Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49199
|
| Title: | 服務業科技化跨業合作歷程之研究— 以健康照護新服務開發聯盟為例
An empirical study of cross-industrial collaboration process within IT enabled services—Two examples of new services in health care development alliances |
| Authors: | 梁煥煒
Liang, Huan Wei |
| Contributors: | 張昌吉
Chang, Chang Chih
梁煥煒
Liang, Huan Wei |
| Keywords: | 服務業科技化
健康照護
跨業聯盟
新服務
合作意會
IT enabled Service
Health care
Cross-industrial alliance
New service
Collaborative sensemaking |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 02:01:31 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 科技與創新，為當前服務業最關心的兩個成長驅動引擎，也是競爭的主要利器。政府為刺激產業創新與升級，研擬「ITeS科技化服務業旗艦計畫」，將「健康照護」納入五大推廣策略主軸內，鼓勵異業合作，期以科技與創新來開創新興服務產業，提升我國經濟成長與競爭的優勢。
為瞭解服務業科技化異業之間如何進行合作，本研究以質性研究的方式，採訪兩個申請技術處「創新科技應用與服務計畫」的健康照護聯盟參與者，一聯盟為「創新數位遊戲復健服務先期計畫」，另一為「遠距健康照護U-Care建置計畫」，藉兩種不同類型的個案，來瞭解是什麼原因影響聯盟的合作成效？
本研究透過系統開發專案研究的幾個觀點進行辯證，包括重視科技物件與營運績效的「物件觀點」、多元利益與政治因素驅動的「社會互動觀點」、思維習慣與限制的Orlikowski與Gash(1994)「科技思維框架觀點」，以及意義建構與詮釋的Weick(1988)「意會觀點」進行跨個案之間合作成效的辯證。
研究發現，新服務跨業聯盟可以「合作意會」(Collaborative sensemaking)做為增進營運順暢的一種有效策略。包括導意(Sensegiving)、需意(Sensedemanding)與意解(Sensebreaking)的運用，採用象徵人物與服務物件做為意會媒介，以非正式活動促進夥伴意會與共識，探詢與參與工作脈絡來主動尋找意會脈絡，其中，工程師透過駐點參與及對護理人員服務痛點的體會，轉變思維框架，化解不同領域與組織背景帶來的衝突，更是文中深富意涵的部分。此外，合作參與者也可以「情感基礎」、「工作脈絡的瞭解」、「領域團體的接觸」與「組織策略與代理人動機的結合」四種策略，深化合作意會，並做為檢視成員涉入合作程度的指標。此外，多元合作意義的塑造，也是間接促進合作意會的有效方式。
其次，本研究也歸納服務業科技化常見的合作問題，如在執行層次，創新應用皆在科技人，服務人缺乏科技與服務應用的想像，而科技人則因服務的動態特質，而添增系統開發模稜兩可的情境；聯盟層次，發現多元利益常使參與者失焦營運重點，忽略對服務對象的關懷。
由於新服務與健康照護的人本關懷與社會互動實驗特性，本研究主張以合作意會做為跨業合作的策略，也提醒惟合作成員能重視與肯定每位聯盟參與者的價值，以及關心服務對象的生活需求與痛點，才能跳脫物件利益的陷阱，提升對人性的敏感層次，以設計出深具社會意義與可行的商業模式。本研究最後提出幾個學術意涵，也對醫療機構、廠商、研發法人機構與政策提出實務意涵，並對健康照護服務業科技化的社會意涵提出看法，重思意會的哲學意涵。
ICT and innovation are the two most mentioned engines and powerful weapons for the growth of the service currently. In order to upgrade the industry, Ministry of Economic Affairs conducted “IT enable Service Program” and made “Health care” being the five main strategies, and more, encouraged organizations using technology and innovation to improve the growth and competition of econonmics through cross-indusrial collaboration.
To know how the cross-industrail firms cooperate with each other in ITeS process, this study used qualitative research approach interviewing 21 participators within two health care alliances which worked “Innovative Technology Applications and Services Program” hold by Department of Industrial Technology, one alliance conducted “Innovative Digital-game enable Physical Rehabilitation Pilot Plan”, the other conduct “Remote Health Care U-Care Establishment Plan”. Base on the two different kind cases, this study explored what affacts influenced alliance work deeply?
This study adopted dialectic method to probe the effect of ICT development program in cross-cases analysis, the theoris embraced “Artifact lens” which focused technology artifact and operating performance, “Social interaction lens” which actions drived from multi-interests and poltics intentions, “Technology frames lens” which developed by Orlikowski and Gash (1994) and “Sensemaking lens” which proposed by Weick(1988).
Respectively, this study found that the “Collaborative sensemaking” strategy was an effective way to promote the operation in new service cross-industrial alliances, including sensegiving, sensedemanding and sensebreaking exercises, taking symbolic person and service artifacts in sensemaking media, using informal activities to enhance particators’ sensemaking and common consensus, asking and participating work context to find the sensemaking conext. Especially, the technologiest could transfer his frame of reference by stationed at the partner’s firm and realized the pain point beyond nursing staff’s service, so that the conflicts which arised from the different field and organizational context could be resolved. Besides, participators also could use flour strategies, “Friendship”, “Working context”, “Contacting with social groups” and “Integration of partner firm’s development strategy and agent’s motivation”, to deep collaborative sensemaking, and be the indexs to examine the extent which participators involve the cooperation. And more, the shaping of multi-collaborative meanings, was also an effective way to improve collaborative sensemaking indirectly.
Besides, this study also found the problems occurred in the ITeS alliances. For example, in working level, the innovative applications often created by the technologists, not service person; second, due to the dynamic characteristic of service, technologists would face equivocal situations during developing systems. In alliance level, multi-interests often enabled participators deviating from the main mission in plan operation, partners maight also ignore concerns the ultimate customers.
Due to the characteristics of humanistic care and social interaction experiment of new service and health care, this study argued that the collaborative sensemaking could be a useful strategy to improve crosss-industrail cooperation. And more, this study also suggested the partners in the alliance should respect and confirm each participators’ value, and concerned the ultimate customers’ life need and pain point, so that they could jump across the artiftact-interest traps, promote the sense level to human nature, and designed rich social meanings and workable business models. Finally, this study proposed some research and practice implications, and advocated the social implications about the health care in ITeS. |
| Reference: | 壹、 中文
1. 王之杰、楊方儒、張育寧與蔡佳珊，預見科技新未來：從台灣製造到台灣創造，台北：天下遠見，2008年。
2. 李明譯(Thomas H. Lee著)，是醫師，更是領導人(Turning Doctors into Leaders)，哈佛商業評論，第44期，天下遠見出版，2010年4月。
3. 林育珊譯(Jonathan Grix原著)，Top研究的必修課：學術基礎研究理論(The Foundations of Research)，台北：寂天文化事業，2008年12月，初版。
4. 周昭正，電子商務產業新創事業創業策略之研究—組織意會觀點之應用，國 立 中 央 大 學企業管理研究所碩士論文，2001年。
5. 周逸衡與凌儀玲譯(Lovelock, Christopher與Wirtz, Jochen原著)，服務業行銷(Services Marketing：People, Technology, Strategy)，台北市：台灣培生教育，6版，2007年。
6. 施振榮，科技化服務業：台灣產業大未來，商業周刊，2005年2月28日。
7. 侯勝宗與蕭瑞麟，科技意會—衛星派遣的人性軌跡，台灣培生教育出版，2008年，初版。
8. 徐作聖、黃啟佑與游煥中，科技服務業發展策略及應用—以RFID產業為例，國立交通大學出版社，2007年9月，初版。
9. 苗豐強，棋局雙贏：苗豐強的全球化策略，台北：天下雜誌股份有限公司，2002年。
10. 許士軍，「服務業」和「非服務業」的矩陣產業觀，產業管理評論，社團法人中華民國管理科學學會，第二卷第一期，2007年。
67. Robey, D. and Newman, M., Sequential Patterns in Information Systems Development: An Application of a Social Process Model, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(1), 1996, pp.30-63.
68. Rosenwein, M., The optimization engine that couldn`t, OR/MS Today, 24 (4), 1997, pp.26-29.
69. Rouleau, L., Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day, Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 2005, pp.1413–1441.
70. Rust, R. T. and Miu, C., What academic research tells us about service, Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 2006, pp.49–54.
71. Schein, Edgar H., Three Cultures of Management: The Key to Organizational Learning, Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 1996, pp.9-20.
72. Solow, Robert M, We`d better watch out, New York Times Book Review, New York: July 12, 1987.
73. STANDISH_GROUP, Chaos 1995, Standish: Dennis, Mass, 1995.
74. STANDISH_GROUP, Chaos 1995, Standish: Dennis, Mass, 1998.
75. STANDISH_GROUP, Chaos 1995, Standish: Dennis, Mass, 2000.
76. Strassmann, Paul A., Will Big Spending on Computers Guarantee Profitability?, Datamation, February 1997, pp.75-85.
11. 許士軍，帶動波瀾壯闊的創新浪潮，能力雜誌，2010年，1月號。
77. Taylor, J. R. and Van Every, E. J., The Emergent Organization: Communication as Its Site and Surface, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2000.
78. Thatcher, M. E. and Oliver, J. R., The Impact of Technology Investments on a Firm’s Production Efficiency, Product Quality, and Productivity, Journal of Management Information System, 18(2), 2001, pp.17-45.
79. Tien, J. M. and Berg, D., A case for service systems engineering, Journal of Systems Science and Engineering, 12(1), 2003, pp.13–38.
80. Tuckman, B. W. and Jensen, M. C., Stages of Small Group Development Revisited, Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 1977, pp.419–427.
81. Uzzi, Brian, Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1997, pp.35-67.
82. Vlaar, Paul W.L., Van den Bosch, Frans A. J. and Volberda, Henk W., Coping with Problems of Understanding in Interorganizational Relationships: Using Formalization as a Means to Make Sense, Organization Studies, 27(11), 2006, pp.1617–1638.
83. Vlaar, Paul W. L., van Fenema, Paul C. and Tiwari, Vinay, Coreating Understanding and Value in Distributed Work: How Members of Onsite and Offshore Vendor Teams Give, Make, Demand, and Break Sense, MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 2008, pp.227-255.
84. Weick, Karl E., Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
85. Weick, Karl E., Sutcliffe, Kathleen M. and Obstfeld, David, Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking, Organization Science, 16(4), 2005, pp.409–421.
86. Westbrook, Johanna I., Jeffrey, Braithwaite, Kathryn, Gibson, Richard, Paoloni, Joanne, Callen, Andrew, Georgiou, Nerida, Creswick and Louise, Robertson, Use of information and communication technologies to support effective work practice innovation in the health sector: a multi-site study, BMC Health Services Research, 9(201), Nov 2009, pp.1-9.
12. 黃天如，衛署砸60億 電子病歷互通 患者少受罪，中國時報， 2010年2月21日，A1版。
87. Wrzesniewski, A., and Dutton, J. E., Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work, Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 2001, pp.179-180.
88. Yang, Heng-Li and Hsiao, Shu-Ling, Mechanisms of developing innovative IT-enabled services: A case study of Taiwanese healthcare service, Technovation, 29(5), 2009, pp.327-337.
89. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. and Berry, L. L., Problems and strategies in services marketing, Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 1985, pp.33-46.
參、 網站
1. 工研院網頁，http://www.itri.org.tw/chi/service/tcsi/index.asp?RootNodeId=030& NodeId=035。
2. 天主教若瑟醫院放射科網站，http://www.stjoho.org.tw/department/xray/ page_pacs.htm。
3. 中國統計年鑑，中華人民共和國國家統計局，http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/ 2008/indexch.htm。
4. 內政部統計月報，http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/month/list.htm。
5. 台灣生醫科技的新藍海未來，遠見影音學院，http://www.videa.com.tw/ album_detail.php?val_id=155。
6. 行政院勞委會勞動統計櫥窗，http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/statis/WebProxy.aspx? sys=220&ym=9602&ymt=9700&kind=21&type=1&funid=q020453&cycle=41&outmode=0&&compmode=0&outkind=11&fld0=1&fld8=1&rdm=MK6f91CE。
13. 陳宇芬，資訊人員的系統開發與組織結構互動之探索性研究—以結構行動理論為基礎，國立台灣大學資訊管理研究所博士論文，2002年。
7. 李慧萍，我國醫療照護產業發展機會，ITIS智網，台灣經濟研究院，2009年12月24日， http://www.itis.org.tw/rptDetailFreeEPaper.screen?industry=1& ctgy=2&rptidno=625077515&check=ok。
8. 勞動統計資料庫，行政院勞工委員會，http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/ statis/WebProxy.aspx?sys=100。
9. 經濟部技術處，ITAS創新科技應用與服務計畫，http://itas.tdp.org.tw/ content/application/itas/common_info/guest-cnt-browse.php?cnt_id=1522。
10. 經濟部技術處，創新科技應用與服務計畫簡介，2009年6月，頁6、20，http://www.tfoi.org.tw/html/news/1-2-創新科技應用與服務計畫.pdf。
11. 經濟部統計處，http://2k3dmz2.moea.gov.tw/ GNWEB/Indicator/wFrmIndicator. aspx。
12. 游子慶，產業全面轉型升級 創新科技化服務業大躍進，商業現代化季刊，國立中山大學 電子商務研究中心，第87期，2008年3月，2010年3月21日取自http://gcis.nat.gov.tw/Moderncom/。
13. 衛生署遠距醫療網，http://www.doh.gov.tw/ newdoh/90-org/org-1/nii/1.htm。
14. 2009科技化服務業旗艦計畫成果發表會，科技化健康照護創新服務計畫，http://www.hanbox.com.tw/edm/IEK2009/images/科技化健康照護創新服務計畫簡要說明.pdf。
15. 97年死因統計結果分析，衛生署網站，http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/ DM2_2.aspx?now_fod_list_no=10642&class_no=440&level_no=3。
16. About Australia: Health Care in Australia, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australuan Government, http://www.dfat.gov.au/facts/healthcare.pdf。
14. 曹松清，遠距健康照護發展計畫 辦公室揭牌，經濟日報，2010年5月6日，C10版，產業商機。
17. Annual Labour Force Statistics，http://stats.oecd.org/WBOS/ Index.aspx? DatasetCode=ULC_QUA。
18. DIGITIMES 企業IT編輯部，自政策助攻、市場潛在需求旺盛 健康照護市場商機看漲，http://map.answerbox.net/landmark-2459410.htm。
19. DIGITIMES 企業IT編輯部，健康照護邁向兆元產業的4個阻礙，2009 台北國際醫療展產業訊息，http://www.taipeitradeshows.com.tw/chinese/bulletin/ industryinfo_view.shtml?docno=2783。
20. The World Factbook，Central Intelligence Agency(CIA)， https://www.cia.gov/ library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2012.html。
15. 張玲星，組織導入資訊系統時各部門成員之權力運作—「科技思維框架與華人關係理論之觀點」，管理與系統，第十五卷，第三期，2008年7月。
16. 張昌吉與梁煥煒，員工健康促進與管理方案—服務業科技化應用模式之探討，產業管理評論，第3卷，第2期，中華管理科學學會，2009年。
17. 曾仁凱，數位台灣優化生活人物專訪，推動科技化服務業 五年創造200億產值，經濟日報，D1版，數位學習Elearning專刊，2007年12月21日。
18. 楊子平，施振榮：知識產業 台灣發展新定位，經濟日報，2003年2月23日，五版，綜合新聞。
19. 楊仁達主編，財團法人資訊工業策進會創新應用服務研究所，2007科技化服務應用及發展年鑑，經濟部技術處，2007年12月。
20. 楊仁達、林玉凡與洪毓祥主編，服務體驗工程方法指引—研究篇，財團法人資訊工業策進會， 2008年9月，初版。
21. 資訊工業策進會，我國關鍵領域資訊投資與應用需求調查報告，經濟部技術處出版，資策會創新應用服務研究所FIND策劃，2006年7月。
22. 湯玲郎、蔡瑋真與王盈超，物流服務業導入服務創新對營運績效之影響，管理評論，第28卷，第2期，2009年4月。
23. 經濟部技術處業界科專辦公室，科技化健康照護創新服務計畫推動成果，經濟部技術處，「科技創新 服務致勝」科技化服務旗艦計畫成果發表會，台北國際會議中心，2009年4月2日，頁4。
24. 溫肇東，從服務改進缺口找到創新突破點，能力雜誌，2010年1月號，頁28-30。
25. 溫肇東，經濟部技術處科技化服務業旗艦計畫推動成果引言，經濟部技術處，「科技創新 服務致勝」科技化服務旗艦計畫成果發表會，台北國際會議中心，2009年4月2日。
26. 樓永堅與方世榮譯(Kotler, Philip與Keller, Kevin Lane原著)，行銷管理學(Marketing Management)，12版，台灣培生教育出版股份有限公司，2007年。
27. 劉錦秀與謝育容譯(大前研一著)，思考的技術，台北：邦城文化，2005年。
28. 潘成滿譯(Christian Grönroos著)，服務業管理與行銷(Service Management and Marketing: A Customer Relationship Management Approach 2/e)，普林斯頓國際有限公司，2003年。
29. 魏鵬舉，鲍莫爾病與文化生產力，經濟參考報，2007年8月3日。
30. 羅耀宗譯 (Bohmer, Richard M. J.著), 是醫院，更是企業(Fixing Health Care on the Front Lines)，哈佛商業評論，第44期，天下遠見出版，2010年4月。
31. 蕭瑞麟，不用數字的研究—鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究，台灣培生教育出版，2007年，二版。
32. 顧淑馨譯 (Hamel, Gary與C. K. Prahalad)，競爭大未來：掌控產業、創造未來的突破策略(Competing for the future：breakthrough strategies for seizing control of tour industry and creating the market of tomorrow)，台北：智庫，2004年。
貳、 外文
1. Ash J., How to avoid an e-headache, British Medical Journal, 334(7608), 2007, pp.1373-1373.
2. Australian Medical Association, Review of health workforce: Submission to the Productivity Commission, Canberra, 2005, pp.1-19.
3. Barki, Henri and Pinsonneault, Alain, A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort and Performance, Organization Science, 16(2), 2005, pp.165–79.
4. Barczak, G., Griffin, Abbie and Kahn, Kenneth B., Perspective: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 2009, pp.3-23.
5. Barrett, M. I., Challenges of EDI Adoption for Electronic Trading in the London Insurance Market, European Journal of Information Systems, 8(1), 1999, pp.1-15.
6. Barua, A. and Lee, B., The Information Technology Productivity Paradox Revisited: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation in the Manufacturing Sector, The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 1(9), 1997, pp.145-166.
7. Baumol, William J., Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis, The American Economic Review, 57, 1967, pp.415-426.
8. Baumol, William J., Sue Anne Batey Blackman, and Edward N. Wolff, Unbalanced Growth Revisited: Asymptotic Stagnancy and New Evidence, American Economic Review, 75(4), 1985, pp.806-817.
9. Berndt, E. R. and Morrison, C. J., High-Tech Capital Information and Economic Performance in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: An Exploratory Analysis, Journal of Econometrics, 65, 1995, pp.9-34.
10. Borrill, C., West, M., Shapiro, D. and Rees, A., Team working and effectiveness in health care, British Journal of Health Care Management, 6(8), 2000, pp.364-371.
11. Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L., Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending, Management Science, 42(4), 1996, pp.541-558.
12. Bstieler, Ludwig and Hemmert, Martin, Increasing Learning and Time Efficiency in Interorganizational New Product Development Teams, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 2010, pp.485-499.
13. Chou, T-C, Dyson, R. G. and Powell, P. L., An empirical study of the impact of information technology intensity in strategic investment decisions, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(3), Sep 1998, pp.325-339.
14. Christiansen, John K. and Varnes, Claus J., Formal Rules in Product Development: Sensemaking of Structured Approaches, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 2009, pp.502–519.
15. Corvellec, H. and Risberg, A., Sensegiving as mise-en-sens—The case of wind power development, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(3), 2007, pp.306-326.
16. Coward, Chris., Obstacles to Developing an Offshore IT-Enabled Services Industry in Asia: the View from the US, Center for Internet Studies at the University of Washington, 2002.
17. Dahlstedt., A. and Persson, A., Requirements Interdependencies: State of the Art and Future Challenges, in Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, A. Aurum and C. Wohlin (eds.), New York: Springer, 2005.
18. Damanpour, F. and Schneider, M., Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers, British Journal of Management, 17, 2006, pp.215-236.
19. Das, T. K. and Kumar, Rajesh, Interpartner sensemaking in strategic alliances Managing cultural differences and internal tensions, Management Decision, 48(1), 2010, pp.17-36.
20. den Hertog, P. and Bilderbeek, R., Conceptualising service innovation and service innovation patterns, Paper in the framework of the SIID Project, Dialogic, Utrecht, 1999.
21. Department of Health and Ageing, Department of Health and Ageing submission to the Productivity Commission: Impact of advances in medical technology on healthcare expenditure, Canberra, 2005, pp.1-36.
22. Dewan, S. and Min, C. K., The Substitution of Technology for Other Factors of Production: A Firm Level Analysis, Management Science, 43(12), 1997, pp.1660-1675.
23. Dougherty, D., Borrelli, L., Munir, K., and O’Sullivan, A., Systems of Organizational Sensemaking for Sustained Product Innovation, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(3–4), 2000, pp.321–55.
24. Dyer, W. Gibb, Jr. and Wilkins, Alan L., Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, to Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt, The Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 1991, pp.613-619.
25. Engwall, M., Kling, R. and Werr, A., Models in action: how management models are interpreted in new product development, R&D Management, 35(4), 2005, pp.427–439.
26. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., Building Theories from Case Study Research, The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 1989, pp.532-550.
27. Gago, D. and Rubalcaba, L., Innovation and ICT in service firms: towards a multidimensional approach for impact assessment, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2007, 17(1), pp.25-44.
28. Gioia, D. A. and Chittipeddi, K., Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation, Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 1991, pp.433–448.
29. Gioia, D. A., Conclusion: The State of the Art in Organizational Social Cognition, In H.R. Sims Jr. and D.A. Gioia (Eds.), The Thinking Organization, San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp.336-356.
30. Goodwin B., Co-op vs ICL – an IT project fiasco, ComputerWeekly, March, 2003, pp.24-27.
31. Grant, Robert M., Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration, Organization Science, 7(4), 1996, pp.375–87.
32. Greenhalgh, Trisha and Stones, Rob, Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory, Social Science and Medicine, 70, 2010, pp.1285-1294.
33. Gustafsson, A. and Johnson, M. D., Competing in a Service Economy: How to Create a Competitive Advantage Through Service Development and Innovation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
34. Hackett, Gregory P., Investment in Technology: The Sector Sinkhole?, Sloan Management Review, winter 1990, pp.97-103.
35. Hennessey, Beth A. and Amabile, Teresa M., Creativity, Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 2010, pp.569-598.
36. India’s top 15 BPO companies, Nasscom, June 05, 2006.
37. Jean-Claude Delaunay, Services in Economic Thought, Norwell MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
38. Jin, K. Gregory and Montague, Richard, Continuous Communication Control Disruptors During Systems Development, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(6), 2003, pp.393-420.
39. Jones, C., Assessment and Control of Software Risks, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1994.
40. Jordan, Michelle E., Lanham, Holly J., Crabtree, Benjamin F., Nutting, Paul A., Miller, William L., Stange, Kurt C. and McDaniel Jr, Reuben R., The role of conversation in health care interventions: enabling sensemaking and learning, Implementation Science, 4(15), 2009, pp.1-13.
41. Jorgenson, D. W., Information Technology and the U.S. Economy, The American Economic Review, 9(1), 2001, pp.1-32.
42. Kuperman, J. C., Using cognitive schema theory in the development of public relations strategy: Exploring the case of firms and financial analysts following acquisition announcements, Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(2), 2003, pp.117–150.
43. Lehr, W. and Lichtenberg, F. R., Computer Use and Productivity Growth in US Federal Government Agencies, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 16(2), 1998, pp.257-279.
44. Levina, Natalia and Orlikowski, Wanda J., Understanding Shifting Power Relations Within and Across Organizations: A Critival Genre Analysis, Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 2009, pp. 672–703.
45. Licht, G. and Moch, D., Innovation and information technology in services, Can J Econ 32(2), 1999, pp.364–381.
46. Lin, Raymund J., IT-enabled Services in Taiwan Transcending the Traditional Service Model, Institute for Information Industry, October 5th, 2007.
47. Lyytinen, K. and Hirschheim, R., Information Systems Failures: A Survey and Classification of the Empirical Literature, Oxford Surveys in Information Technology, Vol.4, 1987, pp.257-309.
48. Lyytinen, K. and Robey, D., Learning Failure in information Systems Development, Information Systems Journal , 9, 1999, pp.85-101.
49. Magne, Jørgensen and Kjetil, Moløkken-Østvold, How large are software cost overruns? A review of the 1994 CHAOS report, Information and software technology, 48(4), 2006, pp.297-301.
50. Mahmood, M. A. and Mann, G. J., Measuring the organizational impact of information technology investment: An Exploratory study, Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), Summer 1993, pp.97-122.
51. Maitlis, S., The social processes of organizational sensemaking, Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 2005, pp.21–49.
52. Maitlis, Sally and Sonenshein, Scott, Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights From Weick (1988), Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 2010, pp.551-580.
53. Mills, Colleen, Experiencing Gossip: The Foundations for a Theory of Embedded Organizational Gossip, Group and Organization Management, 35(2), pp.213–240.
54. Mitev, N. N., More than a failure? The computerized reservation systems at French railways, Information Technology and People, 9(4), 1996, pp.8-19.
55. Nakata, Cheryl and Im, Subin, Spurring Cross-Functional Integration for Higher New Product Performance: A Group Effectiveness Perspective, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 2010, pp.554-571.
56. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
57. OECD Factbook 2008: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics.
58. Olson, Eric M., Walker Jr., Orville C. and Ruekert, Robert W., Organizing for Effective New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness, Journal of Marketing, 59, 1995, pp.48–62.
59. Orlikowski, W. J. and Gash, D. C., Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1993, pp.1-45.
60. Orlikowski , W. J., Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective, Information Systems Research, 7(1), Mar 1996, pp. 63-92.
61. Pinsonneault, A. and Rivard, S., Information technology and the nature of managerial work: From the productivity paradox to the Icarus paradox?, MIS Quarterly, 22(3), Sep 1998, pp.287-311.
62. Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., and Baden-Fuller, C., Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers, Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 1989, pp.397–416.
63. Powell, Koput and Smith-Doerr, Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), Mar 1996, pp.116-145.
64. Ravasi, D. and Schultz, M., Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture, Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 2006, pp.433-458.
65. Ring, P. S. and Van de Ven, A. H., Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships, Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 1994, pp.90-118.
66. Roach, Stephen S., Service Under Siege: The Restructuring Imperative, Harvard Business Review, September–October 1991, pp.82-91. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
勞工研究所
94262014
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094262014 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [勞工研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 407 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
