政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/48994
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51257300      線上人數 : 885
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/48994


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48994


    題名: 以企業策略與品質要素之觀點 探討虛擬社群服務品質之改善 –以Facebook為例
    Virtual community service quality improvement based on an intergrated perspective of business strategy and quality attributes : using Facebook as an example.
    作者: 林旻君
    Lin, Min Chun
    貢獻者: 管郁君
    Eugeuia Huang
    林旻君
    Lin, Min Chun
    關鍵詞: Facebook
    IPA
    Kano二維品質模式
    網路服務品質
    Facebook
    Kano model
    IPA
    network service quality
    日期: 2010
    上傳時間: 2010-12-08 01:54:52 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在當時大家認為產品品質與顧客滿意呈現一維的線性關係時，狩也紀昭首先將二因子的概念應用在產品品質上，發現了品質也有二維的特性，因此可以辨別出何種品質較其他品質重要，藉以形成品質改善的優先順序，其後亦有學者將服務品質概念應用在Kano模式上，發現服務品質也有二維品質的特性，然而Kano模式僅能提供品質的屬性分類，卻無法瞭解目前使用者的狀態，因此後來有學者加入IPA( Importance-Performance Analysis )，藉以瞭解目前使用者主觀的感受如何，因此Kano模式是將品質作「定性」，也就是瞭解品質的特性，而IPA是將品質「定量」，也就是瞭解目前使用者的感受。然而將Kano模式與IPA結合後所提出之品質改善建議往往流於模式上的字面解釋，有些甚至不符合公司當時實際在管理品質的情境，因此本研究試著導入核心策略與戰略行動的概念，試著重新提出Kano模式與IPA結合後的品質改善建議。
    接著本研究以E-S-QUAL網路服務品質為基礎，結合Kano模式與IPA分析方式，並以Facebook為研究對象，探討Facebook網路服務品質的特性是否具有二維品質模式，並以不同人口統計變項將樣本分群，探討不同人口統計變項下，使用者是否對Facebook網路服務品質特性之分類有所不同，最後驗證本研究所提出的品質改善建議之合理性，並同時與Kano模式與IPA結合的品質改善建議作一對比。
    結果發現，Facebook的網路服務品質的確有二維品質的屬性，但在32項品質項目中，沒有任何一項為魅力品質，代表E-S-QUAL所提出的所有品質項目，對於Facebook的使用者而言，沒有一項品質會令他們愛慕或嚮往。而對於不同人口統計變項的使用者而言，對於Facebook的網路服務品質特性之分類，在某些構面上的確有所不同。最後利用分析過後的資料，實證本研究所提出之品質改善建議，同時比較Kano模式與IPA結合的品質改善建議，發現後者確實在某些品質改善建議上有所遺漏，並於本研究所提出之改善建議中加以彌補，以形成更為周全的品質改善建議。
    At the time we think that product quality and customer satisfaction is a linear relationship, hunting Zhao Ji first applied the concept of two factors theory on quality and found that quality and customer satisfaction also has two-dimensional relationship. So you can identify what kinds of quality are more important than others to the formation of quality improvement priorities. Other researches also applied the concept of the Kano model on service quality and found that service quality also has the two-dimensional quality attribute. However, Kano model only can provide the classification of quality attribute, but cannot understand the current experience of the user. So some researches subsequently joined the IPA( Importance-Performance Analysis ), in order to understand current user subjective experience. We can know Kano model is used to “qualitative”, that is, to understand the attributes of quality, while the IPA is used to “quantitative”, that is, to understand the users current experience. However, the quality improvement suggestions from the combination with Kano model and IPA tend to fellow the literal interpretation from two models. Some suggestions even mismatch the actual company management situation. Therefore, the core of this study tried to import the concept of strategy and strategic action into the combination of Kano model and IPA to submit new recommendations of quality improvement.

    Then this study, based on E-S-QUAL, combining with analysis methods of Kano model and IPA, and using Facebook as an example, explores whether the characteristics of Facebook social network service qualities show two-dimensional quality attributes. Grouping the samples by different demographic variables to explore whether different users will affect the classification of quality attributes. Finally, this study examines the reasonableness of quality improvement suggestions from itself and also makes a comparison with the suggestion combining with Kano model and IPA.

    The results showed that, Facebook’s network service qualities do have the two dimensional quality attributes. But in 32 network service quality items, there do not have any attractive quality attribute. It shows that, there is no one service quality item proposed from E-S-QUAL will be loved or desired by Facebook users. For the different demographic variable users, there are some different in classifying Facebook’s network service quality attributes in some dimension. Finally, this study uses the result from the data analyzed through Kano model and IPA to examine the reasonableness of quality improvement suggestions from itself, and also makes a comparison with the suggestion combining with Kano model and IPA. The examination discovered that the latter is indeed miss the quality improvement suggestion in some situation. So the suggestions of this study compensated the missing part and also proposed a more comprehensive suggestion for Facebook’s quality improvement.
    參考文獻: 1. Babakus, E. and Boller, G.W. (1992). An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business Research, 24(3), 253-268.
    2. Berger, C. (1993). Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality Management Journal, 2(4), 3-36.
    3. Booms, B.H., Bitner, M.J. (1981). Marketing strategies and organization structures for service firms. Marketing of Services, 47-51.
    4. Brandt, D. Randall (1993). How service marketers can identify value-enhancing service elements. Journal of Services Marketing, 2(3), 35-41.
    5. Carman, J.M. (1990). Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing, 66(1), 33-55.
    6. Carman, J.M., Langeard, E. (1980). Growth strategies for service firms. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 7-22.
    7. Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H. and Sejo Oh (1987). Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.
    8. Facebook (n.d.). Retrieved August 10, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook
    9. Finkelman, D.P. and Goland, A.R. (1990). How not to satisfy your customers. McKinsey Quarterly (Winter), 2-12.
    10. Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience. The Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 6-21.
    11. Griffin A. and Hauser, John R. (1993). The Voice of the Customer. Marketing Science, 12(1), 1-27.
    12. Gronroos, Christian (1978). A Service-Oriented Approach to Marketing of Services. European Journal of Marketing, 12(8), 599-601.
    13. Herzberg, F. (1964). The Motivation-Hygiene Concept and Problems of Manpower. Personnel Administration (January-February), 3-7.
    14. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F. and Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control (April), 39-48.
    15. Kristensen, K., Kanji, K.G., and DahlGaard, J.J. (1992). On measurement of customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management, 3(2), 123-128.
    16. Li, Y.N., Tan, K.C. and Xie, M. (2002). Measuring web-based service quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 13(5), 685-700.
    17. Madu,C.N. and Madu, A.A. (2002). Dimensions of e-quality. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(3), 246-258.
    18. Martilla,J.A., James, J.C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79.
    19. Matzler K., Bailom,F., Hinterhuber, H.H., Renzl, B. and Pichler, J. (2004). The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance–performance analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(4), 271-277.
    20. Matzler, K. and Hinterhuber, H.H. (1998). How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation, 18(1), 25-37.
    21. Matzler, K. and Sauerwein, E. (2002). The factor structure of customer satisfaction: An empirical test of the importance grid and the penalty-reward-contrast analysis. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(4), 314-332.
    22. Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H.H., Bailom, F., Sauerwein, E. (1996). How to delight your customers. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5(2), 6-18.
    23. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml V.A. and Berry L.L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. The Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
    24. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml V.A. and Berry L.L. (1987). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 51(April), 11-27.
    25. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., and Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
    26. Porter, M.E. (1998), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. (1st ed.), Free Press.
    27. Regan, William J. (1963). The Service Revolution. Journal of Marketing, 27(July), 57-62.
    28. Robert F. Hurley (1998). Alternative Indexes for Monitoring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality: A Comparative Evaluation in a Retail Context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(3), 209-221.
    29. Robert Johnston (1995). International Journal of Service Industry Management. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(5), 53-71.
    30. Scott E. Sampson and Michael J. Showalter (1999). The Performance-Importance Response Function: Observations and Implications. The Service Industries Journal, 19(3), 1-25.
    31. Shane J. Schvaneveldta, Takao Enkawaa and Masami Miyakawab (1911). Consumer evaluation perspectives of service quality: evaluation factors and two-way model of quality. Total Quality Management, 2(2), 149-161.
    32. Swan, John E., Combs, Linda Jones (1976). Product Performance and Consumer Satisfaction: A New Concept. Journal of Marketing, 40(Apri), 25-33.
    33. Yang, C. C. (2003). Establishment and applications of the integrated model of service quality measurement. Managing Service Quality, 13(4), 310-324.
    34. Yang, C.C. (2005). “The Refined Kano’s Model and Its Application. Total Quality Management and Vusiness Excellence, 16(10), 1127-1137.
    35. Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A. and Malhotra, A. (2002). Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 362-375.
    36. Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A. and Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL - A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理研究所
    97356039
    99
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097356039
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋