Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49157
|
Title: | 以台灣不同族群之對日態度看台、中、日三角群際關係 |
Authors: | 莊靜怡 |
Contributors: | 李美枝 莊靜怡 |
Keywords: | 族群認同 社會認同 後殖民 集體記憶 政治認知 台灣 群際關係 ethnic identity social identity post-colonialism collective memory political cognition Taiwan intergroup relationship |
Date: | 2002 |
Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 02:00:15 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 現在台灣的國家(族群)認同正處在一個不明的階段,不僅是族群間有對立的國族意識型態,對第三國-日本的態度似乎也出現族群之間的不同。本研究目的就在瞭解台灣的不同族群之間是否有不同的對日態度,以及族群認同的工具性是否涉入其中。抽樣295位台灣民眾所得的研究結果顯示,不同族群認同者確實有不同的對日態度。族群自我認同為「台灣人」者比起其他族群認同類別者給予日本比給予中國更多的好評,另外,他們也覺得中國比較沒有那麼親近,同時也對日本負面歷史行為做出更有利的歸因。此外,台灣人民的台灣意識為其「族群認同」對親日態度預測力的中介變項。研究結果以選擇性遺忘、建構認同及三角群際關係來加以解釋,亦即,後殖民時期台灣人民的對日態度為建構自身認同所展現的工具性態度,目的在對抗主要外團體中國,不能只是解釋為殖民主義的影響。 This study was set to investigate how people in Taiwan perceive Japan and China differently in terms of their ethnic identities. Taiwan has experienced the Japanese colonial regime and the Nationalist regime consecutively each for about fifty years. Over the century, Taiwan has kept searching for its collective identity, and China remains the number one threat to its nation-building project. From 295 sampled Taiwan people, we found different ethnic self-identifiers showed different attitudes toward Japanese. Those who identify themselves with Taiwanese showed most positive attitudes toward Japanese, regardless of the fact that they are mostly offspring of people having been through Japan colonial regime. To be more specific, they tended to evaluate Japan better than China, to rate China less close, and to make more “Japanese-serving attribution” when reasoning about Japanese`s historical brutality during the Second World War. Moreover, the correlation between Taiwan people`s ethnic identities and their attitudes toward Japanese has been found mediated by Taiwan political ideology. The results were discussed by referring to instrumentality of ethnic identification and selective forgetting of collective history in order to reconstruct a new ethnic identity. |
Reference: | 美國線上百科全書 http://go.grolier.com/gol 王明珂 (1997),《華夏邊緣》。台北:中研院史研所。 王甫昌(1998),族群意織、民族主義與政黨支持:一九九零年代臺灣的族群政治。臺灣社會學研究,1998年7月,頁1-45。 尹章義(2001),台灣人的日本觀-以日台關係史為軸心所做的探索。《歷史》,2000年六月,32期,頁32-41。 王逢振 (2000),《文化研究》。台北:揚智。 石之瑜 (1998),《政治心理學》,台北:五南。 朱全斌(1998),由年齡、族群等變項看台灣民眾的國家及文化認同。《新聞學研究》,56集,1998年1月,頁35-63。 李丁讚,陳兆勇(1998),衛星電視與國族想像:以衛視中文台的日劇為觀察對象。《新聞學研究》,56集,1998年1月,頁9-34。 匡思聖(2000),〈從後殖民理論論台灣族群關係之辯證〉,《三民主義學報》,2000年9月,21期,頁171-182。 李美枝(2002),〈台灣民眾族群與國族認同的顯性與隱性意識〉,第四屆華人心理學研討會,台北。 林修澈 (1994),〈台灣是一個多民族的獨立國家〉,《台灣民族主義》,施正鋒編。台北:前衛。 林瑞端(2001),台灣青少年收看日本偶像劇之效果研究,世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。 吳乃德(1993),〈國家認同和政黨支持--臺灣政黨競爭的社會基礎〉,《中央研究院民族研究所集刊》,84卷,頁33-61。 邱貴芬(1992),〈「發現台灣」:建構台灣後殖民論述〉,《中外文學》,21卷,7期,頁151-167。 胡台麗(1993),〈芋仔和蕃薯-台灣「榮民」的族群關係和認同〉,《族群關係與國家認同》,台北:業強出版社。 孫立群(1998),日本卡通對青少年消費文化影響之研究,政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 高恆信、李美枝(2000),〈台灣地區人民之省籍、黨籍與政治意識型態在政治群體認同中的糾結〉。《本土心理學研究》,2000年6月,13期,頁231-276 陳雅惠(2000 ),日據時代台灣文學的童年經驗,清華大學中國文學所碩士論文。 張雅琪(2000),日本流行文化認同程度與日文廣告效果關係之探討,東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 鄭凱中(1996),「台生」外省人的國家認同與族群想像:以新黨支持者和「外獨會」為參考團體,東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。 羅慧雯(1996),台灣進口日本影視產品之歷史分析,政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 蘇宇鈴(1998),虛構的故事/想像的真實:日本偶像劇的流行文化解讀,輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。 英文部分 Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator—mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173—1182. Barth, F. (1969/1998). Introduction. In Barth (Ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries : The social organization of culture difference.( pp. 9-38). Illinois: Waveland Press. Chu, Y. H., Lin, J. W. (2001). Political development in 20th-century Taiwan: State-building, regime transformation and the construction of national identity. The China Quarterly, 165, 102-129 Comas-Diaz, L., Lykes, M. B., & Alarcon, R. D. (1998). Ethnic conflict and the psychology of liberation in Guatemala, Peru, and Puerto Rico. American Psychologist, 53, 778-792 Eade, J., & Allen, T., (1999). Ethnicity. In T. Skelton & T. Allen (Eds.), Culture and Global Chang. ( pp. 145-155). New York: Routledge Fisher, R. J., (1990). The Social Psychology of Intergroup and International Conflict Resolution. New York: Springer-Verlag. Fuselier, G. D., (1999). Placing the Stockholm Syndrome in Perspective. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, July 1999, 22-24. Guimond, S., Dif, S., & Aupy, A. (2002). Social identity, relative group status and intergroup attitudes: when favourable outcomes change intergroup relations . . . for the worse. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 739-760. Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Intergroup attributions and affective consequences in majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936-950. Kim, U., Cho, W., & Harajiri, H. (1998). The perception of Japanese people and culture: the case of Korean nationals and sojourners. Progress in Asian Social Psychology, Volume 1. New York: J. Wiley Loomba, A., (1998). Colonialism/postcolonialism. London and New York: Routledge. Laroche, M., Kim, C., Hui, M. K., & Joy, A. (1996). An empirical study of multidimensional ethnic change: The case of the French Canadians in Quebec. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 27, 114-131. Tajfel, H. (1982). Instrumentality, identity and social comparisons. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.) Social identity and intergroup relations. (pp. 483-507). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tajfel, H., & Tuner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worschel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelien Hall. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Tajfel, H. (Eds.) Social identity and intergroup relations. (pp. 15-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tsai, H. (1995). Sojourners adjustment: the case of Foreigners in Japan. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 26, 523-36. Weber, J. G., (1994). The nature of ethnocentric attribution bias-ingroup protection or enhancement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 482-504. Young, R. J. C., (2001). Postcolonialism: an historical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell publishers. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 心理學研究所 91 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000088 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [心理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 290 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|