English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51305131      Online Users : 750
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/50794
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50794


    Title: 未分配盈餘加徵10%稅負與企業投資決策之關係
    An investigation of the relationship between 10% surtax on undistributed earnings and corporate investment in Taiwan
    Authors: 張莞兒
    Contributors: 陳明進
    汪瑞芝

    張莞兒
    Keywords: 未分配盈餘
    投資決策
    固定資產投資
    研發費用
    Undistributed earnings
    Investment decision
    Investment on fixed
    R&D expense
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2011-09-29 16:39:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國自民國87年起實施「未分配盈餘加徵10%營所稅」,已有多位學者研究兩稅合一稅制與企業投資之關係,但針對未分配盈餘加徵稅負對企業投資意願的影響,迄今尚未有以『實際加徵之稅負資料』進行實證研究探討。本研究以未分配盈餘加徵稅負對企業投資支出之影響為主軸,並進一步分析當『產業』不同或『公司規模』大小不同時,未分配盈餘加徵稅負與企業投資的關係。除此之外,將企業投資分為固定資產總額投資、固定資產淨額投資及研究發展支出。
    實證結果發現:(1) 未分配盈餘加徵稅負與固定資產投資及研究發展支出之迴歸係數為負值,且當投資為固定資產投資總額及固定資產投資淨額時,達統計上的顯著性。且由數據發現,電子產業研發費用較非電子產業高出5倍之多,因其仰賴高額研發支出,故需較多保留盈餘以因應投資需求;實施未分配盈餘加徵稅負後,電子產業實際加徵之未分配盈餘稅負較非電子產業為高,因此當政府增加未分配盈餘加徵稅負之制度,對電子產業衝擊較大。 (2) 由樣本超過200間的五大產業中發現,其投資支出與未分配盈餘加徵稅負的迴歸係數大致呈負值,且電機機械業、電子產業及建材營造業的迴歸結果達統計上的顯著性。(3) 本研究將企業依總資產規模不同分為四大組,發現當公司規模最小與公司規模最大時,此兩個組的企業,未分配盈餘加徵之稅負愈高,其固定資產投資之金額愈低。上述未分配盈餘稅負與投資的關係,可發現多數企業視未分配盈餘租稅成本為重要之投資決策考量因素,此一研究結果可提供政府制定稅務政策之參考。
    Reference: 一、中文參考資料
    (期刊)
    王銘生,1997,談兩稅合一困擾問題及其改進意見,中國稅務旬刊,第1645
    期:7-10。
    宋秀玲,2003,未分配盈餘加徵10%營利事業所得稅之檢討,主計月刋,
    第570期:21-29。
    汪瑞芝,2006,兩稅合一制對公司資本投資影響,中華管理評論國際學報,
    第9卷第2期:1-19。
    汪瑞芝、陳明進,2007,兩稅合一前後上市公司融資決策之實證研究,交
    大管理學報,第27卷第1期:221-246。
    林世銘,1997,兩稅合一立法應仔細考量,中國稅務旬刊,第1654期:11-12。
    林世銘,2002,兩稅合一前後產業租稅環境與經營績效之比較,財稅研究,第34卷第3期:64-78。
    林祝英、劉正義,2003,企業研發投資對融資、股利政策與成長機會之影響–以電子資訊產業為例,風險管理學報,第5卷第3期:319-339。
    財政部,1996,兩稅合一擬議方案及說明,稅務會計月刊,第20期:4-11。
    陳明進,2002,營利事業有效稅率決定因素之實證研究,會計評論,34 卷:
    57-75。
    陳明進,2003,我國租稅優惠對營利事業租稅負擔之影響,管理學報,第22卷第1期:127-151。
    陳明進,2009,舊制與新制稅法未分配盈餘加徵稅負之實證研究,管理評論,第29卷第1期:1-18。
    陳忠勤,1997,新稅制-兩稅合一之剖析(上),會計師會訊,2月:1-6。
    陳忠勤,1997,新稅制-兩稅合一之剖析(下),會計師會訊,3月:1-18。
    陳宥杉、賴奎魁、陳碧俞、林複營,2007,探討我國紡織業與自行車業之專利技術研發現況,環球科技人文學刊,第5期:25-40。
    陳聽安,1985,我國所得稅制改革的可行途徑,財稅研究,第17卷第4期:12-20 。
    張克偵,1997,兩稅合一與企業經營效益,會計研究月刊,第134期:64-66。
    張家春、謝金國,2004,兩稅合一之保留盈餘課稅對投資影響之分析,實用稅務月刋,第354期:58-64。
    張福淙,2000,兩稅合一應取消未分配盈餘課稅規定,中國稅務旬刊,第1767期:13-14。
    張瑞當、曾玉琦、黃天福,1999,我國兩稅合一新制對投資意願影響之實證研究,經濟情勢暨評論,第4卷第4期:200-224。
    黃瑞靜、徐守德、廖四郎,2001,兩稅合一對公司價值、股利政策與資本
    結構之影響-動態資本結構模型之應用與台灣產業的實証研究,管理
    評論,第20卷第2期:43-74。
    詹湧銘,1998,兩稅合一對高科技事業之影響,實用稅務,第278期:50-53。
    葉金成、王秀美,1999,兩稅合一對企業盈餘、資金結構與稅負之影響-以某製造業為例,新埔學報,第17期:449-471。
    劉正田,1999,企業商譽與研發投資關係之研究,科技管理學刊,第4期:
    105-124。
    趙育培,2001,取消保留盈餘稅負提高投資誘因,國家政策論壇,第1卷第8期:124-125。
    楊台寧、林淑惠,2004,產業國際競爭力之發展及其決定因素實證分析之研究-以台灣紡織業為例,多國籍企業研究學報,第29期:93-116。
    蔡淑梨,2003,高科技素材研發、生產及行銷策略聯盟之探討-以紡織業
    為例,中華家政學刊,第34期:103-120。
    歐進士,1998,我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯性之實證研究,中山管
    理評論,第6卷:357-386。
    闕河士、菅瑞昌、黃旭輝,2000,研究發展密集度與專利對股票績效影響
    -以台灣上市公司為例,產業管理學報,第1卷第1期(4月):257-268。
    (碩博士論文)
    王建棟,2003,兩稅合一稅制對資本投資與股利政策影響之實證研究,中原大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    王詠慧,2001,兩稅合一前後未分配盈餘與股價關連之研究,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    郭豐鈐,1988,公司組織未分配盈餘課稅之探討,國立政治大學財政研究
    所碩士論文。
    陳靜芬,2003,上市電子公司資本結構與產業分類關係之實證研究,國立
    中山大學財務管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    張錦燕,2008,晶圓代工產業資本支出之資源配置政策-以台積電公司為
    例,國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    郭明秀,2000,高階經營團隊與組織運作、競爭優勢、競爭策略及經營績
    效之關係研究-傳統產業與高科技產業之比較,國立成功大學企業管
    理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    曾致農,2007,景氣循環對於不同特性企業績效之影響,國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    趙敏希,2000,新稅制對高科技產業影響之研究-以兩稅合一及促產條例
    分析,國立台北大學會計學系碩士班未出版碩士論文。
    董秋梅,2000,機構投資人對企業R&D活動的影響,交通大學經營管理
    學系碩士論文。
    (年鑑)
    李煥仁,1995,我國機械工業總論,中華民國機械工業年鑑,台灣經濟研
    究院。
    (研究報告)
    財政部,1998,兩稅合一方案。
    孫智麗,2001,新興產業發展動態與策略分析研究計畫─生技產業領域的廠
    商動向調查研究,經濟部。
    二、英文參考資料
    (Journal paper)
    Auerbach, A. J. 1989. Tax reform and adjustment costs: The impact on
    investment and market value. International Economic Review 30(4): 939-962.
    Bah, R. and P. Dumontier. 2001. R&D intensity and coporate financial policy:
    Some international evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 28(June/July): 671-693.
    Bange, M. M. and W. DeBondt. 1998. R&D Budgets and corporate earnings
    targets. Journal of Corporate Finance 4(2): 153-84.
    Billings, B.A. and J. Hamilton. 2002. The effects of the corporate alternative
    minimum tax on the acquisition of depreciable business assets. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21(4-5): 423-452.
    Black, E.L., J. Legoria and K.F. Sellers. 2000. Capital investment effects of
    dividend imputation. The Journal of the American Taxation Association
    22:40-59.
    Bloom, N., R. Griffith and J. V. Reenen. 2000. Do R&D tax credit work?
    Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997. Journal of Public Economics 85: 1-31.
    Breitzman, A., P. Thomas, and M. Cheney. 2002. Technological powerhouse or diluted competence: Techniques for assessing mergers via patent analysis. R&D Management 32 (Junuary): 1-10.
    Brockhoff, K. K. and A. W. Pearson. 1998. R&D budgeting reactions to a
    recession. Management International Review 38: 363-376.
    Bushee, B. J. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D
    investment behavior. The Accounting Review 73(3) :305-33.
    Carlson, S.J., & C.T. Bathala. 2000. Impact of the repeal of the investment tax
    credit on firm’s investment decisions. Journal of Applied Business Research 10: 33-39.
    Chen, Ming-Chin, Suming Lin, and Tien-Hsun Chang. 2001. The impact of
    tax-exempt stock and land capital gains on corporate effective tax rates. Taiwan Accounting Review 2 (April) : 53-56.
    Collins, D. W. and S. P. Kothari. 1989. An analysis of the intertemporal and
    cross-sectional determinants of the earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics 9: 111-139.
    Davenport, F. B., Jr. 1985. Effective use of working capital formula can
    avoid accumulated earning tax. Taxation for Accountants 35(October): 248-254.
    Derashid, C. and H. Zhang. 2003. Effective tax rates and the industrial policy
    hypothesis: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation 12: 45-62.
    Gilchrist, S. and C. P. Himmelberg. 1995. Evidence on the role of cash flow for
    investment. Journal of Monetary Economics 36: 541-572.
    Gupta, S. and K. Newberry. 1997. Determinants of the variability in corporate
    effect tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16: 1-34.
    Graves, S. B. 1988. Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer
    industry . Academy of Management Journal 31: 417-427.
    Hall, R. and D. W. Jorgenson. (1967). Tax policy and investment behavior.
    American Economic Review 57(3): 391-414.
    Hansen, G. C. and C. W. L. Hill. 1991. Are institutional investor myopic? A
    time-series study of four technology-driven industry. Strategic Management Journal 12(1) : 1-16.
    Jalilvand, A. and R. S. Harris, 1984, Corporate behaviour in adjusting to
    capital structure and dividend target: An econometric study. Journal of Finance 39: 127-145.
    Jugurnath, B. , M. Stewart and R. Brooks. 2008. Dividend taxation and
    corporate investment: a comparative study between the classical system and imputation system of dividend taxation in the United States and Australia. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 31(2): 209-224.
    Kim, A.K. and P. Limpaphayom. 1998. A test of two-tier corporate governance
    structure: the case of Japanese Keiretsu. Journal of Financial Research: 37-51.
    Kinney, M. and R.H. Trezevant. 1993. Taxes and the timing of corporate capital
    expenditures. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 15: 40-62.
    Gordon, L. A. and R. J. Iyengar. 1996. Return on investment and corporate
    capital expenditures: Empirical evidence. Journal of accounting and public policy 15: 305-325.
    Liu, Chi-Chun, Suming Lin, and Der-Fen Huang. 2001. Factors influencing
    corporate effective tax rates in Taiwan. Taiwan Accounting Review 2 (April) : 57-78.
    Lunn, J. 1989. R&D, concentration and advertising: A simultaneous equations model. Managerial and Decision Economics 10 (June): 101-105.
    Lintner, J. 1956. Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends,
    retained earnings, and taxes. American Economic Review 46 (May) :97 - 113.
    Manzon, G. and W.R. Smith. 1994. The effect of the Economic Recovery Tax
    Act of 1981 and the Tax Reform Act of 1986 on the distribution of effective tax rates. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 13 (Winter): 349-362.
    Michaelas, N., F. Chittenden, and P. Poutziouris.1999. Financial policy and
    captial structure choice in UK SMEs: Empricial evidence from company panel data. Small Business Economics 12: 113-130.
    Michel, A. J. and I. Shaked. 1986. Country and industry influence on dividend
    policy: Evidence from Japan and the U.S.A., Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 13 (3) : 365-381.
    Morck, R. and B. Yeung. 2005. Dividend taxation and corporate governance.
    Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(3) : 163–180.
    Myers, S. C. and M. S. Majluf. 1984. Corporate financial and investment
    decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13: 187-221.
    Pindyck, R. S. 1988. Irreversible investment, capacity choice, and the value of
    the Firm. American Economic Review 78(4): 969-985.
    Porcano, T. 1986. Corporate tax rates: Progressive, proportional, or regressive.
    The Journal of the American Taxation Association 7 (2): 17-31.
    Richardson, G. and R. Lanis. 2007. Determinants of the variability in corporate
    effective tax rates and tax reform: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26: 689–704.
    Rosacker, R.E., & R.W. Metcalf. 1993. United States federal tax policy
    surrounding the investment tax credit: An empirical investigation of
    enactment,rate enhancement, and repeals. Advance in Taxation 5: 219-246.
    Shevlin, T. and S. Porter. 1992. The corporate tax comeback in 1987: Some
    further evidence. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 14 (1): 58-79.
    Siegfried, J. 1974. Effective average U. S. corporation income tax rates.
    National Tax Journal 27 (2): 245-259.
    Stickney, C. and V. McGee. 1982. Effective corporate tax rates: The effect of
    size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1 (2): 125-152.
    Wahal, S. and J. J. McConnell. 2000. Do institutional investors exacerbrate
    managerial myopia? Journal of Corporate Finance 6: 307-329.
    Zimmerman, J. 1983. Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and
    Economics 5 (2): 119-149.
    (Book)
    Kelloway, E. K. 1998. Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling : A
    Researcher`s Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
    Kline, R. B. 1998. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling.
    New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
    Lintner, J. 1967. Corporate Finance: Risk and Investment, Determinants of
    Investment Behaviour. National Bureau of Economic Research: New York.
    Meryer, J. R. and E. Kuh. 1957. The Investment Decision. Cambridge, Mass:
    HarvardUniversity Press.
    (Working paper)
    Hall, B. and J. V. Reenen. 1999. How Effective are Fiscal Incentives for R&D ?
    A Review of the Evidence. NBER Working Paper. No.7098.
    Kari, S. and J. Ylä-Liedenpohja. 2002. Classical Corporation Tax as a Global
    Means of Tax Harmonization. CESifo Working Paper. No. 665
    (Dissertation)
    Anderson, L. 1964. Corporate Finance and Fixed Investment: An Econometric
    Study. Division of Research, Graduate school of Business Administration, Harvard University.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    97353004
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0973530041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback