Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49676
|
| Title: | 公司治理與銀行績效分析:台灣銀行業之探討 |
| Authors: | 雷佳珍 |
| Contributors: | 鄭士卿
雷佳珍 |
| Keywords: | 公司治理
銀行經營績效
民營化
購併
金融控股公司 |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 16:27:29 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文以1996年至2007年間台灣銀行業為研究對象，同時考量民營化、購併與加入金控等三類公司治理事件改變對經營績效的影響，並在靜態及動態指標外，另外考慮選取指標，以進一步了解從事公司治理改變的理由，並對過去衡量經營績效的計量模型加以改善。本研究發現選取進行民營化及加入金控的銀行，其經營績效皆顯著高於其他銀行，而銀行從事購併可能是為了提升經營績效及加強競爭力。此外，銀行績效在民營化後較民營化前差，雖然整體績效確有提升，但提升的原因並非民營化所造成；而銀行加入金控後不只無法提升效率，且似乎失去加入金控前所享有的優勢。而「不具穩健性」的檢定結果發現當迴歸模型未同時考慮不同公司治理效果及指標時，檢定結果將有明顯差異。
Using data from Taiwan banking industry in the period of 1996 to 2007, this study jointly analyze the effects of privatization, merger and joining financial holding companies (FHCs) on the performance of Taiwan banking industry. In addition to static and dynamic indicators, it also considers the selection indicator in order to understand the reason banks involve in corporate governance changes. Emphasis is placed on the importance of including indicators of all the relevant governance effects in the same model, and the “nonrobustness” checks which purposely exclude some indictors also support this statement. The results show that those undergoing privatization or joining FHCs had particularly better performance beforehand, and those undergoing mergers had poorer performance beforehand. In addition, the performances of banks deteriorate following privatization and following banks joining FHCs. It is possible that banks undergoing privatization or joining FHCs have other strategic or regulatory concerns than improving performances. |
| Reference: | 1.王儷玲、彭金隆、張義宏，2006，我國壽險業銀行保險業務參與度與經營效率分析，台大管理論叢，第17卷第1期，59-90。
2.王家麒，2005，臺灣銀行業合併前後績效之研究，台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
3.江婕寧，2003，美國金融控股公司與非金融控股公司經營績效之比較，台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
4.杜珮宜，2003，台灣地區銀行合併效率之分析—三階段DEA模型之應用，中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
5.林炳文，2001，臺灣地區商業銀行合併之效率分析，風險管理學報，第3卷第1期，1-21。
6.林炳文，2002，臺灣地區商業銀行合併效率性之分析：資料包絡分析法的應用，台灣管理學刊，第1卷第2期，341-355。
7.林銘鈺，2003，台灣地區公營銀行民營化經營效率之研究─DEA方法之應用，成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
8.林卓民、陳明麗、楊於龍，2006，金融控股公司旗下子銀行成本效率之探討，臺灣銀行季刊，第57卷第1期，1-16。
9.高國賡、蕭景楷，2006，臺灣金控與非金控銀行經營效率之分析，財金論文叢刊，第5期，42-56。
10.陳永琦、傅祖壇，2003，本國銀行合併之效益分析，經濟研究，第39卷第2期，173-196。
11.陳玉涓、沈鵬飛，2007，金控公司子銀行與獨立銀行之成本效率分析，運籌與管理學刊，第6卷第2期，45-56。
12.陳添智，2007，金控與非金控銀行經營績效影響因素之探討，政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
13.黃台心，1997，台灣地區本國銀行成本效率之實證研究－隨機邊界模型之應用，人文及社會科學集刊，第9卷第1期，85-123。
14.黃台心，1998，以隨機成本邊界函數分析本國銀行的規模與多元經濟，經濟論文叢刊，第26卷第2期，209-241。
15.黃台心、王美惠、歐陽良裕，2000，台灣銀行業投入產出面技術效率與規模效率分析－資料包絡分析法之應用，東吳經濟商管學報，第31期，1-27。
16.彭金隆，2004，金融控股公司─法制監理與經營策略，智勝文化事業有限公司。
17.劉松瑜、謝燧琪、溫育芳，2006，台灣銀行業在金控與非金控架構下之效率分析，台灣金融財務季刊，第7卷第3期，127-176。
18.歐陽遠芬、陳碧綉，2001，銀行的購併與經營績效—規模經濟、範疇經濟與效率之分析，臺灣銀行季刊，第52卷第3期，1-18。
19.鄭秀玲、劉育碩，2000，銀行規模、多角化程度與經營效率分析：資料包絡法之應用，人文及社會科學集刊，第12卷第1期，103-148。
20.鄭士卿，2008，組織型態及集團結構對效率及生產力的影響：日本商業銀行之研究，財務金融學刊，第16卷第4期，61-106。
21. Amel, D., Barnes, C., Panetta, F., Salleo, C., 2004. Consolidation and efficiency in the financial sector: A review of the international evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 2493–2519.
22. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., 1984. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Managament Science 30, 1078-1092.
23. Berger, A.N., Clarke, R.G., Cull, R., Klapper, L., Udell, G.F., 2005. Corporate governance and bank performance: A joint analysis of the static, selection, and dynamic effects of domestic, foreign, and state ownership. Journal of Banking and Finance 25, 2179–2221.
24. Berle, A., Means, G., 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York：MacMillan.
25. Bonin, J.P., Hasan, I., Wachtel, P., 2005. Privatization matters: Bank efficiency in transition countries. Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 2155–2178.
26. Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.C., Fischer, K., Guedhami, O., 2005. Privatization and bank performance in developing countries. Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 2015–2041.
27. Campa, J.M., Hernando, I., 2006. M&As performance in the European financial industry. Journal of Banking and Finance 30, 3367–3392.
28. Chang T.C., Chiu, Y.H., 2006. Affecting factors on risk-adjusted efficiency in Taiwan’s banking industry. Contemporary Economic Policy 24, 4, 634-648.
29. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.
30. Chen, T.Y., Yeh, T.L., 2000. A Measurement of Bank Efficiency, Ownership and Productivity Changes in Taiwan. The Service Industries Journal 20, 95-109.
31. Clarke, R.G., Cull R., Shirley, M.M., 2005. Bank privatization in developing countries: A summary of lessons and findings. Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 1981–2013.
32. Demsetz, H., 1983. The structure of ownership and theory of the firm’. Journal of Law and Economics 26, 375-390.
33. DeYoung, R., Hasan, I., 1998. The performance of de novo commercial banks: A profit efficiency approach. Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 565–587.
34. Drake, L. and Hall, Maximilian J.B., 2003. Efficiency in Japanese Banking: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Banking and Finance 27: 891-917.
35. Farrell, M.J., 1957. The Measurement of Prodctive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120, 253-281.
36. Favero, C.A., Papi, L., 1995. Technical Efficiency and Scale Efficiency in the Italian Banking Sector: A Non-parametric Approach. Applied Economics 27, 385-395.
37. Fields, L.P., Fraser, D.R., Kolari, J.W., 2007. Is bancassurance a viable model for financial firms? Journal of Risk and Insurance 74, 777-794.
38. Holderness, C., Kroszner, R., Sheehan, D., 1999. Were the good old day that good? Change in managerial stock ownership since the great Depression’. Journal of Finance 54, 435-469.
39. Huang, Tai-Hsin, Wang, Mei-Hui, 2004. Comparisons of economic inefficiency between output and input measures of technical inefficiency using the Fourier flexible cost function. Journal of Productivity Analysis 22, 123-142.
40. Megginson, W.L., 2005. The economics of bank privatization. Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 1931–1980.
41. Rezitis, A.N., 2008. Efficiency and productivity effects of bank mergers: Evidence from the Greek banking industry. Economic Modelling 25, 236–254.
42. Shephard, R.W., 1970. Theory of cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press.
43. Sherman, H.D., Gold, F., 1985. Bank branch operating efficiency – evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance 9, 297-315.
44. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52, 737-783.
45. Stiroh, K.J., Rumble, A., 2006. The dark side of diversification: The case of US financial holding companies. Journal of Banking and Finance 30, 2131–2161.
46. Tobin, J., 1958. Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables. Econometrica 26, 24 -36.
47. Yue, P. 1992. Data Envelopment Analysis and Commercial Bank Performance: A Primer with Applications to Missouri Bank. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis,74, 31-45. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
風險管理與保險研究所
96358004
97 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096358004 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
