政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51192
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50826852      線上人數 : 730
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51192


    題名: 旅行社、領隊與團體套裝旅遊之消費者間三方交換關係之探討
    The study of exchange relationship among travel agent,tour leader&group package tour`s consumer
    作者: 凃明哲
    Tu, Ming Che
    貢獻者: 邱志聖
    Chiou, Jyh Shen
    凃明哲
    Tu, Ming Che
    關鍵詞: 旅行社
    領隊
    4C交換成本
    交易成本理論
    團體套裝旅遊
    領隊管理模式
    travel agent
    tour leader
    4C Exchange Cost
    Transaction Cost Theory
    Group Package Tour
    tour leader’s management model
    日期: 2010
    上傳時間: 2011-10-05 14:29:49 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 旅遊業為我國未來產業發展的重點之一,再加上團體套裝旅遊一直是亞洲國家中最普遍及最受觀迎的旅遊型態之一,我國2009年的團體套裝旅遊比例即佔了35.6%。其中,領隊人員可以說是團體套裝旅遊的重要元素,不僅影響著該次旅遊品質的好壞,領隊也可藉由專業的服務取得旅客的信任,而獲得後續帶團的機會;是以,由於我國過去旅行社設立門檻不高,加上領隊掌握一定旅客數,不少領隊帶槍投靠或自立門戶,造成旅行業良莠不齊、競爭激烈。

    因此,本研究欲探討現行旅行社對於領隊的管理模式,運用交易成本理論及4C交換成本理論架構,剖析旅行社、領隊與團體旅遊消費者間三方交換之關係,並對於旅行社提出適當的領隊管理建議,期盼能對於旅行產業的市場紊亂情形有所助益。而由於本研究議題過去缺乏學術研究成果且未被有系統的討論,故採用質性研究及深度訪談做為本論文的研究方法。

    研究結果得知,透過訪談資料的整理與分析,歸納出兩種現行的領隊管理模式。管理模式1:旅行社著重於處理與消費者間的4C關係,並設法阻礙領隊與消費者間4C關係的建立,使消費者購買團體旅遊產品是出自於旅行社本身,而非領隊;管理模式2:旅行社與領隊共生共榮,在旅行社與消費者的交換關係方面,旅行社著重於產品的外顯單位效益成本;而在旅行社與領隊的交換關係方面,旅行社運用4C的處理得宜,維繫優秀的領隊,鞏固銷售。

    本研究以4C交換成本理論,歸納出兩種領隊管理模式,建議後續研究者可針對旅行社背景,探討何種領隊管理模式對其最有利;另外,針對國內網路時代的盛行,有業者引進國外居家旅遊商業模式H.B.T.A.(Home Based Travel Agents),類似於本研究所提出的管理模式2,後續研究者也可針對此議題進行深入探討。
    Travel industry will be one of the most promising industries in Taiwan; in addition, Group Package Tour is one of the most popular traveling types in Asian countries. In 2009, the percent of Group Package Tour in Taiwan is highly 35.6%. Especially, Tour leader (or tour escort) is the critical element of Group Package Tour.He (or she) can not only influence on the quality of travel, but also can get customers’ trust and the chances of business by professional service. Therefore, because of the low entry barrier of Travel industry and tour leader holding up some customers, lots of tour leaders job-hop or build up their own business. It makes travel industry highly competitive.

    For this reason, this study wants to use the Transaction Cost Theory and 4C Exchange Cost Theory to discuss current tour leader’s management model, and analyze the exchange relationship among travel agent, tour leader and Group Package Tour customer. Finally, this study wants to propose management recommendations for travel agents. However, this topic was less discussed in the past, so that this study uses qualitative research and in-depth interview as the research method.

    According to the research result, this study generalizes two kinds of tour leader’s management model. Model 1: Travel agents focus on the 4C relationship with consumers, and manage to hinder the 4C relationship between tour leader and consumer; Model 2: Travel agents cooperate with tour leader. Between travel agent and consumer, travel agents focus on C1. Between travel agent and tour leader, travel agents focus on the 4C relationship for holding up excellent tour leaders.

    For future research, this study suggests to discuss what travel agent background can benefit from two kinds of tour leader’s management model, or discuss H.B.T.A. (Home Based Travel Agents) deeply.
    參考文獻: 英文部分
    Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York:The Free Press.
    Barney, J. B., & Ouchi, W. G. (1986). Organizational Economics. Jossey Bass,San Francsico, 424-445.
    Bastakis, C., Buhalis, D., & Butler, R. (2004). The perception of small and medium sized tourism accommodation providers on the impacts of the tour operators’ power in Eastern Mediterranean. Tourism Management, 25(1), 151-170.
    Beritellia, P. (2011). Cooperation among prominent actors in a tourist destination Annals of Tourism Research, 38(2), 607-629
    Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
    Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(4), 386-405.
    Cohen, E. (1985). The tourist guide the origins, structure and dynamics of a role. Annals of Tourism Research, 12(1), 5-29.
    Cooper, D. R., & Emory, W. (1995). Business Research Methods Irwin.
    Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (3 ed.): SAGE Publications.
    Dimou, I., Archer, S., & Chen, J. (2003). Corporate development of international hotel firms: a transaction cost economics and agency theory approach. International Journal of Tourism Research 5(2), 147-149.
    Duke, C. R., & Persia, M. A. (1996). Performance-Importance Analysis of Escorted Tour Evaluations. Recent Advances in Tourism Marketing Researchroup, 5(3), 207-223.
    Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods London: Continuum.
    Irene, C. L. (2007). Establishing a service channel: a transaction cost analysis of a channel contract between a cruise line and a tour operator. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(1), 4-14.
    Jonas, L. (2005). Families Seen Sightseeing. Space and Culture, 8(4), 416-434.
    Kahn, R. L., & Cannell, C. F. (1983). The dynamics of interviewing: Theory, technique, and cases: Krieger Pub. Co. .
    Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process. Journal of Law and Economics(21), 297-326.
    Kotler, P. (1972). A Generic Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 36, 46-54.
    Liu, Y. A., Chen, R. F., Chen, H. B., & Wan, C. S. (2007). Customer Relationship Management in the Travel Web Site Journal of Sport and Recreation Research 2(2), 1-25.
    Lumsdon, L. M. (2006). Factors Affecting The Design Of Tourism Bus Services. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(3), 748-766.
    Mancini, M. (2001). Conducting tours (Vol. 3): USA:Delmar Thomson Learning.
    Mossberg, L. L. (1995). Tour leaders and their importance in charter tours. Tourism Management, 16(6), 437-445.
    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2 ed.). US: Sage Publications, Inc. .
    Persia, M. A., & Gitelson, R. J. (1992). The differences among travel agency users in the importance ratings of agency service features. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 1(4), 77-97.
    Quiroga, I. (1990). Characteristics of package tours in Europe. Annals of Tourism Research, 17(2), 185-207.
    Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: social and rational; mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. Garland Pub.New York, 199.
    Turner, J. H. (1986). The Structure of Sociological Theory (4 ed.). Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
    Wang, K. C., Hsieh, A. T., & Chen, W. Y. (2002). Is the tour leader an effective endorser for group package tour brochures? Tourism Management, 23, 489-498.
    Wang, K. C., Hsieh, A. T., & Huan, T. C. (2000). Critical service features in group package tour:An exploratory research. Tourism Management, 21(2), 177-189.
    Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York:The Free Press.
    Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institution of Capitalism:Firms,Market,Relational Contracting. New York:The Free Press.
    Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: the Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative science quarterly(36), 269-296.
    Wong, C. S., & Kwong, W. Y. (2004). Outbound tourists` selecting criteria for choosing all-inclusive package tours. Tourism Management, 25(3), 581-592.
    中文部分
    方博亮、林祖嘉. (2003). 管理經濟學. 臺北: 智勝.
    王國欽. (2006). 銀髮族團體套裝旅遊動機研究. 觀光研究學報, 12(2), 119 -138
    交通部觀光局. (2005). 領隊人員管理規則. 臺北: 交通部觀光局.
    交通部觀光局. (2008). 旅行業從業人員基礎訓練教材.
    何嬿婷. (2010). 領隊人格特質, 團員間互動與旅遊滿意度關係之研究-階層線性模式之運用. 南華大學旅遊事業管理研究所碩士論文.
    吳炳南. (2006). 旅行業者遴選領隊評估因素之研究. 南華大學旅遊事業管理研究所碩士論文.
    林燈燦. (2005). 觀光導遊與領隊 : 理論與實務 (Vol. 六). 台北市: 五南.
    邱志聖. (2010). 策略行銷分析:架構與實務應用 (Vol. 三). 臺北市: 智勝文化.
    凌瓏. (1993). 旅行業策略行銷之研究. 中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文.
    容繼業. (2004). 旅行業理論與實務 (三 ed.). 台北: 揚智文化事業股份有限公司.
    高淑青. (2000). 「現象學方法及其在教育研究上的應用」,質的研究方法. 高雄: 麗文.
    張金明. (2010). 旅行業實務與管理議題(上): 鳳凰旅遊出版社.
    張振煌. (2010). 旅行社對受雇領團人員服務滿意度之研究-以台灣觀光領團人員發展協會為例. 銘傳大學觀光研究所在職專班碩士論文.
    曹勝雄. (2004). GPT服務品質構面與量表之建立:整合旅遊仲介之控制與消費觀點. 文化大學觀光事業學系暨研究所研究計畫.
    連秀芃. (2008). 旅行業領隊人員知識管理之研究. 國立彰化師範大學會計學系企業高階管理碩士論文, 91.
    郭承儒. (2002). 團體旅遊中顧客評估領隊對服務品質影響研究. 中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文.
    陳文河. (1987). 我國旅行業行銷策略之研究. 中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文化大學觀光事業學系暨研究所研究計畫.
    陳正展. (2008). 領隊魅力領導與旅客之追隨者效應關係之研究-以團體套裝旅遊為例. 國立嘉義大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文.
    黃榮鵬. (2003). 電子商務對旅行業經營管理影響之研究. 國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文, 122.
    黃榮鵬. (2010). 領隊實務. 台北: 松根出版社.
    楊正寬. (2003). 觀光行政與法規. 台北: 揚智文化事業股份有限公司.
    楊朋振、李君如. (2007). 關係與社會網絡的建構:以經營海外旅遊旅行業為例 海峽兩岸金廈觀光旅遊交流暨學術研討會
    潘淑滿. (2003). 質性研究-理論與應用: 心理出版社.
    盧筱梅. (2008). 領隊部落格可成為旅行社關係行銷之工具?. 中國文化大學觀光休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文.
    謝永茂. (2003). 旅行社網絡關係運用之研究-以專營出國旅遊之旅行社為例. 靜宜大學觀光事業學系碩士論文.
    韓佩珊. (2006). 服務業顧客關係管理對企業經營績效之影響 ∼ 以旅行業為例. 國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文, 128.
    藍清廉. (2005). 台灣半導體通路商技術支援服務之4C交換成本分析. 政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)之碩士論文.
    旅奇雙週刊第133期 (2010.12.20)
    http://b2b.travelrich.com.tw/subject02/subject02_detail.aspx?Second_classification_id=32&Subject_id=9384
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易研究所
    98351034
    99
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098351034
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    103401.pdf1428KbAdobe PDF22172檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋