政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51541
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51124365      線上人數 : 867
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/51541


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51541


    題名: 克服組織認同衝突—網絡策略、組織認同與合作間關係之研究
    Overcoming orgaiizational identity conflicts – the relations hip among network strategy, organizational identity, and cooperation
    作者: 吳紹慈
    貢獻者: 于卓民
    吳紹慈
    關鍵詞: 網絡策略
    組織認同
    合作
    集團企業
    Network Strategy
    Organizational Identity
    Cooperation
    Business Groups
    日期: 2009
    上傳時間: 2011-10-11 16:48:37 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 組織認同衝突嚴重影響著組織的生存。可惜的是，過去研究多著重於探討組織認同衝突所帶來的影響與嚴重性，但卻較少提及衝突雙方該如何解決此問題。在本論文中，我觀察一個被購併進集團的公司，如何運用網絡策略去培養更多與集團內其他成員相容的價值，同時保存與發展了獨特的價值，進而幫助個案公司跳脫認同衝突的困境並成功整合進集團。為了呼應個案研究之發現，我以一個集團企業做為研究情境，搜集資料並進行實證研究，我發現當一家公司同時具備高整合與高差異化的組織認同時，可得到較多與集團內其他成員合作的機會。此外，在集團網絡中佔據邊陲掮客網絡位置的成員，較有可能培養出高整合與高差異化之組織認同，進而得到較多的合作。本論文亦於結尾提供研究意涵與未來研究方向。
    Identity conflicts can seriously endanger an organization’s survival. Extant studies emphasize the consequences of identity conflicts but not how conflicting parties extricate themselves from this trap. I investigate how an acquired firm uses network strategies to develop more integrating values and distinctive values, resolve identity conflicts, and successfully integrate into the group. To echo these qualitative findings, in my empirical study in the setting of a business group, I found that firms with high identity integration and high identity differentiation have more chances to cooperate with other group members. In addition, peripheral brokers are more likely to achieve high identity integration and high identity differentiation, and further have more cooperation. Implications and future research directions are also provided.
    參考文獻: Ahuja, G. 2000. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkage. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 317-343.
    Albert, S., & Whetten, D.A. 1985. Organizational identity. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: 263-295. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
    Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 20-39.
    Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. 1996. Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. In A.C. Baum & J.E. Dutton(Eds.), Advances in Strategic Management: 17-32. Greenwich: JAI Press.
    Ashmore, R.D., Jussim, L., Wilder, D., & Heppen, J. 2001. Conclusion: Toward a social identity framework for intergroup conflict. In R.D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction: 213-249. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182.
    Baum, J., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. 2000. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 267-294.
    Becker, H.S., & Carper, J.W. 1956. The development of identification with an occupation. American Journal of Sociology, 61: 289-298.
    Becker, M.H. 1970. Sociometric location and innovativeness: Reformulation and extension of the diffusion model. American Sociological Review, 35(2): 267-282.
    Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. 2002. UCINET 6, Version 6.232. Analytical Technologies, Natick, MA.
    Brickson, S.L. 2005. Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organization’s relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50:576-609.
    Burt, R.S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2): 349-399.
    Burt, R.S. 2005. Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
    Cattell, R.B. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1: 245-276.
    Churchill, G.A. 1979. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16: 64-73.
    Cooley, C.H. 1902. Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribners.
    Cording, M., Christmann, P. & King, D.R. 2008. Reducing causal ambiguity in acquisition integration: Intermediate goals as mediators of integration decisions and acquisition performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4): 744-767.
    Corley, K.G., & Gioia, D.A. 2004. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 173-208.
    Datta, D.K., & Grant, J.H. 1990. Relationships between type of acquisition, the autonomy given to the acquired firm, and acquisition success: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management, 16(1): 29-44.
    Dickson, P.H., & Weaver, K.M. 1997. Environmental determinants and individual-level moderators of alliance use. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 404-425.
    Dukerich, J., Kramer, R., & Parks, J.M. 1998. The dark side of organizational identification. In D. Whetten & P. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Developing theory through conversations: 245-256. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Dutton, L.E., & Dukerich, J.M. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: The role of image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 517-554.
    Edwards, J.R. 1993. Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 46: 641-665.
    Edwards, J.R. 1994. The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58: 51-100.
    Edwards, J.R., & Rothbard, N.P. 1999. Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(2): 85-129.
    Eisenhardt, K.M., & Schoonhoven, C.B. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7: 136-150.
    Elsbach, K.D., & Kramer, R.M. 1996. Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 442-476.
    Elsbach, K.D. 1999. An expanded model of organizational identification. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21: 163-199.
    Evan, W. 1965. Toward a theory of inter-organizational relations. Management Science, 11: 217-230.
    Fiol, C.M. 2002. Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organization Science, 13: 653-666.
    Fiol, C.M., Pratt, M.G., & O’Connor, E.J. 2009. Managing intractable identity conflicts. Academy of Management Review, 34(1): 32-54.
    Foreman, P., & Whetten, D.A. 2002. Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13: 618-635.
    Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Gibbons, D.E. 2004. Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 238-262.
    Gioia, D.A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K.G. 2000. Organizational identity, image and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25: 63-81.
    Gioia, D.A., & Thomas, J.B. 1996. Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 370-403.
    Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    Gould, J., & Fernandez, J. 1989. Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology: 89-126.
    Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91:481-510.
    Granovetter, M. 1995. Coase revisited: business groups in the modern economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(1):93-140.
    Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W.F. 1988. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 265-275.
    Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5): 1439-1493.
    Gulati, R., & Higgins, M.C. 2003. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 127-144.
    Harzing, A.W. 2000. An empirical analysis and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1): 101-120.
    Hinkin, T.R. 1998. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1): 104-121.
    Hitt, M.A., Harrison, J.S., Ireland, R.D., & Best, A. 1998. Attributes of successful and unsuccessful acquisitions of US firms. British Journal of Management, 9: 91-114.
    Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., Johnson, R.A., & Moesel, D.D. 1993. Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 215-235.
    Hsu, S.C. 2000. Mr. Wong: Acquire the enemy. Business Weekly, 655: 108.
    Ibarra, H. 1999. Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 764-791.
    Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. 2005. Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16(4): 359-371.
    Isabella, L.A. 1990. Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 7-41.
    Katila, R., Rosenberger, J., & Eisenhardt, K.M. 2008. Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms, and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 295-332.
    Kelman, H.C. 2006. Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57: 1-26.
    Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75: 41-51.
    Khanna, T., & Palepu, K . 1999. The right way to restructure conglomerates in emerging markets. Harvard Business Review: 125-134.
    Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000. The future of business groups in emerging markets: long run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 268-285.
    Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J.W. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 45-74.
    Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J.W. 2006. Interorganizational ties and business group boundaries: Evidence from an emerging economy. Organization Science, 17(3): 333-352.
    Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. 1994. Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 87-108.
    Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. 2003. Social networks and organizations. London: Sage.
    Kumar, N., Stern, L.W., & Anderson, J.C. 1993. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1633-1651.
    Kumbasar, E.A., Romney, K., & Batchelder, W.H. 1994. Systematic biases in social perception. American Journal of Sociology, 100: 477-505.
    Lawrence, P.R. & Lorsch, J.W. 1967. Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business School.
    Leff, N.H. 1978. Industrial organizations and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 27: 661-675.
    Liu, U.C. 2002. Mr. Wong’s life in BETA Co. Taipei: Bookzone.
    Lorrain, F., & White, H.C. 1971. Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1: 49-80.
    Luo, X., & Chung, C.N. 2005. Keeping it all in the family: the role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 404-439.
    McDonald, M.L., & Westphal, J.D. 2003. Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 1-32.
    Mead, G.H. 1934. Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Milton, L.P., & Westphal, J.D. 2005. Identity confirmation networks and cooperation in work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2): 191-212.
    Monteiro, L.F., Arvidsson, N., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19(1): 90-107.
    Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E., & Silverman, B. 1998. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27: 507-523.
    Mullins, N.C., Hargens, L.L., Hecht, P.K., & Kick, E.L. 1977. The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study. American Sociological Review, 42: 552-562.
    Noel, J.G., Wann, D.L., & Branscombe, N.R. 1995. Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1): 127-137.
    Northrup, T. 1989. The dynamic of identity in personal and social conflict. In L. Kriesberg, T. Northrup, & S. Thorson (Eds.), Intractable conflicts and their transformation: 55-82. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
    Ozcan, P., & Eisenhardt, K.M. 2009. Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2): 246-279.
    Podolny, J.M., & Stuart, T.E. 1995. A role-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 100: 1224-1260.
    Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganziational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116-145.
    Pratt, M.G. 2000. The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 456-493.
    Pratt, M.G., & Foreman, P.O. 2000. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 18-42.
    Rao, H., Davis, G.F., & Ward, A. 2000. Embeddedness, social identity and mobility: Why firms leave the NASDAQ and join the New York stock exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 268-292.
    Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. 2006. Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3): 433-458.
    Reger, R.K., Gustafson, L.T., DeMarie, S.M., & Mullane, J.V. 1994. Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Academy of Management Review, 19(3): 565.584.
    Sanchez, R. 1995. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16:135-159.
    Shrout, P.E., & Fleiss, J.L. 1979. Intraclass correlations: Use in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 420-428.
    Stuart, T.E. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 791-811.
    Swann, W.B. 1987. Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6: 1038-1051.
    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. 1985. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations: 7-24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
    Tjosvold, D. 1988. Cooperation and competitive dynamics within and between organizational units. Human Relations, 39: 517-540.
    Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 464-476.
    Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 996-1004.
    Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42:35-67.
    Whetten, D.A., & Godfrey, P. 1998. Identity in organizations: Developing theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    White, H.C., Boorman, S.A., & Breiger, R.L. 1976. Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81: 730-779.
    White, H. 1992. Identity and control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Wong, C.R. 2002. Goodbye BETA Co. Taipei: Linking Books.
    Wooldridge, J.M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Wu, C.P. 1997. A story about BETA Co. Taipei: Linking Books.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    93355512
    98
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093355512
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    35551201.pdf2935KbAdobe PDF21161檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋