Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51298
|
| Title: | 從優選理論分析華語擬聲詞結構
An optimality theory analysis of Mandarin onomatopoeia |
| Authors: | 葉雯琪
Yeh, Wenchi |
| Contributors: | 蕭宇超
Hsiao, Yuchau E.
葉雯琪
Yeh, Wenchi |
| Keywords: | 華語音韻
優選理論
擬聲詞
重疊
Mandarin phonology
Optimality Theory
Onomatopoeia
Reduplication |
| Date: | 2010 |
| Issue Date: | 2011-10-05 14:38:56 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本計畫擬於優選理論 (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004) 框架下，探討現代華語擬聲詞在音韻上的特點與表現，並分析優選理如何論操作單音節及雙音節輸入項所衍生出的雙音節擬聲詞，進而完全或部分重疊成三音節及四音節華語擬聲詞。擬聲詞為模仿自然界中的聲音形成的詞彙，但並非隨意衍生形成，仍然需要遵循語言的構詞及音韻規律，才能衍生成為合法詞彙並順暢地使用。在華語音韻研究方面，歷來學者對於擬聲詞的討論並不豐富詳盡，因此本碩士論文便嘗試探討華語雙音節、三音節及四音節擬聲詞在音韻分析中的樣貌。
重疊在漢語擬聲詞中為極為常見的現象。如現代華語中單音節的「咕」與雙音節的「咕咕」；雙音節的「滴答」與四音節的「滴滴答答」。故擬聲詞衍生中的重疊機制為本計畫中主要討論議題，此外由於華語擬聲詞結構在音段選擇中展現一致性，故另聚焦於固定音段， 如邊音/l/及前元音/i/在現代華語擬聲詞中高度頻繁地出現，我將對其起源提出假設並分析，如現代華語「劈哩啪啦」的/l/及/i/。而華語雙音節擬聲詞的來源二分為單音節輸入項及雙音節輸入項亦為討論對象。
最後預期華語擬聲詞大致符合現代華語成詞的語法，但進行重疊時與實詞相異，語意因素不會成為衍生動機；經由優選理論分析，從音韻結構角度切入，不僅可了解華語擬聲詞衍生的制約排序，亦更加了解其音韻構詞規範，且與實詞如形容詞進行重疊時的制約排序進行比較，說明華語擬聲詞在衍生過程中傾向遵循邊緣音韻規則，與其他實詞多依據核心音韻 規則的狀況大異其趣。以此為基石去了解其他漢語方言對於擬聲成詞的標準，甚或研究日語、韓語中豐富的擬聲詞，便能構擬出擬聲成詞更具體且具有說服力的語法規則。
In this thesis, the generation of Modern Mandarin disyllabic, trisyllabic and quadrisyllabic onomatopoeia under phonological viewpoint via Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004) approach will be discussed. In my M.A. Thesis ‘An OT analysis of Mandarin Onomatopoeia’, four factors motivated this study. First, the different sources of Mandarin disyllabic onomatopoeia which I thought there are monosyllabic and disyllabic inputs aroused my interests. Second, there are some similarities of Mandarin onomatopoeia between Mandarin core lexicons. Third, the reduplication mechanism in Mandarin onomatopoeia will be taken as a main point in this study. For example, in Modern Mandarin ‘gu’ (Sound of bird sing once) will extend into ‘gugu’ (Sound of birdsong) under total reduplication. Finally, the issue concerning what will be the best choice when Mandarin onomatopoeia is reduplicated with fixed segmentism also plays an important role in this study. For instance, the /l/ and /i/ in Modern Mandarin’s ‘pilipala’ (Sound of many things falling).
Onomatopoeias have their special function as sound-imitating icons. They are not the words which are formed by arbitrary but by the rules. They sometimes violate phonological structures of the language in which they occur; hence they belong to the peripheral phonology rather than core one. The Mandarin onomatopoeia is different from Mandarin content words; they are not motivated by semantic factors. So the Chinese onomatopoeia generation analysis via OT approach supplies not only the morpho-phonological constraints but also the comparison of peripheral words between content words. I would like to assume that the Mandarin onomatopoeia generation follows the peripheral phonological rules. This study will provide as a basement to study on other Chinese language’s onomatopoeia or even onomatopoeia in Tibetan, Japanese and Korean. |
| Reference: | Alderete, John et al. 1999. “Reduplication with Fixed Segmentism”. Linguistics Inquiry, Volume 30, Number 3: 327- 364.
Anttila, Arto. 1997. ‘Deriving variation from grammar’, in Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout and Leo Wetzels, (eds.), Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, John Benjamins, Amsterdam / Philadelphia, pp. 35-68.
Chao, Y.-R. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkely: University of California Press.
Chen, Lu. 2007. Double Doubling in Disyllables – Reduplication in Mandarin. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Shanghai International Studies.
Chiang, Wen-yu. 1992. The Prosodic Morphology and Phonology of Affixation in Taiwanese and Other Chinese Languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware.
Duanmu, San. 2007. The Phonology of Standard Chinese. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press.
Duanmu, San, 2000. “Hanyu de jiezou [Prodosy in Chinese]”. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 4: 203-209.
Katamba, Francis. 1989 An Introduction to Phonology, London ; New York : Longman.
Inkelas, Sharon, and Cheryl Zoll. 2007. “Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphonolically conditioned phonology.” Linguistics. 45.1: 133-171.
Katamba, Francis. 1993. Morphology. New York: St. Martin`s Press.
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass. : Blackwell
Kitto, Catherine and Paul de Lacy. 1999. “A correspondence theory of epenthetic quality”. In Catherine Kitto and Carolyn Smallwood (eds.) Proceedings of AFLA (Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association) VI. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, pp.181‐200.
[Rutgers Optimality Archive#337
Lien, C.-F.1989. “Antonymous Quadrinominals in Chinese”. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17, 263-206.
Lombardi, Linda. 2002. “Coronal epenthesis and markedness.” Phonology, 19: 219-251
Lombardi, Linda. 2003. “Markedness and the typology of epenthetic vowels.” University of Maryland, unpublished manuscript. ROA -578
Lunden, S.L.Anya. 2004. “Reduplicant Placement, Achoring and Locality.” ROA-608, 1 – 18.
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1993a. “Generalized Alignment.” Yearbook of Morphology, ed. G.E. and J. van Marle, 79 – 153. Kluwer.
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1993b. “Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction.” Technical Reports of Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, No. 3. 26
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1994a. “The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology”. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 24
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1994b. “Prosodic Morphology”. A Handbook of Phonological Theory.
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1995a. “Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity”.University of Massachusetts Occasional Paper in Linfuistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. by Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey and Suzanne Urbanzyk, 249-384
McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince. 1995b. Prosodic morphology. The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. by John Goldsmith, 318-366. Oxford: Blackwell.
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1999. “Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology” The Prosody-morphology Interface, ed. by Rene Kager, Harry van der Hulst, and Wim Zonneveld, 218-309.
McCarthy, John J. 2008. Doing Optimality Theory: Applying Theory to Data. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell
Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-Based Morphology and Phonology with special attention to Optimality Theory, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, ROA-171.
Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University
Tang, T.-C. 1988. “Hanyu Cifa Jufa Lunji [Studies on Chinese Morphology and Syntax]”. Taipei, Taiwan: Student Bokk Co. Ltd.
Yip, Moira. 2001. “Segmental Unmarkedness versus Input preservation in Reduplication.” in L. Limbardi, ed. Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press. pp 206-230.
王洪君，2008，《漢語非線性音系學》，北京，北京大學出版社。
李方桂，2003，《上古音研究》，北京，商務印書館。
李鏡兒 ，2007，《現代漢語擬聲詞研究》。中國：上海出版社。
竺家寧，1995，<論擬聲詞聲音結構中的邊音成分>，《國立中正大學學報人文分冊》。
竺家寧，2007，《聲韻學》，台北，五南出版社。
林 尹，1971，《文字學概說》，台北，正中書局。
林語堂，1998，<古有複輔音說>，《古漢語複聲母論文集》。
馬慶株，2002，〈擬聲詞研究〉，《著名中年語言學家自選集‧馬慶株卷》，安徽，安徽教育出版
馮勝利，2005，《漢語韻律語法研究》，北京，北京大學出版社。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
華語文教學碩士學位學程
97161007
99 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097161007 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [華語文教學博／碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 100701.pdf | 1509Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1947 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
