Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49627
|
| Title: | 組織活動參與程度與研發主管職能之關聯性研究
The Relationships between the participation of Organizational Activities and the Acquisition of R&D Managerial Competency |
| Authors: | 林隆偉
Lin, Lung Wei |
| Contributors: | 蔡維奇
黃櫻美
Tsai, Wei Chi
林隆偉
Lin, Lung Wei |
| Keywords: | 研發主管職能
高工作績效系統
組織活動
顧客經營
工作指派
RD managerial competency
professional training
high performance work system
job assignments |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 15:24:11 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 近年來，策略性人力資源管理被企業視為一項核心競爭優勢，透過人力資源規劃與組織運作結合，以達到企業經營的目的。因此，著重在管理職能對高組織績效影響效果之策略性人力資源探討愈來愈多，而在管理職能之實證研究，也多著重在管理群組對個人工作績效或部門績效之影響，其結果也證明管理職能之良窳確實會對個人或組織績效產生影響，可說明管理職能在企業營運中的重要性。然而，相較於結果面之研究，管理職能之前因面研究卻明顯地不足，少有研究將組織內外之管理措施或活動與管理職能的因果關係作進一步探討，特別是關於影響研發主管管理職能之前置因素探討。因此，本研究將聚焦於影響研發主管管理職能之前置因素，並探討影響管理職能之組織活動與管理措施為何，為企業培育研發主管時，提供具體且有效之建議。
本研究主張企業中的研發主管，因實際參與公司內的管理措施與組織運作，將能強化自身的管理職能。然而，有鑑於過去研究較少針對研發主管職能發展出符合理論與實務看法之分類與內涵，本研究在探究組織活動與研發主管職能之關係前，先行對研發主管職能進行文獻探究，並藉由業界主管深度訪談與專家效度問卷等多重方式歸納出重要之職能群組。本研究將研發主管職能分為三個職能群組與七個職能，分別為專業知能(包括產品發展能力與領導培育能力)、跨界知識轉換職能(包括搭橋溝通能力與知識管理能力)以及資源整合創新職能(包括資源協調能力、策略規劃能力與創新促進能力)。
同時，本研究認為內部與外部組織活動會對不同的研發主管職能產生影響。內部組織活動可分為專業能力的訓練、員工授權、團隊經營與工作指派；外部組織活動則著重於顧客經營活動。與過去研究不同的是，本研究認為除組織內部相關之措施外，研發主管亦應該要對外經營顧客關係，因為透過顧客關係之建立與維持，將能不間斷地接收顧客資訊，以為產品創新之來源，並提高主管個人之管理職能。
本研究以中高階研發主管為研究對象，而為避免相同方法偏誤之發生，由研發主管自評參與組織活動之程度，並由其直屬上司評量該研發主管之管理職能表現。本研究以問卷調查方式進行資料蒐集，共搜集14家公司、119位研發主管與26位直屬上司之資料，並以階層式迴歸分析資料。研究結果如下：
(一) 訓練與專業知能為正向關係。
(二) 專業能力訓練與跨界知識轉換職能為正向關係。
(三) 專業能力訓練與整合資源創新能力為正向關係。
(四) 授權程度與專業知能為正向關係。
(五) 授權程度與跨界知識轉換職能為正向關係。
本研究另以個別職能為依變項進行分析，研究結果發現顧客經營活動與知識管理能力、創新促進能力呈正向關係。
而就上述之研究發現，本研究建議管理者應建立完整且具系統性之管理職能發展計畫，以做為培育現職工程師為日後之研發主管，並應將專業能力訓練、授權與顧客經營活動納入此培育系統中，以確保研發主管具備專業知能、跨界知識轉換職能以及資源整合創新職能等「技術」與「管理」的職能，以因應環境之變化與競爭，為企業永續經營奠定良好的基礎。
In recent years, strategic human resource management (SHRM) has been regarded as core competitive advantage for frims to respond to uncertain environments. Because human capital can bring innovation into organizations, it is important to select, train, allocate and retain the human resources. Among these human catpial, competency is the essential component representing the knowledge, skills, and abilities. This study focuses on R&D competency, particularly R&D managerial competency. Moreoever, this study investigates the effects of organizational activities on R&D managerial competency to understand the complex relationships among organizational activities and RD managerial competency.
This study suggests that R&D managers will be able to substantially enhance their managerial competency by progressively participating in organizational activities. However, fewer research pay attention on the typology and contents of R&D managerial competency, this study explores this construct before investigating its anticidents. The author reviewed R&D managerial competency literature, interviewed seneior R&D managers and analyzed expert opinion questionnaires to categorize R&D managerial competencies into three competency clusters and seven competencies:
1. Competency cluster of professional knowledge and skill
Product developemtn competency
Leadership competency
2. Competency cluster of integrative capacities
Bridging communication competency
Knowledge management competency
3. Competency cluster of optimizing resource and facilitating innovation
Leveraging resources competency
Strategy planning competency
Innovation stimulation competency
Meanwhile, this study also claims that involvement in both internal and external organizational activities will have substantial effects on R&D managerial competency. Internal activities herein refer to professional training, empowerment, team management, and job assignment; whereas, external activities emphasize on fostering royal customer relationships. In contrast to pre-existing academic researches, this study suggests that, in addition to internal activities, R&D managers should progressively develop customer relations. The reason is that by understanding customer’s needs and absorbing most innovative ideas would no doubt be the origins of technology innovations.
This study focuses on top and middle level R&D managers. In order to avoid common method variances, this study is to match and analyze data collected from 119 R&D managers and their supervisors (26 senior managers in total) of 14 companies in Taiwan electronic industry.
Results showed that:
1. Professional training was significantly and positively related to to competency cluster of professional knowledge and skill.
2. Professional training was significantly and positively related to the competency cluster of integrative capacities.
3. Professional training was significantly and positively related to the competency cluster of optimizing resource and facilitating innovation.
4. Empowerment was significantly and positively related to competency cluster of professional knowledge and skill.
5. Empowerment was significantly and positively related to the competency cluster of integrative capacities.
In addition, this study analyzes the sub-competency of the competency clusters, and found that customer management is positively related to knowledge management competency and facilitating innovation competency.
In sum, this study suggests that organizations should set up an integrated and systematic program for potential engineers who might be competent R&D managers in the future. Furthermore, the findings of this study implies that this program should include professional trainings, empowerment, and customer-relationship management, and to ensure that R&D managers possesses “skill” and “managerial” competencies to make themselves the cornerstones for ever-competitive enterprises and to prepare themselves to be responsive to the constantly evolving environment. |
| Reference: | 中文文獻:
工研院產業學院所(2006)。研發主管職能完全解析，http://college.itri.org.tw/HCMprint.aspx?id=206&type=artl。
安迪葛洛夫(1997)。英特爾管理之道《High Output Management》，巫宗融譯。遠流出版社。
江育君(2008)。高績效工作系統與組織績效之關係探討─ 智慧資本之中介效果。中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
吳政哲(2000)。高科技產業工程專業人員職能需求分析—以某半導體公司為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
吳貴民(2003)。市場導向與學習導向對組織創新與組織績效影響之研究-以台灣生化相關科技產業為例。靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
吳靜吉、林合懋（1998）。轉型領導量表與交易領導量表的建立。測驗年刊，45（2）， 57-88頁。
李吉仁、王文靜、孫秀惠、鄭呈皇(2007) 。商業周刊第1007期，整理者：鄭呈皇。
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬譯（2002）。 組織行為學。 華泰文化事業股份有限公司， Stephen P. Robbins著。
李誠(2001) 主編。高科技產業人力資源管理。天下文化出版社。
李誠(2006) 主編。人力資源管理的12堂課。天下文化出版社。
彼得杜拉克（1978）。有效的管理者。臺灣中華企業管理發展中心，許是祥譯。中華企業管理發展中心。
林淑娟(2005）。人際效能與衝擊影響力對團隊領導效能影響之研究。朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
林淑姬、陳怡靜、林政道 (2004）。策略性人力資源管理研究中的配適觀。創新與科技管理研討會。
林義屏、黃俊英、董玉娟(2004)。市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究: 以科學園區資訊電子產業為例。管理評論， 第二十三卷第一期，101-135頁。
林志龍(2005)。組織市場導向與學習導向對組織效能之影響-知識管理調節效果之探討。國立中央大學資訊管理學研究所碩士論文。
波特(1985)。競爭策略，周旭華譯。天下文化出版社。
波特(1985)。競爭優勢，邱如美、李明軒譯。天下文化出版社。
張麗英(2003)。人力資源管理策略對團隊績效之影響-以軟體產業為例 。 國立中山大學人力資源研究所碩士論文。
理查、佛羅里達(2006)。 創意新貴II:城市與創意階級，傅振焜譯。寶鼎出版社。
陳沛安（2006）。研發專業人員職能需求之研究－以某研究機構為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
曾婉芬(2002)。研發主管管理才能與部門績效之研究。國立中山大學人力資源研究所碩士論文。
黃石發（2003）。人格特質、高績效工作系統與工作滿意度及工作適應間關係之研究－以研發人員為例。成功大學企研所碩士論文。
黃家齊(2002)。人力資源管理活動與組織績效 ─員工技能與動機的中介效果。 人力資源管理學報， 冬季號 第二卷 第四期， 015-032頁。
黃耀輝(2006)。市場導向、組織創新氣候與新產品開發績效相關之研究。中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
溫金豐(2007) 。組織理論與管理。學貴出版社，70-71頁。
詹炳熾（2004）。研發人員職能與績效關聯之研究-以工具機產業為例。朝陽科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
廖良文(2006)。跨層次觀點下高績效工作系統與員工績效之關連性研究-組織創新氣候之中介效果。中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
劉曉雯(2000) 。 主管核心職能模式及評鑑系統之設計-以Z 公司為例 。中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
鄭純媛、孫德修、侯憲澤、趙正敏、張煌基(2004 )。 我國資訊軟體服務業重要研發績效指標之研究。 朝陽學報 11期。
賴宛圻(2002) 。 技術策略、研發績效衡量與績效之關係。國立台灣大學會計學系碩士論文。
魏惠娟（1998）。邁向學習型組織的教育行政領導。教育政策論壇，第一卷第一期，135-172頁。
鐘燕宜、紀乃文、陳景元(2008)。銷售工作價值觀量表之發展與評量。臺大管理論叢，第十九卷第一期，51-82頁。
英文文獻：
Anthony, R.N. (1965). Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
Arthur Anderson Business Consulting (2000). Leveraging Corporate Competency with Knowledge Management. TOKYO KEIZAI INC.
Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.8, 215-241.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein and S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundation, extensions, and new directions: 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bowen, D. E. & Lawer III, E. E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when. Sloan management review, spring, 31-39.
Button, S., Mathieu, J., & Zajac, D.(1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 67, 26-48.
Capaldo, G., Volpe, A., & Zollo, G. (1996). Management of capabilities and situations in R&D centres: The matrix of competences. R&D Management Vol. 26, No 3, 231-239.
Collinson, S. (2001). Knowledge management capabilities in R&D: A UK-Japan company comparison. R&D Management, Vol.31,No. 3, 335-347.
Constable, J. (1988), The Making of Managers. Longman.
David P Lepak & Scott A. Snell (1999). The Human Resource Architecture: Toward A Theory Of Humal Capital Allocation And Development. Academy of Management Review,1999, Vol. 24, No.1, 31-48.
Delery, J. & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, 802-835.
Edvinsson, L. & Malone, M. S.(1999). Intellectual Capital. New York, HarperBusiness, 173-188.
Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25, 419-437.
Glew, L.K. & Griffin, V.F.（1995）.Participation in Organization: A Preview of The Issues and Proposed Framework for Future Analysis. Journal of Management Vol. 21, No. 3 , 395-421.
Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High involvement work practice, turnover and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44, 180-190.
Guthrie, J. P., Flood, P. C., Liu, W., & MacCurtain, S. (2009). High performance work system in Ireland: Human resource and organizational outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,Vol. 20, No.2, 112-125.
Henry C. (2003). Open Innovation： The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston：Harvard Business School Press.
Hitt, M. A., L. Bierman, K. Shimizu, & R. Kochhar (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal , Vol.44, No.1, 13-28.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.38, No.3, 635-672
Katz, R.L. (1955). Skill of an Effective Administrator. Harvard Business Review.
Kohli, A. K. & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, 1-18.
Kotler, P. & Gary, A. (1994). Principles of Marketing, 8th ed. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, Vol.28, No.4, 564~575.
Lepak, D.P., & Snell, S.A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, Vol.24, 31-48.
Lynda, G. (1987). How can we predict management potential in research scientists? R&D Management, Vol. 17, No. 2, 87-97.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist：1-24.
McDonough, E. F. (2000). Investigation of factors contributing to the success of cross-functional teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 17, 221-235.
Milgrom, P. & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 19, No.2-3, 179-208.
Mintzberg, H.(1973). A comprehensive description of managerial work. The Nature of Managerial Work, NY: Harper& Row Publisher.
Nadler, D., Gerstein, M. S., & Shaw, R. B. (1992). Organizational architecture : designs for changing organizations. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass .
Narver, J. C. & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing,Vol. 54, 20-35.
Noe, R. A. (2005). Employee training and development (3rd). New York: McGraw Hill.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2007). Fundamentals of human resource management (2nd). New York: McGraw-Hill.
O`Dell, C. & Grayson, C. J. (1998). If Only We Knew What We Know:ldentification and Transfer oflntemal Best Practices. California Management Review, Vol.40, No.3, 154-173.
Parnes, H. S. (1984). People power. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Pfeffer, J. (1998). Seven Practices of Successful Organizations. California Management Review, Vol. 40, No.2, 96-124 .
Pfeffer, J. (1998). The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Mooreman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, Vol.1, 107-142.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, Vol.26, No.3, 513-563.
Quinn, R.E., S.R. Faerman, & M. R. McGrath (1990). Becoming a master manager. NY: John Wiley & SONS.
Rifkin, K. I., Fineman, M. & Ruhnke, C. H., (1999). Developing Technical Managers – First you need a competency model. Research Technology Management, Vol.4, No.2, 53-57.
Robert, P. (2001). Creating a Leadership Development Program Nine Essential Progaram: Nine Essentual Tasks. Public Personnel Management, Vol. 30, No.4, 429-445.
Roos, J., R. Roos, L. Edvinnsson & N. Dragonetti,（1998）. Intellectual capital：navigating in the new business landscape. New York：New York University Press."
Rosenbaum, P.L. (1991). Leading Today’s Technical Professional. Training & Development, Vol.45, No.10, 55-66.
Sandwith. P. (1993). A Hierarchy of Management Training Requirements: The Competency Domain Model. Public Personnel Management, Vol.22, No.1, 43-62.
Snell, S. A. & Dean, J. W. (1992). Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: A human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, 467-504.
Souder, W. E., & Jenssen, S. A. (1999). Management practices influence new product success and failure in the United States and Scandinavia: A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 16, 183-203.
Spencer & Spencer (1993). Competence at Work: Models for superior performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Thomas, K. W.,& Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, Vol.15, No.4, 666-681.
Tsai, C. J. (2006). High performance work systems and organizational performance: an empircial study of Taiwan’s semiconductor design Firms. Human Resource Management, Vol. 19, No.7, 1512-1530.
Westley, F., & Mintzberg, H. (1989). Visionary leadership and strategic management. Strategic. Management Journal, Vol.10, No. 1, 17-32.
Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Alternative theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, Vol. 18, 295-320. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
96932041
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096932041 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
