政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/49531
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51090927      在线人数 : 930
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/49531


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49531


    题名: 台灣家族企業績效之後設分析
    Meta analysis of Taiwanese family firms` performances
    作者: 林佑軒
    Yu, Hsuan Lin
    贡献者: 樓永堅
    林佑軒
    Yu, Hsuan Lin
    关键词: 家族企業
    經營績效
    後設分析
    family firm
    meta analysis
    performance
    日期: 2009
    上传时间: 2010-12-08 13:18:27 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 家族企業在全世界皆是商業活動中的重要組織型態。因此在過去就有許多國內外研究針對家族企業的特色以及其對績效的影響作探討,但結果相當分歧。因此,本研究希望藉由後設分析(meta analysis)研究方法將過去個別研究的結果,透過計量方法以獲得一特定結論。本研究蒐集23篇過去研究台灣家族企業績效之文獻共29個樣本,以後設分析效應量觀察台灣家族企業與非家族企業之績效是否有顯著差異;以及哪些干擾變數會影響家族企業與非家族企業的績效。在實證分析中,以敘述統計觀察,文獻結論多為家族企業績效優於非家族企業;而以後設分析的效應量觀察,發現總體效應量與個別以ROA、ROE、Tobin’s Q作為績效的效應量皆顯示家族企業的績效優於非家族企業,其中總體效應量和Tobin’s Q的效應量為統計上顯著,說明此研究範圍中家族企業績效較佳的發現。而觀察干擾變數的效應量,以ROA、ROE作為績效衡量時,文獻樣本數為顯著的干擾變數,當文獻樣本數在700以下時,家族企業績效優於非家族企業,樣本數700以上時,反之;在以ROE為績效指標時,文獻類別為具影響的干擾變數,當文獻為學術期刊時,家族企業績效遜於非家族企業,當文獻為學位論文時,反之;以Tobin’s Q作為績效指標的實證發現,以家族成員持股率為家族企業定義時,家族企業績效顯著優於非家族企業。以上實證結果證實了利益收斂假說與家族企業富不過三代之說法。
    Family firm is a significant type of business organizations in the whole world. Therefore, many researches have been done for discussing the characteristic of family firms and how family firms influence organization’s performance. However, the results are varied. Hence, the purpose of this thesis is to get a generalized conclusion about family firm’ performance by Meta analysis’s quantitative method which collect the results from past related researches. The samples of this thesis are from 23 past researches based on Taiwanese family firms. This thesis calculates Meta analysis’s effect sizes to examine the difference of performances between family firms and non-family firms and examine which are the moderator variables that impact the performances. Consequently, description statistics shows that most researches result the performances of family firms are better than non-family firms. In addition, Meta analysis also shows the same finding in total mean effect and Tobin’s Q which are statistical significances on effect size. With regard to moderator variables’ effect sizes, sample size is a moderator variable with statistical significance when ROA and ROE as performance index. While sample sizes are below 700, the performances of family firms are better than non-family firms, vice versa. Additionally, type of sample is a moderator variable when ROE as performance index. While simples are Journal articles, the performances of family firms are worse than non-family firms, vice versa. Furthermore, definition of family firm is a moderator variable as well when Tobin’s Q as performance index. While simples define family firms by family members holding rate, family firms’ performance are better. In conclusion, above findings prove that convergence of interest hypothesis and great men`s sons seldom do well.
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    王逸雯,2004,《集團企業股權結構與公司價值之關聯性研究》。台北:臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    王振寰、陳琮淵,2009,《台灣家族企業的開創與繼承:組織治理與制度環境的企業史分析》。台灣企業史工作坊報告。
    中華徵信所,2006,《台灣地區集團企業研究》。台北:中華徵信所。
    沈昱均,2008,《家族企業與非家族企業經營績效之比較》。雲林:雲林科技大學會計系碩士論文。
    沈大白、賴怡文,1993,〈文化差異與實證會計初探(一) 家族企業從事更多的盈餘管理嗎〉。論文發表於「第五屆會計理論與實務研討會」,台北:台灣大學管理學院、中華民國會計師公會全國聯合會、美國會計學會,1993年11月16日~11月18日。
    李永全,2007,〈台灣家族公司經營績效之實證研究〉。《僑光學報》(29):31-43。
    李禮仲、鄧哲偉, 2003,〈公司治理對台灣企業的意義〉。財團法人國家政策研究基金會委託計畫報告。
    周行一等,1996,〈家族持股、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究〉。《中國財務學刊》4(1):115-139。
    侍台誠,1994,《董事會特性中家族因素與經營績效之實證研究—兼論法人董事
    的影響》。台北:台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    林映成,2006,《台灣家族企業之績效、組織及策略》。台北:台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    林由雪,1997,《台灣高科技產業的研究發展、持股類型與經營績效之研究》。桃園:中央大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    林建山,1991,《台灣企業管理:觀念、經驗與現實》。台北:環球經濟社。
    金昌民,2004,《公司治理在家族企業之應用宏傳電子股份有限公司實例探討》。台北:台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    許士軍、陳光中,1989,《台灣家族企業發展與家族結構關係》。行政院國家科學會專題研究。
    吳建頤,1999,《董事會規模對公司價值的影響》。嘉義:中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    范揚松1987,〈家族企業的病理分析〉。《現代管理月刊》(126):16-38。
    范揚富,1986,《家族企業的繼承問題─國內家族企業繼承人的培育》。台北:國立台灣科技大學工程技術研究所博士論文。
    洪蘭,1998,《所有權結構、投資和公司價值之實證分析》。高雄:高雄第一科技大學金融營運研究所碩士論文。
    施佩雯,2009,《集團企業家族持股、董事會組成與企業績效之關聯性-配對法之應用》。台中:東海大學會計系碩士論文。
    施俊儀,1997,《家族持股、公司控制型態與經營績效-台灣地區上市公司監督機制之研究》。台北:輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。
    苗祺輝,1993,《台灣上市公司所有權結構與公司績效關係之實證研究》。台北:輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
    荒和雄著、褚先忠譯,1995,《家族企業的優勢與劣勢》。台北:建宏出版。(荒和雄,1993,同族経営の強みと弱み―後継者育成、上手な資産運用から体質改善まで。東京:PHP研究所。)
    高振楠,2007,《家族企業與公司績效:台灣電子產業為例》。彰化:彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文。
    高佩君,2009,《公司治理、家族企業對於公司績效之影響:以台灣上市上櫃公司為例》。桃園:國防大學財務管理係碩士論文。
    翁淑育,2000,《台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與公司價值之研究》。台北:輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。
    姚慧玉,1987,《本省中小企業與家企業關係之研究》。台北:英美出版社。
    粘雅維,2008,《家族企業營運績效之實證研究:以台灣上市公司為例》。台中:朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士論文。
    陳佩吟,1996,《企業股權結構與企業經營決策、經營績效之關係》。台北:台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    陳金玲,1997,《台灣上市公司股權結構之分析》。台南:成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    陳文杰,2001,《公司控制機制、高階經營團隊能力與公司經營績效相關性研究》。嘉義:中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳泰和,2001,《台灣家族企業接班人選擇因素之研究-以『交易成本』、『信賴機制』、『網絡關係』之觀點探討》。台北:台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
    陳定國,1984,〈家族企業是否應該,又如何將所有權及經營權分離〉。頁606,收錄於工商時報經營叢書小組編《中國式管理》。台北:時報文化出版專業有限公司。
    陳文美,1993,《家族企業的專業化管理程度與專業化管理類型之研究--以紡織業為例》。台北:台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    陳錦華,2001,《整合分析之概述》。中國醫藥大學生物統計中心。
    黃湘綺,1995,《家族企業與盈餘操縱現象的關連性研究》。嘉義:中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    黃士豪,1999,《董事會特性與企業經營績效、財務決策關聯性之研究》。台中:靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    黃榮龍, 1993,《股權結構與經營績效之研究》。台北:政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    黃光國,1984,〈談家族企業的組織型態〉,《中國論壇》13(7):21-22。
    黃偉倫,2005,《家族企業特性與公司治理對經營績效之影響—考慮家族企業規模水準》。台北:淡江大學會計學系碩士論文。
    黃鈺光,1993,《我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效關係之研究》。台北:台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    葉銀華,1999,〈家族控股集團,核心公司股票報酬互動之研究—台灣與香港證
    券市場之比較〉。《管理評論》18(2):59-86。
    葉銀華,1998,〈家族控股集團與股票報酬共變性之實證研究〉。《台大管理論叢》9(1):25-49。
    詹凱玲,2006,《股權結構、董事會組成與公司績效之關係—以家族與非家族企業之角度》。台北:銘傳大學會計學系碩士論文。
    詹錦宏、楊麗弘,2001,〈臺灣上市公司股權結構與經營績效之研究-產業特性與股權質押之觀點〉,《臺灣銀行季刊》(52):202-220。
    楊俊中,1998,《股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究》。台北:台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    楊嘉文,2003,《台灣家族企業關鍵成功因素之研究》。台南:長榮大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    楊克平,1999,〈統合分析:一種量化的整合法〉。《榮總護理》16(2):168-176。
    楊雅薇,2003,《家族傳承與公司治理之研究》。台北:輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。
    楊蕉霙,1990,《所有權結構與公司價值間關係之研究》。高雄:中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    楊國樞,1995,〈家族化歷程、泛家族主義、及組織管理〉。頁20-59,收錄於鄭伯壎編《台灣與大陸的企業文化及人力資源管理研討會論文集》。台北:信義文化基金會。
    張訓華,1991,《股數結構、董事會組成輿企業當年財務績效--以77年度會計報酬率為準》。台北:東吳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    張峻萍,1999,《公司監理與經營績效之關係》。台北:台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    張慧芳,1995,《領導者與部屬間信任格局的決定要素與行為效果之探討》。台北:台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
    廖秀梅等,2006,〈董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究—兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響〉。《東吳經濟商學學報》(54):117-160。
    鄭秀惠,2007,《家族持股、財務決策與組織績效》。台中:東海大學會計學系碩士論文。
    鄭夙娟,2006,《董事會組成與股權結構對企業績效影響之研究-以機械產業之家族企業為實証》。台南:成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    應立志、鍾燕宜,2000,《統合分析方法與應用》。台北:華泰。
    簡上智,1996,《家族企業上市後股權結構變動對企業經營績效影響之研究》。台南:成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    關蔚菁,2004,《台灣健康信念模式之統合分析》。台南:成功大學護理學研究所碩士論文。
    謝淑娟,1994,《以權益代理問題的觀點探討股權結構變動與企業經營績效之關係》。新竹:交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    嚴奇峰,1994,〈台灣傳統家族企業極端共存組織現象之探討-系統隱態觀點〉。《管理評論》,13(1):1-22。
    英文部分
    Alcorn, P.B. 1982. Success And Survival In The Family-Owned Firm. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Anderson, R. C. and D. M. Reeb. 2003. “Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500.” Journal of Finance, 58(3):1301-1328.
    Adams, R. B., H. Almeida and D.Ferreira. 2005. “Powerful CEOs and Their Impact on Corporate Performance.” Review of Financial Studies,18: 1403-1432.
    Bernes, L.B. and S.A. Hershon. 1976. “Transferring the power in the family business.” Harvard business review, 54(4):105-114.
    Berle, A. A. and G.C.Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.
    Bartholomeusz, S., and G. A. Tanewski. 2006. “The relationship between family
    firms and corporate governance.” Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2): 245-267.
    Beckhard, R. and W.Dyer. 1983. “Managing continuity in the family-owned business.” Organizational dynamics, 12: 5-12.
    Bertin, M.J., F.J.L.Iturriaga and O.Lopez-de-Foromda. 2008. “The Contest to the Control in European Family Firms: How Other Shareholders Affect Firm Value.” Corporate Governance: An international Review, 16(3): 146-159.
    Burch, P, 1972, Managerial revolution reassessed: Family control in America’s largest corporations. Lexington: Lexington books.
    Barontini,R. and L. Caprio. 2006. “The Effect of Family Control on Firm Value and Performance: Evidence from Continental Europe.” European Financial Management, 12 (5): 689–723.
    Carsrud, A. L.1994. “Meanderings of a Resurrected Psychologist or, lessons learned in creating a family business program.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 19(1) :39-48.
    Churchill, N.C.and K.J. Hatten. 1987. “Non-market-based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family business.” American Journal of Small Business, 12 (2): 53-66.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov and L.H.P. Lang. 2000. “Separation of Ownership from Control of East Asian Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2):81-112.
    Chen, C. J. P. and B. Jaggi. 2000. “Association between Independent Non-execute Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosures in Hong Kong.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy , 19(4-5): 285-310.
    Cohen, J.1977. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
    Demsetz, H.1983. “The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Law and Ecomomics, 26(2): 375-390.
    DerSimonian, R. and N.Laird.1986. “Meta-analysis in clinical trials.” Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3): 177-188.
    Dyer, W. G, 1986, Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing
    business and family transitions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Donnelley, R. 1964. “The family business.” Harvard business review, 42(4): 93-105.
    Davis, P. 1983. “Realizing the potential of the family business.” Organizational Dynamics, 12(1): 47-56.
    Fan, J. P.H. and T.J. Wong. 2002. “Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earning in East Asia.” Journal of Accounting and Economics,23: 401-425.
    Fama, E. F. and M.C.Jensen. 1983. “Separation of ownership and control.” Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
    Farley, J. U. and D. R. Lehmann. 1986. Meta-Analysis in Marketing: Generalisation of Response Models. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
    Fama, E. F. 1980. “Agency problems and the theory of the firm.” The Journal of Political Economic, 88(2): 288-307.
    Filatotchev I., Y.C. Lien and J. Piesse. 2005. “Corporate Governance and Performance in PubliclyListed, Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Taiwan.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 257-283.
    Fern, E. F. and K.B. Monroe. 1996.” Effect-Size Estimates: Issues and Problems in Interpretation.” Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2): 89-105.
    Gomez-Mejia, L.R., M. Larraza-Kintana and M. Makri. 2003. “The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations.” Academy of Management Journal, 46: 226-237.
    Glass, G.V., B. McGaw and M.L.Smith. 1981. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Glass, G. V. 1976. “Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research.” Educational Researcher, 5: 3-8.
    Handler,W.C. 1989. Managing the family firm succession process: The next generation family member’s experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, Boston.
    Henry, D.A., and A.Wilson. 1992. “Meta Analysis: Part 1: An Assessment of Its Aims, Validity and Reliability.” The Medical Journal of Australia, 156(2): 31-38.
    Harrison, L. L. 1996. “Pulling it all together: The importance of integrative research reviews and meta-analysis in nursing.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(2), 224-225.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976.“Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
    Jensen, M.C. and R.S. Ruback. 1983. “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 11(5):5–50.
    Klein, P., D. Shapiro and J. Young .2005. “Corporate Governance, Family Ownership and Firm Value: the Canadian Evidence.” Corporate Governance,13(6):769-784.
    La Porta, R., F. Lo’pez de Silances and A. Shleifer. 1999. “Corporate Ownership Around the World.” Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471-517.
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 2002. “Investor protection and corporate valuation.” Journal of Finance, 57: 1147-1170.
    Lee, J. 2004. “The Effects of Family Ownership And Management On Firm Performance.” S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 69(4): 46-53.
    Litz, R.A. 1995. “The family business toward definitional clarity.” Family Business Review, 8(2): 71-82.
    Lipsey, M. W. and D.B.Wilson, 2001, Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Lam, K., M, K, Mok, I. Cheung and H. C. Yam. 1994. "Family Groupings on Performance of Portfolio Selection in the Hong Kong Stock Market." Journal of Banking and Finance, 18: 725-742.
    Miller, D., I. Le Breton-Miller, R.H. Lester and A.A. Cannella. 2007. “Are family firms really superior performers?” Journal of Corporate Finance, 13: 829–858.
    Murali, R. and J. Welch. 1989. “Agents, Owners, Control and Performance” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 16: 385 – 298.
    McConnell, J. J. and H. Servaes. 1990. “Additional Evidence on EquityOwnership and Corporate Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2): 595-612.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny. 1988. “Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 293-315.
    Maury, B. 2006. “Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence fromWestern European corporations.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 12: 321–341.
    Ng, C. 2005. “An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Ownership and Performance in a Family-Based Corporate Environment.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 20(2): 121-146.
    Olson, P. D.,V.S. Zuiker, S.M. Danes, K.Stafford, R.K.Z. Heck and K.A.Duncan. 2003. “Impact of family and business on family business sustainability.” Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5): 639-666.
    Rosenblatt, P.C., L. deMik., R.M. Anderson and P.A. Johnson, 1985, The Family in Business: Understanding and Dealing with the Challenges Entrepreneurial Families Face. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Rosenthal, R. and M.R. DiMatteo. 2001. “Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews.” Annual Review of Psychology, 52: 59-82.
    Rosenthal, R, 1991, Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, 1986, “Large shareholders and corporate control.”, Journal of Political Economy , 94: 461-488.
    Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny. 1997. “The limits of arbitrage.” Journal of Finance, 52: 35-55.
    Stulz, R. 1988. “Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 25-54.
    Smith, M. C. and E.Stullenbarger. 1991. “A prototype for integrative review and meta-analysis of nursing research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16(11): 1272-1283.
    Stern, M. H., 1986, Inside the family-held business. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Tsai, W. H., J. H. Hung., Y. C. Kuo and L. Kuo. 2006. “CEO Tenure in Taiwanese Family And Nonfamily Firms: An Agency Theory Perspective.” Family Business Review, 19(1): 11-28.
    Villalonga, B. and R. Amit. 2006. “How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?” Journal of Financial Economics, 80: 385-417.
    Wang, D. 2006. “Founding Family Ownership and Earnings Quality.” Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), 619-656.
    Xiang, B. and G. Zhang, 1996,” Large shareholder expropriation and corporate ownership structure.“ Paper presented at the APFA/PACAP Finance conference and CFA annual meetings, July 8-10.
    Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. “Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Taiwan.” International Review of Finance,2: 21–48.
    Yeh, Y. H., T. S., Lee and J. Y. Shy. 1998. "Family control, board composition and corporate performance in Taiwan stock market." Paper presented at NFA/APFA First Joint International Conference, Asia-Pacific Finance Association and Nippon Finance Association, Tokyo, Japan, July 22.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    97355011
    98
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097355011
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    501101.pdf5035KbAdobe PDF24531检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈