政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51232
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51158078      線上人數 : 930
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51232


    題名: 團隊創新階段能耐因素之比較研究
    The research of teamwork competencies in team innovation process
    作者: 高長瑞
    Kao, Chung Rui
    貢獻者: 徐聯恩
    Hsu, Michael L. A.
    高長瑞
    Kao, Chung Rui
    關鍵詞: 團隊創新
    團隊歷程
    團隊能耐
    Team innovation
    Team process
    Teamwork competence
    日期: 2010
    上傳時間: 2011-10-05 14:34:06 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 團隊已經是普遍存在於組織中的一種工作型式，探討團隊效能的歷程研究還相當不足，了解也不夠。此外，就組織創新理論，團隊創新是其中之關鍵，要如何增加團隊創新效能也是重要研究議題，團隊創新是團隊各種效能表現中的一種。本文便是以團隊創新來研究團隊歷程。
    團隊效能文獻主要以團隊I-P-O為主要模型，團隊效能是團隊投入因素透過團隊歷程活動後的產出。團隊歷程是影響團隊效能之主要因素，但是過去對團隊歷程研究卻較限制於橫切面研究，多未能探討團隊歷程之變動性。經由文獻探討，發現團隊合作能耐研究可以幫助了解團隊歷程。所謂的團隊合作能耐是指團隊合作的知識、技巧、能力、和其他特徵(KSAOs)，近期研究者如Ilgen et al.將團隊歷程三分為IM-Forming階段、MO-Functioning階段、OI-結束與下階段的循環，並歸納在不同歷程階段，有不同的主要團隊合作能耐因素，讓團隊歷程更清楚，但是Ilgen et al等研究者並未回答團隊創新歷程。因此，本研究是根據團隊效能、團隊創新文獻為基礎，將團隊創新二分為團隊創意和思考、團隊創新實現二個階段，並探討團隊合作能耐重要性在這二個歷程階段的變化比較。
    研究結果得到，(1) 資訊交流和分享是被認為最重要的團隊合作能耐，團隊信心的重要性則最低；(2) 團隊合作能耐重要性的確在不同團隊創新階段會有不同；(3) 團隊信心、資訊交流和分享、團隊默契在團隊創意階段變得比較重要，團隊凝聚力、團隊學習和適應、團隊規範和共識則是在團隊創新階段變得比較重要。
    參考文獻: 邱皓政，2000，組織創新環境的概念建構與測量工具發展。國科會整合型計劃「創新與創造力-技術創造力的涵義與開發」研討會論文集(2000)。
    紀乃文，2008，團隊情感氛圍形成的前因、情境調節及個人層次後果變項之研究，台北，國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    莊立民，2002，組織創新模式建構與實證之研究---以台灣資訊電子業為立，台南，國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    鄧聚龍，2000，灰色系統理論與應用，台北︰高立圖書有限公司。
    鄭伯壎，2005，華人組織行為研究的方向與策略：由西化到本土化。本土心理學研究，24期。
    王思峰、黃家齊、鄭俐敏，2002，團隊知識轉換與知識創造的實驗研究: 知識螺旋理論的驗證。管理與系統，9(1)：29-60。
    黃敏萍，2000，跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能—任務特性與社會系絡之影響，台北：國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
    黃敏萍、鄭伯壎，和王建忠，2003。轉型領導、團隊內互動、及團隊與成員效能：IPO模式之驗證。管理學報，20(3)：397-427。
    Amabile, T. M., 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations, Research in organizational behavior, 10(1): 123-167.
    Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M., 1996. Assessing the working environment for Creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1154-1184.
    Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F., Beyond Task and Maintenance: Defining External Functions in Groups, Group & Organization Studies, 13(4), 468-494.
    Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F., 1992a. Bridging the boundary: External activity & performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4): 634-665.
    Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F., 1992b. Demography &design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3): 321-341.
    Andrew, K.R. (1971), The Concept of Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. IL: Irwin Homewood.
    Austin, J. R., 2003. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 866-878.
    Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Through and Action : A social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall(1986).
    Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K., 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings and future direction. Academy of Management Review, 20:343-378.
    Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C., 1993. Relations between work group characteristics & effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46: 823-825.
    Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., Medsker, G. J., 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension. Personnel Psychology. 49: 429-452.
    Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, eds. 1998. Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C.E., 1995. Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 333–380.
    Carron, A.V., 1982. Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123–138.
    Cartwright, D. and A. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics, (3rd Ed.), Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL, 1968.
    Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E., 1997. What makes teams work? Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.
    DiMasi J. A., Hansen, R. W. & Grabowski, H. G., 2003. The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 151–185
    Drucker, P. F., 1985, Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles
    Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282.
    Festinger,L.,Schachter,S.,Back,K.W.,1950.Social Pressures in Informal Groups:A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Harper,NewYork.
    Gladstein, D. L., 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.
    Goodwin, G. F., Burke, C. S., Wildman, J. L. y Salas, E., 2008. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: An overview. En E. Salas, G.F. Goodwin y C.S. Burke (Eds.), Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches, New York: Psychology Press, 3-16.
    Gregorich, S. E., Helmreich, R. L., & Wilhelm, J. A., 1990. The structure of cockpit management attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 682-690.
    Guzzo, R.A. & Dickson, M.W., 1996. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance & effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 307-338.
    Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P., 1992. Group performance & Intergroup relations in organizations. In Handbook of Industrial &Organizational Psychology, ed. Dunnette, M. D., & Hough, L. M., 3:269–313. Palo Alto, CA: Consult Psychology Press.
    Hackman, J. R., 1990, Groups That Work (And Those That Do not): Creating Conditions for EVective Teamwork, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Hackman, J. R., 1987. The design of work team. In J. W. Lorsh (Ed.) Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Hareli, S., & Rafaeli, A., 2008. Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35-59.
    Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., Jundt, D., 2005. TEAMS IN ORGANIZATIONS: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56:517-543.
    Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there?: The implications of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14 (4), 29-64.
    Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., Neale, M. A., 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741-763
    Jelinek, M. & Wilson, J. 2005. Macro Influences on Multicultural Teams. In: Shapiro, D.L., von Glionow, M.A. & Cheng, J.L.C (editors), Managing Multinational Teams: Global Perspectives, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier: 209-231.
    Jelinek, M. & Wilson, J. 2005. Macro Influences on Multicultural Teams. In: Shapiro, D.L., von Glionow, M.A. & Cheng, J.L.C (editors), Managing Multinational Teams: Global Perspectives, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier: 209-231.
    Jung, D. I., Sosik, J. J., 1999. Effects of group characteristics on work group performance: a longitudinal investigation. Group Dynamics. 3: 279-290.
    Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K., 1995. The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, March-April: 111-120.
    Keller, R.T., 2001. Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44:547-555.
    Kirton, M. J., 1989. A theory of cognitive style. In M. J. Kirton (Ed.). Adaptors and innovators. Styles of creativity and problem-solving, London: Routledge, 1-36.
    Kleinman, D. L. and Serfaty, D., 1989, Team performance assessment in distributed decisionmaking, Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive Networked Simulation for Training , Orlando, 22-27.
    Knight, D., Durham, C., & Locke, E. 2001. The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 320-338.
    Kozlowski, S. W. J., 1998. Training and developing adaptive teams: theory, principles, and research. See Cannon-Bowers & Salas 1998, pp. 115–153.
    Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., Smith, E. M., 1999. Developing adaptive teams: a theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In The Changing Nature of Performance, ed. DR Ilgen, ED Pulakos, pp. 240–92. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
    Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Klein, K. J., 2000.  A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes.  In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90).
    Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R., 2006. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.  Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3): 77-124.
    Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S., 1998. The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation, California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132.
    Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A., 2002, The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups, Academy of Management, 45(2), 352-368.
    Lipnack, J. & Stamps, J., 1997. Virtual teams. In: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    Little, B., & Madigan, R., 1997. The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams. Small Group Research, 28, 517-534.
    Lynn, G.S. & Akgun, A.E., 1998. Innovation Strategies Under uncertainty: A Contingency Approach for New Product Development, Engineering management Journal, 10(3), 11-17.
    Mansfield, E., 1991. Academic research and industrial innovation, Research Policy, 20, 1-12.
    Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., &Zaccaro, S. J., 2001. A temporally based framework & taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26:356-765.
    Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process & performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2): 273-283.
    McGrath, J.E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
    McGrath, J. E., 1984. Groups: Interaction &performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Moreland, R. L., 1996. Lewin’s legacy for small groups research, Systems Practice, 9, 7–26.
    Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration, Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210–227.
    Nieva, V.F., Fleishman, E.A., & Reick, A., 1978. Team dimensions: Their identity, their measurement, and their relationships. Washington, DC: ARRO.
    Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
    Paris, C. R., Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000. Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1052–1075.
    Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel G., 1990, The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, May-June: 79-91.
    Prussia, G.E., & Kinicki, A.J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187–198.
    Ruffell-Smith, H. P., 1979, A Simulator Study of the Interaction of Pilot Workload with Errors. NASA technical report no. TM-78482 (MoVett Field: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Centre).
    Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000, The anatomy of team training, in L. Tobias and D. Fletcher (eds), Handbook on Research in Training (New York: Macmillan).
    Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I., 1992. Toward an understanding of team performance & training. In R. W. Swezy & E. Salas (Eds.), Team: Their training & performance, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, Goodwin GF., 2008. The wisdom of collective in organizations: An Update of the Teamwork Competencies. In: Salas E, Goodwin GF, Burke CS, editors. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches.
    Salk, J. E., and Arya, B. 2005. Social performance learning in Multinational Corporations: Multicultural Teams, their Social Capital and Use of Cross-Sector Alliances, Advances in International Management, 18, 189-207.
    Scott, S.,&Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior:Apath model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
    Selznick, P., 1957, Leadership in administration
    Tuckman, 1965. Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6): 384 -399.
    Walter, F. and Bruch, H., 2008. The positive group affect spiral: a dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 239-261.
    Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Weick, K. E. ,Roberts, K. H., 1993. Collective mind in organizations : heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38,357–381.
    West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355 – 387.
    West, M.A., 2002. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51:355-386.
    West, M. A. and Farr, J. L., 1990. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    管理碩士學程(AMBA)
    94362007
    99
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094362007
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[管理碩士學程/商管專業學院碩士學位學程 AMBA] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    200702.pdf785KbAdobe PDF24856檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋