政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/49977

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Master for Eminent Public Administrators > Theses > Item 140.119/49977

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49977

Title:	文化公共財願付價格之探討－以國立傳統藝術中心為例 Valuing a Cultural Public Good：The Case of “National Center for Traditional Art ”
Authors:	郭苔馥 Kuo, Tai Fu
Contributors:	王國樑郭苔馥 Kuo, Tai Fu
Keywords:	非市場財貨條件評估法願付價格單界二元選擇雙界二元選擇 non-market goods contingent valuation method willingness to pay single-bound dichotomous choice model double-bound dichotomous choice model
Date:	2006
Issue Date:	2010-12-09 15:29:17 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	由於社會變遷迅速，文化資產保存工作，無論在有形或無形資產方面均面臨了嚴苛的挑戰。許多為保存歷史建物、遺址、文物或技藝之民間組織或政府文化機構無不極力爭取以獲得必要的經費資源，以防止文化資產的快速流逝。近年來政府對文化資源的投入程度受到廣泛關注，在財政緊縮下，政府削減各項支出中有關文化設施之補助，或限縮地方政府的文化預算，引起各界對文化預算資源配置問題的熱烈討論，導致以經濟觀點衡量文化產出或文化設施之評價日顯重要。在俱歷史性之藝術或文化資源領域，由於其價值無法快速藉由市場價格機制訂出來，衡量文化政策之最適資源投資一直引起激烈爭議，在各部會資源競爭之下，為了獲得足夠的預算分配，政府各部門必須彰顯其對整體經濟效益之貢獻，因此近年來越來越多研究針對非市場財貨之公共投資進行經濟效益評估。調查民眾對文化公共財的願付價格，除可顯示民眾對文化公共財偏好強度以進行成本效益分析外，亦可作為該文化機構自行籌措財源擬訂定價策略之參考，並可提供政府當局財政配置及公共投資之依據，本篇研究將以非市場財貨評估中之條件評估法，以文建會所屬文化機構國立傳統藝術中心為例，求算民眾對該機構之願付價格。 <br>實證結果，在估計參數值部份，發現文化資產保存重要性認同度、文化資產遺贈價值認同度、文化資產預算擴編認同度、年齡、文化產業消費頻率等變數，對受訪者的支付意願均有顯著影響；第一階段與第二階段的詢價金額係數估計值為負並且顯著，表示當詢價金額提升時，受訪者會傾向於不願意支付。在單界二元選擇問答下，Logit模型估算其值為181.56元，Probit模型估算其值為199.12元，在95％信心水準下區間估計值Logit模型其值為191.56元到171.56元之間，Probit模型其值為205.90元到192.34元之間；在雙界二元選擇問答下以Bivariabe Probit 估算結果得到第一次詢價的願付價格為145.69元，第二次詢價的願付價格為218.42 元，實證結果單界與雙界二元選擇模型願付價格差異不大。 Nowadays, historic building, monument, and artifacts, facing difficult issue of damaging, are quickly dying away. Agencies and organizations whose mission is to protect and preserve historic and culturally important building, monument, and artifacts from the ravages of weather, pollution, development, and even use by the general public must compete urgently for needed resources. Government funding of the cultural arts has received considerable attention in recent years. Efforts to cut funding to the national endowment for the culture and declining budgets for public cultural organizations and art institution have raised questions about how much individuals value the culture and arts. Measuring the economic value of particular arts policies or public cultural organizations is difficult and important. The hard case for measuring economic value of cultural resources is that they are not captured readily by market prices. The appropriate resources to be allocated in public cultural or art institutions often get heated and considerable debate. Valuing the willingness to pay for cultural public goods, not only can be applied for measuring economic value to be used in benefit-cost analysis of public project, but also more efficient in the selection of investment program if the total value（use value and non-use value）can be estimated. The purpose of this study is using one of the non-market goods valuation method, contingent valuation method, to elicit a willingness to pay from individual for hypothetical changes in some situation, further more to value the use value and non-use value of the“National Center for Traditional Art ”. <br>The variables such as the IMPO,BEQU, BUDG, AGE, FRE1, have a significant positive effect on the WTP for a cultural public good valuing. The table broadly indicates that as the bid level is increased, the number of willing to pay the amount decreased. The empirical results show that under the single-bounded dichotomous choice model, the estimated WTP for Logit model is NT$181.56 and for Probit model is NT$199.12. Under the 95％ confidence, for Logit mode the estimated WTP is between NT $191.56 and NT $171.56, and for Probit model is between NT $205.90 and NT $192.34. Under the double-bounded dichotomous choice model, Bivariate Probit model was adopted to estimate the WTP. The first-estimated WTP is NT $145.69, and second-estimated WTP is NT $218.42. The estimated WTP under double bounded dichotomous choice model is not much different from the estimated WTP under single bounded dichotomous choice model.
Reference:	壹、中文部份王國恩，2003，「減重決策與其經濟效益之研究」。碩士論文，國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所。王麗婷，2004，「以條件評估法探討嘉義樹木園之非市場價值」。碩士論文，國立嘉義大學林業暨自然資源研究所。呂適仲，2000，「雪霸國家公園武陵遊憩區發展生態旅遊之遊憩資源效益評估」。碩士論文，東海大學景觀學研究所。邱泉勝，1999，「空氣污染之社會成本評估－以台中火力發電廠為例」。碩士論文，國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所。沈珍珍，2003，「臺灣賞鯨豚活動之遊憩效益評估」。碩士論文，國立海洋大學應用經濟研究所。吳珮瑛、蘇明達，2001，「墾丁國家公園資源經濟效益評估－兼論資源保育之哲學觀與資源價值之內涵」，國家公園學報。第11卷，第1 期，頁1-29。林耀彰，2006，「遊客對國立台灣美術館導覽解說人員需求與付費意願之研究」。碩士論文，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理研究所。林惠玲、陳正倉，2006，「應用統計學-三板」。台北：雙葉書廊有限公司。林佳穎，2004，「抗議性答覆與「無法確定」答覆特質之分析及其對效益評估的影響」。碩士論文，孫司寬，2003，「生態村非使用價值之評估－以桃米生態休閒農業村為例」。碩士論文，國立政治大學地政學系碩士在職專班研究所陳明健主編，2003，「自然資源與環境經濟學」。台北：雙葉書廊有限公司。陳凱俐，1997，「自然資源之經濟效益評估－以宜蘭縣蘭陽溪口為例」，台灣銀行季刊。第48 卷，第4 期，頁153-190。陳威廷，2004，「有害生物對臺灣農業生態環境影響之經濟分析－以福壽螺、果實蠅為例」。碩士論文，國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所。陳淑君，2002，「居民對文化資產保存認知與願付價格之研究」。碩士論文，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理研究所。陳恭鋑，1994。「關渡沼澤區的保護效益評估－假設市場評價法之應用」。碩士論文，國立台灣大學經濟學研究所。陳藍婷，1997，「台南縣七股鄉濕地經濟價值評估之研究」。碩士論文，淡江大學產業經濟學研究所。張曉芬，2004，「台灣地區家庭漁產品消費行為分析與其願付價格之估算」。碩士論文，國立海洋大學應用經濟研究所。張淑賢，2006，「大台中地區垃圾費隨袋徵收收費價格之研究」。碩士論文，逢甲大學財稅研究所。莊謹綺，2004，「基因改造食品之消費者偏好與風險願付價值分析」。碩士論文，國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所。」楊欣薇，2003，「台南市歷史文化園區經濟效益評估之研究」。碩士論文，長榮大學土地管理與開發研究所。黃琬倫，2003，「綠島生態維護稅願付價格之探討－條件評估法之應用」。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。曾筱芬，2006，「血壓改善之心臟血管疾病預防效益評估」。碩士論文，國立台灣大學農業經濟研究所。曾偉君，張意滄，2006，「年輕高等教育民眾對台灣鮭魚之願付價值」。農業與經濟，37期，頁125-156。劉癸君，2003，「以條件評估法與旅遊成本法評估阿里山森林遊樂區之遊憩效益」。碩士論文，國立嘉義大學森林暨自然資源研究所。劉錦添，1990，「淡水河水質改善的經濟效益評估─封閉式假設評估法之應用」。經濟論文叢刊。18 卷，2 期，99-128 鄧福麒，2003，「生態旅遊規劃方案下之居民參與和願付價值關係的探討－黑面琵鷺保護區之檢視」。碩士論文，國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所。羅惠怡，2005，「血液篩檢之效益評估」。碩士論文，逢甲大學財稅研究所。鍾宜庭，2005，「淡水漁人碼頭遊客遊憩體驗與願付價格之研究」。碩士論文，國立海洋大學海洋資源管理研究所。傅祖壇、楊文山，2006。「921 大地震災後重建經費之民眾捐款意願─ CVM 法之應用」，經濟研究，第四十二卷第一期：58-74。傅祖壇、葉寶文（2005），「應用CVM在健康效益之評估---高血壓疾病預防之願付價值」，經濟論文叢刊，33卷，1期，1-32。蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪，2002，「環境保護之成本效益分析：理論、方法與應用」。台北：俊傑書局。蕭代基、錢玉蘭、蔡麗雪，1998，「淡水河系水質與景觀改善效益之評估」。經濟研究，第35 卷，第1 期，頁29-59。闕雅文，1996，「海岸濕地保育與開發之決策分析~以鰲鼓濕地為例」。碩士論文，國立中興大學農業經濟研究所。貳、西文部分 Alberini, A., 1995. “Estimating Willingness–to–Pay Models of Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Survey Data,” Land Economics. 71(1):83-95. Boyle K.J. and Bishop R.C..(1988) .“Welfare Measurements Using Contingent Valuation：A Comparison of Techniques,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics.70: 20-28. Bengt Kristrom Homepage. http://www-sekon.slu.se/~bkr/ Cameron, T.A.and James, M.D (1986). “Efficient Estimation Methods or “Closed-Ended” Contingent Valuation Surveys,” The Review of Economics And Statistics.69: 269-276. Clawson, M., 1959. “Methods of Measuring the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation,” Reprint in Resources for the Future, Inc., 159 Washington, D.C., 1980 David Throsby and Glenn A. Withers. (1983). “Measuring community benefits from the arts.” Research paper no. 261 . Sydney : School of Economic and Financial Studies. Macquarie University. David Throsby (2001) .“ Economics and culture ,”Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press. David Throsby (2002).“Determining the value of cultural goods: How much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us？”Paper presented at the Contingent Valuation of Culture conference. Cultural Policy Center at the University of Chicago. Chicago. February. 2002. Eric Thompson, Mark Berger, Glenn Blomquist and Steven Allen . (2002).“Valuing the Art,A Contingent Valuation Approach .” Journal of Cultural Economics 26:87-113. Freeman, A.M.,(2003). “The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods (2nd edition) .”Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future. Green , J .and Laffont,J..J.(1979). “Incentives in Public Decision Making.” Amsterdam , North-Holland Hanemann, W. M., (1984). “Welfare Evalutions in Contingent Valution Experiments with Discrete Responses,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 4,1057-61. Hanemann, W. M., and Barbara Kanninen.(1998). “The Statistical Analysis Of Discrete-Response CV Data .” Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources University of California at Berkeley. Hanemann, W.M Homepage. http://are.berkeley.edu/~hanemann/ Hansen,B.T.(1997)“The Willingness-to-Pay for the Royal Theater in Copenhagen” Journal of Cultural Economics 21:1-28 Hotelling, H., 1947. “Letter to the National Parks Service, June 18,1947,” Studies of Outdoor Recreation, Outdoor Recreation ReviewCommission, Washington, D.C. Ian J. Bateman, Richard T. Carson, Brett Day, Michael Hanemann, Nick Hanley, Tannis Hett, Michael Jones-Lee, Graham Loomes and Susana Mourato（2002）“Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques.” Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.USA. Poor Joan, Jamie M. Smith. (2004). “The Travel Cost Analysis of a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case of Historic St. Mary City of Maryland . ” Journal of Cultural Economics 28:217-229,2004 Krutilla J.V.,(1967) “Conservation Reconsidered . ”American Economic Review, Vol.57,No.4: 777-786 Kelly H. Tiller, Paul M. Jakus, and William M. Park.,(1997) .“Household Willingness to Pay for Dropoff .” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22(2):310-320 Kenneth Arrow, Robert Solow, Paul R. Portney, Edward E. Leamer, Roy Radner and Howard Schuman,1993. “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation,”Federal Register.58:46004614 Lockwood M., Tracey P and Klomp, N.(1996).“Analysing Conflict between Cultural Heritage and Nature Conservation in Austrian Alps: A CVM Approach .” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 39(3):357-370 Lancaster, K., 1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,” Journal of Political Economy. 74: 132-157. Maddicon D.and Mourato S .(2001).“Valuing Different Road Option for Stonehenge.” Conservation and management of Archaeological Sites 4(4):203-212 Martin, Fernand .(1994).“ Determining the Size of Museum Subsidies.” Journal of Cultural Economics 18:255-270 Mc Connell,E.Kenneth,(1983). “Existence and Bequest Value In Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parkand Wilderness Areas.”.Edited by Robert,D.R.and G.C.Lakuraine.Boulder,Colo.:Westview Press Navrud, Stale and Ready, Richard, Richard C.(2002) “Valuing Cultural Heritage:Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Building, Monuments and Artifacts. ”Edward Elgar,Cheltenham Rosen, S., 1974. “Hedonic Price and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition,” Journal of Political Economy. 82: 34-35. Raymond J .Kopp, Werner W. Pommerehne and Norbert Schwarz （1997）. “Determining The Value of Non-Marketed Goods.” Kluwer Academic Publishers Richard C. Ready and Stale Navrud.(2002).“Valuing Cultural Heritage：Applying Environment Valuation Techniques to Historic Building, Monuments and Artifacts.” Pennsylvania State University, USA, Edward Elgar. Starret, A.D.(1988). “ Foundations of Public Economics ,”Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Snowball. J. D.. and G..G. Antrobus. (2001). “ Measuring the value of the arts to society: The importance of the value of externalities for lower income and education groups in South Africa,”South African Journal of Economics. 69 (4): 752—766. Timothy C. Haab and Kenneth E. McConnel（2002）. “Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources －The Econometrics of Non –Market Valuation.” Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.USA. Walter Santagata and Giovanni Signorello.(2000).“Contingent Valuation of a Cultural Public Good and Policy Design: The Case of “Napoli Musei Aperti.” Journal of Cultural Economics 24:181-204.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 94921039 95
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094921039
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
103901.pdf	420Kb	Adobe PDF2	1223	View/Open
103902.pdf	427Kb	Adobe PDF2	909	View/Open
103903.pdf	870Kb	Adobe PDF2	1385	View/Open
103904.pdf	1122Kb	Adobe PDF2	13816	View/Open
103905.pdf	756Kb	Adobe PDF2	2260	View/Open
103906.pdf	1305Kb	Adobe PDF2	1831	View/Open
103907.pdf	361Kb	Adobe PDF2	1130	View/Open
103908.pdf	319Kb	Adobe PDF2	1518	View/Open
103909.pdf	443Kb	Adobe PDF2	812	View/Open
103910.pdf	739Kb	Adobe PDF2	1024	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...