Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48989
|
| Title: | 考量指標衝突之物流業者評選模式
Logistics service provider selection model based on conflict criteria |
| Authors: | 蔡雅慧
Tsai, Ya Hui |
| Contributors: | 林我聰
蔡雅慧
Tsai, Ya Hui |
| Keywords: | 物流委外
供應商評選
決策實驗室法
網路程序分析法
田口品質損失函數
VIKOR排序法
logistics outsourcing
supplier evaluation
DEMATEL
ANP
Taguchi loss function
VIKOR |
| Date: | 2010 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 01:54:48 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在全球化競爭的條件之下，企業之專業分工漸趨精細，企業為了發展自己本身的核心能力，選擇將非核心能力委外給專業的第三方，以求獲得更佳的服務品質且為企業減少成本支出。其中物流相關費用占企業營運費用約5%~35%，物流在整體企業營運扮演重要角色，近年來供應鏈管理的興起，企業更加重視與上下游廠商間協調關係，物流管理受到重視，物流關係到整體供應鏈的穩定度，因此在選擇物流委外供應商時，企業需審慎的評估供應商各方面的能力，以選出最適物流委外供應商。
過去評選物流委外供應商，多數藉由專家主觀判斷，本研究提出一套完整的物流委外供應商評選模式，以客觀的角度評選物流委外供應商。過去文獻中多數假設評估準則間關係獨立，此假設與現實狀況不符，評估準則通常存在相互關聯。企業在評選過程中，針對特定評選準則會有限定標準，若單以績效值評估，不符企業之需求，本研究將其納入考量，建立出更加完整的物流委外供應商評選模式。此評選模式可給予參與評選之候選廠商改善建議，為雙方建立良好的關係，創造雙贏的局面。
本研究透過決策實驗室法建立指標之網路關係，以網路程序分析法計算指標之權重，於評分處理部份，針對企業特定評選指標，透過田口品質損失函數轉換成與目標之損失值，最後藉由VIKOR排序法評選出最佳物流委外供應商。受限於成本考量，本研究透過系統動態學模擬運送情形，藉由所獲得之營運資料驗證此評選模式。
Under the global competitive conditions, enterprises become more sophisticated division of labor. Enterprises want to develop their own core competencies. Enterprises choose to outsource non-core capabilities to third-party professional,because of better service quality and reducing costs for enterprises. In recent years, enterprises pay more attention to coordination with the relationship between upstream and downstream firms. The logistics in the overall business operations play an important role. Therefore, in the choice of logistics outsourcing providers, enterprises evaluate all aspects of supplier`s abilities to select the most suitable supplier of logistics outsourcing.
This study provides a complete model to evaluate logistic service providers. Enterprises in the selection process, selection criteria will be qualified for a particular standard. Selection criteria usually have interrelationship. Under the condition, this study use DEMATEL and ANP to create criteria relationship and compute criteria weights. Taguchi loss function is used to calculate some criteria loss value, which is the distance between enterprise’s target values. Finally, VIKOR combines loss value with performance value to select the best logistics service providers. These models also give candidates some suggestions to improve their performance. |
| Reference: | 1.李佳芳，民97，綠色供應鏈中供應商評選之研究，國立政治大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
2.林俊宏、曾國雄、任維廉，民94，利用VIKOR 方法解決企業資源規劃系統評選問題 (頁 69-90)，農業與經濟，台大農業經濟學系出版。
3.林志益，民94，平板鋼鐵業企業資源規劃系統評選關鍵模組之研究，國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
4.紀岱玲，民94，供應商績效評估研究-結合ANP及DEMATEL之應用，國立政治大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
5.侯舒茵，民97，運用多準則評估方法於物流委外決策分析，東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
6.張瓊云，民99，建構信任模型探討合作夥伴間資訊分享資意願.，國立政治大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
7.張魁峯，民98，Super Decisions 軟體操作手冊-以ANP突破AHP的研究限制，鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司。
8.屠益民、張良政、吳定芳，系統動力學理論及應用，智勝文化。
9.張朝清，民89，台灣聚酯長纖維紡織業供應鏈策略之研究，國立台北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所碩士論文。
10.陳小萍，民94，企業物流策略分析與第三方物流供應商評選之研究，南台科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
11.陳育生，民97，計程車牌照管制之研究，國立台灣大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
12.黃逸軒，民92，延遲策略於全球運籌模式之應用--以資訊產業為例，國立台北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所碩士論文。
13.潘俊宏，民94，一衡量供應鏈績效之整合性架構，國立中央大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
14.蔡維軒，民96， 我國第三方物流之服務能力與未來朝向第四方物流發展之研究. 國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
15.鄭春生，民85，品質管理 三民書局。
16.鄧振源、曾國雄，民78，『層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)』，中國統計學報，第27卷 第7期：1-19頁。
17.謝薾亦，民97，全球運籌管理與倉庫位址設立－以某家不銹鋼公司為例， 國立雲林科技大學全球運籌管理研究所碩士論文。
18.鐘榮欽，民89，由物流及運籌意義的解析與概念演變看物流行業的定位，物流技術與戰略。
19.簡禎富，民94，決策分析與管理：全面決策品質提升之架構與方法，臺北市：雙葉書廊。
20.蘇朝墩，民93，品質工程，中華民國品質學會。
21.蘇雄義，民89，物流與運籌管理，華泰文化。
22.Andersson, D., & Norrman, A.(2002). Procurement of logistics services--a minutes work or a multi-year project? European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(1), pp3-14
23.Ballou,R.H. (1992). Business Logistics Management. New Jersey: Prentical Hall.Press.
24.Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), pp294–308.
25.Chang, B., Chang, C., and Wu, C. (2010). Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, In Press, Corrected Proof.
26.Chang, C. W., Wu, C. R., & Chen, H. C. (2008).Using expert technology to select unstable slicing machine to control wafer slicing quality via fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications 34(3), pp 2210–2220.
27.Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework. International Journal of Production Research, 42(1), pp131–163.
28.Chu, M. T., Shyu, J., Tzeng, G. H., & Khosla, R. (2007).Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis." Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), pp1011–1024.
29.Coyle, J. J., Bardi, E. J. & Langeley, C. J. (1996). The Management of Business
Logistics, Sixth Edition.
30.Edward H. Frazelle. (2005). logistics and supply chain management, First Edition.
31.Frazelle, E. (2001). Supply chain strategy: the logistics of supply chain management. McGraw-Hill Professional.
32.Ha, S. H., & Krishnan, R. (2008). A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain. Expert System. Appl., 34(2), pp1303-1311.
33.Hsiao, H., Kemp, R., van der Vorst, J., & (Onno) Omta, S. (2010). A classification of logistic outsourcing levels and their impact on service performance: Evidence from the food processing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), pp75-86.
34.J. D. Sterman. (2000). Business Dynamics, Systems Thinking and Modellingfor a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
35.James J.H. Liou,& Yu-Tai Chuang(2010). Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers. Expert Systems with Applications,37(5),pp3755-3761.
36.Jayanth Jayaram, J., & Tan, Keah-Choon, K. (2010). Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers, 125(2),pp 262-271.
37.Jharkharia, S., & Shankar, R. (2007). Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega, 35(3), pp274-289.
38.Jiang, B., Frazier, G. V., & Prater, E. L. (2006). Outsourcing effects on firms` operational performance: An empirical study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(12), pp1280-1300.
39.Kethley, R. B., Waller, B. D., & Festervand, T. A. (2002). Improving customer service in the real estate industry: a property selection model using Taguchi loss functions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 13(6), pp739–748.
40.Knemeyer, A. M. and Murphy, P. R. (2004). Evaluating the Performance of
Third-Party Logistics Arrangements: A Relationship Marketing Perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(1), pp35-51.
41.Li, M. H. (2003). Quality loss functions for the measurement of service quality. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(1), pp29–37.
42.Liao, C., & Kao, H. (2010). Supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, analytical hierarchy process and multi-choice goal programming. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(4), pp571-577.
43.Liu, H., & Wang, W. (2009). An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), pp4387-4398.
44.Meade, L., & Sarkis, J. (2002). A conceptual model for selecting and evaluating third-party reverse logistics providers. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(5),pp 283–295.
45.Meade, L. M., & Rogers, K. J. (1997). Enhancing a manufacturing business process for agility. Portland International Conference on Management and Technology, pp638–641.
46.Min, H., & Joo, S. J. (2006). Benchmarking the operational efficiency of third party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(3), pp 259–65.
47.Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 2(1), pp 5–21.
48.Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2),
pp 514–529.
49.Özbayrak, M., Papadopoulou, T. C., & Akgun, M. (2007). Systems dynamics modelling of a manufacturing supply chain system. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15(10), pp 1338-1355.
50.Pi, W., & Low, C. (2006). Supplier evaluation and selection via Taguchi loss functions and an AHP. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27(5), pp 625-630.
51.Rao, K. and Young, R. R. (1994). Global supply chains: Factors influencing
outsourcing of logistics functions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(6), pp 11-17.
52.Saaty, T. L., & Takizawa, M. (1986). Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 26(2), pp 229–237.
53.Saaty, T.L. (2001). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process USA: RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
54.Saaty, T. L. (1979). Applications of analytical hierarchies. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 21(1), pp 1-20.
55.Selçuk Perçin, S. (2009). Evaluation of third-party logistics (3PL) providers by using a two-phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(5), pp 588-604.
56.Simchi-Levi, D.Kaminsky, P. and Simchi-Levi, E. (2000). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts Strategies and Case Studies, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
57.Sink, H. and Langley, J. (1997). A managerial framework for the acquisition of third party logistics service. Journal of Business Logistics, 18(2), pp. 163-89.
58.Vaidyanathan, G. (2005). A framework for evaluating third-party logistics. Commun. ACM, 48(1), pp 89-94.
59.Wadhwa, V., & Ravindran, A. R. (2007). Vendor selection in outsourcing. Computers & Operations Research, 34(12), pp 3725-3737. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊管理研究所
97356026
99 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097356026 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [資訊管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 291 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
