Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49792
|
| Title: | 以想法為中心的教學設計對大學生在知識建構與知識信念上之影響
Effects of idea-centered design approach on college students’ knowledge construction and epistemological belief |
| Authors: | 林書平 |
| Contributors: | 洪煌堯
林書平 |
| Keywords: | 想法中心
電腦支援協作學習
知識翻新
知識信念
主動學習
idea-centered
CSCL
knowledge building
epistemological beliefs
active learning |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-09 09:31:37 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究的主要目的在探究以想法為中心的教學設計對大學生學習歷程與知識信念的影響。本研究透過知識論壇 (Knowledge Forum，KF) —一個以知識翻新（knowledge-building）教育理念為核心所建立的數位學習平台—來記錄學生的學習歷程。研究設計採個案研究法，以一個班級為研究單位，藉由多元資料的蒐集，以深入瞭解知識翻新教學對大學生在學習歷程上的影響。研究對象為某大學修習「生活科技概論」課程之22位學生。
資料來源包括：(1) 知識論壇上的學習筆記(note)—即學生整學期在知識論壇平台上的貼文與對話記錄；(2) 期末科技成品與影音記錄—即課程中學生所設計科技產品的期末發表; (3) 期末反思—即學生的期末學習心得; (4) 知識信念問卷(Chan & Elliott, 2004)的前後測資料。
本研究依據資料分析結果提出以下三點主要結論: (1)協作式的知識共構活動可以幫助學生跳脫傳統以個人為中心的學習方式，並進而以集體想法交流的形式來共構知識；(2) 從學生在科技產品上的創意表現可知，學生已逐漸能體認到知識是可以被創造的，人人都有能力創造知識；(3) 學生經過一學期的知識建構過程後，在知識信念上也有部分轉變，特別是在「天賦能力」的面向上，傾向學習能力並非天賦且不可改變的觀點。
根據上述結論，本研究在教育實務上提出以下三點建議：(1) 教師應多運用想法中心的教學設計，以培養有自主想法的學生，並藉此激勵學生積極參與學習社群中的知識共構活動；(2) 教師應將知識創造的能力視為學生學習的關鍵能力，以培養學生面對未來職場所需的競爭力；(3) 師資培育機構應注重師資培育生在知識信念上的發展，並協助其養成更具建構取向與學生中心的教學信念。
關鍵詞：想法中心、電腦支援協作學習、知識翻新、知識信念、主動學習
The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of idea-centered education on college students’ learning progress and change in epistemological beliefs. An online collaborative knowledge-building environment—Knowledge Forum (KF)—was employed in this study to document the process of students’ idea generation and development, as well as their belief change. This study employed a case-study design, using a college class as a unit for investigation, with multiple datasets collected to understand how knowledge building might affect students’ learning process and outcome. Participants were 22 students (16 females and 6 males) who took a course titled “Introduction to Living Technology” in a university, Taiwan.
Major data sources include: (1) Students’ online discourse recorded in a KF database; (2) Students’ final presentations about the technology products they designed (the presentations were videotaped); (3) An open-ended survey employed to elicit students’ reflection on what they did and learned from this course; (4) A belief questionnaire, adopted from Chan & Elliott (2004), which was administered in the beginning and at the end of the course. There were three main findings: (1) An idea-centered approach was found helpful for students to move away from individual-based learning to taking more collective responsibility in their knowledge advancement. It was found that with support of KF, students were able to engage in continuous idea exchange and improvement; (2) As evidenced in students’ performance on the design of creative technology products, it was suggested that students have gradually realized that knowledge can be created and that all humans has potential to create knowledge; (3) After doing knowledge-building for a whole semester, the participating students also shifted their’ beliefs to become less inclined to believe in inborn ability as a fixed quality.
Building on the findings, this study made the following suggestions: (1) To foster student capacity for more autonomous learning and collaborative knowledge building, teachers should try to encourage students to work with ideas and to engage them in sustained idea improvement; (2) Teachers should regard knowledge creation as a key ability that students need to acquire in order to face the competitive workplace in the future; (3) Teacher education programs should pay attention to the development of students’ epistemological beliefs, and to help student develop a more constructivist-oriented and student-centered teaching beliefs.
Keywords: idea-centered, CSCL, knowledge building, epistemological beliefs, active learning |
| Reference: | 甘永成(2003)。Web協作學習與電腦支援協作學習的應用研究。中國遠程教育，1。
何宗翰(1998)。主修領域背景對大學生知識信念與學習策略的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
李怡慧 (2000)。網路教學環境上群組合作學習分組之探討。國立中山大 學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
李鋒(2008)。網絡教育:從「信息傳遞」走向「知識建構」。全球教育展望， 37，24-27。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學。臺北：台灣東華。
陳荻卿、張景媛(2007)。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證，教育心理學報，39卷，1 期，23 -43 頁。
黃政傑、林佩璇（1996）。合作學習。台北市：五南出版社。
潘慧玲(1999，11月)。Belenky等人的女性知識論。論文發表於國立台灣師範大學教育學系主辦之「性別與教育」論壇，台北市。
詹雯靜(2009)。不同電腦支援合作學習環境對師培生在教育理論、教師專業與教學實務等概念學習上之影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science: an educational perspective. Science and Education, 8, 1-12.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in student’s intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39 (1), 31-42.
Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Golderberg, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women‘s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.
Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, Socioculturalism, and Popper`s World 3. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 21-23.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Unravelling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments. EARLI Advances in Learning and Instruction Series.
Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: testing the model
structure and a comparison among products-Three novel chairs. Creativity
Research Journal, 11(4), 333-346.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How People
Learn:Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lesson: Intergrating cognitive theory and Classroom practice(pp. 229-272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Branford Books.
Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Teo, T. (2009). Singaporean and Taiwanese pre-service teachers’ beliefs and their attitude towards ICT use: A comparative study. The Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher, 18(1), 117-128.
Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 817-831.
Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a 電腦支援協作學習 community. Computers and Education, 49 (2), 309-329.
Dick, A. (1996). The Dick and Carey model: Will it survive the decade? Educational Technology Research & Development, 44(3), 55-63.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capital Society. New York: Harper & Collins.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education? Lecture delivered at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Gallas, K. (1995). Talking Their Way into Science: Hearing Children`s Questions and Theories, Responding with Curricula. New York: Teachers College Press
Gick, M. L., & Paterson, E. J. (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canandian Journal of Psychology, 46 , 539-550.
Gill, M. G., Ashton, P. T., & Algina, J. (2004). Changing pre-service teachers’ epistemological beliefs about teaching and learning in mathematics: An intervention study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 164-185.
Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (1994). Looking in classroom (6th. ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 47-63.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
Hoadley, C. M., & Pea, R. D. (2002). Finding the ties that bind: tools in support of a knowledge-building community. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 321-354). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hong, H. -Y., & Lin, S. P. (2010). Teacher-education students’ epistemological belief change through collaborative knowledge building. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 99-110.
Hong, H. -Y., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Using key terms to assess community knowledge. Paper accepted for presentation at the annual conference of American Educational Research Association (AERA), New York.
Hong, H. -Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2008). Principle-based design to foster adaptive use of technology for building community knowledge. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P.A. Kirschner, & F.J. Prins (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Creating a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences – ICLS 2008, Vol. 1 (pp. 374-381). Utrecht, the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
Hong, H. -Y. & Sullivan, F. R., (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613-627.
Hong, H.-Y., Chen, F. C., Chai, C. S., & Chan, W. C. (in press). Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice. Instructional Science.
Hong, H. -Y., Chen, F. C., Chang, H. M., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, W. C. (2009). Exploring the effectiveness of an idea-centered design to foster a computer-supported knowledge building environment. In C. O`Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices: CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 142-150). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405.
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13 (4), 353-383.
Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a meta cognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 88–140.
Howard, B. C., McGee, S., Schwartz, N., & Puecell, S. (2000). The experience of constructivism: Transforming teacher epistemology. Journal of Research on Computing Education, 32 (4), 455-465.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Active learning:Cooperation in the college classroom (2nd ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2007). The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. USA: Springer.
Joiner, R. (1995). The negotiation of dialogue focus: An investigation of dialogue processes in joint planning in a computer based task. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning. (pp 203-222). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9 (2), 17-25.
Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: an introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lamon, M., Reeve, R., & Scardamalia, M. (2001). Mapping Learning and the Growth of Knowledge in a Knowledge Building Community. Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington
Leinonen, T., Virtanen, O., Hakkarainen, K., & Kligyte, G. (2002). Collaborative discovering of key ideas in knowledge building. In Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference. Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. D. Cartwright. New York: Harper & Row.
Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the Computer-supported Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference (pp. 72-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Liu, S.Y. & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Differences in the scientific epistemological
views of undergraduate students. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1055-1073.
Oshima, J. (2005). Progressive refinement of a CSCL-based lesson plan for improving student learning as knowledge building in the period for the integrated study. Proceedings of CSCL 2005.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference (pp. 24–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teacher`s beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
Papert, S. (1991). What`s the Big Idea: Towards a Pedagogy of Idea Power. IBM Systems Journal, 39, no. 3-4.
Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers` beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28 (3), 559-586.
Roschelle, J. & Teasley S.D. (1995) The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C.E. O`Malley (Ed), Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp.69-197). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement: what the most current research has to say. Santa Monica: Milken Exchange on Education Technology.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.
Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understanding and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6 (4), 293-318.
Sawyer, R.K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12-20.
Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative conclusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 293 -319
Scardamalia, M. (1999). Moving ideas to the center. In L. Harasim (Ed.), Wisdom & wizardry: Celebrating the pioneers of online education (pp. 14-15). Vancouver, BC: Telelearning, Inc.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Eds.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 76-98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 1370-1373). New York: Macmillan Reference, USA.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118).
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilley (Eds.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Slavin, R. (1991). Cooperative Learning: Theory, research, and practice. Allyn and Bacon.
Soller, A. & Lesgold, A. (2000). Modeling the Process of Collaborative Learning, Proceedings of the International Workshop on New Technologies in Collaborative Learning, Awaiji-Yumebutai, Japan.
Stahl, G. (2002). Groupware Goes to School. In J. Haake & J. Pino (Eds.), Groupware: Design, Implementation and Use, Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag, 1-24.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Stahl, G. (2007). Meaning making in CSCL: Conditions and preconditions for cognitive processes by groups. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL `07), New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Suthers, D. D., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R., Joseph, S., & Dwyer, N. (2008). Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1103-1127.
Trilling, B. & Hood, P. (1999). Learning, technology, and educational reform in the knowledge age or “We’re wired, webbed, and windowed, now what?”. Educational Technology, 39(3): 5-18.
Tsai, C. C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1733-1750
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge MA: Harverd Univerdity Press.
Whitehead, A.N. (1970). Science and the modern world, Free Press. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
97152019
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0971520191 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 019101.pdf | | 1024Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1030 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
