政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51186
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51080485      Online Users : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51186


    Title: 台灣與法國消費者生活型態及消費價值觀之比較
    A comparison of lifestyles and consumption values between Taiwanese and French consumers
    Authors: 柯佳慧
    Contributors: 別蓮蒂
    柯佳慧
    Keywords: 生活型態
    消費價值觀
    台法跨文化比較
    Lifestyles
    Consumption Values
    Taiwan and France Bilateral Cross-cultural Study
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2011-10-05 14:29:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 價值觀與生活型態是消費者從事各項消費行為的基礎，透過價值觀及生活型態可以解釋及預測消費者行為，因此對於研究消費者行為是相當重要的基礎主題之一。Rokeach (1973) 認為價值觀是一種持久的信念，這樣的信念使個人或社會對於某些特定的行為模式或是事情的結果產生偏好。Lazer (1963) 將生活型態定義為一種有特性的生活模式，代表某一個群體或社會有別於其他群體之特徵，這些特徵之差異來自於文化、價值觀及資源等綜合影響的結果。過去學者研究消費者的價值觀及生活型態時，多半以單一國家的消費者為主，雖然也有學者比較跨文化的消費者生活型態，但仍以美歐等地之研究居多。因此，本研究藉由交換至法國的機會，於當地進行消費者調查，取得第一手資料，以瞭解當地消費者生活型態及消費價值觀，並與台灣消費者進行跨文化比較。
    本研究採滾雪球法抽樣，深度訪談十三位法國消費者及十九位台灣消費者。訪談內容為消費價值觀及生活型態等主題，包括工作與休閒生活、家庭及朋友關係、消費模式及金錢分配方式，並導出相關命題如：台灣人較法國人之價格敏感度高、台灣人較法國人具有品牌意識、台灣人在消費時較法國人具他人導向、台灣人較法國人具投資理財觀、台灣人較法國人重視工作所帶來的金錢滿足以及台灣人較法國人對婚姻關係有較高的期待等命題。
    此外，本研究並探討消費價值觀如何具體影響消費者的生活型態及消費模式，透過本研究可發現：價格敏感度高的消費者，會隨著折扣或低價而調整其消費頻率；具他人導向的消費者會傾向購買外顯性的名牌產品，也較易受他人影響而產生衝動性消費行為。
    藉由本研究可瞭解兩地消費價值觀及生活型態之差異，廠商進入兩地市場時，可參考本研究結果設計適合當地消費者之行銷策略，以期更貼近消費者需求。
    Values and lifestyles can be the foundation of most kinds of consumptions. Therefore, studying values and lifestyles is of importance for marketers to explain and predict consumers’behavior. According to Rokeach (1973), a value is defined as “an enduring belief that a specific mode of conduct or end-state of existence is personally or socially preferable to an opposite or converse mode of conduct or end-state of existence.”As for lifestyle, it is defined as“a distinctive or characteristic mode of living (Lazer, 1963). Past studies concerning values and lifestyles mostly focused consumers in one country. Even though some studies dealed with cross-cultural comparison, they usually compared two or more markets in American and European. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the lifestyles and consumption values of consumers in Taiwan and France to do a cross-cultural comparison between Taiwanese and French consumers.
    Thirteen French consumers and nineteen Taiwanese consumers were interviewed during this study. The interview questions were regarding to lifestyles and consumption values, such as respondents` work and leisure life, relations with family and friends, consumption patterns and the way to allocate money. Some important propositions are derived based on content analysis: Taiwanese consumers have higher price sensitivity, more brand consciousness, higher other-oriented degree and more saving and investment concept than French consumers. Besides, Taiwanese people place more importance on the salary of work and have higher expectation about marriage than French consumers.
    Furthermore, this study also discusses how consumption values influence consumers` lifestyles and consumption patterns. It reveals that consumers with higher price sensitivity will adjust their consumption patterns according to discount frequencies. Besides, people-oriented consumers tend to choose prestige brands and have more impulsive consumptions under the influence of friends. The findings of this reseach can provide suggestions to marketers in these two markets to develop marketing strategies corresponding with the values and lifestyles of local consumers.
    Reference: 一、 中文部分
    David, Matthew & Carole D. Sutton (民96)，研究方法的基礎 (Social research : the basics) (王若馨、黃郁青、夏媺婷、李怡芳譯)。台北縣永和市：韋伯文化國際。(原作 2004年出版)
    李秀娥 (民88)，祀天祭地—現代祭拜禮俗，台北縣蘆洲市：博揚文化。
    李竺姮 (民97)，「年輕人的消費價值觀」，國立政治大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    林虹妙 (民95)，「兩岸熟年消費者價值觀與生活型態之比較」，國立政治大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    張澤乾 (民88)，法國文明史，台北市：中央圖書出版社。
    鍾韶庭 (民96)，「台灣、德國品牌個性、廣告訴求與消費者價值信念之跨文化比較」，國立政治大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    二、 英文部分
    Ansbacher, Heina L. (1967). “Life Style: A Historical and Systematic Review,” Journal of Individual Psychology, 23 (2), 191-212.
    Chinese Culture Connection (1987). “Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-free Dimensions of Culture.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 18 (2), 143-164.
    Coleman, James C. (1960). Personality Dynamics and Effective Behavior. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, 69.
    Durgee, Jeffrey F., Gina Colarelli O’connor, & Robert W. Veryzer (1996).“Observations: Translating Values into Product Wants,” Journal of Advertising Research, November/December, 90-100.
    Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989). “Building Theories from Case Study Research,”The Academy of Management Review, 532-550.
    Engel, James F., Roger D. Blackwell, & Paul W. Miniard (1995). Consumer Behavior, 9th ed. Orlando: Harcourt, 69-95.
    Hofstede, Geert (1997). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Holbrook, Morris B. (1996). “Customer Value—A Framework for Analysis and Research,” Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 138-142.
    Holbrook, Morris B. (1999). Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research, New York: Rouledge, 9-24.
    Holbrook, Morris B. (2005). “Customer Value and Autoethnography: Subjective Personal Introspection and the Meanings of a Photograph Collection,” Journal of Business Research, 58, 45-61.
    Kahle, Lynn R. (1983). Social Values and Social Change: Adaptation to Life in America, New York.
    Kahle, Lynn R., Sharon E. Beatty, & Pamela Homer (1986). “Alternative Measurement Approaches to Consumer Values: The List of Values (LOV) and Values and Life Style (VALS),” Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 405-409.
    Lai, Albert Wenben (1995). “Consumer Values, Product Benefits and Customer Value: A Consumption Behavior Approach,” Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 381-388.
    Lazer, William. (1963), “Life Style Concepts and Marketing,” in William D. Wells ed., Lifestyle and Psychographics, Chicago: AMA.
    Overby, Jeffrey W., Sarah Rish Gardial, & Robert B. Woodruff (2004). “French Versus American Consumers’ Attachment of Value to a Product in a Common Consumption Contest: A Cross-National Comparison,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (4), 437-460.
    Peter, J. Paul & Jerry C. Olson (2002). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 79-86.
    Plummer, Joseph T. (1974). “The Concept and Application of Life Style Segmentation,” Journal of Marketing, 38, 33-37.
    Rokeach, Milton (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.
    Schoell, William F. & Joseph P. Guiltinan (1995). Marketing: Contemporary Concepts and Practices. Allyn & Bacon.
    Schwartz, Shalom H. (1994). “Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?” Journal of Social Issues, 50 (4), 19-45.
    Sheth, Jagdish N., Bruce I. Newman, & Barbara L. Gross (1991). “Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Value,” Journal of Business Research,
    22, 159-170.
    Sobel, Michael E. (1981). Lifestyle and Social Structure: Concept, Definitions, Analyses. New York: Academic Press Inc.
    Solomon, Michael R. (1996). Consumer Behavior, 3rd Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 588-589.
    Tse, David K., John K. Wong, & Chin Tiong Tan (1988). “Towards Some Standardized Cross-Cultural Consumption Values,” Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 387-395.
    Vinson, Donald E., Jerome E. Scott., & Lawrence M. Lamont (1977). “The Role of Personal Values in Marketing and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 41
    (April), 44-50.
    Weber, Max (1966). “Class, Status and Party.” in Reinhard Bendix and Seymour Martin Lipset (eds.), Class, Status and Power. New York: The Free Press, 21-28.
    Wells, William D. & Douglas J. Tigert (1971). “Activities, Interests and Opinions,”Journal of Advertising Research, 11 (August), 27-35.
    Wolfe, Raymond N., Richard D. Lennox, & Brian L. Cutler (1986). “Getting Along and Getting Ahead: Empirical Support for a Theory of Protective and Acquisitive Self-Presentation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 356-361.
    Woodruff, Robert B. (1997). “Customer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (2), 139-153.
    Young & Rubicam (1988). “Cross Cultural Consumer Characterisation (4Cs).” Y & R Consumer Insight, 3 (3), 1-14.
    Zablocki, Benjamin D. & Rosabeth Moss Kanter (1976). “The Differentiation of Life-styles,” Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 269-298.
    三、網路資料
    法國在台協會—法國外交暨歐洲事務部
    http://www.fi-taipei.org/spip.php?article619
    東方線上 E-ICP 東方消費者行銷資料庫
    http://www.isurvey.com.tw/index.aspx
    國際貿易局—中華民國進出口貿易統計 (2011)
    http://cus93.trade.gov.tw/fsci/
    Strategic Business Insights (SBI) official website
    http://www.strategicbusinessinsights.com/vals/presurvey.shtml
    Young and Rubicam official website
    www.4cs.yr.com
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    98355030
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098355030
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Business Administation] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    503001.pdf1201KbAdobe PDF22826View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback