Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51467
|
| Title: | 國民中學校長資訊使用環境對資料導向決策影響之研究：結構方程模式之應用
Research on the influence of information use environments on principals` data-driven decision-making in junior high schools: an application of structural equation modeling |
| Authors: | 何奇南
Ho, Chi Nan |
| Contributors: | 張奕華
Chang, I Hua
何奇南
Ho, Chi Nan |
| Keywords: | 資訊使用環境
資料導向決策
information use environment
data-driven decision-making |
| Date: | 2010 |
| Issue Date: | 2011-10-05 14:57:06 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探討國民中學校長資訊使用環境對資料導向決策之影響，並了解校長個人背景是否分別對其資訊使用環境及資料導向決策之實踐造成差異，並根據研究結論，提出建議供有關單位參考。為達上述研究目的，本研究採用問卷調查法，針對臺灣地區北部與中部九縣市（宜蘭縣、基隆市、臺北市、新北市、桃園縣、新竹縣、新竹市、苗栗縣、臺中市）公立國民中學校長為研究對象，採普查方式進行。共寄發問卷357份，回收有效問卷292份，有效回收率為 81.8％。本研究採用 SPSS 17.0 for Windows和AMOS 7.0統計套裝軟體進行分析，獲得以下結論：
一、臺灣地區北部與中部九縣市公立國民中學校長資訊使用環境的運作情形與資料導向決策的運用頻率，均為中高程度。
二、不同性別、主任經歷、教育程度、學校規模、學校歷史、學校地區之校長在資訊使用環境的運作情形上，沒有顯著差異。
三、不同主任經歷、年齡、校長年資、學校歷史、學校地區之校長在資料導向決策的運用頻率上，沒有顯著差異。
四、不同性別、教育程度之校長在合作夥伴關係與區域政治領導此一構面的知覺上有差異。
五、不同年齡、教育程度、校長年資、學校規模之校長在資料分析技巧此一構面的知覺上有差異。
六、不同學校規模之校長在學校願景領導、學校教學領導此二構面的知覺上有差異。
七、本研究建構之模式經過結構方程模式檢定獲得支持，校長資訊環境對資料導向決策具有正向顯著的影響。
最後依據上述研究結論，提出具體建議，以做為教育行政機關、國民中學學校行政參考運用。
This study aimed to explore the current situation of the junior high schools’ principals’ influence of information use environments on data-driven decision-making, to analyze the perception of information use environments and data-driven decision-making, to analyze different background variables and school variables’ on the different perception of information use environments on data-driven decision-making, and to discuss the effect of information use environments on data-driven decision-making. Based on the research conclusions, the specific recommendations were proposed for the relevant institutions for references. To achieve these purposes, this study used questionnaire survey method. The principals of public junior high schools in the middle and the northern Taiwan, including Ilan County, Keelung County, Taipei City, New Taipei City, Taoyung County, Hsinchu County , Hsinchu City, Maoli County,and Taichung City, as the study objects. A total of 357 questionnaires were distributed, with 292 valid questionnaires. The effective rate was 81.8%. In this study, SPSS 17.0 for Windows and AMOS 7.0 statistical software were used for analysis and obtained the following conclusions:
1. The rate of the operation of information use environments and data-driven decision-making is high.
2. There is no significant difference in different gender, the directors’ experience, education level, school size, school history and school location in principals’ information use environments.
3. There is no significant difference in different ages, directors’ experience, principal serving years, school history and school location in principals’ data-driven decision-making.
4. There are significant differences in different gender and education level in the perception of principals’ leadership in collaborative partnerships and larger-context politics.
5. There are significant differences in different age, education level, principal severing year and school size in data analysis skills.
6. There are significant differences in different school size in principal’s leadership in school vision and leadership in school instruction.
7. The model constructed in this study was supported through structural equation modeling test. Information use environments of principals have a significant positive impact on data-driven decision- making.
Finally, based on the above research conclusions, specific recommendations were proposed as references and applications for educational administration and junior high school administration. |
| Reference: | 壹、中文部分
王政彥（1994）。團體式教育決策參與。臺北市：五南。
王浩博（2009）。不讓孩子落後法對美國地方課程與教學之影響：一位紐約州地方學區實務工作者的觀點。教育與發展，265，123-129。
王世英、謝雅惠（2005）。從資料驅動觀點簡介國立教育資料館教育資源。教育資料與研究雙月刊，67，37-52。
吳宗立（2005）。學校行政決策。高雄市：麗文。
吳明隆（2003）。SPSS統計運用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市：知城。
吳清山（1991）。學校行政。臺北市：心理。
吳清山（1992）。學校效能研究。臺北市：五南。
吳清山（1998）。學校效能研究（第二版）。臺北市：師大書苑。
吳清山（2001）。教育發展研究。臺北市：元照。
吳清山、林天祐（2006）。教育名詞解釋：資料驅動導向。教育研究月刊，143，140。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2009）。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市：五南。
吳清山、黃旭鈞(1995)。提昇教育品質的一股新動力：談全面品質管理及其在教育上的應用。教育資料與研究，2，74-83。
吳清基(1983)。賽蒙行政決定理論及其對教育行政之啟示。國立臺灣師範大學學報，28，263-308。
吳清基（1992）。教育行政決策理論與實際問題。臺北市：文景。
林天祐（1998）。全面品質管理與學校行政革新。教育資料與研究，22，19-22。
林水波、張世賢（1984）。公共政策。臺北市：五南。
林其賢（2009）。學校層級資料導向決策系統資料內容之研究：臺北市國民小學校長之意見調查。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，臺北縣。
林其賢、高熏芳（2009）。資料導向決策系統之設計：校長決策領導的新思維。學校行政雙月刊，62，80-97。
邱皓政（2006）。量化研究法（二）：統計原理與分析技術（修訂版）。臺北市：雙葉書廊。
高義展（2001）。國民小學教師知識管理、學習型態、專業成長與專業表現關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，高雄市。
秦夢群（1991）。教育行政理論與應用。臺北市：五南。
張芳全（2008）。統計就是要這樣跑。臺北市：心理。
張芳全（2010）。論文就是要這樣寫（二版）。臺北市：心理。
張奕華（2004）。從「布朗案」論NCLB 政策中績效責任系統之內涵與執行。教育研究月刊，124，139-150。
張奕華（2010）。國民中小學校長資料導向決策（DDDM）及影響因素之分析：以資訊使用環境為前置變項。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫（NSC 99-2410-H-004-025-MY2）。臺北市：國立政治大學教育學系。
張奕華、張敏章（2009）。數位時代中提升學校效能新途徑：科技領導與DDDM 模式。教育研究月刊，188，112-122。
張奕華、蔡瑞倫（2010）。國民中學校長科技領導與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政雙月刊，65，33-53。
張奕華、顏弘欽(2010)。教師專業能力發展新取向：DDDM模式的實踐。北縣教育季刊，71，11-16。
陳紹賓（2009）。資料導向決策在國民小學校長願景領導應用之研究：以臺北縣為例。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
黃芳銘（2009）。結構方程模式理論與應用（第五版）。臺北市：五
南。
黃昆輝（1996）。教育行政學。臺北市：東華。
蔡培村（1990）。從開放社會的決策過程檢討我國的教育政策。載於中國教育學會（主編），開放社會的教育政策(頁163-193)。臺北市：臺灣書店。
劉名峯（2006）。國民小學校長應用資料導向決定之研究。國立臺北教育大學國民教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
蕭奕志、陳漢陽（2004）。全面品質管理在提昇學校品質之應用策略。中國職業教育期刊，31，29-37。
謝文全（1991）。學校行政：理論與實務。臺北市：文景。
謝文全（2004）。教育行政學。臺北市：高等教育。
貳、外文部分
3D2Know (2008). Making it happen: Integrating data into the decision making equation. Retrieved from http://3d2know.cosn.org/publications/page_4.html
American Association of School Administrators. (2002). Using data to improve schools: What’s working. Retrieved from
http://www.aasa.org/cas/ UsingDataToImproveSchools.pdf
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
Bennet, A. (2004). Alive with the fire of shared understanding: Implementing knowledge management in the Department of the Navy. In M. E. D. Koenig & T. K. Srikantaiah (Eds.), Knowledge management lesson learned: What works and what doesn’t (pp. 279-292). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
Bernhardt, V. L. (2003). No schools left behind. Educational Leadership, 605, 26-30.
Bernhardt, V. L. (2003). Using data to improve student learning in elementary schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Bernhardt, V. L. (2004). Data analysis for continuous school improvement (2nd.ed). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Bernhardt, V. L. (2005). Data tools for school improvement. Educational Leadership, 625, 66-69.
Bernhardt, V. L. (2007). Translating data into information to improve teaching and learning. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Bernhardt, V. L. (2009). Data use: Data-driven decision making takes a big-picture view of the needs of teachers and students. Journal of Staff Development, 301, 24-27.
Breiter, A., & Light, D. (2006). Data for school improvement: Factors for designing effective information systems to support decision-making in schools. Education Technology & Society, 93, 206-217.
Choppin, J. (2002). Data use in practice: Examples from the school level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Creighton, T. B. (2001). Schools and data: The educator’s guide for using data to improve decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Cusick, P. A. (1992). The educational system: Its nature and logic. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Davis, S. H., & Davis, P. B. (2003). The intuitive dimensions of administrative decision making. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Doyle, D. P. (2003). Data-driven decision making. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 30(10), 19-21.
Earl, L. M., & Katz, S. (2005). Leading schools in a data-rich world: Harnessing data for school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Engler, C. M. (2004). The ISLLC Standards in action: A principal’s handbook. New York: Eye on Education.
Halverson, R., Grigg, J., Prichett, R., & Thomas, C. (2005). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED497014)
Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Lord, R. G., & Hall, R. J. (1992). Contemporary views of leadership and individual differences. Leadership Quarterly, 3(3), 137-157.
Luo, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling for high school principals’ data-driven decision making: An analysis of information use environments. Educational Administration Quarterly, 445, 603-634.
Luo, M., & Childress, M. (2009). Data-driven decision making: The development and validation of an instrument to measure principals’ practices. Retrieved from http://www.academicleadership.org/emprical_research/566.shtml
Mandinach, E. B., & Honey, M. (2008). Data-driven school improvement: Linking data and learning. New York: Teacher College Columbia University.
Mandinach, E. B., Rivas, L., Light, D., Heinze, C., & Honey, M. (2006). The impact of data-driven decision making tools on educational practice: A systems analysis of six school districts. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/2006/RAND_OP170.pdf
Mason, S. (2002). Turning data into knowledge: Lessons from six Milwaukee public schools. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Mathews, C. V. F. (2002). Principals and data-driven decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Virginia.
McClure, C. R. (1978). The information rich employee and information for decision making: Review and comments. Information Processing and Management, 14, 381-394.
McColskey,W. H., Altschuld, J. W., & Lawton, R. W. (1985). Predictors of principals’ reliance on formal and informal sources of information. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(4), 427-436.
McLeod, S. (2009). Data-driven teachers. Retrieved from http://download.microsoft.com/Education/ThoughtLeaders.
aspx.
McLeod, S., & Creighton, T. (2001). Teaching prospective school administrators how to engage in DDDM. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Murphy, J., & Shipman, N. J. (1998). The interstate school leaders licensure consortium: A standards-based approach to strengthening educational leadership. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Murphy, J., Yff, J., & Shipman, N. J. (2000). Implementation of the interstate school leaders licensure consortium standards. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 31, 17-39.
NCREL. (2004). Guide to using data in school improvement efforts. Retrieved from http://www.learningpt.org/pdfs/datause/guidebook.pdf
O’Reilly, C. A. (1983). The use of information in organizational decision making: A model and some propositions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 103-139.
Pathways to College Network. (2007). Using data to improve educational outcomes. Retrieved from The Education Resources Institute. Website: http://www.pathwaystocollege.net/pdf/data.pdf
Picciano, A. G. (2006). Data-driven decision making for effective school leadership. Saddle upper River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Rosenbaum, H. (1993). Information use environments and structuration: Toward an integration for Taylor & Giddens. In S. Bonzi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 56th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science (pp. 235-245). Columbus, OH: Learned Information.
Salpeter, J. (2004). Data: Mining with a mission. Technology & Learning, 248, 30-36.
Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decision. New York: Harper & Row.
Simon, H. A. (1993). Decision making: Rational, nonrational and
irrational. Educational Administration Quarterly, 293, 392-411.
Streifer, P. A. (2002). Using data to make better educational decisions. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.
Taylor R. S. (1982). Value-added processes in the information life cycle. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 33(5), 341-345.
Taylor, R. S. (1986). Value-added processes in information systems.
Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication science (pp. 217-254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Thornton, B., & Perreault, G. (2002). Becoming a data-based leader: An introduction. NASSP Bulletin, 86(630), 86-96.
Wikipedia (2009). James Samuel Coleman. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James Samuel Coleman
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 32, 53-56.
Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2007). Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239-259. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
97911018
99 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097911018 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101801.pdf | 1006Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 2216 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
