政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51482
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51304146      線上人數 : 885
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/51482


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51482


    題名: 審計委員會與財務報表品質之關聯性
    The relation between the audit committee and the quality of financial reporting.
    作者: 李奕萱
    貢獻者: 林美花
    李奕萱
    關鍵詞: 審計委員會
    公司治理
    財務報表品質
    Audit committee
    corporate governance
    quality of financial reporting
    日期: 2010
    上傳時間: 2011-10-07 14:13:17 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 我國為改善公司治理制度，於2005年12月20日立法院三讀通過大幅修正證券交易法，引進審計委員會制度。審計委員會較獨立董事更專注於財務面之監督，故本研究之研究期間為1998年至2010年，以設置審計委員會之企業為樣本，進行配對，以探討審計委員會與企業財務報表品質之關聯性。
    研究結果顯示，假說一：設置審計委員會或準審計委員會之企業財務報表品質優於未設置者；及假說二：設置審計委員會或準審計委員會後之企業財務報表品質優於設置前，二者皆不成立。
    設置審計委員會目前已是公司治理發展的趨勢，我國既已立法引進審計委員會制度，主管機關應評估企業設置審計委員會後實際之運作情形，是否達到預期之效果，並做必要之修改或配套措施，以使審計委員會之設置不流於形式。
    In Taiwan, for the purpose of improving the corporate governance and introducing regulation of the audit committee, the Securities and Exchange Act was revised and passed by the Legislative Yuan for the Third Reading on 20 December, 2005. This study takes companies had established the audit committee between 1998 and 2010 as a sample so as to discuss the relation between the audit committee and the quality of financial reporting.
    The result of our research revealed that, the first hypothesis: “the quality of the financial reporting of the company with the audit committee is superior” and the second hypothesis: ” the quality of the financial reporting of the company after establishing the audit committee is superior” were both not sustained.
    Establishing the audit committee has become the trend in the development of corporate governance. Besides the regulations enacted, it’s of greater importance to evaluate the substantive effectiveness than the surficial form of the audit committee in companies.
    參考文獻: 參考文獻
    中文文獻
    方俊儒、李秀英與龍春伶，2008，獨立董監事對公司績效與盈餘品質之影響-控制股東之調節效果，會計與公司治理，第五卷，第1期:55-80。
    王文宇，2007，從股權結構談公司治理法制，公司與企業法制(二)，元照出版公司。
    刊欣，2002，美國企業展開自清運動，商業周刊第772期。http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/article.php?id=15223
    余雪明，1996，獨立董事與投資人保護，馬漢寶教授七秩榮慶論文集-法律與當代社會。
    余雪明，2002，台灣新公司法與獨立董事(上)(下)，萬國法律，第123期:66-77、第124期:80-84。
    李存修與葉銀華, 2003，台灣之獨立董事制度的改革-政策性建議，會計研究月刊，第213期:66-85。
    杜榮瑞、劉雅芳與吳婉婷，2006，獨立董監、會計規範與財務報導品質之關係:多重研究方法之運用，當代會計，第七卷，第2期:135-170。
    林咏榮，1985，商事法芻論(上冊)，五南出版社。
    施振榮，2005，做好公司治理 大小股東都有利，商業周刊，第918期。http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/article.php?id=20554
    馬瑜霙，2003，我國獨立董事與獨立監察人之屬性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究，國立政治大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
    莊峻銘，2003，獨立董監事、公司資訊透明度與公司價值之關聯性，國立彰化師範大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
    莊蕎安，2006，從證交法修正看公司治理新貌，會計研究月刊，第243期:28-37。
    陳宜伶，2007，董事會之獨立、專業、參與對企業績效及風險之影響，國立政治大學會計學系研究所博士論文。
    陳逸仲，2009，審計委員會與資訊透明度、財務報導品質與股價反應之探討，國立成功大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
    陳瑞斌與許崇源，2007，公司治理結構與資訊揭露之關聯性研究，交大管理學報，第27卷，第2期:55-109。
    傅豐誠，2004，從公司治理的微觀基礎探討我國強制設立獨立董事之必要性，經社法制論叢第34期:50。
    黃齡慧，2005，我國上櫃公司設置審計委員會決定因素之探討，私立淡江大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
    葉銀華，2008，實踐公司治理:台灣集團企業的功與過，聯經出版事業股份有限公司，初版。
    葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩，2002，公司治理與評等系統，商智文化事業股份有限公司。
    廖玉惠，2007，重振投資人信心，治標前需先治本，會計研究月刊，第257期:40-41。
    廖秀梅、李建然與吳祥華，2006，董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響，東吳經濟商學學報，第54期:117-160。
    劉連煜，2003，健全獨立董監事與公司治理之法制研究-公司自治、外部監控與政府規制之交錯，月旦法學雜誌，第94期:131-154。
    蔡昀蓉與邱秀清，2009，審計委員會特性與盈餘管理，兩岸社會政經文化國際學術研討會經濟組論文。
     
    英文文獻
    Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, G. F. Peters, and Raghunandan, K. 2003. The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22: 17-32.
    Abbottt, L. J., and S. Parker. 2000. Auditor selection and audit committee chracteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19: 47-66.
    Agrawala, A., and C. R. Knoebera. 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31: 377-397.
    Ashbaugh, H. 2001 Non-U.S. Firms` Accounting Standard Choices. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 20: 129–53.
    Ball, R., S. P. Kothari, and A. Robin. 2000. The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics 29: 1–51.
    Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver and W. R. Landsman. 2001. The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Accounting Standard Setting: Another View. Journal of Accounting&Economics 31: 77–104.
    Barth, M. E., W. R. Landsman, and M. H. Lang. 2008. International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research 46: 467-498.
    Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of directors composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review 4: 443-466.
    Bedard J., S. M. Chtourou, and L. Courteau. 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23: 13-35.
    Berle, A. and G. Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, MacMillan, New York.
    Bhagat, S., and B. Black. 2002. Board independence and long term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law 27: 231-274.
    Brickley, J. A., J. L. Coles, and R. L. Terry. 1994. The board of directors and the adoption of poison pills. Working Paper, Simon School of Business.
    Burgstahler, D., And I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses. Journal of Accounting & Economics 24: 99-126.
    Chen, J., R, Duh and F. Shiue. 2008. The effect of audit committee on earnings-return association: Evidence from foreign registrants in the United States. Corporate Governance An International Review 16(1): 32-40
    Cotter, J. F., A. Shivdasani, and M. Zenner. 1997. Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics 43: 195-218.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 183-199.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61: 400-420.
    Dechow, P. M. 1994. Accounting Earnings and Cash Flows as Measures of Firm Performance: The Role of Accounting Accruals. Journal of Accounting & Economics 18: 3–42.
    Dechow, P. M., and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and rarnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77: 39-59.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70: 193-226
    DeFond, M., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and the manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 145-176.
    Fama, E. and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Laws and Economics 26: 227-349.
    Felo, A. J., K. Srinivasany and S. A. Solieri. 2003. Audit committee characteristics and the perceived quality of financial reporting: an empirical analysis. Working paper.
    Fischer, P. E., and R. E. Verrecchia. 2000. Reporting bias. The Accounting Review 75: 229-245.
    Ghosh, A., and Moon D. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review 80: 585-612.
    Gul, F. A., C. J. P. Chen, and J. S. L. Tsui. 2003. Discretionary accounting accruals managers `incentives and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 20: 441-464.
    Healy, P. M. 1985. The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions. Journal of Accounting& Economics 7 : 85–107.
    Hermalin, B. E., and M. S. Weisbah. 1991. The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial management 20: 101-112.
    Ho, S. S. M., and K. S. Wong. 2001. A sudy of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 10: 139-156.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
    Kao, L., and A. Chen. 2004. The effects of board characteristics on earnings management. Corporate Ownership and Control 1(Spring): 96-107.
    Karamanou, I., and N. Vafeas. 2005. The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research 43: 453-486.
    Klein, A. 1998. Firm performance and board committee structure. Journal of Law and Economics 41(April): 275-303.
    Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(August): 375-400.
    Land, J., and M. Lang. 2002. Empirical Evidence on the Evolution of International Earnings. The Accounting Review 77: 115–34.
    Lang, M., J. Raedy and W. Wilson. 2006. Earnings Management and Cross Listing: Are Reconciled Earnings Comparable to US Earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 : 255–83.
    Lang, M., J. Raedy, and M. Yetman. 2003. How Representative Are Firms That Are Cross Listed in the United States? An Analysis of Accounting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research 41: 363–86.
    Lee, Y. S., S. Rosenstein, and J. G. Wyatt. 1999. The value of financial outside directors on corporate boards. International Review of Economics & Finance 8: 421-431.
    MacAvoy, P. W., and I. M. Millstein. 1999. The active board of directors and its effect on the performance of the large publicly traded corporation. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 11: 8-20.
    McMullen, D. A. 1996. Audit Committee Performance：An Investigation of the Consequence Associated with Audit Committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory: 87-103.
    Myers, J. N., L. A. Myers, and D. J. Skinner. 2007. Earnings Momentum and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 22 : 249–84.
    Oviatt, B. M. 1988. Agency and transaction cost perspectives on the manager-shareholder relationship: Incentives for congruent interests. The Academy of Management Review 13: 214-225.
    Pagano, M., A. R’Oell, and J. Zechner. 2002. The Geography of Equity Listings: Why Do Companies List Abroad? Journal of Finance 57: 2651–2694.
    Peasnell, K. V., P. F. Pope, and S. Young. 2005. Board monitoring and earnings management: do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 32: 1311-1346.
    Prevost, A. K., R. P. Rao and M. Hossain. 2002. Determinants of board composition in New Zealand: a simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Empirical Finance 9: 373-397.
    Rangan, S. 1998. Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50: 101-122.
    Schipper, K., and L. Vincent. 1998. Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons:17.
    Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance 52(June): 737-783.
    Tarca, A. 2004. International convergence of accounting practices: Choosing between IAS and US GAAP. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 15 :60-91.
    Teoh, S. H., I. Welch, and T. J. Wong. 1998. Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50:63-99.
    Yermack. D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40: 60-91.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    98353044
    99
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098353044
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋