養父母支持開放的信念、尊重孩子的意願、孩子不是私有財的觀念、同理出養家庭的不捨、期望讓出養家庭放心、對出養家庭印象良好以及養父母之間溝通良好，呈現養父母以兒童最佳利益優先和尊重出養方的理念，促成開放結果順利產生；（二）「外部增強因素」：正向的家庭互動經驗、出養家庭提供支持，以及獲得專業機構支持三項，顯示專業機構與出養家庭對開放的正面態度有助於促使收出養雙方順利見面，且專業機構在收出養流程及後續追蹤期間，持續提供專業建議及諮詢，並擔任收出養聯繫的中介角色，有助於維持開放的穩定。
五、開放收養家庭的需求主要可分為四項：「機構提供輔助性支援」、「同質性養父母支持團體」、「被收養童專業處遇」、「養父母成長課程」。
六、透過機構收養的家庭普遍滿意機構的安排，對於機構提供之收養準備課程、開放聯繫協助、專業諮詢與建議表示肯定，認為機構支持有助於增加開放收養的意願與安全感。
關鍵字：開放收養、兒童福利服務、收養服務
This research intends to investigate the open adoption experience in Taiwan through qualitative research method and in-depth interviews. In addition, we analyze the interaction and feelings between the biological and adoptive families, classify the factors behind successful open adoption cases as well as organize the needs of open adoption families. This research is conducted in cooperation with the Adoption Service Section of the Child Welfare League Foundation and invited those who conform to the definition of “open adoption family” to participate in the research. We provide some suggestions based on the research result for future adoptive families and those who engage in adoption services and practices.
According to the research purpose, we invited eight open adoption families from Northern Taiwan to participate in this research and achieved the following results:
1. The “open adoption” method produces positive effects for both the birth family and the adoptive family. It helps create a positive and interactive experience between both families, increase the empathy of the adopting parents with the biological parents, and hence ease the worries about adoption for the birth family. Meanwhile, the adoptee would understand that they are not abandoned and thus develop a positive memory about their relationship with their biological parents.
2. The adoptive family accepts the open adoption method for the following five motives: let the adoptee know they are loved, show empathy with the birth family, regard this as deserved for the child, believe it is needed by the child, and hope to understand more about the child.
3. Regarding the open adoption experience, the adoptive family show high level of acceptance, tolerance, empathy and understanding, recognizing the benefit and result of open adoption method.
4. The success of the open adoption practice can be determined by the following two categories of factors. First, the “internal motivation” factors: adoptive parents support the open adoption method, respect the wish of the adoptee, agree that children are not private properties, empathize with the birth family’s sorrow, expect to ease the worry of the biological parents, have a good impression about the birth family, communicate well between each other, prioritize the best interest of the child, and respect the birth family. With these internal motivation factors, the success of open adoption can be achieved. Second, the “external reinforcement” factors: having positive family interaction experiences, gaining support from both the birth family and the adoption agency. These external reinforcement factors show that the supportive attitude of both the adoption agency and the birth family makes possible a meeting between the birth family and the adoptive one. Moreover, the stabilization of open adoption can be reached, if, during the adoption processes and the follow-up period, the adoption agency can continuously provide professional suggestions and consultation as well as be a bridge between both families.
5. The open adoption family generally requires the following supports: agency provided assistance, support group of similar adoptive families, professional intervention for the adoptee, adoptive parents training.
6. Those who adopt children through adoption agencies are generally satisfied with the arrangement of the agency, and recognize the provided preparation lessons, assistance as well as professional consultations and suggestions. The adoptive families believe that the agency provided support helps increase the willingness and confidence to accept the open adoption method.
Keywords: open adoption, children welfare service, adoption service |
| Reference: | 壹、 中文部分
內政部兒童局（2009）。《台灣地區歷年法院交查收養監護案件調查統計》。
內政部兒童局網頁（http：//www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/index.aspx）。
內政部統計處（2009a）。《戶政司歷年人口身分變更統計資料》。
內政部統計資訊服務網頁（http：//www.ris.gov.tw/version96/stpeqr_01.html）。
內政部統計處（2009b）。《各縣市人口出生率、育齡婦女一般生育率、年齡別生 育率及總生育率資料》。內政部統計資訊服務網頁（http//www.ris.gov.tw/gateway/stpeqr01.cgi）。
內政部統計處（2009c）。《內政部戶政司統計年報（歷年人口身分變更統計資料）》。內政部統計處網頁（http：//www.ris.gov.tw/version96/stpeqr_01.html）。
自由時報（2007）。《小孩知道買來的，還肯不肯叫我媽》。自由時報新聞網頁（http：//www.libertytimes.com.tw/2007/new/apr/16/today-fo5.htm）。
自由時報（2008）。《王精明開診所販嬰 150家庭涉案》。自由時報新聞網頁（http：//www.libertytimes.com.tw/2008/new/oct/12/today-so1-3.htm）。
白麗芳譯，M. Komar原著（1998）。《收養父母寶典》。台北：中華民國兒福利聯盟文教基金會。
王美恩（2002）。〈收養服務本土化的探討-兒盟六個收養家庭案例分析〉，《東吳社會工作學報》，第8期，頁75-115。
王美恩（2000）。《兒童福利聯盟收養服務評估與未來發展之探討》。中華民國兒童福利聯盟文教基金會委託研究報告。
王碧珠譯，R. S. Carole原著（1997）。《收養與寄養：實務與理論》。台北：巨流。
王仁雄（1983）。《領養安置服務與社會工作》。台中：中華兒童福利基金會。
李芳玲（2007）。《為愛收養，身世告知不害怕》。兒童福利聯盟文教基金會網頁
（http：//www.children.org.tw/news.php?offset=0&id=1708&typeid=16）。
李欣芸（2006）。《論海峽兩岸之收養法制》。東海大學法律學系碩士論文。
吳秀峰（2003）。《我們都是一家人—成功收養大孩子之初探性研究》。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
吳芝儀、李奉儒譯，M. Q. Patton原著（1995）。《質的評鑑與研究》。台北：桂冠。
利翠珊（1999）。〈已婚女性家庭系統的交會：親情與角色的兩難〉，《中華心理衛生學刊》，第3期，頁1-26。
周震歐（1995）。《兒童福利》。台北：巨流。
林芳如（2007）。《養女不是問題，問題才是問題：女性被收養者的自我認同》。國立台北教育大學心理與諮商學系碩士論文。
林秋君（2005）。《影響收養家庭生活適應歷程之初探》。國立台灣大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
林美瑜（1989）。《我國兒童福利領養服務現況探討》。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
林勝義（2002）。《兒童福利》。台北：五南。
胡幼慧（1996）。《質性研究：理論、方法與本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。
郭靜晃（2004）。《兒童福利》。台北：揚智。
張秀傑（2007）。《兩岸收養法制之比較研究》。國立台灣海洋大學海洋法律研究所碩士論文。
張毓娟（1994）。《收養服務制度化之可行性評估研究：以台北市社會局之收養方案為例》。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
陳麟祥（2004）。《兒童及少年福利法與親屬法之交錯─兼論兒童及少年福利法相關規定之修訂》。輔仁大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。
陳祥彬（2002）。《我國收養法修正芻議─以收養之成立要件及效力為中心》。國立政治大學法律學系碩士論文。
陳蓋聖（1994）。《收養之研究》。國立台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
陳若喬、王枝燦（2003）。〈生的放一邊，養的卡大天--台北市收養概況與變遷〉，《兒童福利期刊》，第5期，頁17-36。
彭南元（1999）。〈美國現行收養法制之研究〉，《警大法學論集》，第4期，頁347-378。
彭懷真（1996）。《婚姻與家庭》。台北：巨流。
黃雅琴（2003）。《收養要件之評析與前瞻》。國立成功大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
黃瑞琴（1994）。《質的教育研究方法》。台北：心理。
雷文玫（1999）。〈以「子女最佳利益」之名：離婚後父母對未成年子女權利義務行使與負擔之研究〉，《台大法學論叢》，第28期第3卷，頁245-309。
劉怡伶（2009）。《機構式收養經驗之探討》。東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
駱叔君（2002）。《國際收養法律問題之研究》。國立台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
簡春安、鄒平儀（2004）。《社會工作研究法》。台北：巨流。
簡春安、鄒平儀（1998）。《社會工作研究法》。台北：巨流。
蘇靖媛（1989）。《養父母收養動機與收養安置方式之研究》。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
貳、 西文部分
Alty, C. and S. Cameron (1995). ‘Open adoption: The way forward?’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 15: 40-58.
Avery, R. J. (1998). ‘Information disclosure and openness in adoption: State policy and empirical evidence’, Children and Youth Services Review, 20: 57- 85.
BAAF(British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering). (1999). Contact in permanent Placement-Guidance for local authorities in England & Wales and Scotland, London: BAAF.
Barth, R. (1987). ‘Adolescent Mothers’ Beliefs About Open Adoption’, Social Casework, 68: 323-331.
Barth, R. P. and M. Berry (1988). Adoption and disruption: rates, risks, and responses. New York: Aldine. De Gruyter.
Baran, A., A. Sorosky and R. Pannor (1975). ‘Secret Adoption Records: the Dilemma of Our Adoptees’, Psychology Today, 9: 38-42.
Beek, M. (1994). ‘The reality of face to face contact after adoption’, Adoption and Fostering, 18(2): 39-43.
Belbas, N. F. (1987). ‘Staying in touch: Empathy in open adoptions’, Smith College Studies in Social Work, 57: 184-198.
Bell, V. (1959). ‘Special considerations in the adoption of the older child’, Social casework, 40( 6): 73-86.
Berman, L. C. and R. K. Buffered (1986). ‘Family treatment to address loss in adoptive families’, Social Casework, 67: 3-11.
Berry, M. (1998). ‘Adoption in an era of family preservation’, Children and Youth Services Review, 20: 1-12.
Berry, M. (1993). ‘Risks and Benefits of Open Adoptions’, The Future of Children: Adoption, 3(1): 125-138.
Berry, M. (1991). ‘The effects of open adoption on biological and adoptive parents and their children: The arguments and the evidence’, Child Welfare, 70: 637-651.
Berry, M., D. J. Dylla, R. P. Barth and B. Needell (1998). ‘The role of open adoption in the adjustment of adopted children and their families’, Children and Youth Services Review, 20: 151-171.
Borgman, R. (1982). ‘The Consequences of Open and Closed Adoptions for Older Children’, Child Welfares, 4: 217-230.
Brodzinsky, D. M. and M. D. Schechter (1993). The Psychology of Adoption. (eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brodzinsky, D. M., D. W. Smith and A. B. Brodzinsky (1998). ‘Children`s Adjustment to Adoption: Development and clinical issues’, Developmental Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry, 38: 1-142.
Byrd, A. D. (1988). ‘The case for confidential adoption’, Public Welfare, 46: 20-23.
Checkland, S. G. and E. O. A. Checkland (1974). The Poor Law Report of 1834. (eds.) Harmondsworth U. K. : Pelican Classics.
Christian, C. and C. Bryant (1998). ‘Birth Mothers’ Adjustment and Resolution of Grief’, in R. McRoy and H. Grotevant (eds.), Openness in Adoption: Exploring Family Connections, pp. 135-172. Newbury Park: Sage.
Churchman, D. (1986). ‘The debate over open adoption’, Public Welfare, 44: 11-14.
Cole, E. S. and K. S. Donley (1990). History, Values and Placement Policy Issue in Adoption. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crossen-Tower, C. (2007). Exploring child welfare: a practice perspective (4th ed.). Boston, Mass. : Allyn and Bacon.
Cushman, L. F., D. Kalmuss and P. B. Namerow (1997). ‘Openness in adoption: Experiences and social psychological outcomes among birth mothers’, Marriage and Family Review, 25: 7-18.
Dhami, M. K., D. R. Mandel, G. Loewenstein and P. Ayton (2006). ‘Prisoners’ Positive Illusions of Their Post-Release Success’, Law and Human Behavior, 30: 631-647.
Dickson, L. R., W. M. Heffron and C. Parker (1990). ‘Children from disrupted and adoptive homes on an inpatient unit’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60: 594-602.
Digiulio, J. F. (1987). ‘Assuming the adoptive parents role’, Social Casework, 68: 561-566.
Dutt, R. and A. Sanyal (1991). ‘Openness’ in adoption or open adoption - A black perspective’, Adoption and Fostering, 15(4): 111-115.
Etter, J. (1993). ‘Levels of cooperation and satisfaction in 56 open adoptions’, Child Welfare, 72: 257-267.
Fanshel, D. and E. Shinn (1978). Children in Foster Care. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Fox, G. L. (1980). ‘The Mother-Adolescent Daughter Relationship as a Sexual Socialization Structure: A Research Revie’, Family Relations, 29(1): 21-28.
Fox, N. (1977). ‘Attachment of Kibbutz Infants to Mothers and Metaplet’, Child Development, 48: 1228-1239.
Fratter, J. (1989). ‘How adoption parents feel about contact with birth parents after adoption’, Adoption & Fostering, 13(4): 18-26.
Fravel, D. L., R. G. McRoy and H. D. Grotevant (2000). ‘Birthmother perceptions of the psychologically present adopted child: Adoption openness and boundary ambiguity’, Family Relations, 49: 425-433.
Goldenstein, J. (1979). Beyond The Best Interest of Child. N.Y. : Macmillan Publishing.
Goodman, G., R. Emery and J. J. Haugaard (1998). ‘Developmental psychology and the law: Divorce child maltreatment, foster care, and adoption’. in I. Sigel and A. Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, (5th ed), pp.775-876. New York: John Woley and Sons.
Gross, H. (1997). ‘Variants of open adoptions: The early years’, Marriage and Family Review, 25: 19-42.
Gross, H. (1993). ‘Open Adoption: A Research-Based Literature Review and New Data’, Child Welfare, 72: 269-284.
Grotevant, H. D. (2000). ‘Openness in adoption: Research with the adoption kinship network’, Adoption Quarterly, 4(1): 45-64.
Grotevant, H. D. and J. K. Kohler (1999). ‘Adoptive families’. in M. Lamb (Ed), Nontraditional families: Parenting and child development (2nd ed), pp. 161-190. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Grotevant, H. D. and R. G. McRoy (1998). Openness in Adoption: Exploring Family Connection. London: Sage.
Grotevant, H. D. and R. G. McRoy (1997). ‘The Minnesota/Texas adoption Research project: Implications of openness in adoption for development and relationships’, Applied Developmental Service, 1(4): 168-186.
Grotevant, H. D., R. G. McRoy, C. L. Elde and D. L. Fravel (1994). ‘Adopive family system dynamics: Variations by the level of openness in the adoption’. Family Process, 33: 125-146.
Grotevant, H. D., Y. V. Perry and R. G. McRoy (2005). ‘Openness in adoption: Outcomes for adolescents and their adoptive kinship networks’. in D. Brodzinsky and J. Palacios (Eds.), Psychological issues in adoption: Theory, research, and Application, pp.167-186. New York: Praeger.
Grotevant, H. D., N. M. Ross, M. A. Marchel and R. G. McRoy (1999). ‘Adoptive behavior in adopted children: Predictors from early risk, collaboration in relationship with the adoptive kinship network, and openness aeeangements’, Journal of Adolescent Reasearch, 14: 231-247.
Hajal, F. and E. B. Rosenberg (1991). ‘The family life cycle in adoptive families’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(1): 78-85.
Haugaard, J. J., N. M. West and A. M. Moed (2000). ‘Open adoptions: Attitudes and experiences’. Adoption Quarterly, 4(2): 89-99.
Henry, M. and D. Pollack (2009). Adoption in the United States: A reference for families, professionals, and students. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, Inc.
Hill, M. and M. Show (1998). Signposts in Adoption: Policy, Practice and research issues. London: BAAF.
Holbrook, S. M. (1990). ‘Adoption, infertility, and the new reproductive technologies: Problems and prospects for social work and welfare policy’, Social Work, 35: 333-337.
Howe, D. and J. Feast (2000). Adoption, Search & reunion: The long term experience of adopted adults. London: The children’s Society.
Hughes, J. R. (1995). ‘Applying harm reduction to smoking’, Tobacco Contral: An International Journal, 4(2): 33-38.
Iwanek, M. (1987). A Study of Open Adoption, 14 Emerson Stree. Petone, Wellington, New Zealand: Unpublished.
Katz, L. (1986). ‘Parental stress and factors for success in older-child adoption’, Child Welfare, 65: 569-578.
Kimmel, A. J. (1996). ‘Ethical issues in the Conduct of Human Subject Research II: Field Research’. in Kimmel, A. J., Ethical issues in behavioral research: A survey, pp.118-157. Oxford.
Kirk, D. (1964). Shared fate. New York: The Free Press.
Kirk, D. and S. Mcdaniel (1984). ‘Adoption policy in great Britain and North America’, Journal of Social Policy, 13(1): 75-84.
Kohler, J. K., H. D. Grotevant and R. G. McRoy (2002). ‘Adopted adolescents’ preoccupation with adoption: Impact of adoptive family dynamics’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64: 93-104.
Lauderdale, J. and J. Boyle (1994). ‘Infant Relinquishment through Adoption in Image’, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 26(3).
Lee, J. S. and J. A. Twaite (1997). ‘Open adoption and adoptive mothers: Attitudes toward birthmothers. adopted children, and parenting’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61: 576-584.
Leeding, A. (1977). ‘Access to Birth Records’, Adoption and Fostering, 89(3): 19-25.
Logan, J. and C. Smith, (2005). ‘Face-to-Face Contact Post Adoption: Views from the Triangles’, British Jr. of Social Work, 35: 3-35.
Logan, J. and C. Smith, (1999). ‘Adoption and direct postadoption contact’. Adoption & Fostering, 23(4): 58-59.
Macaskill, A. (2002). Heal the hurt: How to forgiven and move on. London: Guilford Press.
Maynard (2005). ‘Generation and investigation of airborne Ag nanoparticles with specific size and morphology by homogeneous nucleation, coagulation and sintering’, J. Aerosol sci., 36(9): 1108-1124.
McCubbin, H. I. and J. M. Patterson (1983). Stress and the family, Vol. 1: Coping with normative transitions (Eds.). New York: Brunner / Mazel.
McRoy, R. G. (1991). ‘American experience and research on openness’, Adoption & Fostering, 15(4): 99-110.
McRoy, R., H. Grotevant and L. Zurcher (1988). Emotional disturbance in adopted adolescents: Origins and development. New York: Praeger.
McWhinnie, A. (1967). Adoptied Children: How They Grow Up. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Melina, L. R. (1986). Raising adopted children: a manual for adoptive parents. New York: Harper & Row.
Miall, C. (1998). ‘Community assessments of adoption issues: Open adoption, birth reunions, and the disclosure of confidential information’, Journal of Family Issues, 19: 556-577.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Neil, E. (2009). ‘Post-Adoption Contact and Openness in Adoptive Parents` Minds: Consequences for Children`s Development’, British Journal of Social Work, 39: 5-19.
Neil, E. C. (2000). Contact with birth relatives after adoption: A study of young, recently placed children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UK: University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Peters, B. R., M. C. Atkins and M. M. McKay (1999). ‘Adopted children’s behavior problems: A review of five explanatory models’, Clinical Psychology Review, 19: 297-328.
Plumer, E. H. (1992). When You Place a Child. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Powell, S. and J. Warren (1997). The easy way out？ London: Minerva press.
Powledge, F. (1985). The new adoption maze and how to get through it. St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby.
Rappaport, B. M. (1992). The open adoption book. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Reitz, M. and K.W. Watson (1992). Adoption and the family system. New York: Guilford press.
Roby, J. and S. Matsumura (2002). ‘If I give you my child, aren`t we family? a study of birthmothers participating in Marshall Island-US Adoptions’, Adoption Quarterly, 5(4): 7-31
Roby, J. L., J. Wyatt and G. Pettys (2005). ‘Openness in International Adoptions - A Study of U.S. Parents Who Adopted Children from the Marshall Islands’, Adoption Quarterly, 8(3): 47-71.
Rockel, J. and M. Ryburn (1988). Adoption Today: Change and Choice in New Zealand. Auckland: Heinemann Reed.
Rosenblatt, P. C. and L. R. Fischer (1993). ‘Qualitative family research’, in P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm and S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family methods: A contextual approach, pp.167-177, New York: Plenum Press.
Ryburn, M. (1994). Open Adoption: Research Theory and Practice. Great Britain: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Ryburn, M. (1992). Adoption in the 1990’s:Identity and Opennes. Warwickshire: Leamington Press.
Ryburn, M. (1990). ‘Open in adoption’. Adoption & Fostering’, 14(1): 21-26.
Sachdev, P. (1991). ‘The Triangle of Fears: Fallacies and Facts’, in E. Hibbs (eds.), Adoption: International perspectives, Maddison CT: International Universities Press.
Sachdev, P. (1989). ‘The triangle of fears: Fallacies and facts’, Child Welfare, 68: 491-503.
Samuels, S. C. (1990). Ideal Adoption: A Comprehensive Guide to Forming an Adoptive Famil. New York: Plenum Press.
Sandven, K. and M. D. Resnick (1990). ‘Informal adoption among black adolescent mothers’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60(2): 217.
Schaffer, H. R. and P. E. Emerson (1964). ‘The development of social attachments in infancy’, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial 94, 29(3): 3-75.
Siegel, D. H. (1993). ‘Open adoption of infants: Adoptive parents` perceptions of advantages and disadvantages’, Social Work, 38: 15-23.
Smith, S. L., J. A. Howard, and A. D. Monroe (2000). ‘Issues Underlying Behavior Problems in At-Risk Adopted Children’, Children and Youth Services Review, 2(7): 539-562.
Sobol, M. P., K. J. Daly and E. K. Kelloway (2000). ‘Paths to the facilitation of open adoption’, Family Relations, 49: 419-424.
Sorosky, A. and R. Pannor (1978). The Adoption Triangle. New York: Doubleday / Anchor.
Spencer, M. (1983). ‘Children’s Cultural Views and Child Rearing Strategies’, developmental Review, 4: 351-370.
Stone, S. (1994). ‘Contact between adopters and birthparents: The Strathclyde experience’, Adoption and Fostering, 18(2): 36-38.
Susan, M. H., O. Steven, G. M. Ruth and D. G. Harold (1998). ‘Changing Agency Practices Toward Openness in Adoption’, Adoption Quarterly, 1(3): 45-76.
Sykes, M. (2000). ‘Adoption with contact: A study of adoptive parents and the impact of continuing contact with families of origin’, Adoption and Fostering, 24(2): 20-33.
Thomas, C., V. Beckford, N. Lowe and M. Murch (1999). Adopted children speaking. London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.
Triseliotis, J. P. (1991). ‘Open adoption’, in A. Mullender (eds.), Open adoption: The philosophy in practice. London: BAAF.
Triseliotis, J. P. (1973). In Search of Origins. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Triseliotis, J. P. and V. Lobban (1973). ‘Recent Developments Affecting Adoption Numbers and Adoption Practice’, British Journal of Social Work, 5(3): 333-334.
Triseliotis, J. P., J. Shireman and M. Hundleby (1997). Adoption: theory, policy and practice. London: CASSELL.
Valentine, G. (2001). ‘At the Drawing Board: Developing a Research Design’. in M. Limb and C. Dwyer (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates, pp. 41-54. London: Arnold.
Walsh, F. (1998). Strengthenening family resilience. New York: Guilford Press.
Wang, C. W. (2000). ‘Openness in Adoption - an examination of contact with birth families in Taiwan’, University of East Anglia school of social work.
Watson, K. W. (1988). ‘Thee case of open adoption’, Public Welfare, 46(4): 24-28.
Wegar, K. (1997). Adoption, Identity, and Kinship: The Debate Over Sealed Records. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
Winkler, R. and M. Van Keepel (1984). Relinquishing Mothers in Adoption: Their Long-Term Adjustmen. Melbourne: Institute of Family Studies, Monograph, 3.
Wolfgram, S. M. (2008). ‘Openness in Adoption: What We Know So Far-A Critical Review of the Literature’, Social Work, 53(2): 133-143.
Wrobel, G. M., S. Ayers-Lopez, H. D. Grotevant, R. McRoy and M. Friedrick (1996). ‘Openness in adoption and the level of child participation’, Child Development, 67: 2358-2374.
Wrobel, G. M., H. D. Grotevant, J. Berge, T. Mendenhall and R. McRoy (2003). ‘Contact in adoption: The experience of adoptive families in the USA’, Adoption and Fostering, 27(1): 57-67.
Zwimpfer, D. M. (1983). ‘Indicators of adoption breakdown’, Social Casework, 64: 169- 177.
|
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
社會工作研究所
96264003
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096264003 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會工作研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 400301.pdf | 900Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 2213 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
