政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/49581
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51269758      Online Users : 845
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49581


    Title: 運用知識模組化與再用發展平台經濟性創新理論之研究-以軟體元件與矽智財為例
    Economies of platform innovation theory through knowledge modularization and reuse: The cases of software components and silicon intellectual properties(SIPs).
    Authors: 吳明機
    Wu, Ming Ji
    Contributors: 李仁芳
    Lee, Jen Fang
    吳明機
    Wu, Ming Ji
    Keywords: 知識模組化
    模組再用
    平台經濟性創新理論
    軟體產業
    半導體設計業
    動態核心能力
    紮根理論
    knowledge modularization
    module reuse
    economies of platform innovation theory
    software industry
    IC design industry
    dynamic core capabilities
    Grounded Theory
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2010-12-08 14:17:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文主要在探索作為產業組織核心之「公司」，將其知識以公開或特定之標準或程序加以模組化(modularization)後，進行公司內部與外部以產品開發為主之知識分工(division of knowledge)與再用(reuse)活動，因而衍生的組織與管理問題，以及公司間知識移轉與學習問題。並希望藉由產業實證，發展以「知識模組化與再用」為基礎之技術創新理論。
    研究過程採取紮根理論，針對了軟體產業四家公司與半導體設計業四家公司，分別就其採取軟體元件與矽智財之模組化創新現象進行深入訪談研究，進行編碼過程，將觀念類別抽象化為「績效與競爭力」、「研發知識模組技術力」、「知識模組再用力」、「知識模組平台演進力」、「組織政策與文化」、「產業基礎模組主導者之引導力」、「市場異質性」、「知識模組交易/交換成熟度」及「產業中介組織推動力」等九項。
    根據實證發現，知識模組創新公司企業常規為(1)採取知識模組再用平台為核心之產品/服務創新模式；(2)以平台為考量之組織構型設計；(3)建立四項公司內部重要能力—包括研發知識模組技術力、知識模組再用力、知識模組再用平台演進力、及組織政策與文化。至於影響產業知識模組交換/交易之因素，則為(1)開放之平台知識模組來源；(2)營造利於知識模組再用之供需脈絡；(3)妥善運用產業網絡。
    有關理論之建構，本研究選擇「平台經濟性」作為核心類別，並以「知識模組動態組合價值性」作為演化準則，經由主軸編碼與選擇編碼等程序，發展出九項命題，藉以建構「平台經濟性創新(economies of platforms innovation)」理論。根據該理論，本研究指出知識模組創新公司，可依據能力審視、能力構築、能力持續等三階段，建構其動態核心能力。
    本研究最後針對產業與政府等實務界，提出綜合性建議如下：
    一、對產業界之建議
    應注意與學習辨識所處產業是否正進入後產業化階段之分合(dis-integration)過程所產生之知識分工趨勢，並參考本研究所提出之「平台經濟性創新理論」，研擬以「平台經濟性」為基礎之知識模組化創新策略。同時，應積極運用知識模組供需脈絡與產業網絡之力量。
    二、對政府產業政策之建議
    針對協助個別企業提升內部能力方面，可加強輔導企業發展以知識模組再用平台為基礎之研發計畫，並且建立標竿案例與最佳實務，以提供企業導入「平台經濟性創新策略」之參考。同時，針對有主導潛力之知識模組創新企業，協助其深化發展產業主流平台。
    此外，與國際相較，台灣知識型企業之規模仍屬偏小，政府輔導機制可加強推動國際級產業基礎模組主導者與國內業者結盟、輔導建立夥伴廠商體系(e.g.旗艦計畫)、輔導建立知識模組交易/交換機制、協助釐清知識模組之智慧財產權爭議、以及積極參與國際標準制訂，並快速擴散相關資訊與技術供產業參考等。
    Knowledge modularization is a popular phenomenon in knowledge-based industries. This study explores issues related to companies, which use open or specific stan-dards/procedures to encapsulate their knowledge into modules, and then use such mod-ules to pursue internal and/or external division of knowledge and knowledge reuse activi-ties, for the purpose of developing products. The said issues include the organization and management issues, as well as knowledge transfer and learning. Through the process of empirical field investigations this study aims to develop a new technological innovation theory, which is based on knowledge modularization and reuse.
    This study adopted the Grounded Theory, together with case studies, as the main methodology to guide the research process. Eight companies were selected as case stud-ies, which included four companies from the software industry and four design houses from the semiconductor industry. We interviewed these companies to discuss in-depth modularization innovation concerning software components in software industry and silicon intellectual properties (SIPs) in the semiconductor industry. The collected data is differentiated into nine conceptual categories, which are the (1) performance and com-petitiveness, (2) technology capabilities for developing knowledge modules, (3) capabili-ties for reusing knowledge modules, (4) evolution of knowledge module platforms, (5) organization policy and culture, (6) leadership in terms of basic industry modules, (7) market heterogeneity, (8) maturity of knowledge module transactions/exchanges, and (9) promotion of intermediary industry organizations.
    According to the study`s findings, knowledge module innovation companies usually adopt the following procedures : (1) use knowledge module reuse platforms as the core of product/service innovation models; (2) organization structure design based on platforms; establish four internal capabilities, including (i) enhance the technology capabilities for developing knowledge module, (ii) reusing knowledge modules, (iii) speed up the evolution of knowledge module reuse platforms, (5) establish organization policy and culture. As for factors impacting industry knowledge module exchanges/transactions, these include 1) knowledge module sources for open platforms, 2) create supply and demand beneficial to knowledge module reuse, 3) making good use of industry networks.
    Regarding the formation of a theory, the “economies of platforms” are used as the core category, and develop the “dynamic combination value of knowledge modules” as a criterion of evolution. Through axial and selective coding, nine propositions are devel-oped to support and construct the theory of "economies of platform innovation". Accord-ing to this theory, the study finds that knowledge module innovation companies can build their dynamic core capabilities through three phases, including capabilities positioning, building up capabilities, and sustaining capabilities.
    The study also proposes several suggestions for the industry and government:
    1. Suggestions for the industry:
    Companies should closely watch and learn to recognize whether the structure of the industry in which they operate is entering a dis-integration process leading to division of knowledge. If so, the companies can refer to the theory of "economies of platform in-novation", to take action on knowledge module innovation strategies based on the economies of platforms. Meanwhile, they should utilize the power of the sup-ply-demand of knowledge modules and industrial networks.
    2. Suggestions for the government`s industry policies:
    For the purpose of helping individual firms raise their capabilities, the government could improve R&D assistance programs focused on the establishment of knowledge module reuse platforms. The government can also establish benchmarks or best practice cases as references for companies who would like to adopt innovation strategies for economies of platforms. Furthermore, knowledge module innovation companies with the potential to become industry leaders can be further assisted in developing mainstream industry platforms.
    Besides, compared with international companies, the scale of knowledge-based companies in Taiwan is small. Therefore, the government can strengthen its efforts in promoting alliances between international industry leaders and Taiwanese companies, help Taiwanese companies to establish strategic partner networks, assist companies in establishing transaction/exchange mechanism for knowledge modules, clarify issues re-lated to intellectual properties of knowledge modules, participate in international stan-dards bodies, and provide up-to-date and relevant market and technology information.
    Reference: 中文部分
    1. 林銘貴、陳幸雄、王興毅、陳茂成、陳文峰、陳盛福、蔡美柔、溫啟宏、陳梧桐，1997。《我國半導體產業發展策略研究報告(Silicon Island Project)》。台北：經濟部工業局委託研究，工業技術研究院電子工業研究所執行。
    2. 林銘貴、陳幸雄、王興毅、陳茂成、陳文峰、陳盛福、蔡美柔、溫啟宏、陳梧桐，1998。《我國半導體產業發展策略研究報告(Silicon Island Project) —「創新導向」的矽島環境藍圖建構》。台北：經濟部工業局委託研究，工業技術研究院電子工業研究所執行。
    3. 吳明機著，2006/1。〈台灣電子資訊產業之展望〉，《兩岸經貿》，1月號，頁10-17。
    4. 胡幼慧、姚美華，1996。〈一些質性方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何蒐集資料、登錄與分析？〉，胡幼慧主編，《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。頁141-158。
    5. 茅于軾，2004/7/8。〈介紹楊小凱的學術成就：從資源配置到分工理論〉，《博訊新聞網》。< http://peacehall.com/news/gb/pubvp/2004/07/200407081552.shtml>。
    6. 徐宗國，1996。〈紮根理論研究法：淵源、原則、技術與涵義〉，胡幼慧主編，《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。頁47-74。
    7. 張如心，2002。《IA時代下的SIP產業脈動，探索半導體世界—前瞻機會》。工研院經資中心出版。[台北：經濟部技術處發行]
    8. 范哲豪，2003。《矽智產交易(SIP Mall)研究》。新竹縣：工研院經資中心出版。[台北：經濟部技術處發行]
    9. 董鍾明，2003。《從IC設計業看EDA產業發展之歷程與前景》。新竹縣：工研院經資中心出版。[台北：經濟部技術處發行]
    10. 范哲豪，2003。《系統單晶片對半導體應用的衝擊》。新竹縣：工研院經資中心出版。[台北：經濟部技術處發行]
    11. 龔俊霖、黃淑琴、王凱，2001。《軟體元件發展趨勢與科專研發方向建議》。台北市：財團法人資訊工業策進會資訊市場情報中心(MIC)。[台北：經濟部技術處發行]
    12. 劉仁傑、陳國民、甘坤賢，2003。〈台灣工具機產業的模組化應用〉，劉仁傑主編，《讓競爭者學不像：透視台灣標竿產業經營結構》。台北：遠流。頁247-284。
    13. 陳向明，2006/12/23。〈紮根理論的思路與方法〉，《社會學吧》，〈http://www.sociologybar.com/index.asp?xAction=xReadNews&NewsID=2996〉。
    14. 鄭陸霖，2000。〈以田野觀察為中心的產業研究：方法反省與經驗分享〉。雲林科技大學演講稿。
    15. Dedrick, J. and Kraemer, K. L.著，張國鴻、吳明機譯，2000。《亞洲電腦爭霸戰—創造全球競賽新規則》(Asia’s Computer Challenge: Threat or Opportunity for the United States & the World?)。台北：時報文化。
    16. Detlev J. Hoch等著，張國鴻譯，2000。《數位式競爭》(Secrets of Software Success: Management Insights from 100 Software Firms round the World)。台北：天下文化。
    17. Emile Durkheim(涂爾幹)著，1902年，渠東譯，2006。《社會分工論》(De la Division du Travail Social)。台北縣：左岸文化。
    18. Fred Block著，鄭陸霖、吳泉源譯，2004。《後工業機會》(Postindustrial Possibilities)。台北：群學出版。
    19. ITIS計畫，2002。《系統單晶片對半導體應用的衝擊》。新竹縣：工研院經資中心出版。[台北：經濟部技術處發行]
    20. Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A.著，夏荷立譯，2005。《公司的歷史》(The Company)。台北縣：左岸文化。
    21. Rowen, C. 2006/1。〈走向系統單晶片SoC設計的未來—迎接處理器無所不在的新世界〉，《可攜式電子產品設計》。1月號。
    22. Shapiro, Carl and Varian, Hal R.著，張美惠譯，1999。《資訊經營法則》(Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy)。台北：時報文化。
    23. Smith, Adam著，黎冷譯，2003年。《國富論》(The Wealth of Nations)。台北：華立文化。
    24. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J.著，徐宗國譯，1990。《質性研究概論》(Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques)。台北：巨流。
    英文部分
    1. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D, 1999. “Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Chal-lenges, and Benefits,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 1(February).
    2. Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H., 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization,” American Economic Review, 625, pp. 772-795.
    3. Allen, T. J., 1977. Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R & D organization. Cam-bridge, MA: MIT Press.
    4. Aoki, M., 2000. “Innovation in the Governance of Product-System Innovation: The Silicon Valley Model,” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Paper no. 00-003, October.
    5. Archibugi, D. and Pianta, M., 1992. “Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: The analysis of patent data,” Research Policy 21, pp. 79-93.
    6. Argyres, A. and Liebeskind, J., 2000. “The Role of Prior Commitment in Govern-ance Choice,” in N. Foss and V. Mahnke eds., Competence, Governance, and Entre-preneurship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    7. Arora, A. and Gambardella, A., 1994. “The Changing Technology of Technical Change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labor,” Re-search Policy, 23: pp.523-532.
    8. Arora A., Gambardella, A., and Rullani, A., 1997. “Division of Labour and the Lo-cus of Inventive Activity, “Journal of Management and Governance, 1: pp. 123-140.
    9. Arrow, K. J., 1962. “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,” The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, Issue 3, pp. 155-173.
    10. Arrow, K. J., 1969. “Classificatory Notes on the Production and Transmission of Technological Knowledge,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 59, Issue 2, Pa-pers and Proceedings of the Eighty-first Annual Meeting of the American Associa-tion, pp. 29-35.
    11. Arrow, K. J., 1974. The Limits of Organization, New York: Norton.
    12. Arrow, K. J., 1985. “Information Structure of the Firm,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 75, Issue 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, pp.303-307.
    13. Aubert, B., Rivard, S., and Patry, M., 1996. “A Transaction Cost Approach to Out-sourcing Behavior,” Information Management, 30, pp.51-64.
    14. Argote, L., 1999. Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge, Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
    15. Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L., 2000. “Knowledge Trans-fer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others,” Organizational Be-havior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1, May), pp.1-8.
    16. Automobile, 1994. “1995 SAAB 900SE turbo coupe,” August, pp. 97-98.
    17. Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K., 1997. “Managing in the Age of Modularity, Harvard Business Review. September-October, pp.84-93.
    18. Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K., 2000. Design Rules, Volume 1, The Power of Modu-larity, MIT Press. Cambridge MA.
    19. Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K., 2006. “The Architecture of Participation: Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model?” Man-agement Science, Vol. 52, No. 7, pp. 1116-1127.
    20. Barney, J., 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.99-120.
    21. Bartmess, A. and Cerny, K., 1993. “Building Competitive Advantage through a Global Network of Capabilities,” California Management Review, Winter, pp.78-103.
    22. Baszanger, I. (1998). “The work sites of an American interactionist: Anselm L. Strauss, 1917-1996.” Symbolic Interaction, 21(4), pp.353-78.
    23. Becker, G. S. and Murphy, K.M., 1992. “The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, Issue 4, pp. 1137-1160.
    24. Bettis, R. A. and Hitt, M. A., 1995. “The New Competitive Landscape,” Strategic Management Journal, 16, pp. 7-20.
    25. Birner, J., 1996. “Mind, Market and Society: Network Structures in the Work of F. A. Hayek,” Working Paper 1996-02, Computable and Experimental Economic Labora-tory, University of Trento, Italy.
    26. Boland, R., Tenkasi, R., & Te`eni, D. 1994. “Designing I.T. to support distributed cognition,” Organization Science, 5(3), pp.456-475.
    27. Borland, J. and Yang, X., 1992. “Specialization and a New Approach to Economic Organization and Growth,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 82, Issue 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Eco-nomic Association, pp.386-391.
    28. Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., and Nobel, R. 1999. “Knowledge Transfer in Interna-tional Acquisitions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), pp.439-462.
    29. Brooks, Jr., F. P., 1975. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    30. Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. 1998. “Organizing Knowledge,” California Manage-ment Review, 40(3), pp.90-111.
    31. Brusoni, S., 2001. The division of labour and the division of knowledge: The or-ganisation of engineering design in the chemical industry, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, SPRU, University of Sussex at Brighton, UK.
    32. Brusoni, S. and Prencipe, A., 2001. “Technologies, Product, Organisations: opening the black box of modularity,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (1), pp.179-205.
    33. Brusoni, S., A. Prencipe and K. Pavitt., 2001. “Knowledge Specialisation, Organisa-tional Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More Than They Make?,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, pp.597-621.
    34. Brusoni, S. and Prencipe, A., 2001. “Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations,” Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 10, Number 1. pp.179-205.
    35. Brusoni, S. and Prencipe, A., 2006. “Making Design Rules: A Multidomain Perspec-tive, ” Organization Science, Vol. 17, Number 2. pp.179-189.
    36. Burdett, J. O. 1993. “Managing in the age of discontinuity,” Management Decision, 31(1), pp.10-18.
    37. Chandler, A. D., 1992. “Organizational Capabilities and the Theory of the Firm, “Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, pp.79-100.
    38. Charmaz, K. 1983. “The grounded theory method: an explication and interpretation,” in R. Emerson (ed.), Contemporary Field Research: a Collection of Readings, Boston: Little Brown.
    39. Chesbrough, H. and Kusunoki, H., 2000. “The Modularity Trap: Innovation, tech-nology phase-shifts, and the resulting limits of virtual organisations,” in Knowledge and the Firm, I. Nonaka and D. Teece (Eds), Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    40. Chesbrough, H. W., 2003. Open Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    41. Chiang, S.-y., 2001. “Foundries and the Dawn of an Open IP Era,” Computer, IEEE, pp. 43-46.
    42. Chuma, H., 2006. “Increasing complexity and limits of organization in the micro-lithography industry: implications for science-based industries,” Research Policy, 35, pp.394-411.
    43. Clark, H. H. and Brennan, S. E. 1991. Grounding in communication. In L. B. Res-nick & J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cogni-tion, Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
    44. Clark, H. and Brennan, S. 1993. Grounding in communication. In Groupware and computer-supported cooperative work. In R. M. Baecker (Ed.). San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann.
    45. Clark, H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    46. Clark, K. B. and Wheelwright, S., 1993. Managing New Product and Process Development, New York: Free Press.
    47. Coase, R.H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm, Economica, New Series, Vol. 4, Issue, 16, pp.386-406.
    48. Coase, R. H. 1992. “The Institutional Structure of Production,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 82, Issue 4, pp.713-719.
    49. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D.A., “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp.128-152.
    50. Conner, K. R. and Prahalad, C. K., 1996. “A Resource Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism,” Organization Science, 7(5), pp. 477-501.
    51. Coombs, R. and Metcalf, S., 2000. “Organizing for Innovation: Coordinating Distributed Innovation Capabilities,” in M. Foss and V. Mahnke eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    52. Coopey, J., Keegan, O., and Emler, N. 1998. Managers` innovations and the structuration of organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 35(3): pp.263-284.
    53. Cowen, R. and Foray, D., 1997. “The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(3), pp.595-622.
    54. Cusumano, M.A. 1991. Japan’s Software Factories: a Challenge to U.S. Management, New York: Oxford University Press.
    55. Cusumano, M. A. and Elenkov, D., 1994. “Linking international technology transfer with strategy and management: a literature commentary,” Research Policy 23, pp.195-215.
    56. Cusumano, M.A., 2004. The Business of Software, New York: Free Press.
    57. Cyert, R. and March, J. G., 1963. A Behavioural Theory of the Firm, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    58. Davenport, T. H., Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Beers, M. C. 1996. ”Improving Knowledge Work Processes,” Sloan management Review, Summer, pp.53-65.
    59. Davies, A. 1997. “The life cycle of a complex product system,” International Journal of Innovation Management, 1(3), pp.229-256.
    60. Day, J. and Wendler, J., 1999. “The New Economics of Organization,” McKinsey Quarterly, 1, pp.4-17.
    61. Demsetz, H. 1997. “The Firm in Economic Theory: A Quiet Revolution,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 87, Issue 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, pp. 426-429.
    62. Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. 1989. “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage,” Management Science, 35, pp.1504-1511.
    63. Dosi, G. and Marengo, L., 1994. “Toward a Theory of Organizational Competencies,” in R.W. Englander eds., Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, pp.157-178.
    64. Dosi G., and Egidi, M., 1991. “Substantive and Procedural Uncertainty. An Exploration of Economic Behaviours in Changing Environments”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp.145-68
    65. Dosi, G. and Marengo, L., 1994. “Some Elements of an Evolutionary Theory of Organizational Competences,” in R.W. Englander eds., Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
    66. Dosi, G. and Marengo, L., 2000. “On the Tangled Discourse Between Transaction Cost Economics and Competence Based Views of the Firm,” in N. Foss and V. Mahnke eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    67. Earl, M., 1996. “The Risks of IT Outsourcing,” Sloan Management Review, 37, pp. 26-34.
    68. Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 532-550.
    69. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E., 2007. “Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities and Challenges,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 25-32.
    70. Ethiraj, S. K. and Levinthal, D., 2004. “Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems,” Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 159-173.
    71. Foss K. and Foss, N.J., 2002. “Authority in the Context of Distributed Knowledge,” LINK; Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.
    72. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G., 1987. “Competition, Compatibility and Standards: The Economics of Horses, Penguins and Lemmings, “ in H. Landis Gabel eds., Product Standardization and Competitive Strategy, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp.1-2.
    73. Foss, N. J., 1997. “The Classical Theory of Production and the Capabilities View of the Firm,” Journal of Economic Studies, 24, pp. 307-323.
    74. Freeman, C. and Louçã, F., 2001. As Time Goes By – From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution, New York: Oxford University Press, p. 325.
    75. Ford Engineering World, 1990. “4.6 L V-8 is Ford’s first modular engine,” 15(3), pp. 1-4.
    76. Foss, N. J., 1993. “Theories of the Firm: Competence and Contractual Perspectives,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24, pp. 307-323.
    77. Fransman, M., 1994. “Information, Knowledge, Vision and Theories of the Firm,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, pp. 713-757.
    78. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G., 1985. “Standardization, compatibility, and innovation,” Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 70-83.
    79. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G., 1986. “Installed Based and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 940-955.
    80. Funk, J. L. and Methe, D. T., 2001. “Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication,” Research Policy 30, pp. 589-610.
    81. Gartner Group, 2000. Outsourcing Trends 2000-2005.
    82. Garud, R. and Kumaraswamy, A., 1993. “Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of Sun Mirosystems’ open systems strategy,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 351-69.
    83. Garud, R. and Kumaraswamy, A., 1994. “Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution,” Strategic Management Journal, 16 (Special Issue), pp. 93-109.
    84. Gersick, C.J.G., 1988, “Tme and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development,” Academy of Management Journal, 31, pp.9-41.
    85. Grandori, A., 1997. “Governance Structures, Coordination Mechanisms and Cognitive Models,” Journal of Management and Governance 1, pp. 29-42.
    86. Grandori, A., 2001. Organizations and Economic Behavior, London: Routledge.
    87. Glaser, B., 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
    88. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A., 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine.
    89. Goulding, C., 2002. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers, London: SAGE Publications.
    90. Grossman, S. and Hart, O., 1986. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical Integration,” Journal of Political Economy, 94, pp. 691-719.
    91. Granovetter, M. 1973. “The strength of weak ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 6, pp. 1360-1380.
    92. Grant, R. M. 1996. “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 109-122.
    93. Guba, G. and Lincoln, Y., 1994. “Competing paradigms in qualitative research,” in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    94. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K., 1994. Competing for the Future, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    95. Hart, O., 1995, Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    96. Hansen, M. T. 1999. “The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, pp. 82-111.
    97. Harris, S. G. 1994. “Organizational culture and individual sensemaking,” Organization Science, 5, pp. 309-321.
    98. Hedlund, C. 1994. “A model of knowledge management and the M-form corporation,” Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp. 73-90.
    99. Huber, G. P. 1991. “Organizational Learning: The contributing processes and the literatures,” Organization Science, 2, pp. 88-115.
    100. Hutchins, E. 1991. “The social organization of distributed cognition,” in L. B. Resnick & J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
    101. Hayek, F. A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 35.
    102. Hobday, M., 1991. “Semiconductor Technology and the Newly Industrializing Countries: The Diffusion of ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits),” World Development, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 375-397.
    103. Holmström, B. and Roberts, J. 1998. “The Boundaries of the Firm Revisited,” Journal of Economic Perspectives.
    104. Iansiti, M. and Clark, K. 1994. “Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, pp. 557-605.
    105. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Bettis, R. A., and DePorras, D. A. 1987. ”Strategy formulation processes: Differences in perceptions of strength and weaknesses indicators and environmental uncertainty by managerial level,” Strategic Management Journal, 8, pp. 469-485.
    106. Itami, H. 1987. Mobilizing invisible assets, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    107. Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C., 1986. “Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 822-841.
    108. Khazam, J. and Mowery, D., 1994. “The commercialization of RISC: Strategies for the creation of dominant designs,” Research Policy, 23, pp.89-102.
    109. Klein, B., Crawford, R.G. and Alchian, A., 1978. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process,” Journal of Law and Economics, pp. 297-326.
    110. Kogut, B. and Zander, U., 1996. “What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning,” Organization Science, 7, pp. 502-518.
    111. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. 1992. “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology,” Organization Science, 3, pp. 383-397.
    112. Kotabe, M., Parente, R., and Murray, J., 2007. “Antecedents and Outcomes of Modular Production in the Brazilian Automobile Industry: A Grounded Theory Approach,” Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (1), pp. 84-106.
    113. Landau, R. and Rosenberg, N., 1992. “Successful Commercialization in the Process Industry,” in N. Rosenberg, R. Landau and D. Mowery (eds.), Technology and the Wealth of Nations, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    114. Langlois, R.N. and Robertson, P.L. 1992. “Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the minicomputer and stereo component industries,” Research Policy, 21, pp. 297-313.
    115. Langlois, R. N., 1997. “Scale, Scope, and the Reuse of Knowledge,” Paper for the conference in honor of Brian J. Loasby, August 26-28, 1997, Stirling, Scotland.
    116. Langlois, R.N., Foss, N.J. 1999. “Capabilities and governance: the rebirth of production in the theory of economic organization,” Kyklos, Vol. 52 pp.201-18.
    117. Lee, J. F. and Wu, M.J., “Organizational Capabilities Building through CMMI: The Case of Taiwan Software Industry,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 24, 327-339 (2007).
    118. Lippman, S. A. and Rumelt, R. P. 1982. ”Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition,” The Rand Journal of Economics, 13, pp. 418-438.
    119. Loasby B. 1999. Knowledge, Institutions and Evolution in Economics, London: Routledge.
    120. Mahnke, V., 2001. “The Process of Vertical Dis-Integration: An Evolutionary Perspective on Outsourcing,” Journal of Management and Governance, 5, pp. 353-379.
    121. March, J.G. and Simon, H.A., 1958, Organizations, New York: John Wiley.
    122. Marengo, L. 1998. “Interdependecies and Division of Labour in Problem-Solving Technologies,” Paper Prepared for the 7th Conference of the International Schumpeter Society, Vienna (A).
    123. Marengo, L. Pasquali, C. and Valente, M., 2002. “Decomposability and Modularity of Economic Interactions,” in W. Callebaut and A. Rasskin-Gutman (eds.) Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of complex natural systems, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
    124. Marengo, L. and Dosi, G., 2005. “Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving, “ Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 58, pp. 303-326.
    125. Ｍajchrzak, A., Neece, O. E. and Cooper, L.P., 2001. “Knowledge Reuse for Innovation – The Missing Focus in Knowledge Management: Results of a Case Analysis at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,” Academy of Management Proceedings.
    126. Matutes, C. and Regibeau, P., 1988. ”Mix and Match: Product Compatibility without Network Externalities,” The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 221-234.
    127. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., and Ba, S., 2000. “Computer-mediated inter organizational knowledge-sharing: Insights from a virtual team innovating using a collaborative tool,” Information Resources Management Journal, 13(1), pp. 44-59.
    128. Majchrzak, A. and Beath, C., 2001. “Beyond user participation: A process model of learning and negotiation during system development,” in A. Segars & J. Sampler & R. Zmud (Eds.), Redefining the Organizational Roles of Information Technology in the Information Age: University of Minnesota Press.
    129. Mingtzberg, H. 1979. “An Emerging Strategy of ‘Direct Research’,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, pp.582-589.
    130. Moore, G. E., 1965. “Cramming more components onto integrated circuits,” Electronics, Vol. 38, No. 8, April 19.
    131. Mowery, D. C. and Rosenberg, N., 1998. “Chapter 6: The Electronics Revolution, 1947-90,” in Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123-166.
    132. Nalebuff, B. JU. And Stiglitz, J.E., 1983. “Information, Competition, and Markets,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 73, Issue 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, pp.278-283.
    133. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S.G., 1977. “in search of useful theory of innovation,” Research Policy, 6, pp. 36-76.
    134. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge MA: Belknap Press.
    135. Nelson, R., 1991, “Why Do Firms Differ and How Does It Matter?” Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.61-74.
    136. Nelson, R. R., 2001. “The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions,” in G. Dosi, et al., Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 319-335.
    137. Nevins, J. L. and Whiteney D.E., (eds.), 1989. Concurrent Design of Products and Process: A Strategy for the Next Generation in Manufacturing, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    138. North, Douglass C., 1990. “Chapter 4: A transaction cost theory of exchange,” in D. C. North et al, eds., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, London: Cambridge University Press. pp. 27-35.
    139. Noyce, R. 1977. “Microelectronics,” Scientific American, September , Vol. 23, Number 3, pp. 63–9.
    140. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press.
    141. Nonaka, I. 1994. “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science, 5(1), pp. 14-37.
    142. O’Callaghan, J. 1996. “Grounded theory: a potential methodology,” Counselling Psychology Review, 11(1), pp.23-28.
    143. Olson, G. M. and Olson, J. S. 1998. “Making sense of the findings: Common vocabulary leads to the synthesis necessary for theory building,” in K. Finn & A. Sellen & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video-mediated Communication, Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
    144. Ouchi, W. G. 1980. “Markets, bureaucracies, and clans,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, pp.129-141.
    145. Parnas, D.L., 1972. “ On the Criteria To Be Used in Decomposing Systems Into Modules,” Communications of the ACM, 15, pp. 1053-8.
    146. Parnas, D.L. P.C. Clements and D.M. Weiss, 1985. “The modular structure of complex systems,“ IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 11, pp. 259-266.
    147. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K., 1994. “The continuing, widespread (and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies,” Research Policy 23, pp. 533-545.
    148. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K., 1997. “The Technological Competencies of the World`s Largest Firms: Complex and Path-Dependent, but not much Variety,” Research Policy, 26, pp. 141-156.
    149. Pavitt, K., 1998. “Technologies, Products and Organization in the Innovating Firm: what Adam Smith tells us that Schumpeter doesn`t,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 7 (3), pp. 433-452.
    150. Pavitt, K., 1999. Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    151. Pavitt, K., 2002. “Innovating routines in the business firm: what corporate tasks should they be accomplishing,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 117-133.
    152. Pavitt, K., 2002. “Knowledge about knowledge since Nelson & Winter: a mixed record,” SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, No. 73, University of Sussex.
    153. Pennings, J. H. and Harianto, F. 1992. ”Technology networking and innovation implementation,” Organization Science, 3, pp. 356-382.
    154. Penrose, E. T., 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
    155. Peteraf, M. A., 1993. “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 179-191.
    156. Pettigrew, A., 1988, “Longitudinal field research on change Theory and practice, Paper presented at the National Science Foundation,” Conference on Longitudinal Research Methods in Organizations, Austin.
    157. Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension, London: Rutledge & Kegan Paul.
    158. Popper, K., R. 1968. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Harper & Row.
    159. Prahalad, C. K., 2005. The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profit., New Jersey: Wharton School Publishing, pp. 3-22.
    160. Prencipe, A. 1997. “Technological Capabilities and Product Evolutionary Dynamics: a case study from the aero engine industry,“Research Policy, 25, pp. 1261-1276.
    161. Quinn, B. and Hilmer, F., 1995. “Strategic Outsourcing,” McKinsey Quarterly, 1, pp. 48-70.
    162. Quinn, J. B., Baruch, J., and Zien, K. A., 1996. “Software-Based Innovation,” MIT Sloan Management Review, Summer.
    163. Radner R. 1992. “Hierarchy: The Economics of Management,” Journal of Economic Literature, 30, pp. 1382-1415.
    164. Robertson, P. L. and Langlois, R.N., 1995. “Innovation, networks, and vertical integration,” Research Policy 24, pp. 543-562.
    165. Rumelt, R. P., 1984. “Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm,” in R. B. Lamb eds., Competitive Strategic Management, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, pp. 556-570.
    166. Rumelt, R. P., 1995. “Inertia and Transformation,” in C. A. Montgomery eds., Resourced-based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 101-132.
    167. Sanchez R. and Mahoney, J.T., 1996. “Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organisation Design,” Strategic Management Journal, 17, Winter Special Issue, pp. 63-76.
    168. Salvador, F., Forza, C., and Rungtusanatham, M., 2002. ”Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions,” Journal of Operations Management, 20, pp. 549-575.
    169. Schilling, M. A. and Steensma, H.K., 2001. “The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An industry-level analysis,” Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6), pp. 1149-1168.
    170. Senge, P. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Currency Doubleday.
    171. Sherman, W. S. and Lacey, M. Y. 1999. “The Role of Tacit Knowledge in the Team Building Process: Explanations and Interventions,” Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Chicago.
    172. Simon, Herbert A. 1951. “A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship,” in idem. 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    173. Simon, H. A., 1996. The Sciences of Artificial, Cambridge MA and London, The MIT Press.
    174. Simon, H.A., 1962. “The architecture of complexity,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, pp. 467-482.
    175. Spender, J. C. 1996. “Organizational knowledge, learning, and memory: Three concepts in search of a theory,” Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9, pp. 63-78.
    176. Stigler, G. J., 1951. “The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market,” The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 59, Issue 3, pp. 185-193.
    177. Strauss, A., 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientist, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    178. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, London: Sage.
    179. Sturgeon, T., 2002. “Modular production networks: A new model of industrial organization,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 11 (3), pp. 451-496.
    180. Szulanski, G. 1996. “Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 27-43.
    181. Szulanski, G. 2000. “The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1, May), pp. 9-27.
    182. Takeishi A., 2002. “Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: The case of automotive product development,” Organization Science, 13 (3), pp. 321-338.
    183. Teece, D. J. 1993. “The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Perspectives on Alfred Chandler’s Scale and Scope,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 199-225.
    184. Teece, D. J., 1981. “The market for know-how and the efficient transfer of technology,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 458, pp. 81-96.
    185. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A., 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp. 509-533.
    186. Todd, P. and Benbasat, I. 2000. “The impact of I. T. on decision-making: A cognitive perspective,” in R. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the Domains of IT Management, Cincinnati: Pinnaflex.
    187. Thomas, T., 1999. “Technology for IP Reuse and Portability,” IEEE Design and Test of Computers, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 7-13.
    188. Tsoukas, H. 1996. “The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach,” Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter), pp. 11-25.
    189. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1985. “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice,” in G. Wright (Ed.), Behavioral Decision Making, New York: Plenum Press.
    190. Tully, S., 8 February 1993. “The modular corporation,” Fortune, pp. 106-114.
    191. Utterback, J.M., 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change, Boston: Harvard Business Press.
    192. Vandenbosch, B. and Huff, S. L. 1997. ”Searching and scanning: How executives obtain information from executive information systems,” MIS Quarterly, March, pp. 81-99.
    193. Verona, G. 1999. “A resource-based view of product development,” Academy of Management Review, 24(1), pp. 132-142.
    194. von Hippel, E. and Tyre, M., 1993. “How the "learning by doing" is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment,” Sloan School of Management Working Paper #BPS-3521-93.
    195. von Hippel, E., 1990. “Task Partitioning: An Innovation Process Variable,” Research Policy, 19, pp. 407-418.
    196. Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., and Nonaka, I., 2000. Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
    197. Walker, G., 1985. “Network position and cognition in a computer software firm,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, pp. 103-130.
    198. Walker, G. and Poppo R., 1991. “Profit Centers, Single source Suppliers, and Transaction Costs,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp. 66-87.
    199. Wang, J,-C., 1994. “Cooperative research in a newly industrialized country: Taiwan,” Research Policy 23, pp. 697-711.
    200. Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    201. Wernerfelt, B., 1984. “A Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 4-12.
    202. Williamson, O.E., 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York.
    203. Williamson, O., 1985. The Economic Institutes of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.
    204. Williamson, O., 1991. ”Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternative,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp. 269-296.
    205. Williamson, O., 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    206. Williamson, Oliver E., 1998. “Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory,” in G. Dosi et al, eds., Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 17-66.
    207. Winter, S. G. 1995. “Four Rs of profitability: Rents, resources, routines and replication,” in C. A. Montgomery (Ed.), Resource based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Towards a synthesis, Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
    208. Winter, S. G., 2002. “Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Production,” LEM Papers Series 2002/27, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant`Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    209. Woolsey, J. P. (April 1994), “777”, Air Tranport World, pp. 22-31.
    210. Yang, X., 1999. “The Division of Labor, Investment, and Capital,” Papers 8, Chicago - Graduate School of Business.
    211. Yin, R., K. 1994. Case Study Research; Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    212. Zander, U. and Kogut, B., 1995. “Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and limitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test,” Organization Science, 6, pp. 76-92.
    213. Zenger, T. R. and Hesterly, W. S., 1997. “The Disaggregation of Corporations: Selective Intervention, High-Powered Incentives, and Molecular Units,” Organization Science, 8(3), pp. 209-222.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    88359501
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0883595011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Technology and Innovation Management] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    59501101.pdf48KbAdobe PDF2975View/Open
    59501102.pdf112KbAdobe PDF22125View/Open
    59501103.pdf94KbAdobe PDF2976View/Open
    59501104.pdf116KbAdobe PDF21081View/Open
    59501105.pdf191KbAdobe PDF22046View/Open
    59501106.pdf852KbAdobe PDF27501View/Open
    59501107.pdf290KbAdobe PDF224519View/Open
    59501108.pdf993KbAdobe PDF24599View/Open
    59501109.pdf1069KbAdobe PDF212425View/Open
    59501110.pdf855KbAdobe PDF22532View/Open
    59501111.pdf269KbAdobe PDF21170View/Open
    59501112.pdf225KbAdobe PDF21950View/Open
    59501113.pdf381KbAdobe PDF22105View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback