政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/48929

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/48929

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51245555 線上人數 : 899

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/48929

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48929

題名:	會計師公費揭露與公司治理的市場反應 Audit Fee Disclosure, Corporate Governance, and Market Reactions.
作者:	郭青雲 Kuo,Ching Yun
貢獻者:	周玲臺 Chou,Ling tai Lynette 郭青雲 Kuo,Ching Yun
關鍵詞:	會計師公費揭露公司治理累計異常報酬市場反應 audit fee disclosure corporate governance cumulative abnormal return market reactions
日期:	2009
上傳時間:	2010-12-08 01:53:18 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究探討台灣會計師公費揭露的市場反應，並以累計異常報酬（CAR）來衡量市場反應。第一階段針對是否揭露會計師公費研究其不同的反應；第二階段再將有揭露會計師公費的公司區分為主動揭露與被動揭露，並探討是否會造成不同的影響；第三階段更進一步將被動揭露的公司依其所符合的法規揭露原因再做細分，特別探討因為非審計公費過高而揭露公費者之市場反應。研究結果發現，相較於不揭露會計師公費的公司，市場對於有揭露會計師公費資訊的公司會給予較正面的反應；其中，有揭露會計師公費的公司，若屬於主動揭露，市場更是會給予正面的肯定；相反的，有揭露會計師公費的公司，若是因非審計公費達審計公費之四分之一以上者而被動揭露者，市場會對此公司之會計師之獨立性有所懷疑，故給予負面的反應。可見會計師公費的資訊對投資大眾而言確實是一項有意義且重要的資訊。本研究並加入公司治理的相關變數，研究結果發現，若公司之治理程度較差，但「有揭露」會計師公費資訊者，投資大眾會給予正面的反應，此外，相對於被動揭露者，市場對於「主動揭露」之公司會給予更正面的肯定。另一方面，若公司之治理程度較佳，但其揭露原因是屬於非審計公費達審計公費四分之一以上而被動揭露者，市場會對會計師獨立性有所質疑，故對於此種公司仍給予負面的反應。 This study attempts to examine audit fee disclosure and market reactions. We use Cumulative Abnormal Returns to measure market reactions. First, we analyze whether audit fee disclosure has any market reactions at all. Second, we divide the samples into voluntary disclosure and forced disclosure groups. Third, we make further segmentation from the forced disclosure group according to their disclosure reasons, and specially focus on the disclosure reason of high non-audit fees. We find that market reactions are significantly more positive for firms with audit fee disclosures than for firms without fee disclosure. Market reactions are also significantly better for firms with voluntary disclosure than the forced disclosure group. In contrast, market reactions are significantly lower for firms which disclose audit fees due to high levels of non-audit fees. Our evidence supports that audit fee is a piece of useful and important information to investors. Additionally, we include corporate governance variables in the analysis. We find that when firms’ corporate governance is not good, if they choose to disclose audit fee voluntarily, the market responds with positive reactions. In contrast, if a firm’s corporate governance is quite good but discloses audit fees due to high levels of non-audit fee, the market then reacts with negative returns.
參考文獻:	中文文獻方智強與吳安妮，1997，台灣經理人員主動揭露盈餘預測之實證研究，會計評論，第三十期，頁253-269。谷中鈞，2008，會計師懲戒對審計品質之影響，私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。洪榮華、劉永欽、張力與林欣宜，2007，研發投資宣告與股票價值關係之實證研究－對手公司與產業集中度的觀點，輔仁管理評論，第十四卷，第二期，頁1-26。倪衍森、鍾雨潼與王武德，2006，台灣證券市場內線交易嚴重嗎？以台灣公開資訊觀測站之資訊分析為例，中華管理學報，第七卷，第二期，頁89-100。陳怡芳，2005，主動揭露會計師公費公司之研究，私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。陳昭美，1994，自願性揭露盈餘預測次數多寡之研究，私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。陳振遠、王朝仕與徐如萍，2008，會計資訊、公司治理特性與企業評價之攸關性，會計與公司治理，第五卷，第二期，頁79-108。陳振遠、張智堯、王蘭芬與李文智，2005，應用Ohlson 會計評價模型探究公司治理之價值攸關性—以台灣上市公司電子業為例，臺大管理論叢，第十五卷，第二期，頁123-142。黃怡千，2005，非審計服務對會計師獨立性影響之研究：門檻制公費揭露，國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。羅書帆，2007，非審計公費資訊與市場報酬關連性之研究，私立輔仁大學會計學系碩士論文。英文文獻 Agrawal, A., and G. N. Mandelker. 1990. Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25 (June): 143-161. Ashbaugh, H., R. Lafond, and B. Mayhew. 2003. Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78 (July): 611-639. Ball, R., S. Jayaraman, and L. Shivakumar. 2009. The Complementary Roles of Audited Financial Reporting and Voluntary Disclosure: A Test of the Confirmation Hypothesis. SSRN Working Paper Series (October): 1-64. Byrd, J., and K. Hickman. 1992. Do outsider directors monitor managers? Journal of Financial Economics 32 (October): 195-222. Chung, H., and S. Kallapur. 2003. Client importance, non-audit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 78 (October): 931-955. Collins, D. W., and S. P. Kothari. 1989. An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (July): 143-182. Core, J., R. Holthausen, and D. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (March): 371-406. Elliott, J. A., and J. D. Hanna. 1996. Repeated Accounting Write-OflFs and the Information Content of Earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 34: 135-155. DeFond, M. L., K. Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramantam. 2002. Do non-audit services affect auditor independence? Evidence from going-concern audit opions. Journal of Accounting Research 40: 1247-1274. Dhaliwal, D. S., K. J. Lee, and N. L. Fargher. 1991. The association between unexpected earnings and abnormal security returns in the presence of the financial leverage. Contemporary Accounting Research 8 (Fall): 20-41. Francis, J. R., and B. Ke. 2006. Disclosure of fees paid to auditors and the market valuation of earnings surprises. Review Accounting Studies 11: 495–523. Frankel, R. M., M. F. Johnson, and K. K. Nelson. 2002. The relations between auditors` fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77: 71-105. Higgs, J. L., and T. R. Skantz. 2006. Audit and Nonaudit Fees and the Market`s Reaction to Earnings Announcements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 25: 1- 26. Lai, K. 2009. Audit opinion and disclosure of audit fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 24 (Winter): 91-115. Markelevich, A., C. A. Barragato, and R. Hoitash. 2005. The nature and disclosure of fees paid to auditors. The CPA Journal (November): 6-10. Myers, J. N., L. A. Myers, and T. C. Omer. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-clint relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review 78 (Jul.): 779-799. Newell, R., and G. Wilson. 2002. A premium for good governance. The McKinsey Quarterly 3: 20-22. Noe, Y., and M. Rebello. 1997. The design of corporate boards: Composition, compensation, factions and turnover, analyst following and institutional ownership. Journal of Accounting Research 28: 55-76. Patton, A., and J. Baker. 1987. Why won’t directors rock the board? Harvard Business Review 65: 10-18. Rosenstein, S., and J. Wyatt. 1990. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26 (August): 175-192. Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong. 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review (April): 346-366. Whiting, R. H., and J. C. Miller. 2008. Voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital in New Zealand annual reports and the “hidden value”. Journal of HRCA : Human Resource Costing & Accounting: 26-50.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學會計研究所 97353039 98
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0973530391
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[會計學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

沒有與此文件相關的檔案.

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋