政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/50774

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Accounting > Theses > Item 140.119/50774

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50774

Title:	企業環境資訊自願性揭露影響因素之實證研究-以我國化工業及電子業為例 The determinants of corporate voluntary environmental information disclosure – An empirical study of listed chemical and electronic companies in Taiwan
Authors:	黃佳卿 Huang, Chia Ching
Contributors:	張清福黃佳卿 Huang, Chia Ching
Keywords:	環境資訊揭露社會政治理論 environmental disclosure society political theory
Date:	2010
Issue Date:	2011-09-29 16:38:57 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究應用社會政治理論之概念性架構，探討民國96年至98年化工業及電子業之上市公司年報中有關環境資訊揭露程度。其中自願性環境資訊揭露影響之因素有公司規模、經營績效、ISO14001認證、環境支出預算、罰款與賠償以及國際化程度。實證結果顯示，自願性環境資訊揭露與公司規模大小、是否取得ISO14001認證、環境支出預算、罰款與賠償以及國際化程度皆存在顯著正向的關係，其中又以是否取得ISO14001認證這個因素影響程度最大。至於化工業和電子業公司自願性環境資訊揭露受到何種因素較大，實證結果顯示化工業公司規模、經營績效以及環境支出預算愈高時，其環境資訊揭露正相關程度將大於電子業；而電子業若取得ISO14001認證及罰款與賠償金額愈高時，其環境資訊揭露正相關程度將大於化工業；此外，環境資訊揭露與國際化程度亦呈正相關。 This study applies society political theory to explain the voluntary environmental disclosure in annual reports. The sample consists of firms in chemical and electronic industries in Taiwan during 2007 and 2009. The determinants of voluntary environmental information disclosure include firm size, economic performance, ISO 14001 certification, environmental expenditure budgets, penalty, and the extent of internationalization. The empirical results indicate that the firm size, economic performance, ISO 14001 certification, environmental expenditure budgets, penalty, the extent of internationalization are significant determinants of voluntary environmental disclosure while ISO 14001 certification is the most significant determinant. Moreover, the firm size, economic performance, and environmental expenditure budgets are more influential in chemical industry than in electronic industry as determinants of voluntary environmental disclosure. On the contrary, ISO 14001 certification and penalty are more significant for electronic industry. Finally, the extent of internationalization shows positive relation with voluntary environmental disclosure.
Reference:	中文部分天下團隊，2004，製造業排行總表，天下雜誌，第298期：158-197。天下團隊，2004，服務業排行總表，天下雜誌，第298期：298-317。林嬋娟，劉嘉雯，薛敏正，2002，「綠色會計之國際現況與相關指引─兼論改進國內綠色會計之道」，會計研究月刊，第199 期：68-82。黃振豊與史雅男，2005，從社會政治理論觀點論環境資訊揭露程度與環境聲譽關聯性，淡江人文社會學刊，第23期：77-102。陳崇美，1995，探討我國實施環保政策之經濟後果，國立中興大學會計研究所碩士論文。田靜枝，1996，綠化意識與其公開揭露體系，國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。王珮如，2003，年報環境揭露與合理性理論之研究─以上市公司為例，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。白馥禎，1997，環保績效與揭露行為之實證研究：管理當局與會計師之認知差異，私立文化大學會計研究所碩士論文。史雅男，2004，環境資訊揭露與環境聲譽關聯性之研究，私立淡江大學會計研究所碩士論文。汪怡娟，2002，環保支出資訊揭露及揭露品質決定因素之研究，國立成功大學會計研究所碩士論文。李亭誼，2003，董事身分特性與董監經理人相關資訊揭露程度關係之研究，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。李國鳳，2004，環境資訊揭露內容之評估－以違反環保法規之公開發行公司為例，政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。林昆樂，2005，台灣地區石化工業之環境成本研究，成功大學都市計畫學研究所碩士論文。許崇源、陳瑞斌、林政衛與翁慈青，2005，公司治理架構與財務報告透明度之關聯性研究，2005第二屆財務金融及財金未來學術暨實務研討會。陳冬梅，1995，環境資訊揭露之探討─以某鋼鐵公司為例，交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。陳毓樺，1995，社會責任會計揭露與公司特性相關性研究，文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。陳文凱，2007，電子業因應歐盟化學物質管制風險管理之研究，國立台北科技大學環境規劃與管理研究所碩士學位論文。張伊易，2001，環保事件對股價行為影響之研究─以台塑汞污泥事件為例，私立東吳會計研究所碩士論文。張倩綾，2001，我國上市公司環保資訊增額資訊內涵之研究，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。廖以雯，2005，企業揭露環境資訊動機之研究，東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。潘景華，2004，新觀念：企業永續發展與社會責任型投資，證交資料月刊，第501期。台灣環境管理會計協會，2007，推動我國產業環境會計制度(96年度)計畫專案報告，行政院環境保護署。林嬋娟，2001，我國採行綠色會計可行性研究，行政院經濟建設委員會專題研究報告。周玲臺，1994，我國上市公司財務報告環保資訊之內容研究，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。歐用生，1993，內容分析法，教育研究法。英文部分 Ashbaugh, H. 2001. Non-US Firm’s Accounting Standard Choices. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 20: 129-154. Bewley, K., and Y. Li. 2000. Disclosure of Environmental Information by Canadian Manufacturing Companies: A Voluntary Disclosure Perspective. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management 1: 201-226. Bostosan and Plumlee. 2002. Disclosure Level and Expected Cost of Equity Capital. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 54: 329-351. Celik, O., A. Ecer, and H. Karabacak. 2006. Impact of Firm Specific Characteristics on the Web Based Business Reporting: Evidence from the Companies Listed in Turkey. Problems and Perspectives in Management 4 (3): 100-133. Chen, C. J. P., and B. Jaggi. 2000. Association between Independent Non-executive Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19: 285-310. Cormier, D., and I. M. Gordon. 2001. An Examination of Social and Environmental Reporting Strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 14 (5)：587-616. Cormier, D., I. M. Gordon, and M. Magnan. 2004. Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management’s Perceptions with Reality. Journal of Business Ethics 49: 143-165. Cowen, S., Ferreri, L. B., and Parker, L. D. 1987. The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Typology and Frequency- based Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 (2): 111-122. Davis, K. 1973. The Case for and against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal 16 (2): 312-322. Deegan, C., and B. Gordon. 1996. A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26 (3): 187-199. Deegan, C., and M. Rankin. 1999. The Environmental Reporting Expectations GAP: Australian Evidence. British Accounting Review 31: 313-346. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu International (DTTI). 1993. Corporate Environmental Reporting. Coming Clean, Opening UP for Sustainable Development Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu International, London, International Institute for Sustainable Development & Sustainability Ltd. Downey, P. R. 2002. The Essential Stakeholder Dialogue. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9: 37-45. Forker, J. J. 1992. Corporate Governance and Disclosure Quality. Accounting and Business Research. 22: 111-124. Freeman, R. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Marshall, Pitman. Freedman, M., and B. Jaggi. 2005. Global warming, commitment to the Kyoto protocol, and accounting disclosures by the largest global public firms from polluting industries. The International Journal of Accounting 40 (3): 215-232. Gary, R., Kouhy, R., &Laver, S. 2002. Methodological Theme: Constructing a Research Database of Social and Environmental Reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8 (2): 78-101. Gray, R., R. Kouhy, and S. Lavers. 1995. Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting：A Review of the Literature and a Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8 (2)：47-77. Gray, R., D. Owen, and C. Adams. 1996. Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. London: Prentice-Hall Europe. Gamble, G. O., Hsu K., Kite D., and Radtke R. D. 1995. Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports and 10Ks: An Examination. Accounting Horizons 3: 34-54. Hossain, M., Tan, L. M. and Adams, M. 1994. Voluntary Disclosure in an Emerging Capital Market：Some Empirical Evidence From Companies Listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting 29: 334-351. Holland, L., Y. B. Foo. Differences in Environmental Reporting Practices in the UK and the US: The Legal and Regulatory Context. Journal of the British Accounting Review 35 (1): 1-18. Staden J.C., and J. Hooks. 2007. A Comprehensive Comparison of Corporate Environmental Reporting and Responsiveness. The British Accounting Review 39: 197-210. Magness, V. 2006. Strategic Posture, Financial Performance and Environmental Disclosure: An Empirical Test of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19 (4): 540-563. Meek, G. K., C. B. Roberts, and S. J. Gray. 1995. Factors Influencing Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures by U.S., U.K. and Continental European Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (3): 555-572. O’ Dwyer, B. 2002. Managerial Perceptions of Corporate Social Disclosure：An Irish Story. Accounting, Auditing&Accountability Journal 15 (3): 406-436. Patten, D. M. 1991. Exposure, Legitimacy, and Social Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10: 297-308. Patten, D. M. 1992. Intra-industry Environmental Disclosures in Response to the Alaskan Oil Spill: A Note on Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (5): 471-475. Patten, D. 2002. The Relation Between Environmental Performance and Environmental Disclosure: A Research Note. Journal of Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (8): 763-773. Patten, D., and G. Trompeter. 2003. Corporate Responses to Political Cost: An Examination of the Relation between Environmental Disclosure and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22: 83-94. Roberts, R. 1992. Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (7): 595-612. Robert, D. K., and Curtis P. M. 1996. The Impact of Environment Management on Firm Performance. Management Science 42 (8). Roy, M. J., and Vezina, R. 2001. Environmental Performance as a basis for Competitive Strategy: Opportunities and Threats. Corporate Environmental Strategy 8 (4): 339-347. Suchman, M. 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571-610. Ten, E. E. 2004. Determinants of Environmental Disclosures in a Developing Country: An Application of the Stakeholder Theory. Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, Singapore. Venkartraman, N., and V. Ramanujan. 1986. Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review 11 (4): 801-814. Walden, W., and Schwartz. B. 1997. Environmental Disclosures and Public Policy Pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16: 125-154. Wilmshurst, T.D., and G.R. Frost. 2000. Corporate Environmental Reporting: A Test of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 13 (1): 10-24. Wiseman, J. 1982. An Evaluation of Environmental Disclosures Made in Corporate Annual Reports. Journal of Accounting, Organizations and Society 7 (1): 53-63. Wood, D., and R. Jones. 1995. Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in the Empirical Research on Corporate social Performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3 (3): 229-267.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學會計研究所 98353016 99
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098353016
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Accounting] Theses

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

社群 sharing

Loading...