政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/50038
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造访人次 : 51270400      在线人数 : 876
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50038


    题名: 都市生態旅遊資源非市場價值之研究 – 以貓空地區為例
    The non-market value of urban ecotourism resources - a case study of MaoKong area
    作者: 劉匡英
    Liu, Kuang Ying
    贡献者: 邊泰明
    Ben, Tai-Ming
    劉匡英
    Liu, Kuang Ying
    关键词: 貓空
    生態旅遊
    非市場價值
    條件評估法
    MaoKong
    Ecotourism
    Non-Market Value
    Contingent Valuation Method(CVM)
    日期: 2008
    上传时间: 2010-12-09 16:44:52 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 20世紀60年代以降，在強調自然環境護與觀光地區永續利用理念的潮流之下，世界上許多關注於生態保育的學者與民間團體，紛紛提出並推廣了兼顧自然保育與遊憩發展目的—生態旅遊(ecotourism)。
    台灣地狹人稠且都市擴張迅速，使得許多自然環境資源已逐漸成為都市的一部分，加上近年來國人休閒意識的覺醒與親近自然環境的需求增加，更讓自然環境地區成為都市人們不可或缺的紓壓與渡假場所。位於台北市文山區南端的貓空地區，便是在過去20～30年間休閒遊憩發展蓬勃的景點，以鄰近都會區、特色茶產與宗教聖地—指南宮為名。貓空地區大多屬於農業保護區。海拔在七百公尺以下，雖不甚陡峭但地貌複雜多變、雨量豐沛，植物林相及生物資源豐富。加上貓空地區規劃完善之登山步道系統、遠近馳名的宗教聖地指南宮以及著名的茶產文化，提供了發展生態旅遊的生態動植物資源、休閒遊憩資源、宗教文化資源以及產業文化資源，且因為位於台北市都會區，與近年國際興起的「都市型生態旅遊」之型態不謀而合。
    都市型生態旅遊地區除了提供與一般遊憩區皆有的遊憩、休閒、教育等使用價值外，尚有生態環境保育效益的非使用價值存在，為評估都市生態旅遊地區所具有的完整環境價值，本研究運用條件評估法（Contingent Valuation Method, CVM），以支付卡法(payment card method)之詢價方式獲得遊客的願付價格(willing to pay, WTP)，並採用負二元名義(negative binomial)模式建立迴歸模型，獲得主要結果為：存在價值每年約3,693,065,610元，遺贈價值約每年5,368,737,520元，非市場價值高達約每年9,061,803,130元。
    From 1960s, due to the rise of environment protecting concepts and sustainable use of tourist spots, there are more and more non-government organizations and scholars, who care about ecological conversation, propose the importance of ecotourism, which aim at both the conversation of natural and recreation development.
    Taiwan is densely populated and has rapidly urban expansion, which has caused natural environmental resources gradually becoming a important part of city. Moreover, the awareness of leisure consciousness and increasing need for accessing to the natural have made it an indispensable relaxing and vacation location for Taipei people.
    Maokong, located at the south of Wen-Shan district in Taipei, is a famous spot with burgeoning creation activities over the past twenty-five years. It is well-known for its convenience, characteristic tea industry and the sacred place-Zhinan Temple. Mostly parts of Maokong belong to agricultural reservation. The altitude is 700 meters below, although not as steep as others, it has a diversity of terrain features, abundant in rainfall, botanical life-form and organism resources. Those plentiful ecological resources above, the great location near the urban, old-line religious history and culture, plus perfect planning of mountain climbing trail. With all the inborn conditions make Maokong perfect for developing the international-popular leisure style - urban ecotourism.
    Urban ecotourism place provides not only the use value of recreation, leisure and education, but also the non-use value of preservation benefits. In order to evaluate the total value, I used Contingent Valuation Method with Payment Card Method to get the Willing to Pay of tourists, and further I used the Negative Binomial to establish the model. The main result: the Existence Value is about $3,693,065,610(TWD) per year, the Bequest Value is about $5,368,737,520(TWD) per year, finally the Non-market value is about $9,061,803,130 (TWD).
    參考文獻: 中文參考文獻
    內政部營建署，2005，太魯閣國家公園的生態經濟效益分析，內政部營建署太魯閣國家公園管理處。
    台北市文山區公所，2002，文山區文史資料蒐錄計畫，台北市文山區公所。
    宋稟明，2000，「永續觀光發展原則與方向」，『觀光研究學報』，6(2)：1-14。
    吳怡彦，2008，「都市生態旅遊系統之研究」，朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所博士論文：台中。
    吳森田，2004，『經濟學』，台北：智勝文化事業有限公司。
    吳珮瑛、蘇明達，2001，「墾丁國家公園資源經濟效益之評估－兼論資源保育之哲學關與資源價值之內涵」，『國家公園學報』，11(1)：1-29。
    李永展，1998，台北市親山計畫 – 文山區二格山系實質規劃案，台北市政府都市發展局。
    李素馨，1996，「觀光新紀元－永續發展的選擇」，『戶外遊憩研究』，9(4)：1-17。
    李嘉英，2005，陽明山國家公園生態旅遊整體規劃案，內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。
    巫惠玲2003，「福寶濕地發展生態觀光經濟效益之研究」，逢甲大學土地管理研究所碩士論文：台中。
    林中暉，2006，「台灣北海岸岸釣活動發展潛力與效益評估之研究」，國立台灣海洋大學海洋資源管理研究所碩士論文：台北。
    林永森，2001，「地方觀光休閒產業關鍵成功因素與永續發展策略之探討」，『嶺東學報』，12：263-290。
    林明美，2008，「遺址博物館價值之經濟評估：以台灣十三行博物館為例」，中國文化大學建築與都市計畫研究所博士論文：台北。
    林晏州、沈立，2001，「台灣地區農業旅遊發展與展望」，『海峽兩岸二十一世紀觀光學術研討會』，pp.B-1~16。
    林淑瑜，1996，「雪霸國家公園遊憩效益評估研究」，國立中興大學資源管理研究所碩士論文：台中。
    林淑英，2007，「風景區土地使用管制體系之比較及景觀效益評估－以七星潭海岸風景特定區為例」，成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文：台南。
    林政德，1998，「條件評估法之嵌入效果分析：台灣野生動物保護區之應用」，國立中興大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文：台中。
    胡志平，2006，「生態遊憩區價值之估計－假設市場評價法之應用」，『建築與規劃學報』，7(1)1–17。
    唐嘉才，2007，「居民對休閒農業區推動生態觀光認知與態度之研究－以桃園縣中壢大崙自然生態休閒農業區計劃案為例」，政治大學地政學系碩士在職專班論文：台北。
    孫司寬，2004，「生態村非使用價值之評估－以桃米生態休閒農業村為例」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
    曹東月，2005，「地方文化觀光產業發展之研究－以台北市二格山系休閒空間為例」，東吳大學社會學系碩士論文：台北。
    陳明健等，2005，『自然資源與環境經濟學－理論基礎與本土案例分析』，台北：雙葉書廊。
    陳思倫、陳信甫，1998，「遊憩效益評估法之應用與比較—以綠島為例」，論文發表於<第二屆造園景觀與環境規劃設計研究成果研討會>，pp.177-190。
    陳恭鋑，1994，「關渡沼澤區的保護效益評估－假設性市場評估法之應用」，台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文：台北。
    陸雲，1990，「環境資源估價之研究－非市場估價方法」，『經濟論文』，中央研究院經濟研究所，18(1)：93-135
    張則堯，1986，「公共財的基本概念」，『中國經濟』，426：5-8。
    張玉芳，2003，「觀光地區永續發展危機之探討－以台北市貓空地區為例」，國立 臺北大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
    鼎漢國際工程顧問股份有限公司，2004，貓空纜車系統技術服務工作報告書，台北市政府交通局。
    黃婉倫，2005，「綠島生態維護稅願付價格之探討－條件評估法之應用」，台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文：台北。
    黃宗煌，1990，「台灣地區國家公園之保育效益評估」，台灣土地金融季刊，43(3)：305-325。
    黃泰雄，1981，「公共財理論之研究（上）』，『中國經濟』，367：4-11。
    楊珮欣，2008，「住商混合使用對房價之影響–台北市經驗」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：台北。
    廖祥亨，2003，「陽明山國家公園旅遊資源經濟價值評估」，中國文化大學經濟學研究所碩士論文：台北。
    趙得榮，1999，「公共工程計之畫經濟效益評估」，國立交通大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文：新竹。
    劉彥政，1995，「水泥業東移對花蓮地區環境景觀影響成本之研究－條件評估法之應用」，國立中興大學資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    劉癸君，2003，「以條件評估法與旅遊成本法評估阿里山森林遊樂區之遊憩效益」，國立嘉義大學農學院林業研究所碩士論文：嘉義。
    劉建村，1992，「防洪效益之評估－條件評估法之應用」，國立中興大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文：台中。
    鄭蕙燕，1995，「台灣地區休閒農場遊憩經濟效益之估測」，台灣經濟，22(8)：57-65。
    鄭旭智、張育哲、潘倩玉與林克明譯，J. Scott Long著，2002，『類別與受限依變項的迴歸統計模式』，台北：傑俊圖書公司。
    羅健文，2004，「台北市東區地下街使用者外部效益分析」，國立臺北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台北。
    蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭與溫麗琪，2002，『環境保護之成本效益分析─理論、方法與應用』，台北：傑俊圖書公司。
    闕雅文，2005，「自然資源之經濟效益評估及條件評估法：文獻回顧」，『區域人文社會學報』，8：105-126。

    外文參考文獻
    Adamowicz W. L., Bhardwaj V., Macnab B., 1993, “Experiments on the difference between willingness to pay and willingness to accept.”, Land Economics, 30: 43-57.
    Ali Asgary, Jason K. Levy, Nader Mehregan, 2007, “Estimating willingness to pay for a hypothetical earthquake early warning systems”, Environmental Hazards, 7: 312–320.
    Anni Huhtala, 2004, “What Price Recreation in Finland?－A contingent Valuation Study of Non-Market Benefits of Public Outdoor Recreation Areas”, Journal of Leisure Research, 36(1): 23-44.
    Aronsson, L., 1994, “Sustainable Tourism System: The Example of Sustainable Rural Toursim in Sweden”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2(12): 77-92.
    Arrow, K., R. Solow, E. Leamer, P. Porney, R. Rander and H. Schuamn, 1993, “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation”, Federal Register, 58: 4610-4614.
    Augustyn, M., 1998, “National Strategies for Rural Tourism Development and Sustainability: The Polish Experience”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 6(3): 191-209.
    Bateman, L. J. and R. K. Turner, 1992, “Evaluation of the Environment: A Contigent Valuation Method”, CSERGE Working Paper GEC, pp.92-118.
    Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Brett Day, Michael Hanemann, Nick Hanley, Tannis Hett, Michael Jones-Lee, Graham Loomes, Susana Mourato, Ece Ozdemiroglu, David W. Pearce OBE, Robert Sugden and John Swanson, 2002, Economics Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, U.K.
    Bishop RC, Heberlein TA, 1979, “Measuring values of extra-market goods: are indirect measures biased?”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61: 926-930.
    Boo, E, 1990, Ecotourism: Potentials and Pitfall, Washington, D.C.: World Wildlife Fund Report.
    Brougham, J. E., & Bulter, R. E., 1981, “A Segmentation Analysis of Resident Attitudes to the Social Impact of Tourism”, Annals of Tourism Research, 8(4): 569-589.
    Burkart A.J. & Medlik, S., 1990, Tourism: Past, Present and Future, Heinemann.
    Chirgwin, S. & Hughes, K., 1997, “Ecotourism: The participants’ perceptions”, Journal of Tourism Studies , 8 (2): 2–7.
    Choong-Ki Lee, James W. Mjelde, 2007, “Valuation of ecotourism resources using a contingent valuation method: The case of the Korean DMZ”, Ecological Economics, 63: 511-520.
    Clare.A.Gunn, 1988, Tourism Planning, England: Taylor & Francis.
    Clawson, M. ,1959, “Methods of Measuring the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation”, Resources for the Future, pp.63-120.
    C. Y. Jim, Wendy Y. Chen, 2006, “Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou”, China, Landscape and Urban Planning, 75: 81-96.
    Desvousges WH, Johnson FR, Dunford RW, Boyle KJ, Hudson SP and Wilson N., 1993, “Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: Tests of validity and reliability”, pp.91-159 in: Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. edited by Hausman JA, Amsterdam: North Holland.
    Dodds, R., 2001, Uuban Green Tourism - Ecotourism in the City: A Case Study of Toronto, Canada, Sustainable Development and Management of Ecotourism in the Americas:Preparatory Conference for the International Year of Ecotourism.
    Diwakar Poudel, Fred H. Johnsen, 2009, “Valuation of crop genetic resources in Kaski, Nepal: Farmers’ willingness to pay for rice landraces conservation”, Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 483-491.
    Dodds, R.& Joppe,M., 2001, “Promoting urban green tourism: The development of the other map of Toronto”, Journal of Vacation Marketing,7(3): 261-267.
    Dodds, R.& Joppe,M., 2003, “The application of ecotourism to urban environments”, Tourism,51(2): 22-39.
    Douglas Dalenberg, John M. Fitzgerald, Eric Schuck, John Wicks, 2004, “How Much Is Leisure Worth? Direct Measurement with Contingent Valuation”, Review of Economics of the Household, 2: 351-365.
    Driver, B.L., Brown, Perry J., 1975, ”A socio-psychological definition of recreation demand, with implications for recreation resource planning”, pp.64-88, in Assessing demand for outdoor recreation, Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
    Dwyer, L.& Deborah, E., 2000, “Nature-Based Tourism on the Edge of Urban Development”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8(4): 267-287.
    E.C.M. Ruijgrok, 2006, “The three economic values of cultural heritages: a case study in the Netherlands”, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 7: 206-213.
    Eiichiro Nishizawa, Tetsuji Kurokawa, Mitsuyasu Yabe, 2006,” Policies and resident’s willingness to pay for restoring the ecosystem damaged by alien fish in Lake Biwa, Japan”, Environmental Science & Policy, 9: 448-456.
    Gerard S. Dharmaratne, Francine Yee Sang, Leslie J. Walling, 2000, “Tourism potentials for financing protected areas”, Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3): 590-610.
    Gibson,.A., Dodds,R.,Joppe,M & Jamieson,B, 2003, “Ecoutourism in the city? Toronto’s Green Tourism Association”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management ,15( 6): 324-327.
    Gourieroux C., Monfort A., Trognon A., 1984, “Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods”, Theory Econometrica, 52: 681-700.
    Hamid Amirnejad, Sadegh Khalilian, Mohammad H. Assareh, Majid Ahmadian, 2006, “Estimating the existence value of north forests of Iran by using a contingent valuation method”, Ecological Economics, 58: 665-675.
    Hanemann W.M., 1991, “Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?”, American Economic Review, 81: 635-647.
    Hanemann W.M., 1994, “Valuing the environment through contingent valuation”, Journal of Economics Perspectives, 8: 19-43.
    Hassan, S.,2000, “Determinants of Market Competitiveness in an Environmentally Sustainable Tourism Idustry.”, Journal of Travel Research, 38: 239-245.
    Hetzer, N.D., 1965, “Environment, Tourism, Culture. Links”, Ecosphere, 1(2): 1-3.
    Hideo Aizaki, Kazuo Sato, Hiroshi Osari, 2006, “Contingent valuation approach in measuring the multifunctionality of agriculture and rural areas in Japan”, Paddy Water Environ, 4: 217-222.
    Higham.J. & Luck.M., 2002, “Urban Ecotourism:A Contradiction in Terms”, Journal of Ecotourism, 1(1): 36-51.
    Katrin Bernath, Anna Roschewitz, 2008, “Recreation benefits of urban forests: Explaining visitors’ willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior”, Journal of Environmental Management, 89: 155-166.
    Knetsch, J. L. and Davis,R. K., 1966, “Comparisons of methods for recreation evaluation.” in: The economics of the environment, Edited by Wallace E.Oates, pp.337-355.
    Kraus, R., 1990, Recreation and Leisure in Modern Society, Harper Collins.
    Krutilla J. V., 1967, “Conservation Reconsidered”, American Economic Review, 57(4): 777-786.
    Leung, Y.F., Marafa, L. & Chau, K .C., 2005, Urban ecotourism: Embracing or overstretching the concept - The case of Hong Kong, Proceedings of the 5th IUCN/WCPAEast Asia Conference on Protected Areas. Hong Kong: the Chinese University of H.K..
    Lisa HoÈrnstena, Peter Fredman, 2000, “On the distance to recreational forests in Sweden”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 51: 1-10.
    Loomis, J. B., and R.G. Walsh, 1986, “Assessing wildlife and environmental values in cost-benefit analysis : state of the art”, Journal of Environment Management, 22: 125-131.
    L.Venkatachalam, 2004, “The contingent valuation method: a review”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24: 89-124.
    Manning, E. W., & Dougherty, T. D., 1995, “Preserving Golden Goose, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly”, Cornell University press, pp.29-42.
    McConnell, E.Kenneth, 1983, “Existence and Bequest Value.” in Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parkand Wilderness Areas, edited by Robert, D.R. and G.C. Lakuraine. Boulder, Colo : Westview Press.
    Miller, G., 2001, “The Development of Indicators for Sustainable Tourism: Results of a Delphi Survey of Tourism Researchers”, Tourism Management, 22: 351-362.
    Miller, M.L., & Kaae, B.C., 1993, “Coastal and Marine Ecotourism: A Formula For Sustainable Development?”, Trends, 30(1): 35-41.
    Mitchell, R.C. and R.T. Carson, 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method, Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
    Patmore. A., 1972, Land and Leisure, Penquin Books.
    Patricia A. Champ, Kevin J. Boyle and Thomas C. Brown, 2003, A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, Netherland: Kluwer Academic.
    P. C. L. White and J. C. Lovett, 1999, “Public preferences and willingness-to-pay for nature conservation in the North York Moors National Park, UK”, Journal of Environmental Management, 55: 1-13.
    Pearce,.D.G., 2001, An Integrative Framework for Urban Tourism Research, Annals of Tourism Research, 28(4): 926–946.
    Portney PR.,1994, “The contingent valuation debate: Why economics should care”, Journal of Economics Perspectives, 8: 3-17.
    Rosen, S., 1974, “Hedonic Price and Implicit Markets: Product Differentation in Pure Competition”, Journal of Political Economy, 82: 34-35.
    Ross, S., & Wall, G., 1999, “Ecotourism: Towards Congruence Between Theory and Practice”, Tourism Management, 20: 123-132.
    Samuel Seongseop Kim, Kevin K. F. Wong, Min Cho, 2007, “Assessing the economic value of a world heritage site and willingness-to-pay determinants: A case of Changdeok Palace”, Tourism Management, 28: 317-322.
    Scarpa, R. and I. Bateman, 2000, “Efficiency Gains Afforded by Improved Bid Design versus Follow-up Valuation Questions in Discrete-choice CV Studies”, Land Economics, 76: 299-311.
    Schulze W. D., d’Arge R. C., Brookshire D. S., 1981, “Valuing environmental commodities: some recent experiments”, Land Economics, 57: 151-169.
    Schulze W. D., McClelland G., Waldman D., Lazo J., 1996, “Sources of bias in contingent valuation.”, pp.97-116 in: The contingent valuation of environmental resources: methodological issues and research needs, edited by Bjornstad D. J., Kahn J. R., Brookfield: Edward Elgar.
    Shogren J. F., Shin S. Y., Hayes D. J., Kliebenstein J. B., 1994, “Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept.“, American Economic Review, 84: 255-269.
    Smith K. V., 1992, “Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts.”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22: 71-89.
    Smith K., 1993, “Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources: an interpretative appraisal.”, Land Economics, 69: 1-26.
    Thomas Broberg, Runar Brannlund, 2008, “On the value of large predators in Sweden: A regional stratified contingent valuation analysis”, Journal of Environmental Management, 88: 1066-1077.
    Turner, R. K. 1993, Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management: Principles and Practice, New York Halsted Prebhss.
    Weaver, D.B. & Lawton, J. L., 2007, Twenty years on: The state of contemporary ecotourism research, Tourism Management:, 28: 168-1179.
    Wendy Y. Chen, C. Y. Jim, 2008, “Cost-benefit analysis of the leisure value of urban greening in the new Chinese city of Zhuhai”, Cities, 25: 298-309.
    Whitehead JC, Blomquist GC, 1990, “Measuring contingent values for wetlands: effects of information about related environmental goods”, A Research Report.
    Wight, P. A., 1993, Sustainable Ecotourism: Balancing Economic, Environment and Social Goals within an Ethical Framework. Journal of Tourism Studies, 4(2): 54-56.
    Wight, P. A., 1996, “North American Ecotourism Markets: Motivations, Preferences, and Destinations”, Journal of Travel Research, 35 (1): 3-10.
    Willig RD., 1976, “Consumer’s surplus without apology”, American Economic Review, 66: 589-97.
    Xu Zhongmin, Cheng Guodong, Zhang Zhiqiang, Su Zhiyong, John Loomis, 2003, “Applying contingent valuation in China to measure the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in Ejina region”, Ecological Economics, 44: 345-358.
    Ya-Wen Chiueh, Ming-chien Chen, 2008, “Environmental multifunctionality of paddy fields in Taiwan: an application of contingent valuation method”, Paddy Water Environ, 6: 229-236.

    網路參考資料
    International Eco-city association, 2006, The International Conference on Ecocities, Retrieved April 5, 2009 from: http://www.tciconferences.com/ecocity2006/scope_symposia.html
    Planeta, 2006, Urban Ecotourism Declaration, Retrieved April 5, 2009 from: http://www.planeta.com/ecotravel/tour/urbandeclaration.html
    Planeta, 2007, Defining Urban Ecotourism, Retrieved April 7, 2009 from: http://forum.planeta.com/viewtopic.php?t=257
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    96257006
    97
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096257006
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    700601.pdf123KbAdobe PDF2873检视/开启
    700602.pdf288KbAdobe PDF2922检视/开启
    700603.pdf137KbAdobe PDF2952检视/开启
    700604.pdf173KbAdobe PDF21009检视/开启
    700605.pdf448KbAdobe PDF21180检视/开启
    700606.pdf1151KbAdobe PDF22230检视/开启
    700607.pdf345KbAdobe PDF21247检视/开启
    700608.pdf299KbAdobe PDF21321检视/开启
    700609.pdf379KbAdobe PDF2996检视/开启
    700610.pdf241KbAdobe PDF21028检视/开启
    700611.pdf310KbAdobe PDF21351检视/开启
    700612.pdf216KbAdobe PDF21038检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈