Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50828
|
Title: | 私募股權基金對目標公司股東財富及經營績效之影響-以大眾銀行為例 The effect of private equity funds on the stockholders’ wealth and performance of the target company—the case of Ta Chong Bank |
Authors: | 李馥如 |
Contributors: | 李志宏 李馥如 |
Keywords: | 私募股權基金 股東財富 經營績效 Private Equity Funds Shareholder’s Wealth Performance |
Date: | 2010 |
Issue Date: | 2011-09-29 16:47:50 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 本研究以2007年「凱雷私募股權基金入主大眾銀行」一案當作研究主軸,以個案方式來呈現私募股權基金入主案的整個事件過程。大眾銀行財務體質不佳,急需資金,最終在眾多的籌資方式中選擇透過私募現金增資發行新股及可轉換公司債,引進單一策略投資人,轉換後外資持股比率最高大幅攀升至30%以上。 以事件研究法衡量股東財富的短期績效,研究發現在宣告日當天,市場對凱雷集團入主大眾銀行的訊息給予正面的回應,而自宣告日前10天至宣告日後8天,有顯著的平均累積異常報酬率。本研究亦衡量股東財富的長期績效,研究結果顯示, BHAR的衡量方法顯示,買進持有至第28個月及第36個月達10%之顯著水準,私募股權基金入主後有部份顯著增加股東財富。 凱雷集團透過持有多數股權,成為大眾銀行的最大股東,並進駐董事會,拿下半數董監席次,成功取得經營控制權,引進專業投資人的資金挹注來打銷呆帳及國際級的專業經驗、併購投資建議、改善公司治理等方式來強化金融業者的營運體質,使大眾銀行的信用評等得以被調升,有助於增加未來的融資彈性。本研究發現凱雷集團以增設獨立董事、縮小董事會規模及提高股權集中度來改善公司治理,與過去文獻研究結果一致,不過大眾銀行在經營效率性指標並未獲得改善。最後,分析大眾銀行入主前後3年經營績效的變化,研究發現凱雷集團入主後,大眾銀行在資本適足性、資產品質和獲利性指標等經營績效指標都有獲得顯著的改善。 In this study, using the case of “Carlyle Group took over the Ta Chong Bank in 2007” to understand how did private equity funds implement. Due to the poor financial structure, Ta Chong Bank eventually selected through private placements to issuance the new shares and convertible bonds in a number of financing ways. Ta Chong Bank decided to find a single strategic investor, so the highest rate of foreign investor ownership after conversion could significantly increase to about 30%. To measure the shareholder’s wealth, this paper divided the short-term and long-term to analysis. First part, the capital market gave a positive response for the announcement of Carlyle Group took over the Ta Chong Bank. There was a significant average cumulative abnormal return between the ex-announcement and 8 days after announcement. In the long-term, the method of BHAR shows that buy-and-hold to 28 months and 36 months could get abnormal returns at 10% significant level. It presents that this case could increase the shareholder’s wealth in some specific periods. In this case, we find that Carlyle Group became the largest shareholder of Ta Chong Bank through acquiring majority equity. Moreover, Carlyle Group obtained the half numbers of directors, and successfully won the right of operational control. Through the international investment skills and professional operating experience, Carlyle Group improves corporate governance and financial structure of Ta Chong Bank and let the credit rating raised. This study also finds that Carlyle Group sets up independent directors, reduces board size and increases the concentration of ownership to improve corporate governance. It consists with the previous literature. But the operating efficiency indicator doesn’t improve so far. Finally, this study measures the change of operating performance. We find that just the operating performance indicators of capital adequacy, asset quality and profitability have improvement significantly. |
Reference: | 中文部份 1、丁麟祥(2007),傳統產業與國際私募股權基金併購策略因素探討—以復盛公司為例,國立台灣科技大學工業管理系碩士論文。 2、丹.布萊迪(2007),私募股權基金凱雷—政商遊走實錄,財訊出版社。 3、李政賢(2007),私募股權基金於槓桿併購之操作策略,國立台灣大學管理學院商學研究所碩士論文。 4、李存修(2008),國際私募股權基金之發展與監理,台北外匯市場發展基金會委託計畫。 5、吳啟銘(2010),企業評價―個案實證分析 再版,智勝出版社。 6、吳當傑(2007),私募股權基金投資我國資本市場之管理,證券公會季刊,第六卷第二期,頁5-17。 7、吳宴彰(2008),私募股權投資之交易架構,國立台灣大學商學院研究所碩士論文。 8、沈中華、李建然(2000),事件研究法―財務與會計實證研究必備,華泰出版社。 9、沈中華(2002),金控公司的銀行與獨立銀行CAMEL比較:1997~1998,台灣金融財務季刊,第三輯第二期,頁73-94。 10、林佳緯(2003),我國上市銀行併購活動後之經營績效評估,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 11、許伯如(2007),私募股權基金參與台灣企業重建之個案分析,國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班高階公共管理組碩士論文。 12、陳樹(2007),私募股權基金之介紹及發展現況,證券公會季刊,第六卷第二期,頁18-31。 13、張書瑋(2007),當私募股權基金來敲門,會計研究月刊260期,頁27-40。 14、張麗娟、鐘雅雯(2010),探討臺灣商業銀行國際化程度與多角化策略對經營績效之影響,中華管理評論國際學報,第十三卷三期。 15、葉銀華(2007),公司治理與私募股權基金的併購,會計研究月刊260期,頁52-63。 16、葉銀華(2008),實踐公司治理—台灣集團企業的功與過,聯經出版社。 17、喬許.科斯曼(2010),私募股權基金風暴―華爾街地下帝國交易實錄,財信出版社。 18、潘家涓(2007),私募併購基金之操作模式與對市場之影響,國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班財務金融組碩士論文。 19、鄧金生(2007),私募股權基金與併購之評價分析—以凱雷併購日月光為例,國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。 20、劉士愷(2008),私募股權基金在台灣發展之研究,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。 英文部份 1、Acharya, V., and C. Kehoe, 2008, Corporate Governance and value creation evidence from private equity, Working Paper. 2、Achleitner, A.K., A. Betzer, and J. Gider, 2010, Do corporate governance motives drive hedge fund and private equity fund activities?, European Financial Management16, 805-828. 3、Barber, F., and M. Goold, 2007, The strategic secret of private equity, Harvard Business Review. 4、Cornelli, F. and O. Karakas, 2008, Private equity and corporate governance: Do LBOs have more effective boards?, Working Paper. 5、Cressy, R., F. Munari and A. Malipiero, 2007, Playing to their strengths? Evidence that specialization in the private equity industry confers competitive advantage, Journal of Corporate Finance 13, 647-669. 6、Demiroglu, C., and C.M. James, 2010, The role of private equity group reputation in LBO financing, Journal of Financial Economics 96, 306-330. 7、Fruhan, W. E., 2006, The role of private equity firms in merger and acquisition transactions, Harvard Business Review. 8、Gertner, R. and S.N. Kaplan, 1996, The value maximizing board, Working Paper. 9、Hsu, H.C., A.V. Reed, and J. Rocholl, 2010, Competitive effects of private equity investments, Working Paper. 10、Jensen, M.C., 1986, Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers, American Economic Review 76, 323-329. 11、Jensen, M.C., 1993, The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems, The Journal of Financial 48, 831-880. 12、Kaplan, S.N., The effects of management buyouts on operating performance and value, Journal of Financial Economics 24, 217-254. 13、Kaplan, S.N., and A. Schoar, 2005, Private equity performance: Returns, persistence and capital flows, Journal of Finance 60, 1791–1824. 14、Kaplan, S.N., and P. Stromberg, 2009, Leveraged buyouts and private equity, Journal of Economic Perspectives 23,121-146. 15、La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer, 1999, Corporate ownership around the world, Journal of Finance 54, 471-517. 16、Lichtenberg, F.R., and D.S. Siegel, 1990, The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behavior, Journal of Financial Economics 27, 165-194. 17、Leslie, P., and P. Oyer, 2009, Managerial incentives and value creation: Evidence from private equity, NBER Working Paper. 18、Lo, S.F., and W.M. Lu, 2006, Does size matter? Finding the profitability and marketability benchmark of financial holding companies, Working Paper. 19、Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360. 20、McConnell, J.J., and H. Servaes, 1990, Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value, Journal of Financial Economics 27, 595-612. 21、Meuleman, M., K. Amess, M. Wright, and L. Scholes, 2009, Agency, strategic entrepreneurship, and the performance of private equity-backed buyouts, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33, 213-239. 22、Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny, 1988, Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293-315. 23、Pound, J., 1988, Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight, Journal of Financial Economics 20, 237-265. 24、Ritter, J.R., 1991, The long-run performance of initial public offerings, Journal of Finance 46, 3-27. 25、Ruback, R.S., and M.C. Jensen, 1983, The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 11, 5-50. 26、Vennet, R.V., 2002, Cost and profit efficiency of financial conglomerates and universal banks in Europe, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 34, 254-282. 27、Weir, C., D. Laing, and M. Wright, 2005, Incentive effects, monitoring mechanisms, and the threat from the market for corporate control: An analysis of the factors affecting public to private transactions in the UK, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32, 909-944. 28、Wright, M., K. Amess and C. Weir, 2009, Private equity and corporate governance: Retrospect and prospect, Corporate Governance 17, 353-375. 29、Yeh, Y.H., T.S. Lee, and T. Woidtke, 2001, Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan, International Review of Finance 2, 21-48. 30、Yermack, D., 1996, Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors, Journal of Financial Economics 40, 185-211. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 財務管理研究所 98357024 99 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098357024 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [財務管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|