政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51630

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51630

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 50965717 在线人数 : 917

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 財政學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/51630

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51630

题名:	產業部門能源需求與碳排放之驅動力與效率的實證研究 Empirical Analysis on Driving Forces and Technical Efficiency of Energy Demand, Economic Growth and Carbon Emission
作者:	單珮玲 Shan, Pei Ling
贡献者:	黃宗煌 Huang, Chung Huang 單珮玲 Shan, Pei Ling
关键词:	EKC假說環境稅拆解分析隨機生產邊界隨機成本邊界技術效率 EKC hypothesis Environmental taxes Decomposition analysis Stochastic production frontier Stochastic cost frontier Technical efficiency
日期:	2010
上传时间:	2011-10-11 17:03:02 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究包括3個研究議題。第1個議題旨為估算不同部門別（包括農業、工業、服務業與運輸業）的能源燃燒產生CO2排放之組成因素的貢獻量，係藉由拉氏指數法和算術平均迪氏指數法之加法型態，拆解5種不同的因素（包括：碳密集度、部門結構、能源密集度、人口及經濟規模等），觀察其對於CO2排放變動之影響。本文採用台灣1992-2008年的各部門別的資料作為分析的基礎，研究結果顯示，以上部門的經濟規模對於CO2排放的貢獻呈現巨幅的正向效果；人口因素則呈現微幅的正向或負向的影響；而碳密集度對於CO2排放減量有正面的影響，並發現此乃是構成改善能源結構並導致CO2排放減量的最重要因素；能源密集度因素的影響，除服務業以外，其餘部門均呈現負向影響，此一結果顯示，大部分部門要進一步改善其能源效率頗為困難，是以未來致力於減排的努力，應著重於使用乾淨能源，尤其是以再生能源作為替代能源 (Liaskas et al., 2000)；此外，值得注意的是，部門結構因素對於大部分的產業，如農業、工業和運輸業的CO2排放減量有正向的影響，據此可推論，我國的部門結構已漸趨向於低耗能產業（如服務業）發展。另外，本文採用近似不相關迴歸模型，探討各項政策工具（如環境稅、進口關稅）與經濟變數（如貿易條件及時間趨勢等）透過以上5種不同的組成因素，對於CO2排放變動的影響效果作一分析，其實證結果可供決策者制定減排政策的參考。第2個議題係為建立節能減排的有效政策工具，須先詳實掌握各項政策工具對節能減排與經濟成長的影響，乃深入回顧相關文獻之理論與實證方法，據以建立適合台灣的3E聯立模型，並進行實證分析，藉以推估多項政策工具（如環境稅、關稅等及能源價格等）與經濟變數（如貿易條件、所得等）對於節能減排與GDP的影響。實證分析結果顯示，台灣之能源消費、CO2排放、及GDP對於各項政策工具與經濟變數之彈性不僅各異其趣，而且有些彈性並非固定不變，可隨時間經過動態調整。第3個議題係利用台灣1992-2008年之農業、工業、服務業與運輸業等部門別的panel data，仿照Battese and Coelli (1995)提出之隨機邊界(Stochastic Frontier Analysis, SFA)模型，建構隨機生產邊界函數 (stochastic production frontier function)與隨機能源需求函數 (stochastic energy demand frontier function)，利用最大概似法估算出各部門的GDP與能源需求之隨機邊界與技術效率 (technical efficiency, TE)，並據此實證結果提出政策建議。 The thesis includes 3 issues of research. The first research aims at identifying the factors that have influenced change in the level of various sectors (agriculture, industry, service and transport) CO2 emissions from energy use. By means of both Laspeyres index method and the arithmetic mean weight scheme expressed separately in the additive form, the observed changes are analyzed into five different factors: CO2 intensity, structural change, sectoral energy intensity, sectoral employing population and output level. The application study refer to 4 sectors of Taiwan between 1992 and 2008. The obtained decomposition results indicate that the examined sectors the value calculated for the output level effect present the highest value appearing positive contribution of CO2, and the contribution from population is slightly increased or decreased, while CO2 intensity has beneficially influenced the reduction of CO2 emissions, as well as the improvement of fuel mix found to be the most important factor that lead to the reduction of emissions. In most of the examined sectors for the energy intensity factor present positive effect on CO2 emissions, the only exception is service sector showing negative impact on CO2 emissions, which can be stated as Liaskas et al. (2000) that as further improvements in energy efficiency in most sectors become more difficult, efforts to reduce CO2 emissions will be predominantly directed towards the use of clean energy forms and especially towards the deployment of renewable energies. It also should be noted that structural change has positively influenced the abatement of CO2 emissions for the most sectors such as agriculture, industry and transport. We conclude it shifts towards less energy-intensive service sector, due to have negative influenced the observed decrease in CO2 emissions for higher energy use sectors (industry and transport) and agriculture,. In this article, we also use a seemingly unrelated regression to further investigate the policy tools how to change in CO2 emissions level by the five different factors. The results indicate that policymakers may reduce emissions considerably through various policy instruments. The second issue focuses on initiating effective policy to save energy and reduce emission, one needs to reasonably capture the potential impacts of various policy instruments on energy consumption, CO2 emission and economic growth, the second research, after extensively reviewing the literature, builds a locally ideal empirical model that facilitates the estimation of various policy elasticities. The empirical results indicate that policy elasticities may not only differ from one to the others, but also change dynamically, implying the 3E impacts of some policy instruments might be weakening over time. The main goal of the third article is to provide a detailed analysis of productivity and efficiency measurement for panel data on four different sectors from Taiwan over the period 1992-2008. We use a stochastic frontier model set by Battese and Coelli (1995) to build a stochastic production frontier function and a stochastic energy demand frontier function, which are estimated by maximum likelihood to obtain a stochastic frontier of GDP and energy demand, as well as technical efficiency. On this empirical results, we suggest that policymaker may simultaneously make top-down policies (green tax reform, increasing environmental tax etc.) and bottom-up policies (fuel price in line with prices of gas in global markets) to increase energy efficiency in different sectors.
參考文獻:	行政院賦稅改革委員會研究報告 (2009)，《綠色稅制之研究》，財政部賦稅署。王禮茂（2004）。「幾種主要碳增匯 / 減排途徑的對比分析」，《第四紀研究》第24卷第2期，頁191-197。吳榮華、黃玄洲（2001）。「台灣鋼鐵業能源消費變動因素分析 - 物理指標」，《能源季刊》第31卷第4期，頁40-54。吳銘峰（2003）。《製造業能源效率指標的台灣實證研究》，碩士論文，國立台北大學資源管理研究所。李正豐、林勻淅（2008）。「我國公路運輸溫室氣體排放變動因素分解分析」，《運輸計劃季刋》第37卷第４期，頁263-380。周鳳瑛、李佳玲（2001）。「我國能源密集度變動因素分析」，《能源季刊》第31卷第4期，頁55-65。林佑蓉 (2007)。《台灣與數國之能源經濟及CO2之關聯分析比較》，碩士論文，國立成功大學環境工程研究所。林素貞、張子見、張翊峰、李正豐（1996）。「以因素分析探討臺灣地區產業CO2排放量之變動趨勢與關鍵因素」，《能源季刊》第26卷第1期，頁1-15。林素貞、黃群達、林佑蓉（2006）。「台、美、日、英之商業部門CO2排放趨勢與關鍵因素探討」，《能源季刋》第36卷第4期，頁56-77。單珮玲（2010）。「CO2排放減量與環境政策之探討 ― 以拆解分析法估算各種因素之影響效果」，2010多國籍企業學術研討會，中國文化大學商學院。單珮玲（2010）。「參加APEC財政部長會議『氣候變遷對亞太經濟合作經濟體經濟政策意涵』會議報告」，行政院所屬各機關因公出國人員出國報告書。黃仁德、鍾建屏（2008）。「台灣產業結構變動與失業率關係之探討」，《法治論叢》第41期，頁67-108。黃運貴、曹壽民（2005）。「我國運輸部門能源消費量分解分析」，《運輸學刋》第17卷第２期，頁175-208。楊任徽（1999）。「造成我CO2上升關鍵因素之尺度分析」，《能源季刊》第29卷第2期，頁62-77。廖慧嵐（2005）。《台灣地區公路運輸部門能源消費與CO2排放變動分析》，碩士論文，國立成功大學環境工程研究所。盧怡靜（2003）。《台灣地區工業部門能源消費與污染物排放關聯分析》，碩士論文，國立成功大學環境工程研究所。 Ang, B.W. and F.Q. Zhang (2000). “A Survey of Index Decomposition Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies,” Energy 25: 1149-1176. Ang, B.W. and K.H. Choi (1997). “Decomposition of Aggregate Energy and Gas emission Intensities for Industry: Arefined Divisia Index Method,” The Energy Journal, 18(3): 59-73. Ang, B.W. (1995). “Multilevel Decomposition of Industrial Energy Consumption,” Energy Economics 17(1): 39-51. Ang, B.W. (1994). “Decomposition of Industrial Energy Consumption: The Energy Intensity Approach.” Energy Economics 16(3): 163-174. Ang, B.W. and G.. Pandiyan (1997). “Decomposition of Energy-Induced CO2 Emissions in Manufacturing,” Energy Economics 19(3): 363-374. Ang, B.W. and K.H. Choi (1997). “Decomposition of Aggregate Energy and Gas Emission Intensities for Industry: A Refined Divisia Index Method.” Energy Journal 18(3): 59-73. Bruvoll, A. and B. M. Larsen (2004). “Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Norway: Do Carbon Taxes Work?” Energy Policy 32: 493-505. Bruvoll, A. and H. Medin (2003). “Factors Behind the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Decomposition of the Changes in Air Pollution.” Environmental and Resource Economics 24: 27-48. Boyd, G. A., D.A. Hanson, and T. Sterner (1988). “Decomposition of Changes in Energy Intensity― a Comparison of the Divisia Index and Other Methods.” Energy Economics 10(4): 309-312. Chung, H.S. and H.C. Rhee (2001). “A Residual-free Decomposition of the Sources of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: A Case of the Korean Industries.” Energy 26: 15-30. Green, W.H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall International Edition. Howarth, R.B. and L. Shipper (1992). “Manufacturial Energy Use in Eight OECD Countries: Trends Through 1988.” Energy Journal 12: 1540. Liaskas, K., G. Mavrotas, M. Mandaraka, and D. Diakoulaki (2000). “Decomposition of Industrial CO2 Emissions: The Case of European Union.” Energy Economics 22: 383-394. Liu, C.C. (2007). “An Extended Method for Key Factors in Reducing CO2 Emissions.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 189: 440-451. Liu, X.Q., B.W. Ang, and H.L. Ong (1992). “The Application of the Divisia Index to the Decomposition of Changes in Industrial Energy Consumption.” Energy Journal 13(4): 161-177. Schipper, L., F. Unander, S. Murtishaw, and M. Ting (2001,). “Indicators of Energy Use and Carbon Emissions: Explaining the Energy Economy Link.” Annual Review of Energy and Environment 26: 49-81. Selden, T. M., A. S. Forrest and J. E. Lockhart (1999). “Analyzing the Reductions in U.S. Air Pollution Emissions: 1970 to 1990.” Land Economics 75(1): 1-21. Sun, J.W. (1998). “Changes in Energy Consumption and Energy Intensity: A Complete Decomposition Model.” Energy Economics 20: 85-100. Sun, J.W. and B.W. Ang (2000). “Some Properties of an Exact Energy Decomposition Model.” Energy 25: 1177-1188. Ventura, J. (1997). “Growth and Interdependence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 57-84. 行政院環境保護署 (2008)。「土壤及地下水污染整治基金來源與用途表」，行政院環境保護署。取自：http://sgw.epa.gov.tw/public/?ctype=B&cid=public&oid=www。行政院環境保護署 (2008)。「民國85-96年空氣污染防治費收入及支出明細表」，行政院環境保護署。取自：http://air.epa.gov.tw/Public/Main.aspx。吳珮瑛、劉哲良、蘇明達 (2006)。「由永續發展概念到生活品質內涵的檢視－台灣EKC的再檢驗與SKC的呈現」，《農業經濟叢刊》第12卷第1期，頁61-103。何金巡、林建甫、周麗芳（2007）。「油價、景氣與政府財政的總體經濟計量分析」，《農業與資源經濟》第4卷第1期，頁25-80。周婉玲、黃宗煌 (2008)。「環境稅費之雙紅利假說」，《碳經濟》，No. 14, 頁23- 42。林盈均(2005)。《能源使用效率之衡量與溫室氣體減量工具的影響》，清華大學經濟系碩士論文。林建甫 (2006)。「台灣總體經濟金融模型之建立」，《中央銀行季刋》第28卷第１期，頁5-41。林建甫、周麗芳、何金巡 (2005)。「建構台灣總體計量模型：油價、景氣與政府財政的總體經濟計量分析」，總體經濟計量模型研討會，高雄大學。林珮筠 (2008)。《能源相關稅制對溫室氣體減量之成效探討－歐洲15國之實證研究》，碩士論文，國立政治大學財政研究所。財政部統計處 (2009)。財政統計年報，財政部統計處編印。財政部賦稅署 (2009)。《綠色稅制之研究》，行政院賦稅改革委員會研究報告。梁啟源 (2007)。「全球油價走勢及其對台灣經濟的影響與因應政策」，2007年總體經濟計量模型研討會。梁靜云 (2008)。《移動污染源空氣污染減量之政策工具－台灣地區實證研究》，碩士論文，國立政治大學財政研究所。陳明郎 (2001)。《總體經濟學》，學富文化事業有限公司印製。黃宗煌 (2009)。《京都議定書經濟影響評估模型之建立、持續維護及調整（4/5）》，經建會委託專案研究計畫報告黃宗煌 (2010)。《京都議定書經濟影響評估模型之建立、持續維護及調整（5/5）》，經建會委託專案研究計畫期中報告黃宗煌、蔡攀龍、李蕙君 (1997)。「貿易政策對環境的影響」，《台灣經濟預測與政策》 28(1)，頁133-170。黃宗煌、鄧秀玲 (2003)。「環境顧志耐曲線的斜率以及關稅的環境效果」，未發表論文。黃耿信、單珮玲、黃宗煌 (2008)。「CO2排放與經濟成長脫鉤的機制」，經濟部能源局委託研究成果發表會《永續能源發展、排放交易與競爭力》。楊維娟、周登陽、陳正良 (2007)。「跨國污染與貿易同盟」，《農業經濟叢刊》第12卷第2期，頁297-324。經濟部能源局(2009)。能源統計月報，經濟部能源局。取自：http://www.moeaec.gov.tw/opengovinfo/Plan/all/WorkStatisticsAll.aspx。簡慧貞、黃宗煌 (2003)。「脫鉤―當經濟成長遇上環境負荷」，行政院國家永續發展委員會，行政院環境保護署：《與地球對話―永續台灣》。 Andreoni, J. and A. Levinson (2001). “The Simple Analytics of Environmental Kuznets Curve.” Journal of Public Economics 80, 269-286. Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge University Press. Bruvoll, A. and M.L. Bodil (2004). “Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Norway: Do Carbon Taxes Work?” Energy Policy 32, 493-505. Bruvoll, A. and H. Medin (2003). “Factors Behind the Environmental Kuznets Curve.” Environmental and Resource Economics 24: 27-48. Bruyn, de S.M., J.C.J.M. van den Bergh and J.B. Opschoor (1998). “Economic Growth and Emissions: Reconsidering the Empirical Basis of Environmental Kuznets Curves.” Ecological Economics 25, 161-175. Copeland, B. R. and M. S. Taylor (2004). Trade, “Growth, and the Environment.” Journal of Economic Literature, XLII: 7-71. Ederington, J. and M. Jenny (2003). “Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Economics 36(1): 137-154. Essen, C.V. (2009). Carbon Taxation – A Forgotten Climate Policy Tool? Published by Global Utmaning, Stocholm. Euopean Environment Agency (2008). Annual European Community Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990 – 2006 and Inventory Report 2008. European Commission (2007). Taxation in the European Union Data for the EU Member States and Norway, Eurostat Statistical Books. Fullerton, D., L. Andrew and S. Smith (2008). “Environmental Taxes,” NBER Working Paper 14197. Galeotti, M., M. Manera and L. Alessandro (2009). “On the Robustness of Robustness Checks of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis.” Environmental and Resource Economics 42, 551-574. Glasure, Y.U. and A.R. Lee (2002). “The Impact of Oil Prices on Income and Energy.” International Advanced in Economic Research 8(2), 148-154. Goodstein, E. (2003). “The Death of the Pigovian Tax? Policy Implications from the Double-Dividend Debate.” Land Economics 79(3), 402-414. Goulder, L.H. (1995). “Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend: A Reader’s Guide.” International Tax and Public Finance 2(2), 157-183. Grossman, G.M. and A.B. Krueger (1995). “Economic Growth and the Environment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 353-377. Huang, C.H. and P.L. Shan and C.W. Yang (2009). “Measurement of Energy Efficiency in Taiwan and Its Relevance to CO2 Decoupling.” presented at the Workshop on Innovations in Energy Efficiency. Stanford University, California. Hung, M. F. and D. Shaw (2004). “Economic Growth and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Taiwan: A Simultaneity Model Analysis.” In Human Capital, Trade and Public Policy in Rapidly Growing Economies, From Theory to Empirics, Michele Boldrin, Been-Lon Chen, and Ping Wang (eds.), 269-290. Jasen, H. and G. Klaassen (2000). “Economic Impacts of the 1997 EU Energy Tax: Simulations with Three EU-Wide Models.” Environmental and Resource Economics 15, 179-197. Johnstone, Nick (1995). “Commentary Trade Liberalization, Economic Specialization and the Environment.” Ecological Economics 14, 165-173. Kuznets, S. (1955). “Economic Growth and Income Inequality.” American Economics Review 45(1), 1-28. Liu, C.C. (2007). “An Extended Method for Key Factors in Reducing CO2 Emissions.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 189, 440-451. Managi, S. and P.R. Jean (2008). “Environmental Productivity and Kuznets Curve in India.” Ecological Economics 65, 432-440. OECD (2005). Policies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Industry: Implications for Steel. OECD (2002). Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth. OECD. OECD (2006). The Political Economy of Environmentally Related Taxes, OECD. Schipper, L., F. Unander, S. Murtishaw, and M. Ting (2001). “Indicators of Energy Use and Carbon Emissions: Explaining the Energy Economy Link.” Annual Review of Energy and Environment 26, 49-81. Selden, T.M., A.S. Forrest and J.E. Lockhart (1999). “Analyzing the Reductions in U.S. Air Pollution Emissions: 1970 to 1990.” Land Economics 75(1), 1-21. Sterner, T. (2007). “Fuel Taxes: An Important Instrument for Climate Policy.” Energy Policy 35, 3194-3202. Sun, J.W. (1999). “The Nature of CO2 Emission Kuznets Curve.” Energy Policy 27: 691-694. Tapio, P. (2005). “Towards a Theory of Decoupling: Degrees of Decoupling in the EU and the Case of Road Traffic in Finland Between 1970 and 2001.” Transport Policy 12: 137-151. Vollebergh, H.R.J (2008). “Lessons from the Polder: Energy Tax Design in the Netherlands from a Climate Change Perspective.” Ecological Economics 64, 660-672. Zaim, O. and F. Taskin (2000). “A Kuznets Curve in Environmental Efficiency: an Application on OECD Countries.” Environmental and Resource Economics 17, 21-36. 陳怡宜、王泓仁 (2009)。「隨機邊界模型的變數衡量誤差問題：一般動差估計法」，《經濟論文叢刊》37(1)，頁1-22。傅祖壇(1994)。「要素固定性、對偶成本邊界函數及生產效率之衡量─台灣毛豬農場之實證」，《農業經濟叢刊》22(4)，頁451-475。單珮玲 (2010)。《參加APEC財政部長會議『氣候變遷對亞太經濟合作經濟體經濟政策意涵』會議報告》，行政院所屬各機關因公出國人員出國報告書。黃志典、黃智遠(2004)。「台灣地區銀行產業成本效率之實證研究─隨機邊界法之應用」，《企銀季刊》27(3)，頁1-28。黃宗煌 (2009)。《家庭用電服務需求推估與政策推動效益評估》，工研院分包計畫報告。黃宗煌、王貴玲 (2002)。「自來水事業之技術效率與有效供水成本的評估」，《兩岸永續發展研討會論文集》，台北圓山飯店。黃宗煌、王貴玲(2002)。「自來水事業之技術效率與有效供水成本的評估」，兩岸永續發展研討會論文集，2002年6月5-7日，台北圓山飯店。鄭秀玲、周群新(1998)。「調整風險後之銀行效率分析：台灣銀行業的實證研究」，《經濟論文叢刊》26(3)，頁337-366。鄭秀玲、劉錦添、陳欽奇(1997)。「台灣中小企業銀行的效率分析(1986-1994年)」，《經濟論文》25(1)，頁69-95。蕭再安、鄭瓊雯(1990)，「運輸能源效率指標之研究」，中華民國運輸學會第15屆學術研討會會議倫文，頁215-224。 Aigner, D., C. Lovell and P. Schmidt (1977). “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6, 21-37. Battese, G.E. and T.J. Coelli(1995). “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data.” Empirical Economics 20, 325-332. Buck, J. and D. Young (2007). “The Potential for Energy Efficiency Gains in The Canadian Commercial Building Sector: A Stochastic Frontier Study.” Energy 32, 1769-1780. Chang, T., W. Fang, and L. Wen (2001). “Energy Consumption, Employment, Output, And Temporal Causality: Evidence from Taiwan Based on Cointegration and Error- correction Modeling Techniques.” Applied Economics 33, 1045-1056. Cheng, B.S., T.W. Lai (1997). “An Investigation of Cointegration and Causality Between Energy Consumption and Economic Activity in Taiwan.” Energy Economics 19, 435-444. Chiou-Wei, S. Z., C.F. Chen and Z. Zhu (2008). “Economic Growth and Energy Consumption Revisited – Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality.” Energy Economics 30, 3063-3076. Coelli, T. (1996). “A Guide to Frontier Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation.” CEPA Working Paper, No. 96/07, University of New England, Armidale, Australia. Coelli, T., D.S. Prasada Rao, C.J. O’Donnell and G.E. Battese (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, 2nd Edition, printed in the USA. Farrell, M.J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistic Society Series A (General), 120, No. III, 253-281 FeijoÓ，M.L., Franco, J.F. and Hernádex (2002). “Global Warming and The Energy Efficiency of Spanish Industry.” Energy Economics 24, 405-423. Granger, C.W.J. (1969). “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods.” Econometrica, 37, No. 3, 424-438. Greene, W.H. (2003). Econometric Analysis, 5th Edition, Pearson Education Interational. Self, S. and Grabowski, R. (2004). “Does Education At All Levels Cause Growth? India, A Case Study.” Economics of Education Review 23, 47-55. Vaninsky, A. (2010). “Prospective National and Regional Environmental Performance: Boundary Estimations using a Combined Data Envelopment – Stochastic Frontier Analysis Approach.” Energy 30, 1-9.
描述:	博士國立政治大學財政研究所 92255504 99
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922555041
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[財政學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
55504101.pdf	1787Kb	Adobe PDF2	2003	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈