政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/49735
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51105625      Online Users : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Law > Department of Law > Theses >  Item 140.119/49735


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49735


    Title: 國民教育階段中的宗教自由─多元文化主義的觀點
    Religious freedom in mandated education context─a multiculturalism perspective
    Authors: 林榮光
    Contributors: 廖元豪
    林榮光
    Keywords: 國民教育
    多元文化主義
    平等受教育機會
    宗教作為文化認同
    兼顧容納宗教自由
    mandated education
    multiculturalism
    equal education opportunities
    religion as cultural identity
    accommodation of religious freedom
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-12-08 17:39:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文係從多元文化主義之觀點來探討國民教育階段中的宗教自由。我國憲法第159條規定：「國民受教育之機會一律平等」。然而學生在教育過程中實質的平等受教育機會卻與其文化認同有密切的關係。如果學生的獨特文化認同不能在主流教育體制中受到尊重與接納，連帶的也會影響其學習上的成功機會。而透過對於法律「兼顧容納宗教自由」之案例的反省與分析，本論文引出了「宗教也是一深刻文化認同」之看法。筆者根據此一看法來重新思索宗教與國民教育之關係，並認為在憲法基本權利的層次，為了兼顧容納信徒基於宗教認同所產生之需求，我們必須承認「宗教學生平等受教育的權利」與「父母宗教教育之自由」。然而國家在國民教育階段中兼顧容納宗教自由，除了不應違背「政教分離」原則之外，也應以「民主教育」作為兼顧容納之重要界限。以上述想法為基礎，本論文也於最後具體探討我國的教育規範與教育實踐應如何作出調整，以建構一個兼顧信仰與學習的教育環境。
    This dissertation discussed religious freedom in mandated education context from a multiculturalism perspective. Article 159 of ROC Constitution provides, “The educational opportunities of citizens are equal.” Understood in a subjective sense, equal educational opportunities of students have much to do with their cultural identities. If a student’s unique cultural identity cannot be respected and accommodated in mainstream education system, his or her opportunities to success in the education process will be limited seriously. Through the discussion of cases of “accommodation of religious freedom”, this dissertation tried to propose the view that religion is also a profound cultural identity. Accordingly, the author indicated that in order to accommodate believers religious identity, “the equal educational rights of religious students” and “the freedom of religious education of parents” should be recognized in mandated education context. However, the efforts to accommodate religious freedom should also be balanced by the principles of democratic education, in addition to the requirements of secularism in public schools. Based on the ideas mentioned above, this dissertation reviewed educational regulations and practices in Taiwan in the final section, and proposed the ways to construct a education environment in which both the believers’ needs to learn and to develop religious identity can be respected and attended properly.
    Reference: (一)專書
    1. 中文部分
    江宜樺(1998)，自由主義、民族主義與國家認同，台北：揚智文化
    吳庚(2003)，憲法的解釋與適用，修正三版，台北：三民。
    李震山(2001)，人性尊嚴與人權保障，修正二版，台北：元照。
    周志宏(2003)，教育法與教育改革，台北：高等教育。
    許慶雄(2000)，憲法入門，台北：元照。
    許志雄等(2002)，現代憲法論，修正三版，台北：元照
    許育典(2002)，法治國與教育行政，台北：高等教育。
    許育典(2005)，宗教自由與宗教法，台北：元照。
    陳新民(2001)，中華民國憲法釋論，修正四版，台北：陳新民發行：三民總經銷。
    威爾‧金里卡(Will Kymlicka)著，劉莘譯 (2003)，當代政治哲學導論，台北：聯經。
    2.英文部分
    Ackerman, Bruce (1980), Social justice in the liberal state, New Haven : Yale University Press.
    Banks, James A. (2006), Cultural diversity and education: foundations, curriculum, and teaching, Boston, Mass. : Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
    Brown, Kevin (2005), Race, law, and education in the post-desegregation era : four perspectives on desegregation and resegregation, Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press.
    Conkle, Daniel O. (2003), Constitutional Law: The Religion Clauses, New York: Foundation Press.
    Green, Preston C & Julie F. Mead (2004), Charter schools and the law : establishing new legal relationships, Norwood, Mass. : Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
    Gutmann, Amy (1999), Democratic education, with a new preface and epilogue, Rev. ed., Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
    Kymlicka, Will (1995), Multicultural citizenship : a liberal theory of minority rights, New York : Oxford University Press.
    Minow, Martha (1990), Making all the difference : inclusion, exclusion, and American law, Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
    Sandel, Michael J. (1996), Democracy`s discontent : America in search of a public philosophy, Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Sunstein, Cass R. (1993), The Partial Constitution, Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
    Spinner-Halev, Jeff (2000), Surviving diversity : religion and democratic citizenship, Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Walzer, Michael (2004), Politics and passion : toward a more egalitarian liberalism, New Haven [Conn.] : Yale University.
    Young, Iris Marion (1990), Justice and the politics of difference, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
    Yudof, Mark G. et al. (2002), Educational policy and the law, 4th ed., Belmont, Calif. : West/Thomson Learning.
    (二)專書論文
    1. 中文部分
    王和雄 (1998)，憲法保障宗教信仰自由之意義與界限，司法院大法官書記處編輯，司法院大法官釋憲五十週年紀念論文集，頁149-223，台北：司法院。
    吳志光 (2005)，憲法保障宗教自由之意義－本土化觀察之嘗試，蘇永欽主編，部門憲法，頁647-675，台北：元照。
    法治斌 (2003)，政教分離、出版自由與公共論壇─試評論 Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of Virginia, 115 s. Ct. 2510(1995)，法治國家與表意自由，頁319-339，台北：正典。
    李震山 (2004)，論憲法意義下的「集體權」，吳庚大法官榮退論文集編輯委員會編輯，公法學與政治理論：吳庚大法官榮退論文集，頁167-190，台北：元照。
    李建良 (2009)，人權維護者的六十回顧與挑戰─試探大法官人權解釋的反多數決困境，廖福特主編，憲法解釋之理論與實務，第六輯下冊，頁467-549，台北：中研院法律所籌備處。
    周志宏 (2002)，學習權序論─教育基本法學習權規定之解析，翁岳生教授祝壽論文集編輯委員會編輯，當代公法新論：翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集，頁187-219，台北：元照。
    周志宏 (2003)，教育行政法制之研討，周志宏著，教育法與教育改革，頁1-37，台北：高等教育。
    林端 (2005)，宗教與憲法－社會學家另類的看法，蘇永欽主編，部門憲法，頁625-646，台北：元照。
    林火旺 (1998)，公民身分：認同和差異，蕭高彥，蘇文流主編，多元主義，頁379-409，台北：中研院社科所。
    孫效智 (2009)，台灣生命教育的挑戰與願景，2009生命教育論壇論文集，頁1-23。
    秦夢群 (2006)，教育權、教育組織特性與法律保留密度，蘇永欽主編，部門憲法，頁483-505，台北：元照。
    陳新民 (2007)，宗教良心自由與服役正義─釋字第490號解釋與社會役，氏著，法治國家原則之檢驗，頁183-212，台北：元照。
    許育典 (2002)，論宗教自由的保障與實質法治國的實踐─評司法院大法官釋字第490號解釋，劉孔中、陳新民主編，憲法解釋之理論與實務，第三輯上冊，頁265-353，台北：中研院社科所。
    廖元豪 (2004)，「海納百川」或「非我族類」的國家圖像？－檢討民國九十二年的「次等國民」憲法實務，法治斌教授紀念論文集編輯委會編輯，法治與現代行政法學：法治斌教授紀念論文集，頁279-308，台北：法治斌學術基金。
    廖元豪 (2007)，Virginia v. Black與種族仇恨言論之管制─批判種族論的評論觀點，焦興鎧主編，美國最高法院重要判決之研究：二○○○~二○○三，頁105-150，台北市：中研院歐美所。
    廖元豪 (2009)，建構以平等公民權(Equal Citizenship)為基礎的憲法權利理論途徑─對傳統基本權理論之反省，廖福特主編，憲法解釋之理論與實務，第六輯下冊，頁365-428，台北：中研院法律所籌備處。
    廖元豪 (2009)，從全球化觀點省思平等權之意義與適用，吳庚教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集編輯委員會編輯，政治思潮與國家法學：吳庚教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集，頁391-422，台北：元照。
    顏厥安 (2002)，自由主義與憲政體制之建立，李鴻禧等合著，台灣憲法之縱剖橫切，頁419-454，台北：元照。
    蘇永欽 (2005)，部門憲法─憲法釋義學的新路徑？蘇永欽主編，部門憲法，頁3-31，台北：元照。
    蘇永欽 (2005)，橫看成嶺側成峰─從個別社會部門整合憲法人權體系，蘇永欽主編，部門憲法，頁151-163，台北：元照。
    2. 英文部分
    Banks, James A. (2008), Diversity, Transformative Citizenship Education, and School Reform, in Martha Minow, Richard A. Shweder, &Hazel Rose Markus, eds., Just School: Pursuing Equality in Societies of Difference, 227-253, New York, N.Y. :Russell Sage Foundation.
    Bowen, John R. (2008), Republican Ironies: Equality and Identities in French Schools, in Martha Minow, Richard A. Shweder, &Hazel Rose Markus, eds., Just School: Pursuing Equality in Societies of Difference, 204-226, New York, N.Y. :Russell Sage Foundation.
    Conkle, Daniel O. (2000), Secular fundamentalism, religious fundamentalism, and the search for truth in contemporary America, in Stephen M. Feldman ed., Law and religion : a critical anthology, 317-344, New York : New York University Press.
    Dworkin, Ronald (1978), Liberalism, in Stuart Hampshire ed., Public and Private Morality, 113-143, Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press.
    Feldman, Stephen M. (2000), A Christian America and the Separation of Church and State, in Stephen M. Feldman ed., Law and religion : a critical anthology, 261-277, New York : New York University Press.
    Franklin, Kimberly & Harro Van Brummelen (2006), Religious diversity in Western Canadian education : presumptions, provisions, practices, and possibilities, in Farideh Salili and Rumjahn Hoosain eds., Religion in multicultural education, 71-100, Greenwich, Conn. : IAP.
    Garcia, Ricardo L (2006)，Language, Culture, and Education, in James A. Banks, Cultural diversity and education : foundations, curriculum, and teaching, 266-291, Boston, Mass. : Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
    Gutmann, Amy (1994), Introduction, in Amy Gutmann ed., Multiculturalism : examining the politics of recognition, 3-24, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
    Habermas, Jürgen (1994), Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State, in Amy Gutmann ed., Multiculturalism : examining the politics of recognition, 107-148, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
    Markus, Hazel R. (2008), Identity Matters: Ethnicity, Race, and the American Dream, in Martha Minow, Richard A. Shweder, &Hazel Rose Markus, eds., Just School: Pursuing Equality in Societies of Difference, 63-98, New York, N.Y. :Russell Sage Foundation.
    Marshall, William P. (2009), Progressives, the Religion Clauses, and the Limits of Secularism in Jack M. Balkin & Reva B. Siegel eds., The Constitution in 2020, 231-242, New York : Oxford University Press.
    Minow, Martha (2008), We’re All For Equality in U.S. School Reforms: But What Does It Mean? in Martha Minow, Richard A. Shweder, &Hazel Rose Markus, eds., Just School: Pursuing Equality in Societies of Difference, 21-62, New York, N.Y. :Russell Sage Foundation.
    Moon, Richard (2008), Introduction: Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada, in Richard Moon ed., Law and religious pluralism in Canada, 1-20, Vancouver [B.C., Canada] : UBC Press.
    Riedel, Barnaby. B.(2008), Universal Particularism: Making an Ethical Islamic School in Chicago, in Martha Minow, Richard A. Shweder, &Hazel Rose Markus, eds., Just School: Pursuing Equality in Societies of Difference, 132-163, New York, N.Y. :Russell Sage Foundation.
    Rosenfeld, Michel (2007), Equality and the dialectic between identity and difference, in Omid Payrow Shabani ed., Multiculturalism and law : a critical debate, 156-181, Cardiff [Wales] : University of Wales Press.
    Schneiderman, David (2008), Associational Rights, Religion, and the Charter, in Richard Moon ed., Law and religious pluralism in Canada, 65-86, Vancouver [B.C., Canada] : UBC Press.
    Shweder, Richard A. (2008), After Just Schools: The Equality –Difference Paradox and Conflicting Varieties of Liberal Hope, in Martha Minow, Richard A. Shweder, &Hazel Rose Markus, eds., Just School: Pursuing Equality in Societies of Difference, 254-290, New York, N.Y. :Russell Sage Foundation.
    Subedi, Binaya et al., Teachers’ and Students’ Experiences Working With Religious Issues in U.S. Schools, in Farideh Salili and Rumjahn Hoosain eds., Religion in multicultural education, 215-238, Greenwich, Conn. : IAP.
    Taylor, Charles (1994), The Politics of Recognition, in Amy Gutmann ed., Multiculturalism : examining the politics of recognition, 25-75, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
    Webber, Jeremy (2007), A judicial ethic for a pluralistic age, in Omid Payrow Shabani ed., Multiculturalism and law : a critical debate, 67-100, Cardiff [Wales] : University of Wales Press.
    (三) 期刊論文
    1. 中文部分
    卯靜儒、張建成 (2005)，在地化與全球化之間：解嚴後臺灣課程改革論述的擺盪，臺灣教育社會學研究，5卷1期，頁39-76。
    吳清山 (2003)，國民教育階段辦理非學校型態實驗教育之挑戰與策略，北縣教育，45期，頁18-26。
    周志宏 (2000)，高等教育階段中的宗教教育問題─教育基本法第六條與私立學校法第九條之檢討，法令月刊，51卷10期，頁687-718。
    周志宏 (2003)，教育事務民營化之法律問題─以國民中小學公辦民營為中心，月旦法學雜誌，102期，頁30-55。
    許育典，周敬凡 (2006)，從德國聯邦憲法法院「頭巾判決」論學校的宗教中立，台大法學論叢，35卷6期，頁117-168 。
    陳建榮、黃隆民 (2004)，我國國民教育階段「宗教與學校教育分際」現況的評析，臺中師院學報，18卷1期，頁41-60。
    曾志隆 (2007)，公/私領域的界限：瓊塔‧穆芙的詮釋，思與言，45卷3期，頁79-116。
    黃昭元 (2000a)，信上帝者下監獄？從司法院釋字第490號解釋論宗教自由與兵役義務的衝突，台灣本土法學雜誌，8期，頁30-45。
    黃昭元 (2000b)，釋迦牟尼，生日快樂─定佛誕日為國定紀念日是否違憲？月旦法學雜誌，58期，頁16-17。
    黃昭元 (2001)，上帝要我上祂的學校─宗教自由與義務教育的衝突，月旦法學雜誌，74期 頁8-9。
    楊深坑 (2008)，社會公義、差異政治與教育機會均等的新視野，當代教育研究，16卷4期，頁1-37。
    蔡文山 (2004)，從教育機會均等的觀點省思台灣原住民學生的教育現況與展
    望，教育與社會研究，6期，頁109-144。
    薛化元 (1997)，戰後國家教育權發展的考察─「教育基本法」爭議的歷史思考，律師雜誌，210期，頁19-29。
    顏厥安 (1997)，凱撒管得了上帝嗎？─由法管制理論檢討宗教立法，月旦法學雜誌，24期，頁34-43。
    廖元豪 (2006a)，宗教自由：第三講－政教分離(一)，月旦法學教室，48期，頁30-36．
    廖元豪 (2006b)，宗教自由：第四講─政教分離（二）—案例類型與本土反思，月旦法學教室，50期，頁30-38。
    廖元豪 (2006c)，誰的法律？誰的人權─建構「弱勢人權」芻議，律師雜誌，321期，頁10-20。
    2.英文部分
    Bell, Derrick A., Jr.(1980), Brown v. Board of Education and The Interest Convergence Dilemma, 93 Harvard Law Review 518.
    Berger, Benjamin (2002), The Limits of Belief: Freedom of Religion, Secularism, and the Liberal State, 17 NO.1 Can. J. L. & Soc’y 39
    Brown, Kevin (1993), Do African-Americans Need Immersion Schools? The Paradoxes Created by Legal Conceptualization of Race and Public Education, 78 Iowa L. Rev. 813.
    Carter, Stephen L. (1987), Evolutionism, Creationism, and Treating Religion as a Hobby, 1987 Duke Law Journal 977.
    Carter, Stephen L. (1997), Parents, Religion, and Schools: Reflections on Pierce, 70 Years Later, 27 Seton Hall Law Review 1194.
    Conkle, Daniel O. (1994), Different Religions, Different Politics: Evaluating the Role of Competing Religious Traditions in American Politics and Law, 10 J. L. & Religion 1.
    DeGroff, Eric A. (2003), State Regulation of Nonpublic Schools: Does The Tie Still Bind? 2003 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 363.
    Gunn, T. Jeremy (2004), Religious Freedom and Lacite: A Comparison of the United States and France, 2004 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 419.
    Lawrence , Charles R. (1995), Forward Ace, Multiculturalism, and the Jurisprudence of Transformation, 47 Stan. L. Rev. 819.
    McConnell, Michael W. (1990), Free Exercise Revisionism and The Smith Case, 57 University of Chicago Law Review 1109.
    McConnell, Michael W. (1992), Accommodation of Religion: An Update and a Response to the Critics, 60 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 685.
    McConnell, Michael W. (2000), Why is Religious Liberty the "First Freedom"? 21 Cardozo Law Review 1243.
    Paterson, Frances R. A. (2000), “Supreme Court: Enemy of Freedom?” Constitutional Law in Christian School Textbooks, 29 J.L. & Educ. 405.
    Stolzenberg, Nomi Maya (1993), He Drew a Circle That Shut Me Out: Assimilation, Indoctrination, and a Paradox of Liberal Education, 106 Harv. L. Rev. 581.
    Young, Iris Marion (1989), Polity and Group difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship, Ethics, Vol. 99, No.2, 269.
    Zine, Jasmin (2001), Muslim Youth in Canadian Schools: Education and the Politics of Religious Identity, Anthropology & Education Quarterly, Vol.32, No.4, 399.
    (四) 學位論文
    尤伯祥 (1998)，宗教自由之權利內涵研究，國立政治大學法研所碩士論文。
    周志宏 (1999)，私人興學自由與私立學校法制之研究，輔仁大學法律學系博士論文。
    周敬凡 (2001)，宗教自由的法建構-兼論「宗教團體法草案」，國立成功大學法研所碩士論文。
    張源泉 (2002)，台灣宗教教育之合憲性研究─國民教育之分析，國立政治大學宗教研究所碩士論文。
    洪筱淋 (2009)，從多元文化觀點論宗教教育的重要性─自身經驗和國小現況的激盪，國立東華大學多元文化教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳忠雄 (2005)，國民小學實施宗教教育之分析研究，佛光人文社會學院宗教學系碩士論文。
    陳敏華 (2007)，我國國民中學公民類科教科書國家認同內涵之演變，國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法律學研究所
    96651034
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096651034
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    103401.pdf1263KbAdobe PDF22594View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback