Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49948
|
| Title: | 佛教中觀應成派對Axel Honneth批判理論之反思
The reflection on Axel Honneth`s critical theory through prasangika-madhyamika buddhism |
| Authors: | 吳秉儒 |
| Contributors: | 黃厚銘
吳秉儒 |
| Keywords: | 格魯派
中觀應成派
二諦
霍奈特
法蘭克福學派批判理論
dGe Lugs pa
prasangika-madhyamika
two-truths
Axel Honneth
The Frankfurt School of Critical Theory |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-09 14:42:58 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本篇論文主要是以藏傳佛教的格魯派所詮釋的中觀應成派思想，來反思Axel Honneth批判理論。雖然兩者都共同關懷如何解決現實的痛苦，都努力提出一個能夠具體解決當前人類不滿的實踐方案，但由於兩者所辨認的痛苦成因有所差異，因此提出了不同的解決之道。本篇論文站在中觀應成派「二諦」的角度，認為Honneth所提出的批判理論並沒有正確地辨認出痛苦的根源「自性執」，而僅僅提出了「世俗諦」層次的解決方案，因而無法真正地對症下藥，從根源之處解決痛苦。
本篇論文企圖論證以下兩個命題：第一，我們必須正確地掌握「作為痛苦的根源的自性執」，如果不透過這個步驟，就沒有辦法根本地解決痛苦。進一步我們應該要了解到，Honneth批判理論本身也是自性空的，否則一個企圖解決痛苦的理論資源，本身反而就是增加痛苦根源的一部份。第二，由於「黑格爾左翼的批判理論」所提倡的「具體地提出具有交互主體性的解決痛苦的實踐方案」這個訴求是作為中觀應成派與批判理論的共同關懷，因此，我也企圖說明從「二諦」的觀點出發，並不會與這個基本關懷相衝突，如此一來，就能夠說明以中觀應成派的二諦作為分析基礎，是具有社會實踐的潛力的。
為了論證這兩個命題，本文的章節安排如下。首先，第一章作為導論，說明全篇文章的論證架構。第二章則說明Honneth所定位的批判理論，即「黑格爾左翼」及其重要的概念「內在超越」的意涵。這樣的方法論特別強調了「對當前的痛苦提出具體的實踐性解決方案」的訴求。在第三章中，我把焦點放在Honneth所提出的「為承認而鬥爭」的批判理論模型，主要的目的是概要出承認理論的根本命題。在第四章中，我會討論中觀應成派的幾個主要概念，即「所破」和「二諦」，希望透過這三個概念能夠概要出格魯派思想的核心，並以此為基礎來形成反省Honneth批判理論的基礎架構。第五章則具體地說明「Honneth承認理論各個概念的空性」。我將從中觀應成派的思想中，提取較為相關的討論來進行說明，包括了「『人』無自性」、「『行動與行動者』無自性」、「『貪欲與貪者』無自性」以及「『苦』無自性」等等討論，這些都是對應於Honneth承認理論的核心概念而來。第六章為結論，以前五章的討論為基礎，重新說明上述的兩個命題。
In this thesis, I want to reflect Axel Honneth`s critical theory through Tibetan Buddhism dGe Lugs pa, founded by Tsongkhapa in the fourteen century, who followed and expounded the thought of prAsaGgika-mAdhyamika. Both Honneth and dGe Lugs pa are focusing how to comfort people`s suffering realistically and practically. However, by means of the thought of dGe Lugs pa, especially the view of two-truths, we could point out that Honneth`s approach would fail to solve the problem causing people`s suffering completely, because he did not recognize the real cause of the suffering. In the view of dGe Lugs pa, our suffering is resulted from the innate ignorance in our consciousness which grasps everything as existing truly and inherently.
I want to prove two propositions in this thesis: in the first place, I argue that we can`t really comfort our suffering completely unless we recognize the true cause of the suffering, the ignorance of seeing things inherently existing, and transform it rightly by means of understand that everything is empty of inherent existence without exception. I will reflect Honneth`s critical theory and find that all essential concepts of his theory of recognition are empty of inherent existence. Secondly, I argue that if we rightly understand dGe Lugs pa`s thought, we would not abandon the goal of practically resolving the problems causing people`s suffering, which is the common interest of Axel Honneth and dGe Lugs pa.
In order to prove these two propositions, I arrange the thesis into six chapters. The first chapter is the introduction to the thesis`s main arguments. The following two chapters focus on Honneth`s critical theory: in chapter two I will illustrate the so called " left-Hegelianism", by this concept Honneth emphasis the critical theory which is directed to diagnosis the social pathology, and accordingly transform it practically through social praxis; the third chapter will elaborate the model of "struggle for recognition", which is founded by Honneth to revive the left-Hegelianism critical theory at the present time. In chapter four I will illustrate some essential concepts of dGe Lugs pa, including the concept of svabhAva, two-truths and bodhicitta. Through these illustrations I want to found the tool for pointing out the misrecognition of the cause of suffering in Honneth`s critical theory, and explain the dGe Lugs pa`s alternative solution to the problem causing people`s suffering. In fifth chapter, some reasoning using for proving the emptiness of inherent existence will be expounded, the concepts which we want to show empty of inherent existence are: "I", persons, actor, act, suffering, the person who suffers, desirous one and the desire. These concepts are those essential for Honneth`s critical theory. By means of understanding the emptiness of these concepts, we will understand those concepts Honneth used for constructing his theory are empty of inherent existence. In chapter six, the conclusion of this thesis, I will use the resources illustrated in above five chapters to restate the two propositions arguing in the introduction. |
| Reference: | 1.佛教經論
龍樹菩薩 (2000),
龍樹六論：正理聚及其注釋, 北京, 民族出版社.
月稱菩薩 (1975),
入中論 (1 Edition), 台北, 新文豐.
三枝充德 (1985),
中論偈頌總覽, 東京, 第三文明社
土觀洛桑卻吉尼瑪 (2000),
土觀宗派源流：講述一切宗派源流和教義善說晶鏡史, 北京: 民族出版社.
宗喀巴尊者 (1991),
入中論善顯密義疏, 台北市, 法爾.
宗喀巴尊者. (2005).
菩提道次第廣論, 台北: 方廣文化.
貢却亟美汪波 (2009),
宗義寶鬘 (2 Edition), 台北, 法爾.
章嘉‧若白多杰 (2004),
章嘉國師論中觀, 蘭州, 甘肅民族出版社. (章嘉三世的《宗義建立明釋》之〈中觀應成派章〉的中譯本)
法幢吉祥賢 (2005),
`宗義建立`, 正觀, 32.
僧成. (2000).
"中觀根本慧論文句釋寶鬘論", 龍樹六論：正理聚及其注釋. 北京: 民族出版社.
Nāgārjuna. (1997).
Master of wisdom : writings of the Buddhist Master Nāgārjuna, C. Lindtner, translator, Berkeley, Calif.: Dharma Publications.
Nāgārjuna(2007).
Nāgārjuna`s Precious garland : Buddhist advice for living and liberation, J. Hopkins, translator, Ithaca, N.Y.: Snow Lion Publications.(《寶行王正論》的英譯本和譯著)
Khapa, T. (2006),
Ocean of Reasoning: a great commentary on Nagarjuna`s Mulamadhyamakakarika, New York, Oxford university press. (宗喀巴尊者，《中觀根本般若論頌疏：正理海》英譯本)
Sopa, G.L. and Hopkins, J. (1976),
Practice and Theory of Tibetan Buddhism, New York, Grove Press.(《宗義寶鬘》之英譯本)
Hopkins, J. (1995).
Emptiness Yoga: the Tibetan middle way, Ithaca, New York: Snow Lion Publications. (章嘉若悲多傑之〈《宗義建立明釋》之中觀應成派〉英譯及註釋)
Hopkins, J. (1996),
Meditation on emptiness, Boston, Mass, Wisdom Publications. (一世嘉木樣《大宗義》之〈中觀應成派章〉譯註)
2.Axel Honneth之作品
Honneth, A. (1982a).
“Work and Instrumental Action.” New German Critique, 26.
Honneth, A. (1982b).
“Moral Consciousness and Class Domination: some problems in the analysis of hidden morality”. Praxis International 2(1).
Honneth, A. and Joas, H. (1988),
Social Action and Human Nature, Cambridge, University Press
Honneth, A. (1990).
“Atomism and Ethical Life: on Hegel`s critique of the French Revolution.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 14(3/4).
Honneth, A. (1991).
“Domination and Moral Struggle: The Philosophy Heritage of Marxism Reviewed.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 14(1).
Honneth, A. (1992).
“Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition.” Political Theory, 20(2).
Honneth, A.(1993a)
“Critical Theory in Germany Today: an interview with Axel Honneth”, Radical Philosophy, vol.65.
Honneth, A. (1993b)
The critique of power : reflective stages in a critical social theory. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Honneth, A. (1995a)
The struggle for recognition : the moral grammar of social conflicts (J. Anderson, Trans.). Cambridge, Mass. : Polity Press.
Honneth, A. (1995b),
The fragmented world of the social : essays in social and political philosophy. Albany, N.Y., State University of New York Press.
Honneth, A. (1996).
“Pathologies of the Social: the past and present of social philosophy.” In D. Rasmussen (Ed.), The handbook of critical theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
Honneth, A. (1997).
“Recognition and Moral Obligation.” Social Research, 64(1).
Honneth, A. (1999a).
“The social dynamics of disrespect: situating critical theory today”. In P. Dews (Ed.), Habermas: a ctitical reader. Malden, Mass. : Blackwell.
Honneth, A. (1999b),
`Postmodern Identity and Object-Relations Theory: On the Seeming Obsolescence of Psychoanalysis`, Philosophical Explorations, 2, 3.
Honneth, Axel. (1999c).
“Mutual Recognition as a Key for a Universal Ethics." in International Conference on Universal Ethics and Asian Value. Seoul, Korea.
Honneth, A. (2001a).
"Recognition or Redistribution?: Changing Perspectives on the moral order of society." Theory Culture Society.18(2/3)
Honneth, A., & Margalit, A. (2001b).
“Invisibility: on the epistemology of recognition.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 75.
Honneth, A. (2002a),
`Grounding Recognition: A rejoinder to Critical Questions`, Inquiry, 45.
Honneth, A., Petersen, A. and Willig, R. (2002b),
`An Interview with Axel Honneth: The Role of Sociology in the Theory of Recognition`, European Journal of Social Theory, 5.
Honneth, A. and Fraser, N. (2003b),
Redistribution or recognition? : a political-philosophical exchange, New York Verso.
Honneth, A., & Markle, G. (2004a).
“From Struggles for Recognition to a Plural Concept of Justice: An Interview with Axel Honneth.” Acta Sociologica, 47(4).
Honneth, A. (2004b).
“A social pathology of reason: on the intellectual legacy of critical theory.” In F. Rush (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory. New York Cambridge University Press.
Honneth, A., & Anderson, J. (2005b).
“Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice”. In J. Philip, J. Christman & J. A. Christman (Eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays Cambridge University Press.
Honneth, A. (2006). “The Work of Negativity: a psychoanalytical revision of the theory of recognition”. Critical Horizons, 7(1).
Honneth, A. (2007a),
`Recognition as Ideology`, in Brink, B.v.d. and Owen, D. (eds.), Recognition and power : Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory. New York Cambridge University Press.
Honneth, A. (2007b).
“rejoinder”. In B. v. d. Brink & D. Owen (Eds.), Recognition and power : Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory New York Cambridge University Press.
Honneth, A. (2008).
Reification : a new look at an old idea. Oxford University Press.
Honneth, A. (2009a).
“Reconstructive Social Criticism with a Genealogical Proviso: On the Idea of “Critique” in the Frankfurt School”. In Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press
3.其他
王堯, & 字天挺. (1995).
宗喀巴評傳. 南京: 南京大學出版社.
白曉麟 (1987),
`佛教在西藏的演變`, 西藏佛教論集 台北: 文殊出版社.
王鳳才(2008)
蔑視與反抗─霍耐特承認理論與法蘭克福學派批判理論的「政治倫理轉向」，重慶出版社
拉馬. (1987).
"早期的西藏佛教" 西藏佛教論集. 台北: 文殊出版社.
周平. (2004).
"諸法皆空：質性研究與知識想像", 林本炫、何明修, (ed.), 質性研究方法及其超越. 嘉義大林: 南華大學教育社會學研究所.
周平. (2005).
"以中觀的觀點空去社會學理論中的二元論與實體論", 黃瑞祺、羅曉南, (ed.), 人文社會科學的邏輯. 台北: 松慧文化.
周平. (2009).
"社會畢竟空何處惹塵埃？", in 鄒川雄、蘇峰山, (ed.), 社會科學本土化之反思與前瞻：慶祝葉啟政教授榮退論文集. 嘉義大林: 南華大學教育社會學研究所.
周加巷 (1981),
宗喀巴傳, 青海, 新華出版.
格梅茲. (1993).
‘談戒與持戒.’ 中華佛學研究所, 6.
陳俊宏. (1997).
社會學實體論問題：龍樹中觀哲學的啟發, 國立台灣大學碩士論文, 台北.
御牧克已 (1991),
`西藏宗義文獻(學說綱要書)的問題`, 西藏的佛教 台北: 法爾出版社.
劉宇光. (2002).
‘經院哲學：以中觀「四句」為線索.’ 哲學門, 3(2).
劉宇光. (2005a).
"譯詞說明", 藏傳佛教中觀哲學. 北京: 中國人民大學出版社.
劉宇光. (2005b).
"附錄1: 當代西方的藏傳佛教哲學研究1980-2005", 藏傳佛教中觀哲學. 北京: 中國人民大學出版社.
劉宇光. (2005c).
"譯者導言", 藏傳佛教中觀哲學. 北京: 中國人民大學出版社.
劉宇光 (2006),
`左翼佛教 (Engaged Buddhism) : 激進佛學、世俗公民社會與現代佛教的政治反省`, 世界宗教學刊, 7, 42.
傅偉勳. (1995).
佛教思想的現代探索, 台北: 東大.
傅偉勳. (1999).
從創造的詮釋學到大乘佛學, 台北: 東大圖書.
釋法尊. (1987).
西藏與西藏佛教. 台北: 天華.
釋法尊 (2002),
法尊法師論文集 (2 Edition), 台北縣, 大千.
釋觀空. (1987).
"西藏格魯派概觀", 西藏佛教論集. 台北: 文殊出版社.
釋觀空 (2000),
`中觀宗二諦略義`, 龍樹六論：正理聚及其註釋, 北京, 民族出版社.
林鎮國 (1999),
空性與現代性 : 從京都學派、新儒家到多音的佛教詮釋學. 台北, 立緒文化.
廖本聖 (2005),
`至尊法幢吉祥賢著《宗義建立》之譯著研究`, 正觀, 32.
Buddhadasa, B. (1996),
法的社會主義, 嘉義, 香光書鄉.
Epstein, M. (2007).
那一夜，佛洛依德遇見佛陀，聊欲望, 梁永安, translator, 台北: 橡實文化.
Fromm, E. (1971),
心理分析與宗教, 台北, 有志圖書.
Fromm, E. (1998),
`精神分析與禪宗`, 禪宗與精神分析, 貴州, 貴州人民出版社.
Gumnior, H., & Ringguth, R. (1992)
霍克海默. 北京: 中國社會科學出版社發行.
Horkheimer, M. (1989),
批判理論, 台北, 結構群.
Löwith, K. (2006).
從黑格爾到尼采 : 19世纪思维中的革命性決裂, 北京: 新知三聯.
Mclellan, D. (1987).
青年黑格爾學派與馬克思. 台北縣: 谷風.
Hubbard, J. and P. Swanson, Eds. (2004).
修剪菩提樹：「批判佛教」的風暴. 上海, 上海古籍出版社.
Schumacher, E.F. (2000),
小卽是美 : 一本把人當回事的經濟學著作, 台北, 立緒文化.
Thurman, R. (1999).
內在革命 : 生命,自由,與眞正幸福的追求, 台北: 遠流.
Allen, J. (1998).
The situated critic or the loyal critic? Rorty and Walzer on social criticism Philosophy & Social Criticism, 24(6).
Benjamin, J. (1988).
The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problems of Domination. Pantheon Books.
Benjamin, J. (1996).
"Master and slave: the bond of love", in J. O`Neill, (ed.), Hegel`s dialectic of desire and recognition : texts and commentary. Albany: State University of New York.
Bottomore, T. (1983).
A Dictionary of Marxist thought . City: Blackwell Reference: Oxford.
Bottomore, T. (1984)
The Frankfurt School. London ; New York Tavistock.
Brien, K. (1996),
`Marx and the Spiritual Dimension`, Topoi, 15.
Brien, K. (2002).
"Logos and Mythos: Humanistic-Marxism and Buddhism." Dialogue and Universalism, 3.
Brien, K. (2004),
`Buddhism and Marxism: Ironic Affinities`, Dialogue and Universalism, 1, 2.
Broido, M. (1988),
`verdical and delusive cognition: Tsong-Kha-Pa on the two satyas`, Journal of lndian Philosophy 16.
Bunnin, N., & Yu, J. (2004).
The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy, Malden, MA: blackwell publishing.
Butler, J. (1987).
Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth-Century France, New York: Columbia University Press.
Deranty, J.-P. (2004).
"Injustice, Violence and Social Struggle. The Critical Potential of Axel Honneth`s Theory of Recognition. ." Critical Horizons 5(1).
Deranty, Jean-Philippe (2005),
`The Loss of Nature in Axel Honneth`s Social Philosophy`, Critical Horizons, 6 (1).
Dreyfus, G.B.J. and McClintock, S.L. (eds.) (2003),
The Svatantrika-Prasangika distinction : what difference does a difference make?, Wisdom Publications, Somerville, Mass.
Eppsteiner, F. (ed.) (1988),
The Path of Compassion: writings on socially engaged Buddhism, Parallax Press, Berkeley, California.
Fromm, E. (2001),
Beyond the Chains of Illusion: my encounter with Marx and Freud, New York, Continuum International publishing Group.
Goodman, C. (2009).
Consequences of compassion : an interpretation and defense of Buddhist ethics . Oxford Oxford University Press.
Gyatso, G. K. (1997).
Understanding the Mind: an explanation of the nature and functions of the mind. London: Tharpa Publications.
Gyatso, T. (1998),
`Hope for the Future`, in Eppsteiner, F. (ed.), The Path of Compassion: writings on socially engaged Buddhism, Berkeley, CA, Parallax Press.
Hackett, P. (2001).
"Drawing the Steel Bow: a bibliographic appreciation of the literary legacy of Paul Jeffrey Hopkins and His program at the University of Virginia", in G. Newland, (ed.), Changing Minds: contributions to the study of Buddhism and Tibet in honor of Jeffrey Hopkins. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications.
Hattam, R. (2004),
Towards a Buddhist Critical Social Theory: Towards a Buddhist Critical Social Theory, Post Pressed.
Heidegren, C.-G. r. (2002).
"Anthropology, Social Theory, and Politics: Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition." Inquiry, 45.
Horkheimer, M. (1982).
“traditional and critical theory” Critical theory : selected essays. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group
Hopkins, Jeffrey (1988),
`Ultimate Reality in Tibetan Buddhism`, Buddhist-Christian Studies, 8.
Hopkins, J. (1989).
"A Tibetan delineation of different views of Emptiness in the Indian Middle Way School: Dzong-ka-ba`s two interpretations of the Locus Classicus in Chandrakirti`s Clear Words showing Bhavaviveka`s assertion of commonly appearing subjects and inherent existence." Tibet Journal, 14(1).
Hopkins, J. (1996a),
Meditation on emptiness, Boston, Mass, Wisdom Publications.
Hopkins, J. (1996b).
"The Tibetan Genre of doxography: structuring a worldview", in J. I. Cabezon and R. R. Jackson, (eds.), Tibetan Literature: studies in genre. Ithaca, New York: Snow Lion Publications.
Hopkins, J. (2007),
Nāgārjuna`s Precious garland : Buddhist advice for living and liberation (2 Edition), Ithaca, N.Y., Snow Lion Publications.
Ikaheimo, H. (2002).
On the Genus and Species of Recognition. Inquiry, 45.
Inwood, M. (1992).
A Hegel dictionary. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Publishers.
Laitinen, A. (2002).
Interpersonal Recognition: A Response to Value or a Precondition of Personhood? Inquiry, 45.
Jinpa, T. (2002).
Self, reality and reason in Tibetan philosophy : Tsongkhapa`s quest for the Middle. Way New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
Jones, K. (1988),
`Buddhism and Social Action: an exploration`, in Eppsteiner, F. (ed.), The Path of Compassion: writings on socially engaged Buddhism, Berkeley, California, Parallax Press.
Jones, K. (2003),
The New Social Face of Buddhism: a call to action, Boston, Wisdom Publications.
Kalyvas, A. (1999)
“Critical Theory at the Crossroads: Comments on Axel Honneth`s Theory of Recognition.” European Journal of Social Theory 2(1)
Keown, D. V. (2000).
Contemporary Buddhist ethics . City: Curzon Press: Richmond, Surrey, England.
Keown, D. V., Prebish, C. S., and Husted, W. R. (1998).
Buddhism and human rights. City: Curzon Press: Richmond, Surrey, England.
Kompridis, N. (2004),
`From Reason to Self-Realisation? Axel Honneth and the `Ethical Turn` in Critical Theory `, Critical Horizons, 5, 1.
Loy, D. (2003).
The great awakening: a Buddhist social theory, Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Marcuse, H. (1988),
`Philosophy and critical theory `, Negations : essays in critical theory, London, Free Association Books.
Napper, E. (1986).
Mind in Tibetan Buddhism. New York: Sonw Lion.
Napper, E. (2003).
Dependent-Arising and Emptiness: A Tibetan Buddhist Interpretation of Madhyamika Philosophy Emphasizing the Compatibility of Emptiness and Conventional Phenomena. MA. USA: Wisdom Publications.
Newland, G. (1992),
The two truths in the Mādhyamika philosophy of the Ge-luk-ba order of Tibetan Buddhism, Ithaca, New York, Snow Lion Publications.
Newland, G. (1999).
Appearance and Reality: the two truths in the four Buddhist tenet systems. Ithaca, New York: Snow Lion Publications.
O`Neill, J. (1996).
Hegel`s dialectic of desire and recognition : texts and commentary, Albany: State University of New York.
Sprung, M. (ed.) (1973),
The problem of two truths in Buddhism and Vedanta, D. Reidel Publishing Comoany, Dordrecht.
Thakchoe, S. (2007),
The Two Truths Debate: Tsongkhapa and Gorampa on the Middle Way, Boston, Wisdom Publications.
Thurman, R. (1988),
`Nagarjuna`s Guidelines for Buddhist Social Activism`, in Eppsteiner, F. (ed.), The Path of Compassion: writings on socially engaged Buddhism, Berkeley, California, Parallax Press.
Westerhoff, J. (2009),
Nāgārjuna`s Madhyamaka: a philosophical introduction. New York, Oxford University Press
Williams, P. (1983).
"A note on some aspects of Mi bskyod rdo rje`s critique of dGelugs pa Madhyamika." Journal of Indian Philosophy, 11.
Williams, P. (1989).
"Introduction: some random reflections on the study of Tibetan Madhyamika." Tibet Journal, 14(1).
Yar, M. (2001).
"Recognition and the Politics of Human(e) Desire." Theory, Culture & Society, 18.
Zurn, Christopher. (2000).
"Anthropology and normativity: a critique of Axel Honneth`s `formal concept of ethical life`." Philosophy Social Criticism 26.
4.工具書
荻原雲來. (1979).
梵和大辭典, 台北: 新文豐.
張怡蓀. (1992).
藏漢大辭典, 台北: 新文豐.
The Oxford English dictionary online , Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press. (簡稱OED) |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
95254005
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095254005 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 400501.pdf | 1814Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1923 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
