Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49526
|
| Title: | 綠色經營策略之階段性實踐—以精工愛普生公司為例
Stage-dependent management maturity for implementing green strategy：a case study of Seiko Epson |
| Authors: | 宋雅玲
Sung, Ya Ling |
| Contributors: | 管康彥
宋雅玲
Sung, Ya Ling |
| Keywords: | 綠色經營
綠色策略
環境經營
精工愛普生
Green management
Green Strategy
Environmental Management
Seiko Epson |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 13:16:01 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 二十一世紀人類面對環境變遷及資源耗竭的問題，廣泛地討論因應對策，並提出環境議題成為產業下一次工業革命之觸發重點。各國政府、環境保護推行組織及企業皆針對該議題提出施行策略與政策，其中企業界回應態度由早期被動因應，近年來轉變為主動結合企業核心經營理念，實踐兼具環境與經濟目標之綠色經營，並開拓創造價值之新商機。針對企業綠色經營策略之規劃與執行，多位學者指出需要透過一個完整的管理架構，將企業於環境行動之現況與未來綠色經營之實踐藍圖，以具體可行的階段性目標陳述出來，並展開成為行動方案，逐步實現綠色經營下永續發展之願景。
本研究文獻探討著重三部份：永續經營思維的演變，綠色經營的發展，及綠色經營實踐階段性作法。利用Olson (2008) 綠色經營階段性發展模型之三大構面：領導理念、指導方針及具體實踐，並選擇日本綠色經營領導廠商精工愛普生公司，研究實務個案與理論架構之異同與行動背後之策略意涵。
本研究歸納出以下結論：一、企業推行綠色經營前期決策為戰術層級，發展至後期提升至戰略層級。二、企業推動綠色經營前期，視外部壓力為經營條件之限制；發展至後期企業將環境議題視為下一個驅動企業成長的機會。三、企業推動綠色經營前期因應外部壓力，主要回應法規及市場需求，推動單一倡議與重點投資，以降低成本與風險為主；後期主動領導階段以環境行動創造價值，結合綠色思維與企業價值主張，進而創造競爭優勢及打造新經營模式。四、企業推行綠色經營前期以產品相關議題為改善標的，因應環境相關法規改善製造成份與製造程序為主；產品階段改良步上軌道後，後期企業開始思考創新價值活動的可能性。五、合作對象範圍隨經營發展階段擴大，前期以整合合作夥伴、教育員工為主；後期擴大將環境理念教育傳達至顧客、社區協力合作。
Facing the problems of environmental change and natural resources depletion, these environmental concerns are widely discussed and debated in hope to bringing up more public attention and countermeasures. Overtime, these environmental factors have become the trigger of next generation industrial revolution in twenty-first century. Governments, organizations and enterprises put forward environmental protection strategies and policies. Enterprises generally take a passive stand to respond to the issue of actively taking environmental initiatives combined with their core business philosophy to achieve both the environment and economic goals of a green business model, and further explore new business opportunities to create value. A number of scholars have pointed out that enterprises manage sustainable green vision through a complete management structure in response to the current situation and the future blueprint for a green business strategy. Green strategy implementation plans illustrate specific, feasible and stage-dependent statement for enterprises to achieve both economy and ecology objectives.
In this research, the literature review focuses on three issues: the evolution of sustainable development thinking, green business development and management, and stage-dependent implementation of the green strategy. Meanwhile, the research chooses a green management leading practitioner in electronic product industry- Seiko Epson Corporation as the case-study company and the study focuses on three distinct dimensions of a green strategy maturity model which are illustrated by Olson (2008): role of leadership, role of policies and illustrative actions.
The research identifies and draws the following conclusions. First, with the management maturity for implementing green strategy, the decision-making level is escalated from tactical level to strategic level. Second, in the early stage of implementing green strategy enterprises see external conditions as constrains and in later stage they see them as opportunities for driving growth. Third, the early stages of awareness are largely in response to external pressure, regulations and demand from the community, investing in simple initiatives to streamline costs and reduce risks. The later stage of the initiative leads to the value creation which combines green thinking and business value proposition, thereby creating competitive advantages and create new business model. Fourth, the early stages of green management focus on product-related improvement issues and, in the later stage, enterprises start to consider innovative new value activities through green strategy. Fifth, the scope of cooperation expands as green management stage develops. In early stages enterprises integrate partners and educate employees and in the later stage to convey the environmental concept to customers and the community to achieve the vision together. |
| Reference: | 一、 中文資料
1. 丁錫鏞 (2000)，日本知名企業之環保成功策略，台北市：嵐德出版社。
2. 中條寬 (2002)，三菱總合研究所著，羿慧文化編輯部譯，在企業日益普及的環境管理，環境管理&環保商機全預測，嘉義市：羿慧文化出版社。
3. 朱麗真譯 (2009)，三橋規宏著，綠色復甦時代，台北市：商周出版；城邦文化。
4. 林家任 (2001)，ISO14000系列環境管理標準在綠色產品生命週期設計之應用研究，大葉大學設計研究所碩士論文。
5. 林玲華 (2006)，日本精工愛普生公司核心技術經營導向之企業轉型，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程企管組商學碩士論文。
6. 安寶儀、徐木蘭、劉仲矩 (1999)，食品業環境管理之初探—從環保執行面論衡，科技管理學刊，第四卷第一期，頁147-174。
7. 汪明生 (1993)，環境管理架構概述，公害防治與環境管理，國立中山大學環境工程研究所(編)，高雄市：復文出版社，頁103-114。
8. 汪銘生、方之光 (1993)，綠色企業經營與環境管理教育，台灣銀行月刊，第二十四卷，第八期，頁32-47。
9. 宋偉航譯 (1995)，Kit Sadgrove 著，綠色管理手冊，台北市：天下文化。
10. 岡本憲之 (2002)，三菱總合研究所著，羿慧文化編輯部譯，在企業日益普及的環境管理，環境管理&環保商機全預測，嘉義市：羿慧文化出版社。
11. 洪慧芳譯 (2007)，Esty, Daniel C. and Winston, Andrew S.著，綠色商機：環保節能讓企業賺聰明財，台北市：財訊出版社。
12. 歐陽嶠暉 (2000)，Green Power解讀台灣綠色競爭力，台北市：天下雜誌。
13. 長谷川健 (2002)，三菱總合研究所著，羿慧文化編輯部譯，在企業日益普及的環境管理，環境管理&環保商機全預測，嘉義市：羿慧文化出版社。
14. 美商麥肯錫股份有限公司中國分公司 (2009)，中國的綠色革命-實現能源與環境可實現發展的技術選擇。
15. 高明瑞 (1995)，環境保護與企業管理，教育部大專商管科學生通識教育課程規劃，教育部環境保護小組/國立中山大學企業管理學系。
16. 陳小娟、徐木蘭、劉仲矩 (1997)，企業環境管理績效評量因素建立之探討，科技管理學刊，第二卷第一期，頁179-205。
17. 經濟部工業局 (2001)，生態效益-主導21世紀的經營理念。
18. 經濟部工業局 (2002)，綠色生產力示範計畫執行手冊。
19. 陳宥杉 (2004)，綠色環保壓力對企業競爭優勢影響之研究—以國內資訊電子相關產業為例，國立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。
20. 張維亮 (2005)，企業綠色管理模式之建置與探討，台北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所碩士論文。
21. 張漢宜 (2008)，CSR新方向：愛普生讓產品說環保的故事，天下雜誌，第406期，頁152-155。
22. 黃義俊 (2000)，企業的綠色管理隻整合性模式的實證研究─以化工與機電產業為例，國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
23. 曾聰智 (2005)，環保產業經營策略之個案研究，政治大學經營管理碩士學程企管組商學碩士論文。
24. 溫肇東、陳泰明 (1997)，台灣的綠色創新組織初探，臺大管理論叢，第八卷，第二期，頁99-124。
25. 溫肇東 (2009)，力行企業永續發展，企業永續發展指南，馬可‧愛普斯坦編著，台北市：天下雜誌。
26. 精工愛普生公司 (2002)，精工愛普生公司2002年環境報告書。
27. 精工愛普生公司 (2003)，精工愛普生公司2003年環境報告書。
28. 精工愛普生公司 (2004)，精工愛普生公司2004年環境報告書。
29. 精工愛普生公司 (2005)，精工愛普生公司2005年環境報告書。
30. 精工愛普生公司 (2006)，精工愛普生公司2006年永續發展報告書。
31. 精工愛普生公司 (2007)，精工愛普生公司2007年永續發展報告書。
32. 精工愛普生公司 (2008)，精工愛普生公司2008年永續發展報告書。
33. 管康彥 (2009)，從企業社會責任到社會責任企業，綠色復甦時代，三橋規宏編著，台北市：商周出版；城邦文化。
34. 鄭益明譯 (2006)，Ray C. Anderson著，綠色資本家一個可永續企業的實踐典範，新自然主義。
35. 橋本賢 (2002)，三菱總合研究所著，羿慧文化編輯部譯，躍升經營主幹的環境管理顧問事業，環境管理&環保商機全預測，嘉義市：羿慧文化出版社。
36. 蕭富峰 (1994)，21世紀行銷情報，台北市：商周文化。
二、 英文資料
1. Aragon-Correa, J. A. (1998), Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41,No.5, pp.556-567.
2. Azzone,G. U. Bertele and Noci G. (1997), At Last We Are Creating Environment Strategies Which Work, Long Range Planning, Vol.30, August, pp.562-571.
3. Bansal, P., Roth, K. (2000), Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Corporate Ecological Responsiveness, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.43, No.4, pp. 717-736.
4. Bass, L. W. (1995), Cleaner Production: Beyond Projects, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.3, No.1-2, pp.55-59.
5. Berry, M. A. and Rondinelli, D. A. (1998), Proactive corporate environmental management：A new industrial revolution, Academy of Management Executive, Vol.12, No.2, pp.38-50.
6. Beschorner, D., Maerz, T., Peemoeller, V. H. (1985), Energieorientierte Unternehmensplanung, in: Die. Betriebswirtschaft, Heft, pp. 511-523.
7. Brockhoff, K., Chakrabarti A. K. and Kirchgeorg M. (1999), Corporate strategies in environmental management, Research Technology Management, Vol.42, No.4, pp.26-30.
8. Coddington, W. (1993), Environmental Marketing: Positive Strategies for Reaching the Green Consumer, New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Davis, J, (1991), Greening Business-Managing for sustainable development, MA: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
10. Dyllick, T. and Hockerts, K. (2002), Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability, Business Strategy and Environment, Vol. 11, pp.130–141.
11. Elkington, J. (1998), Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business, New Society Publishers
12. Epstein, M. J. (1996), You’ve Got a Great Environmental strategy-Now What? , Business Horizon, Vol. 39, No.5, pp.53-59.
13. Epstein, M. J. (2008), Making Sustainability Work, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
14. Everard, M. (2005), Sustainability and Sustainable Development, Environmental Management in Organizations, in Brady, John ed., Earthscan in the UK and USA, pp.28-47.
15. Fischer, K. and Schot J. (1993), Environmental Strategies for Industry, Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
16. Frost, T.S., Birkinshaw, J. M. and Ensign P. C. (2002), Centers of excellence in multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.23, No.11, pp.997-1018.
17. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. (1989), Strategic Intent, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp.63-76.
18. Hart, S. L. (1995), A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm, Academy of Management Review, Vol.20, No.4, pp.986-1014.
19. Hart, S. L. (1997), Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world, Harvard Business Review, Vol.75, No.1, pp.67-76.
20. Hunt, C. B. and Auster E. R. (1990), Proactive Environmental Management: Avoiding the Toxic Trap, Sloan Management Review, Vol.31, No.2, pp.7-18.
21. Hutchinson, C. (1992), Corporate Strategy and the Environment, Long Range Planning, Vol.25, No.4, pp.9-21.
22. International Union for Conservation of Nature, United Nations Environment Programme and World Wildlife Fund (1980), World Conservation Strategy, Switzerland: IUCN.
23. International Organization for Standardization (2007), The ISO Survey 2007.
24. Ito, M. (2006), Environmental Consciousness Increases in Japanese Business, JETRO Japan Economic Report, Vol.26. June-July, pp.1-8.
25. Kolk, A. and Mauser, A. (2002), The evolution of environmental management: from stage models to performance evaluation, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol.11, No.1, pp. 14-31.
26. Leavitt, H. J. (1965), Applied organizational change in industry: structural, technological and humanistic approaches, in J. G. March ed., Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 1144~1170.
27. Lee, K. H. and Ball, R. (2003), Achieving Sustainable Corporate Competitiveness: Strategic Link Between Top Management’s (Green) Commitment and Corporate Environmental Strategy, Greener Management International, Vol.44, pp.89-104.
28. Makower, J. (2009), Strategies for the Green Economy: Opportunities and Challenges in the New World of Business, New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Maxwell, J., Rothenberg S., Briscoe F. and Marcus A. (1997), Green Schemes: Corporate Environmental Strategies and their Implementation, California Management Review, Vol.39, No.3, pp.118-134.
30. McDonough W. and Braungart M. (2002), Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, North Point Press.
31. Nonaka, I., and Yamanouchi, T. (1989), Managing innovation as a self-renewing process, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.4, No.5, pp.299-316.
32. Olson, E.G. (2008),”Creating an enterprise-level “green strategy”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol.29, No.2, pp.22-30.
33. Peters, T. J. and Waterman, R. H. (1982), In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America`s Best-Run, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
34. Piasecki, B. W. (1995), Corporate environmental strategy: the avalanche
of change since Bhopal, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
35. Porter, M. E. and van der Linde, C. (1995), Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate, Harvard Business Review, Vol.73, No.5, pp.120–134.
36. Shrivastava, P. (1995), Environmental technologies and competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, pp.183-200.
37. Slater, J. and Angel, I. T. (2000), The Impact and Implication of Environmentally Linked Strategies on Competitive Advantage: A Study of Malaysian Companies, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 47, No.1, pp. 75-89.
38. Steger, U. (1993), The Greening of the Board Room：How German Companies are Dealing with Environmental Issues, in Fischer, Kurt and Schot, Johan eds., Environmental Strategies for Industry, Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp.147-166.
39. Taylor, S. R. (1992), Green Management: The Next Competitive Weapon, Future, Vol.24, No.7, pp.669-680.
40. Thorpe, J. and Prakash-Mani, K. (2003), Developing Value：The Business Case for Sustainability in Emerging Markets, Greener Management International, Winter, pp. 17-32.
41. Venkatraman, N. and Ramanunjam, V. (1986), Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches, Academy of Management Review, Vol.11, No.4, pp. 801-814.
42. Wenger, E. C. and Snyder, W. M. (2000), Communities of practice: The organizational frontier, Harvard Business Review, Vol.78, No.1, pp.139-145.
43. Winn, S. F. and Roome, N. J. (1993), R&D Management Response to the Environment Current Theory and Implications to Practice and Research, R&D Management Review, Vol.23, No.2, pp.147-160.
44. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future—The World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press.
45. Winsemius, P. and Guntram, U. (1990), Responding to the Environmental Challenge, Business Horizons, Vol.35, No.2, pp.12-20.
46. Yin, R. K. (2002), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods) 3/e, CA: Sage Publications.
三、 日文資料
1. 日経エコロジー (2008)，9月号。
2. セイコーエプソン (1999)，セイコーエプソン1999年環境報告書。
3. セイコーエプソン (2000)，セイコーエプソン2000年環境報告書。
4. セイコーエプソン (2001)，セイコーエプソン2001年環境報告書。
四、 網站資料
1. 台灣環境資訊協會-環境資訊中心網站：http://einfo.org.tw/ (瀏覽時間：2009年3月30日)
2. 全球前二十大經濟體(G20)高峰會官方網站：http://www.londonsummit.gov.uk/en/ (瀏覽時間：2009年3月30日)
3. 社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會網站：http://www.bcsd.org.tw/ (瀏覽時間：2009年3月30日)
4. 國際標準組織網站：http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm
(瀏覽時間：2009年4月10日)
5. 精工愛普生公司中文網站：http://w3.epson.com.tw/epson/index.asp
(瀏覽時間：2009年4月15日)
6. 精工愛普生公司全球網站：http://www.epson.co.jp/e/index.htm
(瀏覽時間：2009年4月15日)
7. 精工愛普生公司日文網站：http://www.epson.jp/
(瀏覽時間：2009年4月15日)
8. 株式会社環境経営戦略総研公司網站：http://www.kankyo-keiei.org/environment/index.html
(瀏覽時間：2009年3月30日)
9. Institute of Environmental Management & Assessment website：
http://www.iema.net/ems/emas (瀏覽時間：2009年4月30日)
10. British Standards Institute website：http://www.bsigroup.com/en/ (瀏覽時間：2009年4月30日) |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
96355036
97 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096355036 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [企業管理學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
