政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/49237
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51627458      在线人数 : 691
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49237


    题名: 法定公司所得稅稅率政策之決定因素-國際租稅競爭或國內政治運作?
    Determinants of tax rates in corporate income taxation -international tax competition or domestic political influences?
    作者: 翁逸珊
    贡献者: 陳香梅
    翁逸珊
    关键词: 公司稅率
    國際租稅競爭
    政府品質
    追蹤資料
    日期: 2009
    上传时间: 2010-12-08 02:02:32 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 近期的租稅文獻認為影響一國公司所得稅稅率政策制定的國際因素最主要為國際間的租稅競爭,政治經濟文獻則強調政治才是最後決定租稅的關鍵因素;然而過去的實證文獻幾乎並未針對兩者綜合討論。因此,不同於過去的租稅及政治經濟文獻,本文除探討來自鄰國的稅率競爭及經濟因素對一國之法定公司所得稅稅率的影響外,同時亦分析法定公司稅率是否受到政治運作如政府體制與貪腐等因素之干擾。本文的樣本跨越全球五大洲,涵蓋不同開發程度之50個國家於1985-2007年間的追蹤資料,採用固定與隨機效果模型來估計,結果得到法定公司稅率同時受到國際租稅競爭與政治因素的顯著影響,但國際租稅競爭所給予的影響力較強;而且政府品質越差、政體為議會制的國家之法定公司稅率會較高。另外,開發程度越高的國家,對於稅率壓力的反應越敏感。
    參考文獻: 李秋錦,2003,愛爾蘭經濟發展之經驗及其對我國之啟示,經濟研究,第四期:14。
    黃建興與林俊儒,2009,OECD 國家公司所得稅稅率發展趨勢與對我國之啟示,經濟研究,第九期:7。
    Altshuler, R., and T. J. Goodspeed. 2002. Follow the leader? Evidence on European and U.S. tax competition. Unpublished manuscript, City University of New York.
    http://econ.hunter.cuny.edu/~goodspeed/papers/altshuler_goodspeed_dec063.pdf
    Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58: 277-297.
    Besley, T., and A. Case. 1995. Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. American Economic Review 85: 24-45.
    Bordignon, M., F. Cerniglia, and F. Revelli. 2003. In search of yardstick competition: a spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting. Journal of Urban Economics 54: 199-217.
    Brueckner, J. E. 1998. Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls. Journal of Urban Economics 44 (3): 438-467.
    Bretschger, L., and F. Hettich. 2002. Globalisation, capital mobility and tax competition: theory and evidence for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy 18: 695-716.
    Bucovetsky, S. 1991. Asymmetric tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics 30: 167-181.
    Campos, N. F., and F. Giovannoni. 2007. Lobbying, corruption and political influence. Public Choice 131: 1-21.
    Case, A. C., H. S. Rosen, and J. C. Hines. 1993. Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence. Journal of Public Economics 52 (3): 285-307.
    Cassette, A., and S. Paty. 2008. Tax competition among eastern and western European countries: with whom do countries compete? Economic Systems 32 (4): 307-325.
    Devereux, M. P., and R. Griffith. 2003. Evaluating tax policy for location decisions. International Tax and Public Finance 10: 107-126.
    http://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/DharmapalaHines2006.pdf
    Devereux, M. P., R. Griffith, and A. Klemm. 2002. Corporate income tax reform and tax competition. Economic Policy 35: 450-495.
    Devereux, M. P., B. Lockwood, and M. Redoano. 2002. Do countries compete over corporate tax rates? CEPR Discussion Paper 3400. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.11.5108&rep=rep1&type=pdf
    Devereux, M. P., B. Lockwood, and M. Redoano. 2008. Do countries compete over corporate tax rates? Journal of Public Economics 92 (June): 1210-1235.
    Dharmapala, D., and J. R. Hines. 2006. Which countries become tax havens? NBER Working Paper 12802.
    Edward, C., and D. J. Mitchell. 2008. Global tax revolution: the rise of tax competition and the battle to defend it. Cato Institute: Washington, D.C.
    Egger, P., M. Pfaffermayr, and H. Winner. 2007. Competition in corporate and personal income taxation. Paper presented at the 2007 meeting of the European Tax Policy Forum, London.
    http://www.etpf.org/papers/25pers.pdf
    Fredriksson, P. G., S. Gohmann, and K. Mamun. 2009. Taxing under the influence? Corruption and U.S. state beer taxes. Public Finance Review 37 (3): 339-365.
    Garrett, G. 1998. Global markets and national politics: collision course or virtuous circle? International Organization 52 (4): 787-824.
    Ghinamo, M., P. M. Panteghini, and F. Revelli. 2007. FDI determination and corporate tax competition in a volatile world. Munich, CESifo Working Paper 1965.
    http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocCIDL/cesifo1_wp1965.pdf
    Goodspeed, T. J. 2006. Taxation and FDI in developed and developing countries. J. Alm et al. (ed.), The Challenges of Tax Reform in a Global Economy. New York (Springer): 137-154.
    Gordon, R. 1992. Can capital income taxes survive in open economies? Journal of Finance 47: 1159-1180.
    Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. 1994. Protection for sale. American Economic Review 84 (4): 833-850.
    Gurgur, T., and A. Shah. 2002. Localization and corruption: panacea or Pandora’s box? In Ehtisham Ahmad and Vito Tanzi (eds.) London and New York: Routledge Press Managing Fiscal Decentralization: 46-67.
    Hines, J. R. 2005a. Corporate taxation and international competition. Ross School of Business Paper 1026. University of Michigan.
    https://www.econ.berkeley.edu/users/burch/incometax05/hines.pdf
    Hines, J. R. 2005b. Do tax havens flourish? In James M. Poterba (ed.). Tax Policy and the Economy 19 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 65-99.
    Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous
    panels. Journal of Econometrics 115: 53-74.
    IMF-International Monetary Fund. 2008. World economic outlook: housing and the business cycle. April: 236.
    Jack, M. M., and J. W. Alfons. 2008. The indirect side of direct investment: multinational company finance and taxation. Book manuscript prepared for the CESifo Series at MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
    Judge, G. G., W. E. Griffiths, R. C. Hill, H. Lütkepohl, and T. C. Lee. 1985. The theory and practice of econometrics. 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    KPMG. 2009. KPMG’s Corporate and indirect tax rate survey 2009.
    Ladd, H. F. 1992. Mimicking of local tax burdens among neighboring counties. Public Finance Quarterly 20 (4): 450-467.
    Levin, A., C. F. Lin, and C. S. Chu. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108: 1-24.
    MacManus, S. A. 2000. Politics and taxation. Hildreth, W. B.,and J. A. Richardson.(Ed.) Handbook of Taxation. Marcel Dekker, New York: 31- 69.
    Maddala, G. S., and S. Wu. 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61: 631-652.
    Manski, C. 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 60 (July): 531-542.
    Martinez-Mongay, C. 2000. ECFIN`s effective tax rates: properties and comparisons with other tax indicator`s. Economic Paper 146 (October). European Commission, Directorate for Economic and Financial Affairs, Brussels.
    http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication11064_en.pdf
    Moran, T. H. 1998. Foreign direct investment and development: the new policy agenda for developing countries and countries in transition. Institute for International Economics, Washington D.C.
    Nicodème, G. 2001. Computing effective corporate tax rates: comparisons and results. Economic Paper 153 (June), European Communities.
    http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/3808/1/MPRA_paper_3808.pdf
    Oates, W. E. 1972. Fiscal federalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Overesch, M., and J. Rincke. 2008. Tax competition in Europe 1980–2007: evidence from dynamic panel data estimation. Working Paper.
    http://www.uni-graz.at/socialpolitik/papers/Overesch.pdf
    Persson, T., G. Roland, and G. Tabellini. 2000. Comparative politics and public finance. Journal of Political Economy 108 (6): 1121-1161.
    Quinn, D. 1997. The correlates of change in international financial regulation. American Political Science Review 91: 531-551.
    Redoano, M. 2007. Fiscal interactions among European countries-does the EU matter? CESifo working paper 1952. Munich.
    http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocCIDL/cesifo1_wp1952.pdf
    Robinson, Z. 2005. Corporate tax rates in the SADC region: determinants and policy implications. South African Journal of Economics 73 (4): 722-740.
    Rodrik, D. 1997. Has globalization gone too far. Institute for International Economics, Washington D.C.
    Ruiz, F. M. M., and M. Gerard. 2008. Is there evidence of strategic coporate tax interaction among EU countries. Working paper University of Mons: 43.
    http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10094/1/MPRA_paper_10094.pdf
    Sachs, J. D., and A. Warner. 1995. Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1: 1-118.
    Slemrod, J. 2004. Are corporate tax rates, or countries, converging? Journal of Public Economics 88: 1169-1186.
    Swank, D. 1998. Funding the welfare state: globalization and the taxation of business in advanced market economies. Political Studies 46 (4): 671-692.
    Wilson, J. D. 1986. A theory of interregional tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics 19 (3): 296-315.
    Wilson, J. D. 1991. Tax competition with interregional differences in factor endowments. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21: 423-451.
    Winner, H. 2005. Has tax competition emerged in OECD countries? Evidence from panel data. International Tax & Public Finance 12: 667-687.
    Zodrow, G. R., and P. Mieszkowski. 1986. Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics 19: 356-370.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政研究所
    97255027
    98
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097255027
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[財政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2377检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈