政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/50792
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51695263      Online Users : 387
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50792


    Title: 投資稅負對企業權益資金成本之影響
    The effect of investment tax on cost of equity capital
    Authors: 林方婷
    Lin, Fang Ting
    Contributors: 許崇源
    Hsu, Chun Yuan
    林方婷
    Lin, Fang Ting
    Keywords: 股利稅租稅罰
    權益資金成本
    dividend tax penalty
    cost of equity capital
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2011-09-29 16:39:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究採用Dhaliwal, Krull, Li, and Moser (2005)之實證模型研究投資相關稅負對企業權益資金成本的影響。Dhaliwal et al. (2005)利用股利所得與資本利得最高級距稅率計算股利稅租稅罰,然而,使用最高級距稅率計算而得知代理變數恐無法完全捕捉稅負對資金成本的影響,因此本研究參考許崇源、俞洪昭、洪盈斌與戚務君 (2000),假設在個人董監事等大股東之所得稅率較一般散戶為高的前提下,以個人董監事持股比例做為個人股東邊際稅率之替代變數,再計算股利稅租稅罰之代理變數。
    本研究利用台灣經濟新報資料庫(簡稱TEJ資料庫)取得台灣上市櫃公司2000年至2009年之財務資料,進行迴歸分析。實證結果顯示,因股利所得稅率與證券交易所得稅率差異造成的股利稅租稅罰,會使得權益資金成本上升;而且因為機構投資人較一般投資人享有較多租稅優惠,造成其適用稅率較低;而公司的邊際投資人又多為機構投資人,因此機構投資人持股可減輕股利稅租稅罰造成權益資金成本上升的情形。
    This study uses the empirical model proposed by Dhaliwal, Krull, Li, and Moser (2005) to examine the effect of investment tax on the cost of equity capital. Dhaliwal et al. (2005) used the top statutory tax rates on dividends and capital gains to get the variable “penalty”; however, it may not perfectly capture the dividend tax penalty. We follow the assumption that individual directors and supervisors may adopt higher tax rate than other individual stockholders (Hsu, Yu, Hung, and ,Chi 2000), then derive the variable “penalty” by using the rate of shares owned by individual directors and supervisors as the proxy variable of individual stockholder‟s marginal tax rate.
    This study uses the financial data of listed companies in Taiwan via Taiwan Economic Journal database (TEJ database) from 2000 to 2009 for regression analysis. The empirical results show that the dividend tax penalty resulting from the difference between the tax rate on dividend and capital gain increase the cost of equity capital. Furthermore, institutional investors always receive more favorable tax treatment than individual investors, making them adopt lower tax rate, and a firm‟s marginal investor is more likely to be an institutional investor, therefore the aggregate institutional ownership mitigates the increase of cost of equity capital.
    Reference: 一、 中文部分
    中國租稅硏究會,2001,中華民國稅務年鑑 90年版,台北:中國租稅硏究會。
    方智強與姚明慶,1998,台灣上市公司的淨值市價比現象,管理學報,第15卷第3期(9月):367-391。
    王玉鳳,1996,台灣地區股票股利除權行情之研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    王建煊,2006,租稅法 30版,台北:王建煊。
    王雪花,1994,股票股利與股價關聯性之研究,國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    古永嘉與李鑑剛,1998,台灣股票市場報酬率之橫斷陎及縱斷陎混和分析,輔仁管理評論,第5卷第1期(3月):77-96。
    李存修,1994,股票股利除權交易日之稅後超額報酬與比價心理假說之實證,臺大管理論叢,第5卷第1期(2月):41-60。
    李雁雯,2007,資本結構與股價報酬率之共同決定因素,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林天中,1998,台灣股票市場三因子:系統風險、公司規模及淨值市價比實證研究,國立清華大學經濟研究所未出版碩士論文。
    金成隆、楊昌田與林憶樺,2000,如何以EBO評價模式衡量股票的真正價值,會計研究月刊,第173期(4月):133-139。
    洪榮華與雷雅淇,2002,公司規模、股價、益本比、淨值市價比與股票報酬關係之實證研究,管理評論,第21卷第3期(7月):25-48。
    胡星陽,1998,流動性對台灣股票報酬率的影響,中國財務學刊,第5卷第4期(4月):1-19。
    許崇源、俞洪昭、洪盈斌與戚務君,2000,兩稅合一制度對公司屬性與股票報酬關聯性之影響,會計評論,第32期(4月):81-102。
    陳明進,2009,股利所得及股東可扣抵稅額隱含稅之實證研究,證券市場發展季刊,第20卷第4期(1月):87-117。
    陳姿良,2009,分析師報導與股票報酬的關係:在不同層級之投資人心態下,元智大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
    黃婷鈺,2010,庫藏股收回對台股報酬率影響之研究,國立台灣大學國際企業學系未出版碩士論文。
    楊世芳,1988,除息(權)日之股價行為─臺灣股票市場之實證研究,國立台灣科技大學工程技術研究所未出版碩士論文。
    經濟日報,2009.12.23,證所稅 企業優先復徵(A4版)。
    廖永鎮,2007,從行為財務學探討盈餘預測偏誤與票報酬,國立彰化師範大學商學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
    劉亞秋、黃理哲與劉維琪,1996,國內股市系統風險之探討,證券市場發展季刊,第8卷第1期(1月):45-66。
    二、 英文部分
    Amoako-Adu, B., M. Rashid, and M. Stebbins. 1992. Capital gains tax and equity values: Empirical test of stock price reaction to the introduction and reduction of capital gains tax exemption. Journal of Banking and Finance 16 (April):275-287.
    Ayers, B., C. B. Cloyd, and J. Robinson. 2002. The effect of shareholder-level dividend taxes on stock prices: Evidence from the revenue reconciliation act of 1993. The Accounting Review 77 (October): 933-947.
    Barclay, M. J. 1987. Dividends, taxes, and common stock prices : The ex-dividend day behavior of common stock prices before the income tax. Journal of Financial Economics 19 (September): 31-44
    Barron, O., and Stuerke P. 1998. Dispersion in analyst`s earnings forecasts as a measure of uncertainty. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 13 (Summer): 243-268.
    Bhattacharya, S. 1979. Imperfect information, dividend policy, and „the bird in the hand‟ fallacy. Bell Journal of Economics 10 (Spring): 259–270.
    Black, F. 1972. Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. Journal of Business 45 (July): 444-455.
    Black, F., M. C. Jensen, and M. Scholes. 1972. The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests. In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, edited by Michael Jensen. New York: Praeger.
    Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1974. The effect of dividend yield and dividend policy on common stock prices and returns. Journal of Financial Economics 1 (May): 1-22.
    Chan, L. K., Y. Hamao, and J. Lakonishok. 1991. Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan. Journal of Finance 46 (December): 1739-1789.
    Chen, N., B. Grundy, and R. Stambaugh. 1990. Changing risk, changing risk premiums, and dividend yield effects. Journal of Business 63 (January): 51-70.
    Chui A., N. Strong, and J. Cadle. 1992. The empirical significance of tax effects on the valuation of dividends: The UK evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 19 (June): 515-532.
    Claus, J., and J. Thomas. 2001. Equity premia as low as three percent? Empirical evidence from analysts‟ earnings forecasts for domestic and international stock markets. Journal of Finance 56 (October): 1629-1666.
    Dhaliwal, D. S., M. Erickson, R. Trezevant. 1999. A test of the theory of tax clienteles for dividend policies. National Tax Journal 52 (June): 179-194.
    Dhaliwal, D. S., O. Z. Li, and R. Trezevant. 2003. Is a dividend tax penalty incorporated into the return on a firm‟s common stock? Journal of Accounting and Economics 35 (June): 155-178.
    Dhaliwal, D. S., L. Krull, and O. Z. Li. 2007. Did the 2003 Tax Act reduce the cost of equity capital? Journal of Accounting & Economics 43 (March): 121-150.
    Dhaliwa, D. S., L. Krull, O. Z. Li, and W. Moser. 2005. Dividend taxes and implied cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (December): 675-708.
    Diether, K. B., C. J. Malloy, and A. Scherbina. 2002. Difference of opinion and the cross section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance 57 (October): 2113-2141.
    Eades, K. M., Hess P. J., and Kim E. H. 1984. On interpreting security returns during the ex-dividend period. Journal of Financial Economics 13 (March): 3-34.
    Elton, E. J., and M. J. Grube. 1970. Marginal stockholder tax rates and the clientele effect. The Review of Economics and Statistics 52 (February): 68-74
    Fama, E., and J. MacBeth. 1973. Risk return and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy 81 (May):607-636.
    Fama, E., and K. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47 (June): 427-465.
    Fama, E., and K. French. 1996. Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. Journal of Finance 51 (March): 55-84.
    Fama, E., and K. French. 1998. Taxes, financing decisions, and firm value. Journal of Finance 53 (June): 819-843.
    Fant, L. F., and D. R. Perterson. 1995. The effect of size, book-to-market equity, prior returns, and beta on stock returns: January versus the remainder of the year. Journal of Financial Research 18 (Summer):129-142.
    Gebhardt, W. R., C. C. Lee, and B. Swaminathan. 2001. Toward an implied cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (June): 135-176.
    Gode, D., and P. Mohanram. 2003. Inferring the cost of capital using the Ohlson-Juettner model. Review of Accounting Studies 8 (December): 399–431.
    Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76 (May): 323-329.
    John, K., and J. Williams. 1985 Dividends, dilution, and taxes: a signaling equilibrium. Journal of Finance 35 (September): 1053-1070.
    Johnson, T. C. 2004. Forecast dispersion and the cross section of expected returns. Journal of Finance 59 (October): 1957-1978.
    Kalay, A. 1982. The ex-dividend day behavior of stock prices: A re-examination of the clientele effect. The Journal of Finance 37 (September): 1059-1070.
    La Porta, R. 1996 Expectations and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Finance 51 (December): 1715-1742.
    Lakonishok, J., and A. C. Shapiro. 1986. Systematic risk, total risk and size as determinants of stock market returns. Journal of Banking and Finance 10 (March): 115-132.
    Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1998. Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. Journal of Finance 49 (December): 1541-1578.
    Lakonishok, J., and T. Vaemalen. 1983. Tax reform and ex-dividend day behavior. The Journal of Finance 38 (September): 1157-1179.
    Lamdin, D. J., and C. Hiemstra. 1993. Ex-dividend day share price behavior: Effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The Review of Economics and Statistics 75 (November): 778-783.
    Lasfer, M. A. 1995. Ex-day behavior: Tax or short-term trading effects. The Journal of Finance 50 (July): 875-897.
    Litzenberger, R., and K. Ramaswamy. 1979. The effect of personal taxes and dividends on capital asset prices. Journal of Financial Economics 7 (June): 163-195.
    Litzenberger, R., and K. Ramaswamy. 1980. Dividends, short selling restrictions, tax-induced investor clienteles and market equilibrium. Journal of Finance 35 (May): 469-482.
    Litzenberger, R., and K. Ramaswamy. 1982. The effects of dividends on common stock prices: tax effects or information effects? Journal of Finance 37 (May): 429-443.
    Loughran, T. 1997. Book-to-market across firm size, exchanges, and seasonality: is there an effect? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 32 (September): 249-268.
    Menyah, K. 1993. Ex-dividend equity pricing under UK tax regimes. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 20 (January): 61-81.
    Miller, M., and F. Modigliani. 1961. Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business 34 (October): 411-433.
    Miller, M., and K. Rock. 1985. Dividend policy under asymmetric information. Journal of Finance 40 (September): 1031-1051.
    Miller, M., and M. Scholes. 1982. Dividends and taxes: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Political Economy 90 (December): 1118-1141.
    Naranjo, A., M. Nimalendran, and M. Ryngaert. 1998. Stock returns, dividend yields, and taxes. Journal of Finance 53 (December): 2029-2057.
    Peters, D. 1991 Valuing a growth stock. The Journal of Portfolio Management 17 (Spring): 49-51.
    Poterba, J. M., and L. H. Summers. 1984. New evidence that taxes affect the valuation of dividends. The Journal of Finance 39 (December): 1397-1415
    Reinganum, M. R. 1981. A new empirical perspective on the CAPM. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 16 (November): 439-462.
    Rosenberg, B., K. Reid, and R. Lanstein. 1985. Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency. Journal of Portfolio Management 11 (Spring): 9-17.
    Sias, R. W., and L. T. Starks. 1997. Return autocorrelation and institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 46 (October): 103-131.
    Sun, Z. 2001. The PEG ratio and stock valuation. Working paper, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    98353053
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098353053
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback