Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50786
|
| Title: | 新產品開發專案策略與供應商管理制度之探討-以我國某汽車製造公司為對象
Discussion of new product development project strategy and supplier management system |
| Authors: | 張明益 |
| Contributors: | 王文英
張明益 |
| Keywords: | 新產品開發專案策略
供應商遴選
供應商發展活動
供應商績效評估
供應商管理
Strategy for new product development project
Selection of suppliers
Supplier development activities
Supplier performance evaluation
Supplier management |
| Date: | 2010 |
| Issue Date: | 2011-09-29 16:39:06 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究係透過實地訪談暸解企業在不同的新產品開發專案策略下所採行的供應商管理制度（包括供應商遴選、供應商發展活動與供應商績效評估與獎酬制度）具體內容為何，進而探討不同的新產品開發專案策略在供應商管理制度上的異同處為何，以期提供企業在選擇參與新產品專案供應商、進行供應商發展活動及評估供應商專案績效與設計獎酬制度時的參考。本研究依據個案分析之結果，提出以下三項結論以回應研究問題，並根據研究發現陳述相關建議，最後提出研
究限制與未來研究方向之建議。
一、新產品開發專案策略會影響遴選參與專案供應商時的遴選流程、優先重視的評估構面與遴選時間。
二、新產品開發專案策略會影響專案中進行供應商發展活動的活動內容、範疇與時間。
三、新產品開發專案策略會影響供應商之專案績效評估的目標訂定範圍與嚴苛程度。
Conducted by field interviews, this research is primary to focus on the details of supplier management system including selection of suppliers, supplier development activities, supplier performance evaluation, and reward system) under different strategies of new product development projects. This research also discusses the similarities and differences of supplier management system under different strategies of new product development projects. According to the result of case analysis, we claim three conclusions in response to the research questions, and propose some relevant suggestions. Finally, we state research limitation and direction for future research.
1.The strategy of new product development project will affects the selection process, priority of assessment dimensions, and duration in selecting the suppliers who can join the project.
2.The strategy of new product development project will affects the content, scope, and period of supplier development activities in the project.
3.The strategy of new product development project will affects the scope and severeness of goals in evaluating suppliers` performance in the project. |
| Reference: | .Ansoff, H. I., and J. M. Stewart. 1967. Strategies for a technology-based business. Harvard Business Review 45(Nov.-Dec.): 71-83.
.Billesbach, T. J., H. Alan, and C. Simon. 1991. Supplier performance measures and practices in JIT companies in the U.S. and the U.K. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 27(4): 24-28.
.Carr, A. S., and H. Kaynak. 2007. Communication methods, information sharing, supplier development and performance- An empirical study of their relationships. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27(4): 346-370.
.Choi, T. Y., and J. L. Hartley. 1996 An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management 14: 333-343.
.Cooper, R. G., S. J.Edgett, and E. J. Kleinschmidt. 2004. Benchmarking best NPD practices-II. Research Technology Management 47(May/June): 50-59.
.Cusumano M. A., and K. Nobeoka. 1992. Strategy, structure and performance in product development: Observation from the auto industry. Research Policy 21(3): 265-293.
.Coombs, G., and L. R. Gomez-Mejia. 1991. Cross-functional pay strategies in high-technology firms. Compensation and Benefits Review 23(5): 40-48.
.Dickson, G.W. 1966. An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing 2(1): 5-17.
.Dubas, K. M., and C. Chao. 1996. Chinese purchasing managers’ preferences and trade-offs in supplier selection and performance evaluation. Industrial Marketing Management 25: 115-124.
.Ellram, L. M. 1990. The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 26(4):8-14.
.Feldman, L. P. 1996. The role of salary and incentives in the new product function. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13: 216-228.
.Gordon, S. 2005. Seven step to measure supplier performance. Quality Progress 38(8): 20-25.
.Griffin, A. 1997. PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14: 429-458.
.Hahn, C. K., C. A. Watts, and K. Y. Kim. 1990. The supplier development program: A conceptual model. Journal of Purchasing and Material Management 26(2): 2-7.
.Handfield, R. B., G. L.Ragatz, K. J. Prtersen, and R. M. Monczka. 1999. Involving suppliers in new product development. California Management Review 42(1): 59-82.
.Handfield, R. B., and B. Lawson. 2007. Integrating supplier into new product development. Research Technology Management 50(5): 44-51.
.Kannan, V. R., and K. C. Tan. 2002. Supplier selection and assessment: Their impact on business performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management 38(4): 11-21.
.Krause, D. R. 1997. Supplier development: Current practices and outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management 33(2): 12-19.
.Krause, D. R., and L. M. Ellram. 1997. Critical elements of supplier development. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 3(1): 21-31.
.Krause, D. R., R. B. Handfield, and T. V. Scannell. 1998. An empirical investigation of development: Reactive and strategic processes. Journal of Operations Management 17(1): 39-58.
.Lehmann, D. R., and J. O’Shaughnessy. 1974. Difference in attribute importance for different industrial products. Journal of Marketing 38(April): 36-42.
.Miles, R. E., C. C. Snow, A. D. Meyer, and H. J. Coleman Jr. 1978. Organization strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review 3(July): 546-562.
.Ndubisi, N. O., M. Jantan, L. C. Hing, and M. S. Ayub. 2005. Supplier selection and management strategies and manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18(3): 330-349.
.Newman, R. G., and K. A. Rhee. 1990. A case study of NUMMI and its suppliers. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 26(4): 15-20.
.Nobeoka, K., and M. A. Cusumano. 1997. Multirproject strategy and sales growth: The benefits of rapid design transfer in new product development. Strategic Management Journal 18(3): 169–186.
.Page, A. L. 1993. Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10: 273-290.
.Porter, M. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
.Ragatz, G. L., R. B. Handfield, and T. V. Scannell. 1997. Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14(3): 190-202.
.Sarin S., and V. Mahajzn. 2001. The effect of reward structure on the performance of cross-functional product development teams. Journal of Marketing 65(April): 35-53.
.Simpson, P. M., J. A. Siguaw, and S. C. White. 2002. Measuring the performance of suppliers: An analysis of evaluation processes. Journal of Supply Chain Management 38(1): 29-41.
.Swift, C. O. 1995. Preferences for single sourcing and supplier selection criteria. Journal of Business Research 32: 105-111.
.Trent R. J., and R. M. Monczka. 1998. Purchasing and supply management: Trends and changes throughout the 1990s. International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management 34(4): 2-11.
.Weber, C. A., J. R. Current, and W. C. Benton. 1991. Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research 50: 2-18.
.Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park:
Sage Publications |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
98353036
99 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098353036 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
