English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50926925      Online Users : 965
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51514


    Title: 追索權價值、負權益與違約房屋抵押貸款關連性在台灣之研究
    The study on relationship among the value of recourse, negative equity and default mortgage in Taiwan
    Authors: 賴宗炘
    Lai,Tsung Hsin
    Contributors: 林左裕
    林秋瑾

    賴宗炘
    Lai,Tsung Hsin
    Keywords: 違約房屋抵押貸款
    權益學說
    支付能力學說
    負權益
    貸款追索權
    Default Mortgage
    Equity Theory
    Ability-to-Pay Theory
    Negative Equity
    Right of Recourse
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2011-10-07 14:28:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 金融海嘯(financial tsunami)對全世界造成了相當大之衝擊,遭受最大損失者莫過於金融機構,其中房屋抵押貸款(mortgage)違約(default)產生之損失在銀行損失中占了一定的比例,本文認為深入研究影響違約之因素有其必要性。過去文獻於探討貸款違約時,主要可分為兩種學說,分別為權益學說(Equity Theory)與支付能力學說(Ability-to-Pay Theory),本文以台灣地區之實際房屋抵押貸款資料作為研究對象,以確認權益學說與支付能力學說於台灣房屋抵押貸款之適用程度。
    本文採用二元羅吉特迴歸模型(Binomial Logit Regression Model, BLR)與比例危機模型(Proportional Hazards Model, PHM),並於權益學說之驗證中,考慮台灣房屋抵押貸款契約中常見之貸款追索權(right of recourse),以了解是否因借款人考慮追索權價值(value of recourse)而較不易違約。
    實際結果發現,由於台灣長期房價趨勢皆為上漲之緣故,且台灣之貸款成數(Loan-to-value, LTV)較國外為低,導致處於負權益(Negative Equity)之抵押貸款筆數較少,然本研究發現,在修正了過去研究所使用之借款人權益變數後,其顯著性於BLR模型與PHM中皆較佳,而考量了追索權之價值後,考量追索權之修正後權益變數的表現更優於修正後之權益變數,顯示本研究於權益變數上之修正與考量追索權價值有助於模型改善違約預測之能力。
    就權益學說與支付能力學說而言,由於兩種學說之相關變數皆有部分變數顯著,顯示兩種學說於台灣皆有其適用性,故於違約模型中需將權益學說與支付能力學說之相關變數皆列入考慮。
    Financial tsunami caused considerable impact in the world, and the financial institutions suffered huge losses in this crisis. Mortgage default losses accounted for a certain proportion in losses of financial institutes. It’s necessary to research the factors which influence the default decisions. In the past, the literatures divided the theory related to mortgage default into two parts, the Equity theory and the Ability-to-Pay theory. This article use the mortgage data in Taiwan to confirm which theory is more applicable in Taiwan.
    To understand if the borrowers would consider value of recourse when they make decision of default, this study adopts Binomial Logit Regression Model (BLR) and Proportional Hazards Model (PHM), adding the right of recourse, which is common in the mortgage contract in Taiwan.
    The result shows that owing to the rising trend of Taiwan housing price and the lower loan-to-value (LTV) level than foreign countries, there are fewer mortgages in negative equity situation. However, we discover that after we modify equity variable, the modified equity variable is more significant than non-modified equity variable. Besides, if we consider the value of recourse, the modified equity variable with value of recourse performs best among three types of equity variable. The results above show that the modification of equity variable and the consideration of recourse can improve predicting ability of default model. And it shows the clause of recourse in Taiwan has certain influence on the decision of borrowers’ default behavior.
    Furthermore, the results of model illustrate the equity-related variables and ability-to-pay-related variables have certain explanation power on the behavior of default, which mean equity theory and ability-to-pay theory are applicable in Taiwan. We infer when carrying out the prediction of default, it’s necessary to take equity-related variables and ability-to-pay-related variables into consideration.
    Reference: 一、 學位論文
    王儷璇(2004),「商業銀行如何衡量住宅貸款之違約機率與違約損失率-內部模型法之應用」,國立中央大學財務金融所碩士論文。
    林炳棋(2007),「住宅抵押貸款違約損失之實證分析」,朝陽科技大學財務金融所碩士論文
    郭姿伶(1999),「住宅貸款之提前清償與逾期還款」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    陳健豪(2004),「台灣地區住宅抵押貸款提前清償與違約之分析」,國立清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    黃建智(2004),「以卜瓦松迴歸方法探討房屋抵押貸款提前償還與違約決策」,國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    楊博翔(2008),「點「屋」成金不是夢!—逆向房屋抵押貸款在台推行之可行性研究」,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
    劉宗哲(2002),「房屋抵押貸款客戶違約預測模式之比較研究」,國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運所碩士論文。
    鍾岳昌(2003),「以比例危險模型估計房貸借款人提前清償及違約風險」,國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士班碩士論文。
    二、 期刊論文
    江百信、張金鶚(1995),「我國購屋貸款放款條件之研究」,3(1),1-20。
    林左裕、柯俊禎、王琮生(2006),「房貸保險之費率結構研究」,台灣土地研究,9(2),27-52。
    林左裕、賴郁媛(2005),「我國銀行業逾放比與總體經濟因素間關係之研究」,商管科技季刊,6(1),165-179。
    林哲群、張家華(2009),「房貸違約率估計之初探」,金融聯合徵信雙月刊,7,24-35。
    黃佳玲、張金鶚(2005),「從房地價格分離探討地價指數之建立」, 台灣土地研究,8(2),73-106。
    黃嘉興、謝永明、劉宗哲(2004),「房屋抵押貸款客戶違約預測模式之比較研究」,東吳經濟商學學報,48,103-126。
    楊顯爵、林左裕、陳宗豪(2006),「住宅抵押貸款違約之研究-影響因素之顯著性分析」,台灣土地研究,11(2),1-36。
    三、 會議論文
    林左裕、王美玲(2003),「應用競爭風險模型 (Competing Risks Model) 於不動產抵押貸款終止行為之探討」, 2003全國大專教師經濟金融會計研討會, 台大財金系。
    林亭妙、洪甄鎂、廖子家、廖茂原(2008),「房屋信用貸款之違約因素探討」,2008健康與管理學術研討會,元培科技大學餐飲管理系。
    賴宗炘、林左裕、林秋瑾、李展豪(2011),「追索權價值、負權益與違約房屋抵押貸款關連性在台灣之研究」,世界華人不動產學會2011年會。
    四、 國外期刊論文
    Ambrose, B. W., C. A. Capone, Jr., and Y. Deng , 2001, ”Optimal put exercise: An empirical examination of conditions for mortgage foreclosure”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 23(2): 213–234.
    Archer, Wayne R., Peter J. Elmer, David M. Harrison, and David C. Ling, 2002, “Determinants of Multifamily Mortgage Default”, Real Estate Economics, 30: 445–473.
    Campbell, T. S. and J. K. Dietrich, 1983, “The determinants of default on insured conventional residential mortgage loans”, Journal of Finance, 38: 1569-1581.
    Childs, Paul D., Steven H. Ott and Timothy J. Riddiough, 1994, “The Value of Recourse and Cross-Default Clauses in Commercial Mortgage Contracting”, Forthcoming Journal of Banking and Finance, 20(3): 511-536.
    Cox, D.R., 1972, “Regression Models and Life-Tables”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 34: 187-220.
    Cox, J. C., Ingersoll, J. E., and Ross, S. A., 1984, “A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates” , Econometrica, 53(2): 385-407.
    Crawford, G. W., and Rosenblatt, E.,1995, “Efficient Mortgage Default Option Exercise: Evidence from Loss Severity”, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 10(5): 543-556.
    Cunningham, D., and Hendershott, P. H.,1986, “Pricing FHA Mortgage Default Insurance ”, Housing Finance Review,3(4): 373-92.
    Deng, Y. H., 1997, “Mortgage Termination: An Empirical Hazard Model with Stochastic Term Structure”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14: 309-331.
    Calhoun, C. A. and Deng, Y., 2002, “A Dynamic Analysis of Fixed-and Adjustable Rate Mortgage Terminations ”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 24(1/2): 9-33.
    Deng, Y., and Van Order, R., 2000, ”Mortgage Terminations, Heterogeneity and the Exercise of Mortgage Options ”, Econometrica, 68(2): 275-307.
    Foster, C., and Van Order, R., 1984,”An Option-based Model of Mortgage Default”, Housing Finance Review, 3(4): 351-372.
    Gardner, Mona, J. and Dixie L. Mills, 1989, “Evaluating the Likelihood of Default on Delinquent Loans,” Financial Management, 18: 55-63.
    Gatzlaff, Dean H., and Tirtiroglu, Dogan, 1995,“Real Estate Market Efficiency: Issues and Evidence”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 3: 157-189.
    Jackson, Jerry R. and David L. Kaserman, 1980, “Default Risk on Home Mortgage Loans: A Test of Competing Hypotheses”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 47: 678-690.
    Kau, J. B., Keenan, D. C., Muller, W. J. III, and Epperson, J. F.,1992, “A Generalized Valuation Model for Fixed-Rate Residential Mortgages”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 24(3): 279-298.
    Kau, J. B., Keenan, D.C., Muller, W. J. III, and Epperson, J. F., 1995, “The Valuation at Origination of Fixed-Rate Mortgages with Default and Prepayment”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 11(1): 5-39.
    Lekkas, Quigley, and R. Van order, 1993, “Loan Loss Severity and Optimal Mortgage Default”, Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 21(4): 353-371.
    M Gendron, VS Lai, I Soumaré, 2007, “Project Finance with Limited Recourse An Option Pricing Approach to Debt Capacity and Project Risk”, The Journal of Structured Finance, 13(3): 97-104.
    Noordewier, T. G., and Harrison, D. M., and Ramagopa, K., 2001, “Semivariance of Property Value Estimates as a Determinant of Default Risk”, Real Estate Economics, 29(1): 127-159.
    Vandell, Kerry D., 1993, “Handing Over the Keys: A Perspective on Mortgage Default Research,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 21(3): 211-246.
    Vendell, K. D., and Thibodeau, T.,1985, “Estimation of Mortgage Default Using Disaggregate Loan History Data”, AREUEA Journal, 15(3): 292-317.
    Von Furstenberg, G. M., 1969, “The default risk on FHA-insured home mortgages”, Journal of Finance, 24: 459-477.
    五、 專書
    林左裕(2003),《不動產投資管理》,智勝文化,台北市。
    Jolliffe, I. T, 2002, Principal component analysis, New York: Springer.
    六、 研究報告
    內政部地政司,2010,「都市地區地價指數」第35期。
    Deng, Yong heng, John M. Quigley, and Robert Van Order, 1996, “Mortgage Default and Low Down payment Loans: The Cost of Public Subsidy,” NBER Working Paper #5184.
    Ghent, A. C. and Kudlyak, M., 2009, “Recourse and Residential Mortgage Default: Theoryand Evidence from U.S. State”, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Working Paper No.09-10.
    International Monetary Fund, April 2010,”Global Financial Stability Report-Meeting New Challenges to Stability and Building a Safer System”, World Economic and Financial Surveys.
    七、 網站
    MBA智庫百科:
    http://www.mbalib.com/
    中央銀行:
    http://www.cbc.gov.tw/mp1.html
    中華民國統計資訊網
    http://www.stat.gov.tw/
    內政部住宅統計資訊網:
    http://housing.cpami.gov.tw/house/default.aspx
    永慶房屋
    http://yungching.housefun.com.tw/
    信義房屋
    http://www.sinyi.com.tw/
    新北市政府稅捐稽徵處
    http://www.tax-en.ntpc.gov.tw/
    臺北市稅捐稽徵處
    www.tpctax.gov.tw/eng/index.php
    標準普爾金融服務公司
    http://www.standardandpoors.com/home/en/ap
    Investopedia
    http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/deed_in_lieu_of_foreclosure.asp
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    98257004
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098257004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    700401.pdf1504KbAdobe PDF21272View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback