政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51284
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51623112      線上人數 : 749
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 宗教研究所 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/51284


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51284


    題名: 〈析論吉藏之時間觀–以《中觀論疏》與《大乘玄論》對「三世實有」之論辯為考察中心〉
    Time and Liberation in Three-Treatise Master Jizang`s Madhyamika Thought
    作者: 白立冰
    Brewster, Ernest
    貢獻者: 林鎮國
    Lin, Chen kuo
    白立冰
    Brewster, Ernest
    關鍵詞: 吉藏
    三論宗
    三世實有
    中觀
    說一切有部
    《成實論》
    日期: 2010
    上傳時間: 2011-10-05 14:36:48 (UTC+8)
    摘要: In this thesis, I hope to make a small contribution to the study of of Chinese Buddhism. The preliminary discussion in the first and second chapters takes the form of a historiographical overview of some concepts that developed within the Three-Treatise tradition of Chinese Buddhism between the 5th and 6th centuries. This serves to illuminate the intellectual practices of this unique tradition of thought, which has been largely underrepresented in Western-language studies of Buddhism. In the subsequent chapter, I will clarify the exposition of these ideas within Master Jízàng’s commentary on the Mūlamadhyamaka-kārikās《中論》, the Zhōngguānlùn-shū《中觀論疏》 (completed in 608 C.E.). The examination of this work and its immediate contexts promises to shed light upon the development of Mādhyamika thought in East Asia, especially with regards to the basic exegetical strategies of the Three Treatise tradition.
    The third and fourth chapters elucidates Jízàng’s interpretation and commentary upon two seminal chapters within Nāgārjuna’s Zhōnglùn, the “Contemplation of the Three Characteristics”〈觀三相品〉 and the “Contemplation of Time”〈觀時品〉. The content of these two chapters reflect the doctrinal and philosophical diversity of the intellectual terrain in early 7th-century China. Jízàng’s analysis in these chapters unfolds into a systematic refutation of the “false doctrines” of the Indian Ābhidharmika sects, which, in turn, illuminate the divergent intellectual currents of Jízàng’s milieu, as well as revealing the encyclopedic breadth of Jízàng’s Zhōngguānlùn-shū as well as other monumental commentarial works of the period. The examination of Jízàng’s refutation of the Sarvāstivādins in the fourth chapter – an as of yet unexplored facet of his considerable corpus – serves to enlarge our current comprehension of both Chinese intellectual culture during this critical juncture in Chinese history, and to enrich our understanding of the variegated exegetical and philosophical approaches of the great thinkers of 6th- and 7th-century China.
    參考文獻: Abbreviations
    T Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《大正新修大藏經》. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭, et al. 100 vols. Tōkyō: Taishō issaikyō kankōkai 大正一切經刊刻會, 1924-1932. (CBETA version). Citations are indicated by the text number, followed by the volume, page, register (a, b, or c), and line number(s).
    X Shinsan Dainihon zokuzōkyō《卍新纂大日本續藏經》. Edited by Kawamura Kōshō 河村考照 between 1975 and 1989, printed by Kokusho kangyōkai 國書刊行會. Originally compiled by Nakano Tatsue中野達慧. Kyōtō: Zōkyō shoin 藏經書院, 1905-1912. (CBETA version).
    Bibliography
    Sources in Canonical Collections
    1. Āpídámó dàpípōshā-lùn《阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論》(Mahā-vibhāṣa śāstra), by the Five-hundred Great Arhats 五百大阿羅漢等造, translated by Tripiṭaka Master Xuánzàng 三藏法師玄奘奉詔譯, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 27, No. 1545.
    2. Āpítán pípōshā-lùn《阿毘曇毗婆沙論》, Abhidharma-vibhāṣā-śāstra, by Kātyāyanīputra迦旃延子, explanations by the Five-Hundred Arhats五百羅漢, translated by the Indian śrāmaṇa Buddhavarman 天竺沙門浮陀跋摩and Dàotài道泰 of the Northern-Liáng Dynasty, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 28, No. 1546.
    3. Bǎilùn《百論》(Treatise in One-Hundred Verses[Śata-śāstra]), attributed to the Bodhisattva Āryadeva提婆, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 30, No. 1569.
    4. Bǎilùn-shū《百論疏》(Commentary on the Śata-śāstra), by Jízàng吉藏, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 42, No. 1827.
    5. Chéngshí-lùn《成實論》, (Tattvasiddhi-śāstra), by Harivarman訶梨跋摩Qín-Dynasty, translated by Tripiṭaka Master Kumārajīva of the Latter-Qín Dyansty姚秦．三藏鳩摩羅什, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 32, No. 1646.
    6. Chūron-soki《中論疏記》, by Anchō安澄 (763-814), Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 65, No. 2255.
    7. Dàfāng Guǎngfó huáyán jīng suíshū yǎnyì chāo《大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔》，composed by Chéngguān of the Táng Dynasty 唐．清涼澄觀, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 36, No. 1736..
    8. Dàfāng Guǎngfó Huáyánjīng shū《大方廣佛華嚴經疏》(Sub-commentary to the Avataṁsaka Sūtra), composed by Śramaṇa Chéngguān of Great Avataṁsaka on Mt. Qīngliáng 唐．清涼山大華嚴寺沙門澄觀, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 35, No. 1735.
    9. Dàshèng xuánlùn《大乘玄論》by Jízàng , Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 45, No. 1853.
    10. Dàzhìdù-lùn《大智度論》(Mahāprajñāpāramitāśāstra), by the Bodhisattva Nāgārjuna龍樹菩薩, translated by Tripiṭaka Master Kumārajīva, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 25, No. 1509.
    11. Èrdì-yì《二諦義》, by Jízàng吉藏, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 45, No. 1854.
    12. Fǎhuá xuányì shìqiān《法華玄義釋籤》(Notes on Zhìyǐ’s Profound Meaning of the Lotus), by Śramaṇa Zhànrán of Mt. Tiāntái天台沙門湛然, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, T33, no. 1717.
    13. Fóshuō guānwúliàng shòujīng-shū《佛說觀無量壽經疏》, by Jízàng, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, T37, no. 1726.
    14. Huízhēng-lùn《迴諍論》(Vigrahavyāvartani), Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 32, No. 1631. Attributed to Nāgārjuna; trans. Tripiṭaka Master Vimokṣapra (fl. Early 6th-century) of the Northern-Wèi後魏．三藏毘目智仙and Gautama Prajñāruci瞿曇流支 (arr. China 516). T no. 1631, 32.
    15. Jìngmíng xuánlùn《淨名玄論》, by Jízàng吉藏法師, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 38, No. 1780.
    16. Mǒhě sēngzhǐ lǜ《摩訶僧祇律》(Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya), translated by Tripiṭaka Master Buddhabhadra and Fǎxiǎn during the Eastern-Jìn Dynasty東晉．天竺三藏佛陀跋陀羅共法顯, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō, T22, no. 1425.
    17. Miàofǎ liánhuá jīng《妙法蓮華經》 (Lotus Sūtra), translated by Tripiṭaka Master Kumārajīva of the Latter-Qín Dyansty秦．龜茲國三藏法師鳩摩羅什, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 9, No. 262.
    18. Nièpán jīng yǒuyì《涅槃經遊意》, by Jízàng吉藏, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 38, No. 1768.
    19. Shènmàn bǎokū《勝鬘寶窟》(The Precious Storehouse of the Śrīmālādevī), Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 37, no. 174.
    20. Shèngmán shīzǐ hǒng yīshèng dàfāngbiàn guǎngjīng《勝鬘師子吼一乘大方便方廣經》(Śrīmālādevī-siṃha-nāda-sūtra), Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 12, No. 353.
    21. Sānlùn xuánshū wényì yào《三論玄疏文義要》, by Chinkai珍海 (1092–1152), Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 70, No. 2299
    22. Sānlùn-zōng zhāngshū《三論宗章疏》, by Vinaya Master Ānyuán of Yuánkāng Monastery元興寺安遠律師, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 55, No. 2179.
    23. Sānlùn Xuányì《三論玄義》, composed by Śramaṇa Jízàng at the Huìrì Temple at the commission of the Suí Emperor 隋．慧日道場沙門吉藏奉命撰, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 45, No. 1852
    24. Sānlùn yǒuyì yì《三論遊意義》, by Master Shuò 碩法師, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 45, No. 1855.
    25. Shíèrmén-lùn《十二門論》(Twelve Gates Treatise), by the Bodhisattva Nāgārjuna龍樹菩薩, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 30, No. 1568.
    26. Shíèrmén-lùn shū《十二門論疏》, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 42, no. 1825
    27. Shízhù pípōshā lùn《十住毘婆沙論》, by the Acāryā Nāgārjuna聖者龍樹造, translated by Kuchean Tripiṭaka Master Kumārajīva of the Latter-Qín Dynasty 後秦．龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, T26, no. 1521.
    28. Tōiki dentō mokuroku《東域傳燈目錄》, Compiled by Eichō of Kōfuku-ji Temple興福寺沙門永超, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 55, No. 2183.
    29. Wùbùqiān zhèngliàng zhèng《物不遷正量證》, by Dàohéng Míng-Dynasty明．道衡, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 54, No. 878.
    30. Wù bùqiān zhèngliàng lùn《物不遷正量論》, by Míngchéng of the Míng-Dynasty明．鎮澄, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 54, No. 879.
    31. Wùbùqiān lùnbiàn jiě《物不遷論辯解》(Resolution of the Debate on “Things Do not Move”), 明‧真界解, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 54, No. 880.
    32. Zhàolùn《肇論》, composed Shì Sēngzhào of the Latter-Qín Dynasty at Chángān後秦．釋僧肇, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 45, No. 1858.
    33. Zhàolùn lüè zhù《肇論略註》, commentary by Śramaṇa Hānshān of Mt. Kuāng明‧匡山沙門憨山釋, , Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 54, No. 873.
    34. Zhàolùn-shū《肇論疏》, by Yuánkāng of the Táng-Dynasty唐‧元康, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 45, No. 1859.
    35. Zhàolùn-shū《肇論疏》, by Shì Huìdá 釋慧達 of the Eastern-Jìn Dyansty. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 54, No. 866.
    36. Zhù Wéimójié jīng《注維摩詰經》, by Sēngzhào of the latter Qín-Dynasty後秦‧釋僧肇, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 38, No. 1775.
    37. Zhōngguān-lùn《中觀論》(Mūla-mādhyamika kārikā), by the Acāryā Nāgārjuna, 聖者龍樹造, commentary by the Bhrāmaṇa Pinġala梵志青目釋, translated by Kumārajīva of the Latter-Qín Dynasty後秦．鳩摩羅什譯, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 30, No. 1564.
    38. Zhōngguān-lùn shū《中觀論疏》, by Śramaṇa Jízàng of the Suí Dynasty 隋．沙門吉藏, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō《卍大正新修大藏經》, Vol. 42, No. 1824.
    Secondary References
    1. Berman, Michael. 1997. “Time and Emptiness in the Chao-lun,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, Vol. 24 pp. 43-58.
    2. Blattner, William D. 1999. Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism, (New York: Cambridge University Press).
    3. Bocking, Brian, Nāgārjuna in China: A Translation of the Middle Treatise, (New York: Edwin Mellen, 1995).
    4. Buswell, Robert E., Jr. 1997. “Buddhadeva: Materials Toward and Assessment of His Philosophy,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 25, pp. 561-587.
    5. CÀI Jīnchāng蔡金昌. 2006 Hānshāndàshī sānjiào huìtōng sīxiǎng《憨山大師的三教會通思想》, (Táipěi: Wénjīn chūbǎnshè 文津出版社）.
    6. CHÉN Shìxián 陳世賢. 1999. “Jízāng duì Shuōyíqiè yǒubù xuéshuō zhī píngpàn”〈吉藏對說一切有部學說之評破〉, Zhèngguān《正觀》Vol. 10 (09.25) , pp. 67-107.
    7. CHÉN Shìxián 陳世賢. 2000. Chéngshílùn sānxīn sīxiǎng zhī yánjiū – duìyújiǎmíngxīn, fǎxīn, kōngxīn de jiěxī〈《成實論》「三心」思想之研究—對於「假名心」、「 法心」、「 空心」 的解析〉(Fǔrén University M.A. Thesis輔仁大學哲學研究所碩士論文).
    8. CHÉN Shìxián 陳世賢. 2008. “Fǎtǐ yú shíjiān guānxì zhī yánjiū – yǐ Jùshělùn yú Shùnzhènglǐlùn duì ‘sānshì shíyǒu’zhī lùnbiàn wéizhǔ”《「法體」與「時間」關係之研究－以《俱舍論》與《順正理論》對「三世實有」之論辯為主》(Chinese Culture University中國文化大學, Ph.D. Dissertation).
    9. Ch’en, Kenneth K.S. 1964. Buddhism in China, (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
    10. Cox, Collett. 1998. Disputed Dharmas – Early Buddhist Theories on Existence – An Annotated Translation of the Section on Factors Dissociated from Thought from Saṇghabhadra’s Nyāyānusāra, (Tōkyō: Studia Philologica Buddhica, Monograph Series XI).
    11. Eckel, Malcom David. 1994. To See the Buddha: A Philosopher’s Quest for the Meaning of Emptiness, (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
    12. FĀNG Lìtiān方立天. 2007. “Sēngzhào Píngzhuàn”〈僧肇評傳〉, Wèi Jìn Nánběicháo Fójiào lùncōng《魏晉南北朝佛教論叢》,（Běijīng北京: Zhōnghuá shūjú 中華書局, 2007）, pp. 111-154.
    13. Fujī Kyōkō藤井教公. 1988. “Tendai to Sanron no kōshō – Kantei no Hokkegengi shūji to Kichizō Hokkegenron wo megutte,” 〈天台と三論の交流--灌頂の《法華玄義》修治と吉蔵《法華玄論》をめぐって〉, Kamata Shigeo hakushi kanreki kinen ronshū – Chūgoku no Bukkō to bunka《鎌田茂雄博士還暦記念論集》, （Kyōtō: Daizō shuppansha大蔵出版社）.
    14. Frauwallner, Erich. 1995. Studies in Abhidharma Literature and the Origins of Buddhist Philosophical Systems, trans. Sophie Francis Kidd, (Albany, New York: State University of New York Press), pp. 185-208. (call #: 294.3824 F845).
    15. Garfield, Jay L. 1995. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. (New York: Oxford University Press.)
    16. Gimello, Robert M. 1976 “Zhìyǎn智儼 (602-668) and the Foundations of Huáyán Buddhism.” (Columbia University Diss.).
    17. Harris, Ian Charles. 1991. The Continuity of Madhyamaka and Yogācāra in Indian Mahāyāna Buddhism. (New York: E.J. Brill).
    18. HIRAKAWA Akira平川彰. 1974. “Genshi Bukkyō Abidaruma ni okeru jikanron”〈原始仏教．アビダルムにおける時間論〉, Kōza Bukkyō shisō – Sonzairon．Jikanron《講座仏教思想．「存在論．時間論」》, Vol. 1, （Tōkyō 東京：Risō-sha理想社）, pp. 181-269.
    19. HIRAKAWA Akira平川彰. 1991. “Bukkyō no jikanron.”〈仏教の時間論〉, Genshi Bukkyō to Abidaruma Bukkyō《原始仏教とアビダルム仏教》,（Tōkyō: Shunjūsha春秋社）,pp. 409-437.
    20. Husserl, Edmund, On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time, trans. John Barnett Brough, (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991).
    21. ITŌ Takatoshi伊藤隆寿. 1988. “Sōjō to Kichizō – Chūgoku ni okeru Chūkan shisō juyō no yichimen”〈僧肇と吉蔵－中国における中観思想受容の一面〉, Kamata Shigeo hakushi kanreki kinen ronshū – Chūgoku no Bukkō to bunka, 《鎌田茂雄博士還暦記念論集―中国の仏教と文化》,（Tōkyō：Daizō shuppansha大蔵出版社）, pp. 119-140.
    22. ITŌ Takatoshi伊藤隆寿. 1994. “Sanronkyō no konpon kōzō – ri to kyō”〈三論教学の根本構造―理と教〉, Chūgoku Bukkyō no hihanteki kenkyū 《中国仏教の批判的研究》,（Tōkyō：Daizō shuppansha大蔵出版社）, pp. 301-333.
    23. JIǍN Kǎitíng簡凱廷. 2010. “Jízàng jiějīng de jīběn lìchǎng jí qí zhǔyào fāngfǎ”〈吉藏解經的基本立場及其主要方法〉, Taiwan University Buddhist Studies Journal《臺北佛學研究》, Vol. 7 (June), (Taipei 臺北: Taiwan National University Research Center for Buddhist Studies臺灣大學文學院佛學研究中心）, pp. 119-178.
    24. LǏ Yǒng 李勇. 1999. Sānlùnzōng Fóxué sīxiǎng yánjiū《三論宗佛學思想研究》, (Gāoxióng高雄: Fóguāngshān wénjiào jījīnhuì佛光山文教基金會）.
    25. LIÀO Mínghuó 廖明活. 1985. Jiāxiáng Jízàng xuéshuō《嘉祥吉藏學說》,（Táiběi: Táiwān xuéshēng shūjú 臺灣學生書局）.
    26. Hans-Rudolf Kantor康特. 2008. “Zhōngguánxué de shíjiānguān – yì Zhōnglùn yú Zhàolùn wéizhǔ”〈中觀學的時間觀 – 以《中觀》與《肇論》爲主〉, Zhèngguān zázhì《正觀雜誌》, Vol. 46, pp. 40-79.
    27. Hans-Rudolf Kantor康特. 2008. “Xūjiǎ dāngniàn zhī shíjiān gòuzào – yǐ Tiāntái-zōng jí Huáyán-zōng wéi zhǔ”〈虛假當念之時間構造 -- 以天臺宗及華嚴宗為主〉, National Taiwan University Journal of Buddhist Studies《臺大佛學研究》, Vol. 16 (December), (Taipei臺北: Taiwan National University Liberal Arts Institute Buddhist Studies Center臺灣大學文學院佛學研究中心) , pp. 171-288.
    28. Hans-Rudolf Kantor. 2010. ``‘Right Words are Like the Reverse`—The Daoist Rhetoric and the Linguistic Strategy in Early Chinese Buddhism`, Asian Philosophy, 20.3 (2010).
    29. HARA Yutaka原裕. 1974. “Ryūju ni okeru jikanron no ikkōsatsu”〈竜樹における時間論の一考察〉, Indogaku Bukkyōgaku kenkyū《印度学仏教学研究》, Vol. 23.1 (Dec.), pp. 158-9.
    30. HIRAI Shunei平井俊榮. 1979. “Sankyōgiso to Kichizo-so”〈《三経義疏〉と吉蔵疏》, Indogaku Bukkyōgaku kenkyū《印度学仏教学研究》, Vol 27.2 (March),（Tōkyō: Nihon Indogaku Bukkyōgaku gakkai,日本印度学仏教学会） pp. 22-28.
    31. HIRAI Shunei平井俊榮. 1976. Chūgoku Hannya shisō-shi kenkyū《中国般若思想史研究》,（Tōkyō: Shunjū-sha春秋社）.
    32. HIRAI Shunei平井俊榮. 1965. “Sanron kyōgaku seiritsu-shi no sho mondai -- Nansei Chirin Chūron-so ni tsuite”〈三論教学成立史上の諸問題 –南斉・智琳《中論疏》について 〉, Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism of the Komazawa University [Komazawa Daigaku Bukkyō Gakkai nenhō]《駒沢大学仏教学会年報》(23.3), pp. 143-161.
    33. HIRAI Shunei平井俊栄. 1967. “Chūgoku sanron-shū no rekishiteki seikaku” 〈中国三論宗の歴史的性格〉, Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism of the Komazawa University [Komazawa Daigaku Bukkyō Gakkai nenhō]《駒沢大学仏教学会年報》(25.3), pp. 78-102.
    34. HIRAI Shunei, ed.平井俊榮. 1990. Sanron-shū kyōgaku no kenkyū《三論宗教学の研究》, (Tōkyō: Shunjū-sha春秋社).
    35. Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Trans. John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson, (New York: Blackwell).
    36. Heidegger, Martin. 1978. The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, trans. Heim, Michael, (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
    37. Husserl, Edmund. 1991. On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time, trans. John Barnett Brough, (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
    38. Hurvitz, Leon. 1955. “Book Review: Early Mādhyamika in India and China,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 90, No. 2 (Apr. – Jun. 1970), pp. 384-389.
    39. JIĀNG Cànténg江燦騰. 1990. Wǎnmíng Fójiào cōnglín gǎigé yú Fóxué zhēngbiàn zhī yánjiū – yǐ Hānshān Déqīng de géshēngyá wěi zhōngxīn《晚明佛教叢林改革與佛學爭辯之研究 – 以憨山德清的革生涯為中心》, (Táipěi: Xīnwénfēng chūbǎnshè 新文豐出版社).
    40. JUNJIRŌ Takakusu. 1978. The Essentials of Buddhist Philosophy, (Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press).
    41. Liebenthal, Walter, “Chinese Buddhism During the 4th and 5th Centuries,” Monumenta Nipponica, Vol. 11, No. 1 (1955), pp. 44-83.
    42. Lai, Whalen. 1980 “Further Developments of the Two Truths Theory in China: The ‘Ch’eng-shih-lun’ Tradition and Chou Yong’s San-tsung-lun,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. 30., No. 2 (Apr., 1980), pp. 139-141.
    43. Lai, Whalen. 1977. “Chinese Buddhist Causation Theories: An Analysis of the Sinitic Mahāyāna Understanding of Pratitya-samutpāda,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Jul. 1977), pp. 241-264.
    44. Lai, Whalen. 1983. “The Early Prajñā Schools, Especially ‘Hsin-Wu,’ Reconsidered,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. 33, No. 1 (Jan., 1983), pp. 61-77
    45. Lai, Whalen. 1987. “Tao-sheng’s Theory of Sudden Enlightenment Re-examined,” in Sudden and Gradual: Approaches to Enlightenment in Chinese Thought, (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press), pp. 169-200.
    46. LǏ Sìlóng 李四龍. 2003. Tiāntái Zhìzhě yánjiū: jiānlùn zōngpài Fójiào de xīngqǐ《天台智者研究：兼論宗派佛教的興起》,（Běijīng 北京: Běijīng shèhuì kēxué lǐlùn zhùzhuò chūbǎnjījīn zīzhù 北京市社會科學理論著作出版基金資助).
    47. Lusthaus, Dan. 2002. Buddhist Phenomenology: A Philosophical Investigation of Yogācāra Buddhism and the Ch’eng Wei-shih lun, (New York: Routledge Curzon).
    48. KAMATA Shigeo. 1968. “Shotō ni okeru sanron-shū to Dōkyō”〈初唐における三論宗と道教〉, Tōyō Bunka Kenkyūsho kiyō 《東洋文化研究所紀要》 (46), pp. 49-108.
    49. KAMATA Shigeo鎌田茂雄. 1968. “Sanron- shū Gozu- shū Dōkyō o musubu shisōteki keifū – zokumuku jōbutsu wo tegakari to tsuite”〈三論宗‧牛頭宗‧道教を結ぶ思想的系譜―草木成仏を手がかりとして〉, Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism of the Komazawa University [Komazawa Daigaku Bukkyō Gakkai nenhō]《駒沢大学仏教学会年報》26.3, pp. 79-89.
    50. KOGA Hidehiko古賀英彦. 1968. “Ūbu no taiyō-ron to Samusukāra no gainen” 〈有部の体用論と行の概〉, Indogaku Bukkyōgaku kenkyū《印度学仏教学研究》, Vol. 22.2, (Tōkyō: Nihon Indogaku Bukkyōgaku gakkai日本印度学仏教学学会), pp. 130-131.
    51. KǑNG Wéiqǐn孔維勤. 1980. Zhēnkōng Miàoyǒu《真空妙有》,（Taipei: Xīnwénfēng chūbǎn gōngsī 新文豐出版公司）.
    52. Koseki, Aaron K. 1981. “The Concept of Practice in San-lun Thought: Chi-Tsang and the ‘Concurrent Insight’ of the Two Truths,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Oct.), pp. 449-466.
    53. Jaini, Padmanabh S. 2010. Collected Papers on Buddhist Studies. (New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass).
    54. Lai, Whalen. 1982. “Sinitic Speculations on the Buddha-Nature: The Nirvāṇa School (420 -589), Philosophy East and West, Vol. 32, No. 2 (April 1982), pp. 135-149.
    55. Lai, Whalen. 1983. “The Early Prajñā Schools, Especially ‘Hsin-Wu,’ Reconsidered,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. 33, No. 1 (Jan.), pp. 61-77.
    56. Lai, Whalen W. 1983. “Once More on the Two Truths: What Does Chi-tsang Mean by the Two Truths as `Yüeh-chiao`?” Religious Studies, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Dec.), pp. 505-521.
    57. Liu Ming-Wood廖明活. 1994. Madhyamaka Thought in China, (New York: Brill).
    58. Liu Ming-Wood廖明活. 1988. ”The Lotus Sūtra and Garland Sūtra According to the T`ien-t`ai and Hua-yen Schools in Chinese Buddhism,”T`oung Pao, Second Series, Vol. 74, pp. 47-80.
    59. LǙ Chéng呂澂. 1982. Zhōngguó Fóxué sīxiǎng gàilùn《中國佛學思想概論》(Táipěi: Tiānhuá chūbǎn shìyè gǔfèn yǒuxiàn gōngsī天華出版事業股份有限公司).
    60. McDermott, Charlene A. 1974. “The Sautrāntika Arguments against the Traikālyavāda in the Light of the Contemporary Tense Revolution,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. 24, No. 2, (Apr.), pp. 193-200.
    61. MATSUMOTO Shirō松本史朗. 1990. “Sanron kyōgaku no hihanteki kōsatsu -- dhātu-vāda toshite kichizō no shisō”〈三論教学の批判的考察--dhātu-vādaとしての吉蔵の思想〉, in Hirai Shunei平井俊榮, ed., Sanron kyōgaku no kenkyū《三論宗教学の研究》,（Tōkyō: Shunjū-sha春秋社）, pp. 193-222.
    62. MATSUMOTO Shirō松本史朗. 1994. Zenshisō no hihanteki kenkyū《禅思想の批判的研究》, (Tōkyō: Daizō shuppansha大蔵出版社).
    63. MIZUNO Kōgen水野宏元. 1930. “Hiyūshi to Jōjitsu-ron”〈譬喩師と成實論〉, Komazawa Daigaku Bukkyō Gakkai nenhō《駒沢大学仏教学会年報》, vol. 1, pp. 134-156.
    64. Monteiro Joaquim. 1999. “Jōjitsu-ron shi no shisō ni tsuite – Kaizenji Chizō no shiō wo chūshin ni”〈成実論師の思想について--開善寺智蔵の思想を中心に〉, Annual of Studies of Buddhism, Graduate School of Komazawa University《駒沢大学大学院仏教学研究会》, 32.7, pp. 67-81.
    65. MÓU Zōngsān牟三宗. 1984. Fóxìng yú Bōrě《佛性與般若》, (Táipěi: Táiwān xuéshēng shūjú臺灣學生書局).
    66. Murti, T.R.V. 2008. The Central Philosophy of Buddhism: A Study of the Mādhyamika System. (London: George Allen and Unwin).
    67. QIŪ Mǐnjié 邱敏捷. 2003. Zhàolùn yánjiū de fūyǎn yú fāzhǎn《肇論研究的衍進與開展》,（Kāoxióng高雄: Fùwén chūbǎnshè 復文出版社）.
    68. SATŌ Seijun佐藤成順. 1985. “Kichizō ni okeru Butten kaishaku-hō no tokushitsu,”〈吉蔵における仏典解釈法の特質〉, Chūgoku Bukkyō shisō-shi no kenkyū《中国仏教思想史の研究》, (Tōkyō：Sanki-bō bussho-rin山喜房佛書林), pp. 83-114.
    69. Robinson, Richard. 1958. “Mysticism and Logic in Seng-Chao’s Thought,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. 8, No.3/4 (Oct.), pp. 99-120.
    70. Robinson, Richard. 1978. Early Mādhyamika in India and China. (New York: Samuel Weiser).
    71. SASAKI Genjun佐々木現順. 1969. Abidatsuma Junshōri-ron‧sanzei jitsuyū-ron《阿毘達摩順正理論‧「三世実有論」》, (Tōkyō: Higashi-hongan-ji shuppansha東本願寺出版社).
    72. SHÌ Zhìrú 釋如戒. 2001.“Jízǎng sāndìshuō chūtàn – yǐ Zhōngguānlùn-shū duì Guānsìdìpǐn dìshísān jìsòngshì wéizhù”〈吉藏三諦說初探－以《中觀論疏》對〈觀四諦品〉第十八偈頌解釋為主〉, Chung-Hwa Buddhist Studies Journal《中華佛學研究》，5 (March）, pp. 291-342.
    73. Sinha, Braj M. 1983. Time and Temporality in Sāṃkhya-Yoga and Abhidharma Buddhism, (New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharhal Publishing).
    74. TĀNG Yījiè 湯一介. 2007. ‘Guìwú zhī xué’〈貴無之學〉, Hàn Jìn xuánxué lùngǎo《魏晉玄學論稿》,（Shànghǎi上海: Shànghǎi gǔjí chūbǎnshè 上海古籍出版社）, pp. 154-172.
    75. TSUKAMOTO Zenryū 塚本善隆, ed. 1955. Jōron Kenkyū《肇論研究》，（Tōkyō京都：Hōzōkan 法藏館）.
    76. RÈN Jìyù 任繼愈. 1963. Hàn-Táng Fójiào sīxiǎng lùnjí《漢唐佛教思想論集》, （Beijing: Rénmín chūbǎnshè 人民出版社）.
    77. RÈN Jìyù任繼愈. 1988. Zhōngguó zhéxué fāzhǎnshǐ《中國哲學發展史》, (Běijīng: Rénmín chūbǎnshè人民出版社）.
    78. Robinson, Richard. 1976. Early Mādhyamika in India and China, (Delhi, India: Samuel Weiser).
    79. SASAKI Genjun. 1974. Bukkyō ni okeru jikanron no kenkyū《仏教における時間論の研究》, (Tōkyō: Shimizukōbundō清水弘文堂)
    80. SATAMI Taion 里見泰穏. 1965. “Kichizō no Hokkekyō kaishaku – Kichizō no Hōun hihan wo chūshin shite”〈吉蔵の法華経解釈 -- 吉蔵の法雲批判を中心として〉, “Hokkekyō no shisō to bunka”《法華経の思想と文化》, ed. Yukio Sakamoto坂本幸男,（Kyōtō: Heirakuji shoten平楽寺書店）.
    81. SATŌ Seijun佐藤成順. 1985. “Kichizō ni okeru Butten Kaishaku-hō no tokushitsu”〈吉蔵における仏典解釈法の特質〉, Chūgoku bukkyōshi no kenkyū《中国仏教思想史の研究》, (Tōkyō 東京: Sankibō shorin山喜房書林）, pp. 83-172.
    82. Sharf, Robert. 2002. Coming to Terms with Chinese Buddhism –A Reading of the Treasure Store Treatise, (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press).
    83. Sinha, Braj M. 1983.Time and Temporality in Sāṃkhya-Yoga and Abhidharma Buddhism, (New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharhal Publishing, 1983).
    84. Swanson, Paul L. 1989. Foundations of T’ien-T’ai Philosophy: The Flowering of the Two Truths Theory in Chinese Buddhism. (New York: Asian Humanities Press).
    85. TĀNG Yījiè湯一介. 2006. “Wèijìn xuánxué yú Fójiào”〈魏晉玄學與佛教〉, Wèi Jìn xuánxué lùn jiǎngyì《魏晉玄學論講義》, (Xiàmén廈門: Jǐngjiāng chūbǎnshè 鷺江出版社), pp. 244-286.
    86. TĀNG Yòngtōng湯用彤. 1989. Suí-Táng Fójiào shǐgǎo《隋唐佛教史稿》(Taipei:Mùduǒchūbǎnshè 木鐸出版社).
    87. TĀNG Yòngtōng湯用彤. 1991. Hànwèi liǎng Jìn nánběicháo Fójiào shì《漢魏兩晉南北朝佛教史》, (Táipěi : Táiwān Shāngwù chūbǎnshè臺灣商務出版社).
    88. TĀNG Yòngtōng湯用彤. 1999. Tāng Yòngtōng quánjí《湯用彤全集》. Ed. Tāng Yījiè湯一介. (Shíjiāzhuāng: Héběi rénmín河北人民)
    89. Von Rospatt, Alexander. 1995. The Buddhist Doctrine of Momentariness, (Hamburg: Franz Steiner Verlag Stuttgart).
    90. Westerhoff, Jan. 2009. Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka: a Philosophical Introduction. (New York: Oxford University Press).
    91. Westerhoff, Jan. 2010. The Dispeller of Disputes: Nāgārjuna’s Vigrahavyāvartanī. (New York: Oxford University Press).
    92. WǓ Jiéchāo 吳傑超. 1983. “Xiǎoshèng Fójiào de shíkōng lǐlùn”〈小乘佛教的時空理論〉, Táng Jūnyì Xiānshēng jìniàn wénjí《唐君毅先生紀念論文集》,（Táipěi: Táiwān xuéshēng shūjú 台灣學生書居）, pp. 655-683.
    93. XIŌNG Shílì 熊十力. 1988. Míngxīn-piān《明心篇》,（Táipěi 臺北: Táiwān xuéshēng shūjú 臺灣學生書局）.
    94. YONEMORI Shunsuke米森俊輔. 2003. “Shikan Sōsen no kenkyū”〈止観寺僧詮の研究〉, Bukkyō gaku kenkyū《佛教學研究》,（Kyōtō: Ryūkoku daigaku Bukkyō gakkai 龍谷大學佛教學會），Vol. 60/61 (05）, pp. 44-73.
    95. Master Yìnshùn印順法師. 1992. Zhōngguān jīnlùn《中觀今論》, (Táipěi: Zhèngwén chūbǎnshè正聞出版社).
    96. Master Yìnshùn印順法師. 1998. Zhōngguān lùnsòng jiǎngjì《中觀論頌講記》, (Táipěi: Zhèngwén chūbǎnshè 正聞出版社).
    97. Master Yìnshùn 印順法師. Shuōyí1qièyǒubù wéizhǔ de lùnshū yú lùnshī zhī yánjiū《說一切有部為主的論書與論師之研究》, (Táipěi: Zhōnghuá shūjú 中華書局).
    98. ZHĀNG Chūnbō張春波. 2010. Zhàolùn jiàoshì《肇論校釋》(Běijīng: Zhōnghuá shūjú)
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    宗教研究所
    98156014
    99
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098156014
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[宗教研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    601401.pdf2838KbAdobe PDF22936檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋