政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51603
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51247894      Online Users : 866
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51603


    Title: 政府績效管理資訊化的交易成本分析：以「政府計畫管理資訊網」為例
    Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and government performance management: A case study of GPMnet in Taiwan
    Authors: 謝叔芳
    Hsieh, Hsu Fang
    Contributors: 陳敦源
    Chen, Don Yun
    謝叔芳
    Hsieh, Hsu Fang
    Keywords: 績效管理
    資訊通信科技
    交易成本
    混合方法論
    偏最小平方法
    performance management
    Information and Communication Technologies
    transaction cost
    mixed methodology
    Partial Least Squares
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2011-10-11 16:59:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自1980年代政府再造潮流以來，績效管理及資訊通信技術業已成為政府提昇績效的重要工具，在此一背景下，我國亦於民國94年完成「政府計畫管理資訊網（GPMnet）」整合，用以協助執行績效管理作業。不過，由於資訊科技涵蓋面向相當寬廣，影響層面頗為廣泛，因此也引發樂觀、悲觀及務實主義等不同立場的爭辯，其運用成效確實有待進一步的評估。在相關文獻的基礎上，本研究採用交易成本理論途徑，首先透過問卷調查瞭解GPMnet使用者的態度及行為偏好，其次則經由訪談資料進一步解析資訊通信科技對於政府績效管理成本的增加與減少。
    本研究採取混合方法論（mixed methodology）進行研究設計，兼採量化資料及質化資料蒐集分析。量化資料部分，以GPMnet使用者為分析單位進行問卷調查，回收148份有效樣本；質化資料部分，依主辦、主管、會審及研考等4項權限功能，選取8位GPMnet使用者進行訪談，以了解不同權限受訪者使用GPMnet的經驗與看法。
    資料分析部分，本研究以偏最小平方法分析問卷資料，調查結果分析顯示，GPMnet系統使用的交易成本認知與態度、主觀系統績效有顯著負向關係；不確定性、資產專屬、使用頻率與交易成本之假設則未獲實證資料支持。此外，訪談資料分析發現，制度環境下，因受限於現行不同機關有不同資訊系統、GPMnet多個子系統，以及紙本流程仍然存在的情況下，使用GPMnet執行績效管理作業會增加行政成本負擔；此外，在實際使用的情形之下，因為系統可以保存過去資料、提供清楚欄位、網路化傳遞、進行進度控管及主動公開資訊等功能，減少了行政作業交易成本。相對的，也造成學習時間不符成本、溝通費時、校對、資訊過載、介面不友善及系統不穩定等負面影響，增加績效管理作業的交易成本。
    最後，本研究建議在學術研究上，結構模式的觀察變項應更謹慎設計，資訊系統評估理論應重視成本觀點。至於在實務面則應全面落實電子化績效管理，在GPMnet系統資源環境更應進行資料備份，以減少資訊的過度負荷。
    Governments invest much more attention, time, and money on performance management and evaluation on the public sector today than ever before. To better utilize agency program management systems under the Executive Yuan, the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC) has completed the planning of the "Policy Program Management Information System" (Government Program network, GPMnet). The system is a common service platform created to integrate various policy implementation management information systems to enhance the performance of different agencies in program management. However, the performance of GPMnet needs to be evaluated. In order to evaluate the system, this study introduces an empirical research which focuses on a transaction cost approach that has often been used to support the idea of information and communication technology and its positive impact on the economic system.
    The data was collected by mixed methodology, combining quantitative data from 148 users and eight interviews with a semi-structured questionnaire. The Partial Least Squares was used to analyze the quantitative data. According to the research findings, information-related problems represent only some of the elements contributing to the transaction costs. These costs also emerge due to the institutional factors contributing to their growths. The study of the consequences associated with ICT design and its implementation, based on the transaction cost theory, should therefore consider the costs of ICTs.
    Reference: Ajzen, Icek (2005). Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. New York : Open University Press.
    Ammons, David N. (1995). Municipal Benchmarks: Assessing Local Performance and Establishing Community Standards. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
    Andersen, Kim V. (1999). “Reengineering Public Organizations Using Information Technology.” in Richard Heeks (Ed.), Reinventing Government in the Information Age : International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform (p.p. 312-330). New York : Routledge.
    Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. (1988). “Structural equation modeling in practice:A review and recommended two-step approach.” Psychological Bulletin, 103,411-423.
    Angelov, S. and P.Grefen (2003). “The 4W Framework for B2B E-Contracting.” International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organization, vol. 1, 78-97.
    APEC (2007), Economic Policy Report. APEC: Singapore.
    Bailey, J. and J.Y. Bakos (1997). “An Exploratory Study of the Emerging Role of Electronic Intermediaries.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol.1, 7-20.
    Barber, Benjamin R. (1998). “Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy.” Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 573-589.
    Benjamin, R. and R.Wigand (1995). “Electronic Markets and Virtual Value Chains on the Information Superhighway.” Sloan Management Review, vol. 36, 62-72.
    Behn, Robert D. (2002). “Government Performance and the Conundrum of Public Trust.” In John D. Donahue and Joseph S. Nye (Eds.) Market-Based Governance (pp. 323-347). Cambridge, Mass: Visions of Governance in the 21st Century.
    Bouckaert, G. and B.G. Peters (2002). “Performance Measurement and Management: The Achilles` Heel in Administrative Modernization.” Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 359-362.
    Brown, Douglas M. (1999). “Information System for Improved Performance Management: Development approaches in US Public Agencies.” in Richard Heeks (Ed.), Reinventing Government in the Information Age : International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform (p.p. 113-134). New York : Routledge.
    Brynjolfsson, E., T. W. Malone, V. Gurbaxani, and A. Kambil (1994). “Does Information Technology Lead to Smaller Firms?” Management Science, 40(12), 1628-1644.
    Chen, Chun-Der, Yi-Wen Fan, and Cheng-Kiang Farn (2007). “Investigating Factors Affecting the Adoption of Electronic Toll Collection: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective.” Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
    Chin, W. W. (1998). “Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling.” Management Information System Quarterly, 22(1), vii-xvi .
    Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). “Structural equation modelling analysis withsmall samples using partial least squares.” In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research(p.p. 307-341). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Ciborra, C. (1981). “Information Systems and Transactions Architecture.” International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems, 5(4), 305-323.
    Ciborra, C. (1987a). “Research Agenda for A Transaction Cost Approach to Information Systems.” In R. Boland & R. HIirschheim (Eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (p.p. 253-274). Wiley, Chichester.
    Ciborra, C. (1987b). “Reframing the Role of Computers in Organizations- The Transaction Costs Approach.” Information Technology & People, 3(1), 17-38.
    Ciborra, C. (1993). Teams, Markets and systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Cloete, Fanie (2003). “Assessing Governance with Electronic Policy Management Tools.” Public Performance & Management Review, 26(3), 276-290.
    Coase, R. H. (1937). “The Nature of the Firm.” In Williamson, Oliver E and Sidney G. Winter (Eds.), The Nature of the Firm : Origins, Evolution, and Development (p.p.18-33). New York : Oxford University Press.
    Coase, R. H. (1988). The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago :University of Chicago Press.
    Cordella, A. and K. A. Simon (1997). “The Impact of Information Technology on Transaction and Coordination Cost.” Conference on Information Systems Research in Scandinavia (IRIS 20), Oslo, Norway, August 9-12.
    Cordella, A. (2001). “Does Information Technology Always Lead to Lower Transaction Costs ?” in Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia.
    Cordella, Antonio (2006). “Transaction Costs and Information Systems: Does IT Add Up?” Journal of Information Technology, 21 (3), 195-202.
    Davis, Fred D. (1989). “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
    Davis, Fred D., Richard P. Bagozzi, Paul R. Warshaw (1989). “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models.” Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
    Denzin, N. K. (1978). “The logic of naturalistic inquiry.” In N. K. Denzin (Eds.), Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker (1981). “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and MeasurementError.” Journal of Marketing Research,18(1), 39-50.
    Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington D. C.: Brooking Institution Press.
    Feenberg, Andrew (1991). Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Hair, J. F. Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. Tatham, and W. C.Black (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th Ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
    Hatry, Harry P. (2007). Performance Measurement: Getting Results ( 2nd Ed.). Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
    Heckman,J., C Heinrich, J Smith.(2002). “The performance of performance standards.” Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 778-811.
    Heeks, Richard B. (1999). “ Reinventing Government in the Information age.” in Richard Heeks (Ed.), Reinventing Government in the Information Age : International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform (p.p. 9-21). New York : Routledge.
    Heeks, Richard B., and Anne Davies (1999). “ Different Approaches to Information Age Reform.” in Richard Heeks (Ed.), Reinventing Government in the Information Age : International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform (p.p. 22-48). New York : Routledge.
    Heeks, Richard B., and Subhash Bhatnagar (1999). “ Understanding Success and Failure in Information Age Reform.” in Richard Heeks (Ed.), Reinventing Government in the Information Age : International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform (p.p. 49-74). New York : Routledge.
    Ho, T.K. (2002). “Reinventing Local Governments and the E-Government Initiative.” Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434-444
    Heinrich, Carolyn J. (1999). “Do Government Bureaucrats Make Effective Use of Performance Management Information?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(3), 363-394.
    Heinrich, Carolyn J., and Laurence E. Lynn, Jr. (2001). “Means and Ends: A Comparative Study of Empirical Methods for Investigating Governance and Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(1), 109-138.
    Heinrich, Carolyn J. (2002). “Outcomes-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness. ” Public Administration Review, 62(6), 712-725.
    James, Oliver (2004). “The UK Core Executive’s Use of Public Service Agreements as a Tool of Governance.” Public Administration, 82(2), 397-419.
    Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come.” Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
    Kaplan, R. (2001). “Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership, vol. 11: 353-370.
    Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (2002). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA: Havard Business School Press.
    Katzer J., and P. T.Fletcher (1992). “The Information Environment of Managers.” In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 27 (pp. 227-263). Medford, NJ: Learned Information, for ASIS.
    Kettl, D. F. (2000). The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance. Washington, D. C.:Brookings Institution Press.
    Kraemer, Kenneth L. and John Leslie King. (1986). “Computing and Public Organizations.” Public Administration Review, Vol. 46, 488-496.
    Kraemer, Kenneth L., James N. Danziger, Debora E. Dunkle, and John L. King (1993). “The Usefulness of Computer-Based Information to Public Managers.” MIS Quarterly, 17(2), 129-148.
    Liang, T. P., J.S. Huang (1998). “An Empirical Study on Consumer Acceptance of Products in Electronic Markets: A Transaction Cost Model.” Decision Support Systems, vol. 24, 29-43.
    Malone T., Yates J., Benjamin R. (1987). “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies.” Communications of the ACM, vol. 6 , 485-497.
    McKnight & J. P. Bailey, (Eds.). (1997). Internet Economics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Ndou, Valentina (2004). “E–Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges.” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1-24.
    Noordegraaf, Mirko and Tineke Abma (2002). “Management by Measurement? Public Management Practices Amidst Ambiguity.” Publc Administration, 81(4):853-871.
    North, Douglass (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2003). Progress Implementing the President’s Management Agenda. Washington, D.C.: Office of Management and Budget.
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (2009). “Rating The Performance of Federal Programs.” Retrived March 15, 2009 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part/.
    Palme, J. (1984). “You Have 134 Unread Mail! Do You Want to Read Them Now?” IFIP WG 6.5 Working conference on computer-based document services, Nottingham.
    Podsakoff, P. and D.W. Organ (1986). “Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects.” Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
    Picot, Arnold, Ralf Reichwald and Rolf Wigand (2008). Information, Organization and Management, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    Schultze, U. and Vandenbosch, B. (1998). “Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now you see it, now you don’t.” Journal of Organisational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 8(2), 127-148.
    Smith, Peter (1990). “The Use of Performance Indicators in the Public Sector.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (Statistics in Society), 153(1), 53-72.
    Tashakkori A. and Teddlie C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Sage.
    Teo, Thompson S. H., and Yuanyou Yu. (2005). “Online Buying Behavior: a Transaction Cost Economics Perspective”, Omega, Oxford, 33(5):451-465.
    Wang, Eric T. (2002). “Transaction Attributes and Software Outsourcing Success: an Empirical Investigation of Transaction Cost Theory.” Information Systems Journal, 12 (2), 153-181.
    Wholey, Joseph S. ( 2007). “Quality Control: Assessing the Accuracy and Usefulness of Performance Measurement System.” in Harry P. Hatry (Ed.), Performance Measurement: Getting Results ( 2nd Ed., p.p. 217-240) . Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications : A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York : Free Press.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism : Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting(1st Ed.). New York : Free Press.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1999). “Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective.” Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 15(1), 306-342.
    Yen, Chia-Hui, Chih-Chin Yang, and Mei-Chuan Huang (2009). “An Empirical Study of Bidder’s Perceived Value in Online Auction: Integrating Transaction Cost Economics and Expectancy Confirmation Theory.” International Conference on Business And Information, 2009 July,6-8.
    van Thiel, S. and Frans L. Leeuw (2002). “The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector.” Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267-281.
    Venkatesh, Viswanath and Fred D. Davis (2000). “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
    中央社（2009）。〈經建會:明年公共建設經費85%屬愛台12建設〉。2009年7月13日報導。
    行政院主計處（2001）。《政府跨機關網際網路服務（Extranet）的應用現況調查》。發布於2001/3/1。
    行政院主計處（2004）。《政府機構行政業務資訊化程度與應用概況》。發布於2004/5/1。
    行政院主計處（2009）。《97年電腦應用概況調查速報》，2009年9月21日，取自：http://eng.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=17967&CtNode=4919。
    行政院研考會（2001）。《行政院所屬各機關施政績效評估要點》。台北：研考會。
    行政院研考會（2008）。《電子化政府軌跡》，2009年9月17日，取自：http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=4087173&CtNode=12037&mp=100。
    李茂能（2008）。〈SEM 適配度指標的潛藏問題：最佳模式難求〉，測驗統計年刊，16(2)，17-30。
    李鍵壕（2004）。高雄市公務人員對知識管理系統之科技接受度。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，中山大學。
    吳芝儀、李奉儒合譯（1999）。質的評鑑與研究（Michael Quinn Patton原著）。台北：桂冠，初版三刷。
    吳安妮（2004）。平衡計分卡在公務機關實施之探討。收錄於政府績效評估，台北：行政院研考會。
    邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模式。台北：雙葉書廊。
    施宗英、陳海雄（2006）。政府計畫網路化管理機制建置與展望。研考雙月刊，30 (1)，65-102。
    郭昱瑩（2004）。政府機關績效評估探討。收錄於政府績效評估，台北：行政院研考會。
    陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。台北：五南。
    陳淑鳳（2001）。電子化政府下國稅稽徵人員資訊科技接受行為模式之研究。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士在職專班論文，未出版，中山大學。
    陳祥甫（2007）。探討台灣汽車消費者資訊搜尋行為，國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士在職專班論文，未出版，東華大學。
    陳海雄、蔡世田（2007）。政府實施計畫網路化管理後的新課題。研考雙月刊，(31) 4: 102-111。
    陳敦源（2005）。民主與官僚：新制度論的觀點。台北：韋伯，初版。
    張鐙文（2009）。我國地方行政主管對電子化參與之認知與行為：計畫行為理論觀點的驗證。世新大學行政管理學系碩士學位論文，未出版，世新大學。
    彭台光、高月慈、林鉦琴（2006）。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救，管理學報，23(1), 77-98。
    彭錦鵬（2005）。美國聯邦政府機關績效評量制度的發展。「行政機關績效管理暨績效獎金制度學術研討及觀摩會」論文，台北：行政院人事行政局、台灣大學政治學系。
    黃厚銘（2001）。Heidegger的哲學思想與資訊科技，資訊社會研究，(1), 1-31。
    蕭乃沂（2005）。公部門資訊單位的組織設計：文獻回顧與實務分析。二十一世紀電子化政府之發展與未來研討會，台南：國立成功大學政治系。
    魏鏞（1999）。中華民國政府研究發展與管制考核體系之建立與發展。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告。台北：行政院研考會。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    公共行政研究所
    95256003
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095256003
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Public Administration] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    600301.pdf1557KbAdobe PDF21435View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback