Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49890
|
| Title: | 有助於國小學童英語聽力之聽前教學活動研究
The Effectiveness of pre-listening activities on listening comprehension in elementary english teaching |
| Authors: | 楊智媛
Yang, Chih Yuan |
| Contributors: | 葉潔宇
Yeh, Chieh Yu
楊智媛
Yang, Chih Yuan |
| Keywords: | 聽力理解
聽力教學
聽力理解過程
由下而上
由上而下
相互作用
listening comprehension
listening teaching
listening comprehension processing
bottom-up processing
top-down processing
interactive processing |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-09 12:17:16 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探討不同聽力教學法對台灣國小學童聽力表現之影響，並試圖了解國小學童處理聽力之過程。本研究將七十六位國小五年級學童，其中包括五十二位男性與二十四位女性，分為「自下而上教學(bottom-up)」與「相互作用教學(interactive)」兩組，進行十五週之聽力教學。學童於聽力教學前後，均以劍橋兒童英檢初級(Starter Level)之聽力測驗進行前測與後測；同時，學童於每週聽力教學後，均須完成一份聽力小考，共計十五份。受試學童之前測、後測與十五次聽力小考皆以統計計量法加以計算，作為探討兩種聽力教學法成效之依據。此外，後測結束後，「相互作用教學(interactive)」組之學童接受問卷調查，以了解國小學童處理聽力之過程。
本研究主要發現「自下而上教學(bottom-up)」與「相互作用教學(interactive)」兩組之聽力表現並無重大差異。但整體而言，「相互作用教學(interactive)」組之平均分數較優於「自下而上教學(bottom-up)」組。問卷結果顯示，受訪之國小學童較常使用「由上而下」之訊息處理方式(top-down processing)，但大多數之受訪者表示，了解每一個單字的意義是聽力理解之關鍵因素。本研究最後提出若干相關建議以供參考。
The purposes of this study were to identify effective teaching activities that improve elementary EFL students’ listening comprehension and to investigate when learners rely on top-down processing, bottom-up processing, and interactive processing.
Participants in this study were 76 fifth graders from two classes in an elementary private school in Taipei County, including 52 males and 24 females. One of the two classes was treated with bottom-up pre-listening activities, while the other class was treated with interactive pre-listening activities. A pre-test and a post-test, adopted from the Starter level in the Cambridge Young Learners’ English Test, were implemented before and after a 15-week listening instruction. During the 15-week listening teaching, participants were also required to take a listening quiz after each session of teaching. Scores of the pre-test, post-test and the 15 listening quizzes were calculated by employing statistical measures to investigate the effectiveness of the two types of pre-listening activities, namely interactive and bottom-up pre-listening activities. Further, a questionnaire was administered for the interactive group after the post-test to investigate when learners relied on top-down processing, bottom-up processing and interactive processing.
The major findings of the study are: first, results from participants’ listening scores revealed that there was no significant improvement between pre-test and post-test of the two groups although the mean scores of the interactive group were higher than that of the bottom-up group; second, results from the questionnaire indicated that participants employed top-down processing more frequently than bottom-up processing in their listening, while they viewed the understanding of each word (bottom-up processing) as essential to listening comprehension. Suggestions and implications are made at the end of the study. |
| Reference: | Adams, M. J., & Collins, A. (1979). A schema-theoretic view of reading. In Roy O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 1-22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Anderson, A., & Lynch, T. (1988). Listening. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14(4), 367-381.
Anderson-Hsieh, J., & Koehler, K. (1988). The effects of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, 38, 561-613.
Asher, J. J. (1977). Children learning another language: A developmental hypothesis. Child Development, 48(3), 1040-1048.
Asher, J. J. (1982). Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher’s guidebook. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks.
Bacon, S. M. (1989). Listening for real in the foreign-language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 22(6), 543-551.
Bacon, S. M. (1992). Authentic listening in Spanish: How learners adjust their strategies to the difficulty of input, Hispania, 75, 29-43.
Bartlett, Frederic C. (1932). Remembering : A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beall, M. L., Gill-Rosier, J., Tate, J., & Matten, A. (2008). State of the context: Listening in education. The International Journal of Listening, 22, 123-132.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning and Instruction (pp. 361-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Berne, J. E. (1995). How do varying pre-listening activities affect second language listening comprehension? Hispania, 78(2), 316-329.
Blau, E. K. (1990). The effect of syntax, speed and pauses on listening comprehension, TESOL Quarterly, 24, 746-753.
Blau, E. K. (1991). More on comprehensible input: The effect of pauses and hesitation markers on listening comprehension, ERIC DOC NO. ED340 234.
Bond, Z. S., & Garnes, S. (1980). Misperceptions of fluent speech, In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Perception and Production of Fluent Speech (pp. 115-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Bonk, W. J. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 14-31.
Brown, G. (1990). Listening to spoken English. New York: Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brownell, J. (1996). Listening: Attitudes, principles, and skills. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Buck, G. (1990). The Testing of Second Language Listening Comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Lancaster, England.
Buck, G. (1991). The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective study. Language Testing, 8(1), 67-91.
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. (1983). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33(2), 183-207.
Carrell, P. (1988). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading. In P. Carrell, J. Devine, and D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading (pp. 101-13). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.
Cheng, Y. C. (1999). Effects of Pictures as Cues on English Assessment of Listening Comprehension at Junior High School in Taiwan. Unpublished master thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chiang, C. S., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 345-374.
Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: an introduction on psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In Culture,, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), 146-161. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Conrad, L. (1981). Listening comprehension strategies in native and second language, Michigan State University.
Conrad, L. (1985). Semantic versus syntactic cues in listening comprehension, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 59-72.
Dunkel, P. (1988). Academic listening and lecture note taking for L1/ L2 students: The need to investigate the utility of the axioms of good note taking, TESL Canada Journal, 6, 11-26.
Dunkel, P. (1991). Listening in the native and second/ foreign language: Toward an integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 431-457.
Ellermeyer, D. (1993). Improving listening comprehension through a whole-schema approach. Early Child Development and Care, 93, 101-110.
Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). The effect of prelistening activities on listening comprehension in Arabic learners. Foreign Language Annuals, 38(4), 505-513.
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second-language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 247-257.
Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 75, 173-180.
Field, J. (2000). Finding one’s way in the fog: Listening strategies and second language learners. Modern English Teacher, 9(1), 29-34.
Fitch-Hauser, M. (1990). Making sense of data: Constructs, schemas, and concepts. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Listening behavior: Measurement and application (pp. 76-90). New York: The Guilford Press.
Flammer, A., & Tauber, M. (1982). Changing the reader’s perspective. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 379-391). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Ford, W. S. Z., Wolvin, A. D., & Chung, S. (2000). Students’ self-perceived listening competencies in the basic speech communication course. The International Journal of Listening, 14, 1-13.
Friedman, H. L. & Johnson, R. L. (1971). Some actual and potential uses of rate controlled speech in second language learning. In P. Pimsleur and T. Quinn (eds.), The psychology of second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gans, K. D. (1994). Learning through listening. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/ Hunt Publishing Company.
Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(1), 126-135.
Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58(4), 747-783.
Griffiths, R. (1991). Pausological research in an L2 context: A rationale, and review of selected studies. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 345-364.
Hamilton, R. J. (1997). Effects of three types of elaboration on learning concepts from text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 299-318.
Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd ed.).Essex, England: Longman.
Henricksen, L. (1984). Sandhi variation: a filter of input for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 34, 103-126.
Herron, C. (1994). An investigation of the effectiveness of using an advance organizer to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (2), 190-198.
Herron, C., Hanley, J. E. B., & Cole, S. P. (1995). A comparison study of two advance organizer for introducing beginning foreign language students to video. Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 387-395.
Hildyard, A. & Olson, D. (1982). On the comprehension and memory of oral versus written discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language (pp. 19-32). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Hudson, Thom. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the “short circuit” in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32(1), 1-31.
Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Imhof, M. (1998). What makes a good listener? Listening behavior in instructional settings. The International Journal of Listening, 12, 81-105.
Imhof, M. (2001). How to listen more efficiently: Self-monitoring strategies in listening. The International Journal of Listening, 15, 2-19.
Janusik, L. A., & Wolvin, A. D. (1999). Listening treatment in the basic communication course text. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Listening Association, Albuquerque, NM.
Jensen, C., & Hansen, C. (1995). The effect of prior knowledge on EAP listening-test performance. Language Testing, 12(1), 99-119.
Johnson, D. I. & Long, K. M. (2007). Student listening gains in the basic communication course: A comparison of self-report and performance-based competence measures. The International Journal of Listening, 21(2), 92-101.
Johnson, R. L. & Friedman, H. L. (1971). Some temporal factors in the listening behaviour of second language students. In P. Pimsleur and T. Quinn (eds.), The psychology of second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joiner, E. (1991). Teaching listening ends and means. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Linguistics and language pedagogy (pp. 194-214). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Kant, I. (1963). Critique of pure reason. (1st ed. 1781, 2nd ed. 1787, N. Kemp Smith, translator.) London: MacMillan Publishing Co.
Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. IRAL, 29(2), 135-149.
Kennedy, G. D. (1978). The testing of listening comprehension. RELC Monograph Series. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Kintsch, W. (1989). The representation of knowledge and the use of knowledge in discourse comprehension. In R. Dietrich & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 185-209). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Kohler, B. D. (2002). The effects of metacognitive language learning strategy training on lower-achieving second language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, Salt Lake City, UT.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
Lai, X. M. (1985). Attitudes and attained EFL proficiency: a study of the Chinese senior high school students. MA. Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Long, D. R. (1990). What you don’t know can’t help you: An exploratory study of background knowledge and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(1), 65-80.
Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 337-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Lund, R. J. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension, The Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 196-204.
Lynch, T. (1998). Theoretical perspective on listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 3-19.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
Mayer, R. E. (1980). Elaboration techniques that increase meaningfulness of technical text: An experimental test of the learning strategy hypothesis. Journal of Educaitonal Psychology, 72, 770-784.
McGruddy, R. (1995). The effect of listening comprehension strategy training with advanced level ESL students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Meccarty, F. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11, 323-348.
Mendelsohn, D. J. (1998). Teaching listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 81-101.
Meyer, B. J. F. & McConkie, G. W. (1973). What is recalled after hearing a passage? Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 109-117.
Min, D. G. (1996). The effects of topic familiarity, prelistening activity, and question type on Korean junior-high school students’ listening comprehension. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
Moll, L. C. (1990). Introduction. In Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. C. L. Moll (Ed.), 1-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mueller, G. (1980). Visual contextual cues and listening comprehension: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal, 64(3), 335-340.
Nichols, R. G., Brown, J. I., & Keller, R. J. (2006). Measurement of communications skills. The International Journal of Listening, 20, 13-17.
Nichols, R. G., & Stevens, L. S. (1957). Are you listening? New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nord, J. R. (1981). Three steps to listening fluency: A beginning. In H. Winitz (Ed.), The comprehension approach to foreign language instruction (pp. 69-100). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Oakeshott-Taylor, J. (1977). Information redundancy, and listening comprehension. In Dirven, R., editor, Hrverstndnis im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Listening comprehension in foreign language teaching, Kronberg/ Ts: Scriptor.
Ockey, G. J. (2007). Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening tests. Language Testing, 24(4), 517-537.
Omaggio Hadley, A. (1979). Pictures and second language comprehension: Do they help? Foreign Language Annals, 12, 107-116.
Omaggio Hadley, A. (2001). Teaching language in context, 3rd ed. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. H., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition, Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzaneres, G., Russo, R. P., & Kupper, L. (1985). Learning strategy application with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 557-584.
Osada, N. (2001). What strategy do less proficient learners employ in listening comprehension? A reappraisal of bottom-up and top-down processing. Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5, 73-90.
Ozeki, N. (2000). Listening strategy instruction for female EFL college students in Japan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, The Graduate School and Research Department of English.
Pichert, J. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives in a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 309-315.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Raphan, D. (1996). A multimedia approach to academic listening. TESOL Journal, 6(2), 24-28.
Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening comprehension: Approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 219-240.
Rivers, W. M. (1966). Listening comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 50, 196-202.
Rivers, W. M. (1981). Teaching foreign language skills. Second Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning. London and New York: Longman.
Rost, M. (1994). Introducing listening. New York: Penguin Books Ltd.
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. London: Person Education.
Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Introduction to human information processing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Theoretical issues in reading comprehension, Rand J. Spiro, Bertram C. Bruce, & William E. Brewer (Eds.), 33-58. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rumelhart, D. (1983). Understanding understanding. In Flood, J., editor, Understanding reading comprehension, cognition, language and the structure of prose. Neward, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Rumelhart, D. E. & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, Richard C. Anderson, Rand J. Spiro, & William E. Montague (Eds.), 99-135. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Samuel, A. G. (1981). Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 110, 474-494.
Scarcella, R. C. & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Schiefele, U. & Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 141-160.
Segalowitz, N., & Segalowitz, S. (1993). Skilled performance practice and the differentiation of speed-up of automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 53-67.
Seo, K. (2000). Interventing in tertiary students’ strategic listening in Japanese as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
Shang, H. F. (2008). Listening strategy use and linguistic patterns in listening comprehension by EFL learners. The International Journal of Listening, 22, 29-45.
Sherman, J. (1997). The effect of question preview in listening comprehension tests. Language Testing, 14(2), 185-213.
Shohamy, E. & Inbar, O. (1991). Validation of listening comprehension tests: The effect of text and question type. Language Testing, 8(1), 23-40.
Smith, F. (1971). Understanding Reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Stanley, J. A. (1978). Teaching listening comprehension: an interim report on a project to use uncontrolled language data as a source material for training foreign students in listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 12(3), 285-295.
Sticht, Thomas G. (1971). Learning by listening in relation to aptitude, reading and rate-controlled speech: Additional studies. Human Resources Research Organization. Technical Report, 71(5), 1-40.
Su, P. C. (1994). The effect of visual elements on English listening comprehension: video-tape-testing verse audiotape-testing. Kaohsiung Normal University Journal, 5, 263-87.
Teichert, H. U. (1996). A comparative study using illustrations, brainstorming, and questions as advance organizers in intermediate college German conversation classes. The Modern Language Journal, 80 (4), 509-517
Teng, H. C. (1994). Effects of culture schemata and visual cues of Chinese students’ listening comprehension. Paper presented at the 11th national conference on English teaching, Republic of China, Taipei: Crane.
Thompson, I. & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29, 331-342.
Tsui, A. B. M., & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 performance. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 432-451.
Tyler, L. & P. Warren. (1987). Local and global structure in spoken language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 638-57
Underwood, M. (1989). Teaching Listening. New York: Longman.
Ur, P. (1984). Teaching Listening Comprehension. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vande Berg, C. K. (1993). “Turning down the fire hose”: Some techniques for using SCOLA broadcasts at the intermediate level. The French Review, 66(5), 769-776.
Vandergrift, L. (1996). Listening comprehension strategies of core French high school students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(2), 200-223.
Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Cinderella of communication strategies: Reception strategies in interactive listening. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 494-505.
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25.
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and Validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431-462.
Vanderplank, R. (1985). Isochrony and intelligibility, CDEF 84, Papers from the Conference of Departments of English in Finland. Ed. J. Tommola. & K. Battarbee. Turku, Finland: Publications of the Department of English, 301-328.
Vanderplank, R. (1988). Implications of differences in native and non-native speaker approaches to listening, British Journal of Language Teaching, 26, 32-41.
Van Dijk, T. & Kintsh, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Van Lier, L. (1995). Introducing language awareness. Harmondsworth. Middlesex: Penguin.
Vogely, A. (1999). Addressing listening comprehension anxiety. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second learning: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Voss, B. (1979). Hesitation phenomena as sources of perceptual errors for non-native speakers, Language and Speech, 22, 129-144.
Voss, B. (1984). Perception of first language and second language texts: A comparative study, Bielefelder Beitrage zr Sprachlehrforschung, 13(2), 131-153.
Wallace, C. (1992). Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watson, K. W., & Barker, L. L. (2000). Watson/ Barker Listening Test (2nd ed.). New Orleans, LA: Spectra, Inc.
Weissenreider, M. (1987). Listening to the news in Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 71(1), 18-27.
Wertsch, J. V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: some conceptual issues. In Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development”, B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), 7-18. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Winitz, H. (Ed.). (1981). The comprehension approach to foreign language instruction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Wolff, D. (1987). Some assumptions about second language text comprehension, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9(3), 307-326.
Wu, J. R. (2004). The effects of pictures at different time periods on the listening comprehension of junior high school students in Taiwan. Master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taiwan.
Yeh, M. (1997). Enhance the listening comprehension in Mandarin: Designing active listening activities. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 32(3), 65-92.
潘世尊 (民91)。教學上的鷹架要怎麼搭。屏東師院學報，16卷，263-293。
詹餘靜 (民93)。教師、教學、評量與教材—九年一貫課程國小英語教學探究。國立台北師範學院學報，17卷1期，167-196。
陳昇飛 (民95)。教師語文教學鷹架之搭建及其教學策略之發展。國民教育研究集刊，15卷，179-204。
單文經 (民82)。鷹架支持的譬喻在大班教學上的應用。視聽教育雙月刊，39卷6期，1-22。
沈添鉦 (民86)。鷹架在語言發展中的角色：母語學習及第二語教學之實況分析與比較。國民教育研究學報，3卷，1-24。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
英語教學碩士在職專班
94951019
97 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094951019 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [英語教學碩士在職專班] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
