政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51434

政大典藏 > College of Education > Graduate Institute of Early Childhood Education > Theses > Item 140.119/51434

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51434

Title:	蒙特梭利幼兒教育的幼兒就學準備度之研究 The school readiness of montessori early childhood education
Authors:	莊佳樺 Chuang, Chia Hua
Contributors:	徐聯恩莊佳樺 Chuang, Chia Hua
Keywords:	幼兒就學準備度幼兒就學準備度評量蒙特梭利教育蒙特梭利幼稚園五歲幼兒 school readiness school readiness assessment Montessori education five-year-old children
Date:	2010
Issue Date:	2011-10-05 14:54:19 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	蒙特梭利教育推行逾百年，至今屹立不搖，主要有賴蒙特梭利以科學方法發現了幼兒成長的原理和法則，其以幼兒為中心，將教學法劃分為三個要素： (1)預備的環境，(2)教師，(3)教具，透過三者相輔相成，引導幼兒學習。不過，蒙特梭利教育目前仍被視為另類教學，人們擔心蒙氏幼兒教育缺乏情感、創造力與人際互動的學習，並對蒙氏幼兒教育是否能與小學教育接軌感到疑慮。對此，中華民國蒙特梭利教師協會在2007年慶祝蒙特梭利教育100周年紀念特刊中指出許多追蹤研究顯示，蒙特梭利孩子除了在課業成績表現優異外，在主動學習、人際關係、情緒管理上也優於一般小孩。由於近十餘年來，「幼兒就學準備度」的觀念日趨重視，教育部正積極編訂的「幼兒園教保活動及課程大綱」也特別重視幼小銜接，因此，研究者將從幼兒就學準備的觀點，探討蒙特梭利教育。本研究首先採用文獻分析法探討蒙特梭利教育與就學準備度的共同脈絡，並依據探討之結果，建構「蒙特梭利教育與五歲幼兒就學準備度評量對照表」，進而運用問卷調查進行專家效度之檢視，以做對照表的修訂。接續研究者使用調查研究的方式，評量接受蒙特梭利教育之幼兒的就學準備度，將蒐集的資料進行統計及分析。本研究所使用的統計方法包含描述性統計分析、交叉表（Crosstabs）與卡方檢定（Chi-square test）、皮爾森積差相關(Pearson’s product -moment correlation)、斯皮爾曼等級相關（Spearman`s rank correlation）、t考驗（t- test）與單因子變異數分析(one way ANOVA)。研究結論如下：壹、蒙特梭利教育與五歲幼兒就學準備度評量對照表的對應度高，顯示五歲幼兒就學準備度評量表中所關心的幼兒行為能力，與蒙特梭利幼兒教育的教學內容高度相符。初步反映蒙特梭利教育的內容符合我國幼兒教育對幼兒基本能力之要求與發展，有利我國幼兒發展入小學前的就學準備。貳、本研究所取樣就讀蒙特梭利幼兒園之幼兒，具有良好的就學準備度。參、就學準備度差異存在於幼兒就讀/非就讀蒙特梭利幼兒園之間，其中以幼兒就讀蒙特梭利幼兒園之就學準備度較高。肆、蒙特梭利兒童背景變項中，蒙特梭利幼稚園與托兒所在「健康與身體領域」、「認知數理邏輯與科學領域」的就學準備度達顯著差異；幼兒就讀蒙特梭利幼兒園年數與就學準備度無顯著相關；不同性別的蒙特梭利幼兒就學準備度無顯著差異。伍、蒙特梭利教師背景變項中，蒙特梭利教師大班(含混齡)教學年資與「健康與身體領域」、「語言與溝通領域」、「認知數理邏輯與科學領域」、「認知文化藝術領域」、及「整體」的就學準備度有顯著正相關；蒙特梭利教師最高學歷與幼兒就學準備度有顯著正相關；不同蒙特梭利教師證照別之幼兒就學準備度無顯著差異。最後，根據上述研究結論針對實務面以及未來研究提出建議。 Montessori education has developed for over a century, mainly due to Montessori found the early childhood development principles and rules by the scientific method. She advocates child-centered,and there are three elements of Montessori education：(1)prepared environment, (2) teachers, (3) teaching aids, through the three to guide children`s learning. However, in Taiwan, people worried about that Montessori education is lack of emotional, creativity , interpersonal learning, and the transition with primary education, therefore Montessori education is still being considered as an alternative education. In this regard, Montessori Teachers Association of the R.O.C pointed many longitudinal study shows that Montessori children perform better than the traditional-education children in many ways of academic achievements, active learning, interpersonal relationships, and emotional management. Nowadays, the concept of " school readiness " becomes more important, and the Ministry of Education is actively compiling the "Guidelines of Nursery Education Activities and Security Curriculum " which is particularly imply the importance of transition program. Thus, this study proposes to investigate Montessori education from the perspective of school readiness. First , researcher explored the common context of Montessori education and school readiness by document analysis, then based on the results to construct "The corresponding table of Montessori education and five-year-old children school readiness assessment “, and corrected the table by expert validity. Finally, assess the Montessori children`s school readiness in actually. Data were analyzed by descriptive analysis, Crosstabs, Chi-square test, Pearson’s product -moment correlation, Spearman`s rank correlation, t- test, and one way ANOVA. The results were summarized as follow: A."The corresponding table of Montessori education and five-year-old children school readiness assessment “ is highly corresponded, show they concerned the same capacity of children. Initially reflected Montessori education conform the basic development requirements of Taiwan early child education, and could help children get ready into primary school. B. Montessori children in this study sample get good school readiness. C. There is significant difference towards the school readiness between children study /non-study Montessori kindergarten. D. There is significant difference towards school readiness of “physical health and development domain”、”mathematical logic and cognitive science domain” between Montessori kindergartens and Montessori child care；there is no significant correlation between children’s school year in Montessori kindergarten and children’s school readiness；there is no significant difference towards the school readiness between boys and girls. E. There is significant correlation in “physical health and development domain”、”language and communicate domain”、” mathematical logic and cognitive science domain”、” cultural and artistic domain” and ” overall average” between school readiness and the years of teaching five-year classes (ambiguous age)；there is significant correlation between school readiness and the highest degree of Montessori teachers；there is no significant difference towards the school readiness between the teachers with different Montessori teacher license.
Reference:	參考文獻中文部份方聖文（2009）。幼兒就學準備度相關因素之比較研究－以台北縣、宜蘭縣為例。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。付地紅、張冬梅（編譯）（2003）。蒙特梭利幼兒英才教育的秘密。台北市：台先智。李田樹（譯）（2000）。M. Montessori著。童年之秘。台北市：及幼。吳玥玢、吳京（譯）（2001）。M. Montessori著。發現兒童。台北市：及幼。呂淑芳（2006）。家長參與幼兒入園準備及幼兒在幼兒園適應之相關研究。輔仁大學兒童與家庭學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北縣。李雅玲（2001）。蒙特梭利教學法。重中論集，1，120-127。邱琡雅等（2006）。認識蒙特梭利教育。台北：蒙特梭利文化。岩田陽子、南昌子、石井昭子(1987)。蒙台梭利教育-日常生活練習，第二卷。新民出版社：台北。林庭玉、楊淞丞(2005)。蒙氏日常生活練習-幼兒教學活動設計。台北：桂冠圖書。林義男（1998）。國小學生家長社經背景、父母參與及學業成就的關係。輔導學報，16，157-211。相良敦子著（1988）。蒙台梭利教育理論與實踐－蒙台梭利教育理論概說。台北：新民幼教圖書。施玠羽（2007）。幼兒就學準備度相關因素之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。施蘊珊(2008)。幼教課程與幼兒語言發展之關係-以方案課程與蒙特梭利課程為例。臺北市立教育大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。陳怡全（譯）（1997）。P. P. Lillard著。蒙特梭利教學的新視野（Montessori:A modern approach）。臺北市：及幼。徐瑞仙（譯）（1996）。E. Hainstock著。細論蒙特梭利教育。台北市：及幼。徐聯恩、施玠羽（2006）。幼兒學習標準：美國經驗及其涵義。國立政治大學2006年幼兒教育專業、品質與卓越學術研討會論文集，台北市。徐聯恩、鄭雅方（2008）。積極提升幼教品質：從幼小銜接到就學準備。幼教資訊，214，12-19。教育部（2010年，3月4日）。2009年美國總統歐巴馬教改總回顧。教育部電子報，399。2010年3月12日，取自http://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=5217 張郁雯（1997）。學習準備度評鑑計畫。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，計劃編號：NSC86-2413-H-030-006。張國保(2010)。少子化社會下臺北市教育資源分配之研究。臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會，初版，台北市。張維志(2009)。蒙特梭利小學教學法之研究－兼論台灣兩所蒙氏小學。台北市立教育大學教育系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。許惠欣（1979）。蒙特梭利教育與幼兒教育。台南：光華女子高級中學。許惠珠（譯）（1989）。M.Montessori 著。幼兒的心智－吸收性心智（The absorbent mind）。臺南市：光華女中。許興仁、邱琡雅（譯）（1987）。P.P. Lillard.著。蒙特梭利新探。台南市：光華女中。單偉儒（1997）。如何經營一所兒童之家？－蒙特梭利園管理手冊。臺北市：蒙特梭利文化。單偉儒等(2001)。小青的一天-開開心心上學去。臺北市：蒙特梭利文化。詹道玉（譯）（1989）。Montessori,M.著。蒙特梭利教學法。台北市：崇文。楊瑞琴(2007)。蒙特梭利教室中主題活動實施之探究。國立臺南大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台南市。鄭青青（1993）。蒙特梭利實驗教學法與單元設計教學法對幼兒創造力發展影響之比較研究。未出版之碩士論文，台灣師範大學家政教育研究所，台北。趙琲（2005）。蒙特梭利教育-日常生活篇。臺北市：華騰文化。鄭雅方（2009）。幼兒就學準備度評量之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。蔡淑惠（2007）。三至六歲蒙特梭利教師之證照培訓。國立嘉義大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義市。蕭麗君（譯）（1996）。A. D. Wolf著。一間蒙特梭利教室。台北市：及幼。鍾叔惠（2003）。幼兒圖畫故事書在蒙特梭利教學中之應用---以一所托兒所為例。未出版之碩士論文，屏東師範學院國民教育研究所，屏東。簡淑真（1992）。蒙特梭利教學與單元設計教學對幼兒發展影響之比較研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC80-0301-H003-20）。台北市：國立台灣師範大學教育學系。蘇建文等（1998）。發展心理學。臺北：心理。英文部分 Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Vandell, D. L., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Owen, M. T., et al. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early child care?Child Development,78(2), 681-701. Burke, J. F., & Burke, W. M. (2005). Student-ready schools. Childhood education: Annual Theme, 81(5), 281-285. Coleman, J. S. (1987). Norms as social capital. In G. Randnitzky & P.Bernholz(Eds.), Economic Imperalism(pp.133-155). NY: Paragon Press. Cuban, L. (1992). Why some reforms last: The case of the kindergarten.American Journal of Education, 100, 166–194. Faith, L. P., Alison, Y. B., Kenneth, W. G., Carol, R., & Lenore, P. (1999).Parent-child relationship, home learning environment, and school readiness. School Psychology Review, 28(3), 413-425 Gagne, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning (2nd ed.). New York: Holt,Rinehart, & Winston. Graue, M. E. (1992). Social interpretations of readiness for kindergarten.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 225–243. Graue, M. E.(1993). Ready for what?: constructing meanings of readiness for kindergarten. Albany, N.Y. Gredler, G. R. (1992). School readiness: assessment and educational issues. Clinical Psychology Publishing Company, Inc., 4 Conant Square, Brandon. Hair, E., Halle, T., Terry-Humen, E., Lavelle, B., Calkins, J.(2006).Children’s school readiness in the ECLS-K: Predictions to academic, health, and social outcomes in first grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4),431-454 Harradine, C. C., & Clifford, R. M. (1996). When are children ready for kindergarten? Views of families, kindergarten teachers, and childcare providers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. Ilg, F., & Ames, L. B. (1972). School readiness. New York: Harper & Row. Kagan, S. L. (1990). Readiness 2000: Rethinking rhetoric and responsibility. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 272-279. Kagan, S. L., Moore, E., & Bredekamp, S. (1995). Reconsidering children’s early development and learning: Toward common views and vocabulary.Washington,DC: National Education Goals Panel. Kuo, H. D. & Hauser, R. M. (1995). Trends in family effects on the education of black and white brothers. Sociology of Education, 68(2), 136-160. Love, J. M. (1995). Conception of readiness for ECLS and HSLS. Unpublished memorandum. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. Magnuson, K. A., Meyers, M. K., Ruhm, C. J.,& Waldfogel, J. (2004). Inequality in preschool education and school readiness. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 115-157. Maxwell, K. L., Clifford R. M.(2004). School readiness assessment. YC Young Children, 59(1), 42-46. Meisels, S. J. (1998). Assessing readiness. Center for the improvement of early reading achievement (CIERA). University of Michigan - Ann Arbor. Michael Sadowski(2006).The school readiness gap. Harvard Education Letter,22(4),1-4. NAEYC (1995). School readiness, A Position statement of the National Association For the Education of Young Children. NASBE (National Association of State Boards of Education) (1991).Caringcommunities: Supporting young children and families. Alexandria, VA:Author. Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C.,Kagan, S. L., Yazejian, Noreen（2001）.The relation of preschool child-care quality to children`s cognitive and social developmental trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 72(5), 1534-53. Pelletier, J., & Brent, J. M. (2002). Parent participation in children’s school readiness:The effects of parental self-efficacy, cultural diversity and teacher strategies. International Journal of Early Childhood, 34(1), 45-60. Snow, K. L.(2006). Measurement school readiness: Conceptual and pratical considerations. Early Education and Development, 17(1), 7-14. Stahl, S. A., & Yaden, D. B. (2004). The development of literacy in preschool and primary grades: Work by the center for the improvement of early reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 105(2), 3-14. Suzanne, M. W., & Michael, F. K. (2008). Forty years of school readiness research: What have we learned? Childhood Education, 84(5), 260-266. Vandell & Wolf (2002). Child care quality: Does it matter and does it need to be Improved? ED441941. Wesley, P. W., & Buysse, V. (2003). Making meaning of school readiness in schools and communities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18(3), 351-375.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學幼兒教育所 98157015 99
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0981570151
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Early Childhood Education] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
015101.pdf	2132Kb	Adobe PDF2	2979	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...