政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/49543
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51064176      在线人数 : 916
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/49543


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49543


    题名: 套票型式與消費者規範導向對轉換與續購行為之影響
    The Effects of Bundled Ticket Forms and Consumer Regulatory Focus on Switching and Repurchase Behavior
    作者: 邱亞康
    Chiu ,Ya-Kang
    贡献者: 別蓮蒂
    樓永堅
    邱亞康
    Chiu ,Ya-Kang
    关键词: 沉入成本效果
    規範導向論
    動機系統
    價格組合
    套票
    認知評估論
    Sunk Cost Effect
    Regulatory Focus Theory
    Motivation Systems
    Price Bundling
    Bundled Ticket
    Cognitive Evaluation Theory
    日期: 2006
    上传时间: 2010-12-08 13:26:24 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究經由兩個系列的實驗設計以探討套票的使用行為與續購行為。其中，實驗一是以虛擬情境檢視套票型式影響消費者的使用意圖，並以受測者的規範導向做為調節變數；實驗二則更進一步地以較接近真實生活的情境來進行操弄，更明確地檢測了消費者對套票的實際使用情形以及續購行為，除仍以受測者的生理規範導向做為調節變數，另探討了套票持有的前期與後期對使用行為的調節效果。
    實驗一的結果顯示透過不同套票類型所引發持有者沉入成本上的差異，可能導致受測者在套票的使用意願不同。具體來說，愈是能讓受測者感受到不使用便等同於虧損的套票，受測者的使用意願便會更高。此外，不同規範導向的受測者所重視的目標不同。積極導向動機較強的受測者，行為較易受到努力得到想要結果的動機驅策，所以比較在意結果是否能獲得之前欠缺的東西；反過來說，保守導向動機較強的受測者，行為較易受到努力保持現有結果的動機引導，所以比較在意結果是否會失去之前擁有的東西。以不同動機系統為主的不同類型受測者的行為會有很大的差異。積極導向者比較容易追尋更完美的結果，所以當競爭者推出可能是較佳的替代品時，轉換意願較高；至於保守導向者則較在意持有現有可接受的結果，所以發現可能是較佳的替代品時，則寧願使用手中持有的套票。
    至於實驗二的結果則顯示受測者在套票持有的前期較易於使用套票，換言之，隨著套票持有的時間愈久，對未使用完畢套票的沉入成本感受會隨著時間降低，使用套票的可能性也就因此愈低。此外，不同的套票型式對保守導向者的影響比較大，對保守導向動機較強的受測者而言，若所持有的套票型式是較容易感受到當未使用套票時，就意謂著沉入成本無法回收時，使用套票的意願會較高。而當持有的型式是較不容易感受到套票成本的型式時，使用此套票的可能性就相對降低了。但是積極導向動機系統為主的受測者來說，套票的實體型式對使用行為的差異就不太明顯了。不同型式的套票，並不會對積極導向者產生太大使用行為上的差異。
    若保守導向者持有的是較容易感受到此套票成本的型式時，在套票持有的前期與後期間的使用差距不太會有明顯的改變，也就是說，他們比較不會因為套票持有的時間較久就明顯地降低使用行為，但若持有的是比較不容易感受到成本的套票時，在套票持有的後期會比前期容易不去使用套票。至於對積極導向者來說，這項因為套票型式上的差別造成在持有套票的前期與後期使用套票上的變化就不太明顯，事實上，積極導向者無論持有何種型式的套票，在後期都會明顯的降低使用套票的行為。
    當套票使用完畢後，原持有的是較不容易感受到成本的套票型式受測者，續購意願比較高。而原持有的是較容易感受到套票成本的型式時，相對上的續購意願會較低。這項影響僅對保守導向者有影響，至於對積極導向者來說，就沒有什麼明顯的差異。
    研究的結果大致與研究假說一致，因此，對於理論與實務上亦據本研究的結論提一些的建議。

    關鍵詞: 沉入成本效果、規範導向論、動機系統、價格組合、套票、認知評估論
    This study utilized two experimental designs in testing consumer behavior in the usage and repurchase of bundled tickets (price bundling). In the first experiment, a traditional context was employed by using respondent regulatory focus as the moderator to test the impact of bundled ticket types on consumer usage intention. In the second experiment, a more realistic context was employed to examine consumers’ real usage and repurchase behavior with the bundle. Here in addition to using respondents’ regulatory focus as pure-moderator, study two also included bundling quasi-moderator—possession phases.
    The results of the first study showed that the difference in sunk cost effects caused by the two types of bundling would result in different bundling utilization intentions. Moreover, respondents within different motivation systems showed significantly different behavior patterns—promotion focus respondents were more likely to seek better gains, thus when competitors provided better alternatives, these respondents were more likely to make the switch. Prevention focus respondents, on the other hand, cared more about losses, making them more likely to remain with the original service provider.
    The result of the second study showed that compared with the later phase, bundling usage propensity was higher in the earlier holding phase. Moreover, different forms of bundled tickets had different extent influences on prevention focus respondents. Prevention focus respondents held that separate types caused them to have higher intentions in using bundling, but they would be relatively less likely to use bundling when they were in possession of an integrated one. However, the effect of different types of bundling on the usage behavior of promotion focus respondents was not significant.
    Among prevention focus respondents who were more sensitive to bundled ticket costs, there is no significant difference in their utilization of bundling from earlier to later phases. However, if the bundled tickets in possession were the integrated type, they were less likely to use the tickets in the later phase than in the earlier one. Regarding promotion focus respondents, the effect of bundled ticket form in the usage of said tickets in the two phases was not significant. In fact, no matter what form the bundling took, promotion focus respondents displayed significantly less use for the bundling in the later phase.
    Bundling possession forms had the direct impact on repurchasing behavior. In this regard, respondents holding integrated bundling types displayed a higher incidence of repurchase behavior. This was, however, only effective when it came to prevention focus respondents; no significant difference was found regarding promotion focus respondents.
    The results of this study yielded suggestions for both theoretical and practical areas.

    Key Words: Sunk Cost Effect, Regulatory Focus Theory, Motivation Systems, Price Bundling, Bundled Ticket, Cognitive Evaluation Theory
    參考文獻: Aaker, J. L. & Lee, A. Y. (2001). “I” seek pleasures and “We” avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33-49.
    Adams, W. J. & Yellen, W. L. (1976). Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(3), 475-498.
    Amabile, T. M., DeJong W., & Lepper M. R. (1976). Effects of externally-imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(July), 92-98.
    Arkes, H. R. & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124-140.
    Arkes, H.R. (1996). The psychology of waste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 9(3), 213-224.
    Avnet, T & Higgins E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(February), 1-10.
    Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068.
    Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
    Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social psychology, 6, (L. Berkowitz, Ed.). 1-62. New York: Academic Press.
    Black, A. E. & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors` autonomy support and students` autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.
    Boal, K. B. & Cummings, L. L. (1981). Cognitive evaluation theory: An experimental test of processes and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28 (October), 289-310.
    Brockner, J. (1992). The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 39-61.
    Burstein, M. L. (1960). The economics of tie-in sales, Review of Economics and Statistics, 42(February), 68-73.
    Buss D. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski, Eds.). 3-38. New York: Guilford.
    Cameron, J. & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423.
    Cameron, J. & Pierce, W. D. (1996). The debate about rewards and intrinsic motivation: Protests and accusations do not alter the results. Review of Educational Research, 66(Spring), 39-52.
    Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst, 24(Spring), 1-44.
    Cameron, J. & Pierce, W. D. (2002). Rewards and intrinsic motivation,Westport: Greenwood.
    Cleveland, E. S. & Reese, E. (2005). Maternal structure and autonomy support in conversations about the past: Contributions to children`s autobiographical memory. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 376-388.
    Crowe, E. & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132.
    Cunningham, W. A., Raye, C. L., & Johnson, M. K. (2005). Neural correlates of evaluation associated with promotion and prevention regulatory focus. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(2), 202-211.
    deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior. New York: Academic Press.
    Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
    Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), (2002). Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
    Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105-115.
    Deci, E. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(1), 113-120.
    Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.
    Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668.
    Eisenberger, R. & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality of myth? American Psychologist, 51(November), 1153-1166.
    Flora, S. R. (1990). Undermining intrinsic interest from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Psychological Record, 40(3), 323-347.
    Freitas, A. L., Liberman N., & Higgins E. T. (2002). Regulatory fit and resisting temptation during goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(May), 291-98.
    Friedman, R. S. & Forster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1013.
    Garland, H. & Newport, S. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48(1), pp.55-69.
    Gourville, J. T. & Soman D. (1998). Payment depreciation: The behavioral effects of temporally separating payment from consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(September), 160-174.
    Graham, J. F. (1994). Increasing repurchase rates: A reappraisal of coupon effects. Psychology & Marketing, 11(6), 533-547.
    Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. A Model for Personality (H. J. Eysenck Ed.). 246-276. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Guay, F., Senecal, C., Gauthier, L., & Fernet, C. (2003). Predicting career indecision: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(2), 165-177.
    Guiltinan, J. P. (1987). The price bundling of services: A normative framework. Journal of Marketing, 51(April): 74-85
    Guland, S. T. & Grolnick, W. S. (2003). Children’s expectancies and perceptions of adults: Effects on rapport. Child Development, 74(4), 1212-1224.
    Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model. Human Development, 21(1), 34-64.
    Heath, C. & Fennema, M. G. (1996). Mental depreciation and marginal decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(2), 95-108.
    Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
    Herrnstein R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13(2), 243-266.
    Higgins, E. T, Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23.
    Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
    Higgins, E. T. (1998). From expectancies to worldviews: Regulatory focus in socialization and cognition. Attribution and Social Interaction: The Legacy of Edward E. Jones (J. M. Darley & J. Cooper Eds.). 243-309. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217-1230.
    Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177-191.
    Higgins, E. T., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1985). Self-concept discrepancy theory: A psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of depression and anxiety. Social Cognition, 3(1), 51-76.
    Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. H., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23.
    Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 515-525.
    Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 252-274.
    Jain, S. P., Lindsey, C., Agrawal, N., & Maheswaran, D. (2007). For better or for worse? Valenced comparative frames and regulatory focus. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 57-65.
    Kahnemman, D. & Tversky A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
    Kidwell B. & Jewell R. D. (2003). An examination of perceived behavioral control: internal and external influences on intention, Psychology and Marketing, 20(7), 625-640.
    Knee, C. R. & Neighbors, C. (2002). Self-determination, perception of peer pressure, and drinking among college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 522-543.
    Kohn, A. (1996). By all available means: Cameron and Pierce`s defense of extrinsic motivators. Review of Educational Research, 66(Spring), 1-4.
    Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(June), 1122-1134.
    Lee, L. & Ariely D. (2006). Shopping goals, goal concreteness, and conditional promotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 60-70.
    Lepper, M. R. & Greene, D. (1976). On understanding “overjustification”: A reply to Reiss and Sushinsky. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(1), 25-35.
    Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the overjustification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129-137.
    Lepper, M.R., Keavney, M., & Drake, M. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards: A commentary on Cameron and Pierce’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(spring), 5-32.
    Lockwood, P., Christian H. J., and Ziva K. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(October), 854-64.
    Lynch, M. F., Plant, R. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2005). Psychological needs and threat to safety: Implications for staff and patients in a psychiatric hospital for youth. Professional Psychology, 36(4), 415-425.
    Markman, A. & Brendl, M. (2000). The influence of goals on value and choice. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 39(1), 97-123.
    Matsumoto, H., & Takenaka, K. (2004). Motivational profiles and stages of exercise behavior change. International Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2(1), 89-96.
    Miyazaki, A., Langenderfer, J., & Sprott, D. (1999). Government-sponsored lotteries: Exploring purchase and nonpurchase motivations. Psychology & Marketing, 16(1), 1-20
    Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 444-453.
    Okada, E. M. (2001). Trade-ins, mental accounting, and product replacement decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 433-446.
    Orne, M. T. & Evans, F. J. (1966). Social control in the psychological experiment: Antisocial behavior and hypnosis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(March), 189-200.
    Pennington, G. L., Aaker J. L., & Roese N. J. (2004). Factors determining the persuasiveness of promotion- and prevention-focused appeals. Advances in Consumer Research (edited by B. E. Kahn & M. F. Luce Eds.). 31. 229. Association for Consumer Research, Valdosta, GA.
    Periatt, J., LeMay S. A., & Chakrabarty S. (2004). The selling orientation–customer orientation (SOCO) scale: Cross-validation of the revised version. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 24(1), 49–54.
    Petrick, J. F. (2002). Experience use history as a segmentation tool to examine golf travellers’ satisfaction, perceived value and repurchase intentions. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 8(4), 332-342.
    Porter, L. W. & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial Attitudes and Performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin-Dorsey.
    Prelec, D. & Loewenstein G. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(January), 4-28.
    Pullins, E. B. (2001). An exploratory investigation of the relationship of sales force compensation and intrinsic motivation. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(5), 403-413.
    Reinboth, M., & Duda J. L. (2006). Perceived motivational climate, need satisfaction and indices of well-being in team sports: A longitudinal perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(3), 269–286.
    Reis, H. T. (1994). Domains of experience: Investigating relationship processes from three perspectives. Theoretical Frameworks for Personal Relationships (R. Erber & R. Gilmour Eds.). 87–110. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Reuter, M., Stark, R., Hennig, J., Walter, B., Kirsch, P.,Schienle, A., & Vaitl, D. (2004). Personality and emotion: Test of Gray’s personality theory by means of an fMRI study. Behavioral Neuroscience, 118(3), 462-469.
    Richer, S. F., Blanchard, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (2002). A motivational model of work turnover. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2089-2113.
    Rummel, A. & Feinberg, R. (1988). Cognitive evaluation theory: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Social Behavior and Personality, 16(2), 147-164.
    Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319-338.
    Ryan, R. M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: An organizational view on the social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9(4), 701-728.
    Salinger, M. A. (1995). A graphical analysis of bundling. Journal of Business, 68(1), 85-98.
    Schmalensee, R. (1984). Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. Journal of Business, 57(1-2), 211-230.
    Senecal, S., Buehrer R. E., & Pullins E. B. (2005). Sales force technology usage - reasons, barriers, and support: An exploratory investigation. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(4), 389-398.
    Shiv, B., Edell-Britton, J. A., & Payne J. W. (2004). Does elaboration increase or decrease the effectiveness of negatively versus positively framed messages? Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 285-293.
    Simon, H., Fassnacht, M., & Wubker, G. (1995). Price bundling. Pricing Strategy and Practice, 3(1): 34-45.
    Simoneau, H. & Bergeron, J. (2003). Factors affecting motivation during the first six weeks of treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 28(7), 1219-1241.
    Simonson, I. & Staw, B. M. (1992). De-escalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 419-426.
    Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580-591.
    Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of Organism: An Experimental Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Skinner, E. & Edge, K. (2002). Parenting, motivation, and the development of children`s coping. Agency, Motivation, and the Life Course: The Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (L. J. Crockett, Ed.) 48. 77-143. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    Soenens, B. & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in three life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 589-604.
    Soman, D. and Gourville J. T. (2001). Transaction decoupling: How price bundling affects the decision to consume. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 30-44.
    Spiegel, S., Grant-Pillow, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(1), 39-54.
    Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 27-44.
    Stremersch, S. & Tellis, G. J. (2002). Strategic bundling of products and prices: A new synthesis for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 55-72.
    Tang, S-H. & Hall, V. C. (1995). The overjustification effect: A meta-analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(5), 365-404.
    Teger, A. L. (1980). Too Much Invested to Quit: the Psychological of the Escalation of Conflict. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1), 39-60.
    Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214.
    Thogersen-Ntoumani, C. & Ntoumanis, N. (2006). The role of self-determined motivation in the understanding of exercise-related behaviours, cognitions and physical self-evaluations. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(4), 393-404.
    Thomas, R. W., Soutar G. N., & Ryan M. M. (2001). The selling orientation-customer orientation (S.O.C.O.) scale: a proposed short form, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 21(1), 63-69.
    Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal Intelligence. New York, NY: Macmillan.
    Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2003). Competitively contingent rewards and intrinsic motivation: Can losers remain motivated? Motivation and Emotion, 27(4), 273-299.
    Vansteenkiste, M., & Sheldon, K. M. (2006). There is nothing more practical than a good theory: Integrating motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(1), 63-82.
    Vlachopoulos, S. P. & Michailidou, S. (2006). Development and initial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: The basic psychological needs in exercise scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 10(3), 179-201.
    Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
    Walls, T. A. & Little, T. D. (2005). Relations among personal agency, motivation, and school adjustment in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 23-31.
    Wang, J. and Lee A. Y. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(February), 28–38.
    White, R. W. (1963). Ego and Reality in Psychoanalytic Theory. New York: International Universities Press.
    Whyte, G. (1986). Escalating commitment to a course of action: a reinterpretation. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 311-321.
    Wiersma, U. J. (1992). The effects of extrinsic rewards in intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 101-114.
    Yadav, M. S. & Monroe, K. B. (1993). How buyers perceive savings in a bundle price: An examination of a bundle‘s transaction value. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 350-358.
    Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59-71.
    Zhu, R. & Meyers-Levy J. (2003). The influence of regulatory focus on consumer information processing. Advances in Consumer Research (P. A. Keller & D. W. Rook Eds.). 30. 16. Association for Consumer Research, Valdosta, GA.
    Zhu, R. & Meyers-Levy J. (2007). Exploring the cognitive mechanism that underlies regulatory focus effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 89-96.
    Zuckerman, M., Porac, J., Lathin, D., Smith, R., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically-motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(3), 443-446.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    92355508
    95
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923555081
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    55508101.pdf49KbAdobe PDF2816检视/开启
    55508102.pdf108KbAdobe PDF21263检视/开启
    55508103.pdf82KbAdobe PDF2759检视/开启
    55508104.pdf96KbAdobe PDF2822检视/开启
    55508105.pdf135KbAdobe PDF21189检视/开启
    55508106.pdf296KbAdobe PDF21583检视/开启
    55508107.pdf249KbAdobe PDF21191检视/开启
    55508108.pdf258KbAdobe PDF2847检视/开启
    55508109.pdf143KbAdobe PDF2900检视/开启
    55508110.pdf62KbAdobe PDF2848检视/开启
    55508111.pdf390KbAdobe PDF21053检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈