政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/48877
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51328798      Online Users : 895
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48877


    Title: 企業海外擴張與風險之關聯性研究
    Authors: 劉少縈
    Contributors: 譚丹琪
    劉少縈
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2010-12-08 01:52:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 　　台灣加入WTO後，國際化已經成為不得不然的趨勢，企業國際多角化有的是為了求生存，有的是想降低成本以獲得更高的報酬，公司在海外擴張時雖享有規模經濟、範疇經濟、學習曲線、租稅利益、研發或製造的改進、建立組織優勢的好處，但好處不一定會實現，而且會面臨到不同國家間匯率風險、政治風險、文化差異、法令差異、資訊不對稱以及代理問題，所以企業在國際化時有收益也有成本，究竟國際化會使的公司營運風險上升或下降？是否有干擾變數會影響公司國際多角化與營運風險的關係，這是本研究要探討的主題。
    　　本研究在相關的文獻探討後，以公司的營運特性以及國際化策略兩個層面，來探討企業國際多角化與風險的關係，並提出6個假設，首先先看公司國際多角化與公司營運風險是否有相關，公司的負債比例和公司的營運風險是否為正向關係，再來看公司的負債比例、研發支出比例、到開發中國家投資比例、國際化涉入程度對公司國際化與營運風險之關係的影響。
    　　本研究以日本製造業有從事海外擴張活動的廠商為例，來進行實證研究，研究期間為1996年到2000年，去除貿易公司和資料不全的樣本，最後剩下288家廠商，資料分析方法是採回歸分析，以公司的資產報酬的變異作為迴歸分析的依變項，公司國際化程度、負債比例為自變項，而公司的研發支出比例、負債比例、到開發中國家投資的擴張程度、國際化涉入程度會與國際化程度有調節關係，公司規模與公司年齡為控制變數，來探討國際多角化與公司營運風險的關係。
    　　研究結果顯示公司的負債比例會增加公司的營運風險，這是因為公司的負債比例越高，破產風險越大，公司的營運風險也會增加，而公司的規模和年齡越大，公司的營運風險則越小，公司的負債比例會使得公司國際多角化對營運風險的影響降低，所以當公司的負債比例較多時，可以利用不同國家間匯率、租稅的差異，來達到減少利息支出或是節稅的效果。公司去開發中國家擴張的比例要適中，才能使公司國際化對營運風險的影響降到最小，如此利用彼此景氣循環的不同、產品及要素市場的差異，來增加公司營運彈性以及分散風險。而當企業在負債比例、到開發中國家投資比例為0的情況下，公司國際多角化對營運風險有正向的顯著影響。
    Reference: 中文文獻
    1.于卓民，國際企業：環境與管理，台北：華泰出版社，民國89年9月。
    2.王健聰，許溪南，〝台灣多國籍企業財務績效與財務特性之實證研究〞，國立成功大學學報第三十四卷人文社會篇，民國88年，頁143-165。
    3.吳青松，國際企業管理：理論與實務，台北：智勝書局，民國88年。
    4.曹殿宏，〝國際多角化對企業經營績效的影響研究〞，政治大學國際貿易研究所未出版碩士論文，民國83年6月。
    5.陳昭維，〝企業對外投資與系統風險影響之研究〞，國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文，民國86年6月。
    6.許勝武，〝美國單國籍與多國籍企業之財務績效、結構暨風險探討〞，國立成功大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文，民國90年6月。
    7.廖芳群，〝多國籍與單國籍企業在財務績效暨風險之探討〞，國立成功大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文，民國86年6月。
    8.鄭學淵，〝我國上市公司-多國籍與單國籍企業在財務績效暨風險之探討〞，國立成功大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文，民國89年6月。
    英文文獻
    1.Agmon, T., and Lessard, D. (1977). Investor recognition of corporate international diversification. Journal of Finance, 32:1049-1055.
    2.Amit, R. and Wernerfelt, B. (1990). Why do firms reduce business risk? Academy of Management Review, 33: 520-533.
    3.Barkema, H. G., Bell, John H. J. and Pennings, J. M. (1996). Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic management Journal, 17: 151-161.
    4.Bartov, E., Bodnar, G., and Kaul, A. (1996). Exchange rate variability and the riskiness of US multinational firms: evidence from the breakdown of Bretton Woods. Journal of Financial Economics, 42: 105-132.
    5.Bane, W. T., and Neubauer, F. (1981). Diversification and the failure of new foreign activities, Strategic Management Journal, 2(3): 219-233.
    6.Bowman, E. H. (1980). A risk/return paradox for strategic management. Sloan Management Review, 21: 17-31.
    7.Burgman, Todd. (1996). An empirical examination of multinational capital structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 27: 553-70.
    8.Campa, J. M. (1994). Multinational investment under uncertainty in the chemical processing industries, Journal of International Business studies, 3: 557-575.
    9.Cave, R. E. (1982). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge University Press.
    10.Cave, R.E. and Mehra, S. K. (1986). Competition in global Industries, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    11.Collins, J. M. (1990). A market performance comparison of U.S. firms active in domestic, developed and developing country. Journal of International Business studies, 2: 271-287.
    12.Czinkota, M. R., Rivoli, P., and Ronkainen, I .A. (1992). International Business, Chicago: Dryden Press.
    13.Dumas, B., and Solnik, B. (1991). The world price of risk, Working paper, Group HEC.
    14.Dunning, J. H. (1993). The Globalization of Business, New York: Routledge.
    15.Eun, C., and Resnick B. (1988). Exchange rate uncertainty, forward contracts, and international portfolio selection. Journal of finance, 43:197-215.
    16.Fatemi, A. M. (1984). Shareholders benefits from corporate international diversification, Journal of Finance, 39: 1325-1344.
    17.Geringer, J., Beamish, P. and daCostra, R. (1989). Diversification strategy and internationalization: implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 109-119.
    18.Hamel, Gary and Prahalad, C.K. (1985). Do you really have a global strategy? Harvard Business Review, 63(4): 139-148.
    19.Hennart, J. F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 9: 361-374.
    20.Hughes, J., Logue, D., and Sweeney, R. (1975). Corporate international diversification and market assigned of risk and diversification, Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 10: 627-637.
    21.Killing, J. Peter. (1982). How to make a global joint venture work, Harvard Business Review, 60(3): 120-127.
    22.Kim, W. C., and Mauborgne, R. A. (1988). Becoming an effective global competitor, Journal of Business Strategy, 9(1): 33-37.
    23.Kim, W. C., Hwang P. and Burgers, W. P. (1993). Multinationals’ diversification and the risk-return trade-off, Strategic management Journal, 14: 275-286.
    24.Kim, W. C., Hwang P. and Burgers, W. P. (1989). Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance, Strategic management Journal, 10: 45-57.
    25.Knight, F.H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Houghton Mifflin; reprint, Chicago: University of Chicago, 1971.
    26.Kogut, B. (1985). Designing global strategies: profiting from operating flexibility, Sloan Management Review, 26: 27-38.
    27.Kogut, B. (1988). Joint venture: Theoretical and empirical perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 9: 319-332.
    28.Kogut, Bruce and Kulatilaka, Nalin. (1994). Operating flexibility, global manufacturing, and the operating value of a multinational network. Management Science, 40(1): 123-135.
    29.Kwok, Chuck C. Y. and Reeb, David M. (2000). Internationalization and firm risk: An upstream-downstream hypothesis, Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4): 611-629.
    30.Kwok, Chuck C. Y., Reeb, David M. and Baek, H. Y. (1998). Systematic risk of the multinational corporation, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2): 263-279.
    31.Lane, H.W., and Hildebrand, T. (1990). How to survive in U.S. retail markets, Business Quarterly, 54(3): 62-66.
    32.Lee, K. and Kwok, C. (1988). Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations: international environmental factors and determinants of capital structure. Journal of international business studies, 19:195-217.
    33.Lubatkin, M. (1983). Mergers and the performance of acquiring firm. Academy of Management Review, 8(2): 218-225.
    34.Madura, Jeff. (1992). International Financial Management, 3rd edition, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
    35.Mahajan, Arvind. (1990). Pricing risk of expropriation, Financial Management, 19:77-86.
    36.McConnell, J. J. and Nantell, T. J. (1985). Corporate combinations and common stock returns: the case of joint ventures, Journal of Finance, 40(2): 519-536.
    37.Michel, Allen and Shaked, Israel. (1986). Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations: Financial performance and characteristics, Journal of International Business Studies, 18(3): 89-100.
    38.Miller, J.C., and Pras, B. (1980). The effects of multinational and export diversification on the profit stability of US corporations, Southern Economic Journal, 46: 792-805.
    39.Miles, R.E., and Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    40.Miller, K. D., and Bromiley, P. (1990). Strategic risk and corporate performance: An analysis of alternative risk measures. Academy of management journal, 33: 756-79.
    41.Miller, K. D. (1992). A Framework for integrated risk management in international business, Journal of international business studies, 2: 311-331.
    42.Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12: 133-43.
    43.Mitchell, W., Shaver J. M., and Yeung B. (1992). Getting there in a global industry: Impacts on performance of changing international presence, Strategic Management Journal, 13: 419-432.
    44.Mitchell, W., Shaver J. M., and Yeung, B. (1994). Foreign entrant survival and foreign market share: Canadian companies’ experience in United States medical sector markets. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 555-567.
    45.Morck, R. and Yeung, B. (1991). Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 64(2): 165-187.
    46.Olusoga, S. A., (1993). Market Concentration Versus Marker Diversification and Internationalization：Implications for MNE Performance, International Marketing Review, 10(2): 40-59.
    47.Palepu, K. (1985). Diversification strategy, profit performance, and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6: 239-255.
    48.Prahalad, C. K. (1976). Strategic choice in diversified MNCs, Harvard Business Review, 54(4): 67-78.
    49.Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
    50.Qian, G. (1996). The effect of multinationality measures upon the risk-reture performance of U.S. firms. International Business Review, 5(3): 247-265.
    51.Qian, G. (2000). Performance of U.S. FDI in different world regions. Asian Pacific Journal of Management, (17): 67-83.
    52.Shapiro, Alan. (1978). Financial structure and the cost of capital in the multinational corporation, Journal of financial and quantitative analysis,13: 211-66.
    53.Rugman, A. M. (1979). International diversify and the multinational enterprise. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
    54.Terpstra, Vern. (1983). Critical mass and international marketing strategy, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 11(3): 269-282.
    55.Wan, Chun-Cheong. (1998). International diversification, industrial diversification and firm performance of Hong Kong MNCs, Asia pacific Journal of management, 15: 205-217.
    56.Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness, Academy of Management Review, 38(2): 341-363.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易研究所
    89351007
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000436
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of International Business] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2277View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback