政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/48859
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51283437      線上人數 : 875
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/48859


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48859


    題名: 最低購買金額門檻促銷對消費者購物決策與價格認知之影響
    The effects of minimum purchase requirement promotion on consumers` purchase decisions and price perceptions
    作者: 葉乃綺
    Yeh, Nai Chi
    貢獻者: 樓永堅
    別蓮蒂
    Lou, Yung Chien
    Bei, Lien Ti
    葉乃綺
    Yeh, Nai Chi
    關鍵詞: 促銷型態
    交易效用
    價格回憶
    內部參考價格
    Promotion
    Transaction Value
    Price Recall
    Internal Reference Price
    日期: 2009
    上傳時間: 2010-12-08 01:51:55 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文主要探討「最低購買金額門檻」促銷，例如、「滿一千送一百」、「滿三千送三百」等對於消費者購物行為之影響。分為兩大研究主題：研究主題一旨在探討「最低購買金額門檻」促銷對購物決策與認知之影響，透過實地賣場購物實驗，瞭解該促銷能否提高購買金額、令消費者傾向去計算購買商品總價格，及帶來較高之知覺交易效用。
    研究主題二則根據研究一中發現「最低購買金額門檻」促銷下消費者會傾向於心中計算總價格之結果，進一步探究該促銷是否會影響消費者對價格的認知，包括如價格記憶的正確性、及內部參考價格的影響，透過型錄購物及電腦網頁模擬購物之實驗來驗證。
    根據上述兩大研究主題，本文中進行了三個實驗，皆同樣以提供10%折扣幅度，但未設定購買金額門檻的「九折優惠」促銷來做為控制組：研究一實驗在實際書店賣場舉行，以賣場門口發放三種促銷 (滿一千送一百、滿五百送五十、及九折優惠)折扣券方式，購物結束後再透過購物發票、賣場銷售資料及問卷衡量，瞭解消費者當日購物行為結果。
    研究二則透過實驗室實驗法，以商品型錄模擬購物來瞭解消費者在「滿千送百」與「九折優惠」促銷下回憶商品價格正確性之差異；研究三實驗以電腦網頁模擬百貨公司購物，先讓受測者在兩種促銷 (滿三千送三百、九折優惠)情境下購買商品，觀察他們購物接近促銷金額門檻時，購買最後一件商品的選擇結果，之後再請受測者賣回所購買商品，並藉由訂價過程瞭解其內部參考價格水準。

    本研究的主要發現，對於消費者購物行為影響方面：(1)「最低購買金額門檻」促銷確實能夠提高消費者購買的金額，符合定錨調整理論 (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974)推論之結果；(2)兩種促銷下的知覺交易效用結果則無法證實，推測由於實驗中「滿千送百」贈送的現金是緊接著消費決策後發生，延遲得到小額利得的感受不夠明顯，使得銀線原則 (Thaler, 1985)無法被驗證。
    對於商品價格認知影響方面：(1) 當購買金額超過促銷門檻時，「最低購買金額門檻」促銷下的內部參考價格高於「直接折扣」促銷者；(2)在該促銷下消費者在心中計算總價格的比例明顯高於「直接折扣」促銷；(3)在該促銷下消費者因為必須計算總價格，使得價格回憶的正確性提高；(4)透過內部參考價格間接推估「最低購買金額門檻」促銷在購買金額超過促銷門檻時，有較高之交易效用。
    The present research explores the effects of “the minimum purchase requirement promotions” on consumers’ purchasing behavior. Study 1 examined consumers’ purchasing decisions in a field experiment with three types of promotional coupons randomly handed to customers: Purchase over $1000 and get a $100 cash reward, purchase over $500 and get a $50 cash reward, or 10% off price discount. Consumers’ invoices from the bookstore’s database were recorded, and questionnaires were used to measure transaction value and how these promotions influenced consumers’ shopping spending, and tendency to calculate total expense.
    Study 1’s findings show that consumers tend to calculate total expense under “the minimum purchase requirement promotion”. Study 2 and Study3 explored how this promotional type influences on consumers’ price cognition, including price recall accuracy and internal reference price. In Study 2, laboratory experiment was used: (a) purchase over $1000 and get a $100 cash reward and (b) 10% off price discount through manipulated catalog shopping. Study 3 was a computer-manipulated shopping experiment, with participants purchasing product in the shopping stage of experiment and selling the products in a later auction to ascertain their internal reference price under two different promotional frames (purchase over $3000 and get a $300 cash reward, and a 10% off price discount).
    Major findings about consumers’ purchasing decisions were: (a) as the inference of anchoring and adjusting heuristic theory (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974), consumers increase their spending; (b) the “requirement promotion” improvement of consumers’ transaction value cannot be proved as the inference of silver linings principle (Thaler, 1985) because the time delay was not obvious in the experiment.
    The results of the influence on price cognition were: (a) “the minimum purchase requirement promotion” had a higher internal reference price than regular price discount with total expense over the promotional threshold; (b) this promotion will increase consumers’ tendency to calculate total expense; (c) consumers have higher price recall accuracy in this requirement promotion; and (d) the internal reference price was used to infer that this promotion might have a higher transaction value with total expense over the promotional threshold.
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    王曉晴 (2005)，創下經典百貨行銷的傳奇—SOGO百貨忠孝店，Cheers第57期，天下出版社，出版地：台灣台北。
    理查．塞勒 (Richard H. Thaler)/ 高翠霜譯 (2009)，贏家的詛咒：不理性的行為，如何影響決策？經濟新潮社，出版地：台灣台北。
    溫佩妤 (2003)，你可以不必陷入折扣混戰，Cheers第35期，天下出版社，出版地：台灣台北。
    戴國良博士 (2007)，整合行銷傳播關鍵報告: 主管沒有教的行銷手法，書泉出版社，出版地：台灣台北。
    英文部分
    Arkes, Hal R. and Catherine Blumer (1985), “The Psychology of Sunk Cost,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.35 (Feb.), p.124-140.
    Barbin, Barry J., William R. Darden, and Mitch Griffin (1994), “Work and/ for Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utitarian Shopping Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20 (4), p.644-656.
    Blattberg, Robert C., Gary D. Eppen, and Joshua Lieberman (1981), “A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Price Deals for Consumer Nondurables,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.45 (1), p.116-129.
    Bowman, Russell (1989), “Dollars Up but Cooling Down,” Marketing & Media Decisions, Vol.24, p.124-126.

    Bulkeley, William M. (1998), “Rebates’ Secret Appeal to Manufacturers: Few Consumers Actually Redeem Them,” The Wall Street Journal, February 10, B1.
    Cheema, Amar and Dilip Soman (2006), “Malleable Mental Accounting: The Effect of Flexibility on the Justification of Attractive Spending and Consumption Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.16 (1), p.33-44.
    Chen, Yu Xin, Sridhar Moorthy, and Z. John Zhang (2005), “Research Note-Price Discrimination,” Management Science, Vol.51 (7), p. 1131-1141.
    Dickson, Peter R. and Alan G. Sawyer (1990), “The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, p.42-53.
    Emery, Fred E. (1970), “Some Psychological Aspects of Price,” Pricing Strategy, Bernard Taylor and Gordon Willis, Eds. Princeton, NJ: Brandom/System, p.98-111.
    Ericsson, K. Anders and Simon, Herbert A. (1984), Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Folkes, Valerie and Rita D. Wheat (1995), “Consumers’ Price Perception of Promoted Products,” Journal of Retailing, Vol.71 (3), p.317-328.
    Gilbride, Timothy, Joseph Guiltinan, and Joel Urbany (2008) “Framing Effects in Mixed Price Bundling,” Marketing Letters, Vol.19 (2), p. 125-139.
    Gourville, John T. and Dilip Soman (1998), “Payment Depreciation: The Behavior Effects of Temporally Seperating Payments form Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25 (Sep.), p.160-174.
    Grewal, Dhruv, Kent B. Monroe, and R. Krishnan (1998), “The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.62 (2), p.46-59.
    Henderson, Pamela W. and Robert A. Peterson (1992), “Mental Accountung and Categorization,” Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, Vol.51, p.38-54.
    Heilman, Carrie M., Kent Nakamoto, and Ambar G. Rao (2002), “Pleasant Surprises: Consumer Response to Unexpected in-store Coupons”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 39 (2), p. 242-252.
    Hodge, Sharon K. and Charlotte H. Mason (1995), “Work Versus Windfall: An Exploration of Saving on Subsequent Purchase,” Marketting Letters, Vol.6 (2), p.91-100.
    Jarnebrant, Peter, Olivier Toubia, and Eric Johnson (2009), “The Silver Lining Effect: Formal Analysis and Experiments,” Management Science, Vol.55 (11), p.1832-1841.
    Kalyanaram, G, and Russell S. Winer (1995), “Empirical Generalizations from Reference Price Research,” Marketing Science, Vol.14(3), p.161-169.
    Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky Amos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, Vol.47, p.263-291.
    Kim, Hyeong Min (2006a), “Consumers` Responses to Price Presentation formats in Rebate Advertisements,” Journal of Retailing, Vol.82 (4), p. 309-317.
    ______ (2006b), “The Effect of Salience on Mental Accountung: How Integration versus Segregation of Payment Influences Purchase Decisions,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol.19, p. 381-391.
    Lattin, James M. and Randolph E. Bucklin (1989), “Reference Effects of Price and Promotion on Brand Choice Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.26 (3), p.299-310.
    Lee, Leonard and Dan Ariely (2006), “Shopping Goals, Goal Concreteness, and Conditional Promotions,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.33 (1), p. 60-71.
    Levav, Jonathan and A. Peter Mcgraw (2009), “Emotional Accounting: How Feelings about Money Influence Consumer Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.46 (1), p.66-80.
    Lichtenstein, Donald R., and William O. Bearden (1989), “Contextual Influences on Perceptions of Merchant-Supplied Reference Prices,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.16 (June), p.55-66.
    ______, Richard G. Netemeyer, and Scot Burton (1990), “Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.54 (July), p.54-67.
    ______, Scot Burton, and Eric J. Karson (1991), “The effect of Semantic Cues on Cunsumer Perceptions pf Reference Price Ads,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18 ( Dec.), p. 380-391.
    ______, Nancy M. Ridgway, Richard G. Netemeyer (1993), “Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.30 (2), p. 234-246.
    Chien-Huang Lin, Shih-Chieh Chuang, and Chaang-Yung Kung (2006), “The Presence of Reference Price: How Value Can Appear Convergent to Buyers and Sellers,” Proceedings of Advance in Consumer Research, Vol. 33, p.237-241.
    Manning, Kenneth C. and David E. Sportt (2007), “Multiple Unit Price Promotions and Their Effects on Quantity Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, Vol.83 (4), p.411-421.
    Morwitz, Vicki G., Eric A. Greenleaf, and Eric J. Johnson (1998), “Divide and Prosper: Consumers’ Reaction to Partitioned Prices,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.35 (Nov.), p.453-463.
    Okada, Erica M. (2005), “Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utitarian Goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.42 (Feb.), p.43-53.
    Plott, Charles R. and Kathryn Zeiler (2005), “The Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap, the Endowment Effect, Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations,” The American Economic Review, Vol.95 (3), p.530-545.
    Prelec, Drazen and George Loewenstein (1998), “The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt,” Marketing Science, Vol.17 (1), p.4-28.
    Rosa-Diaz, Isbel Maria (2004), “Price Knowledge: Effects on Consumers’ Attitude toward Prices, Demographics, and Social-Cultural Characteristics,” Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol.13 (6), p.406-428.
    Rosch, Eleanor (1975), “Cognitive Reference Points,” Cognitive Psychology, Vol.7, p.532-547.
    Schindler, Robert M. (1992), “A Coupon is More than a Low Price: Evidence from a Shopping-Stimulation Study,” Marketing & Psychology, Vol.9, p.431-451.
    Seligman, Daniel (1994), “The Rebate Debate,” Fortune, Dec. 12, p. 255.
    Smith, Michael F. and Indrajit Sinha (2000), “The Impact of Price and Extra Product Promotion on Store Preference,” International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol.28 (2), p.23-32.
    Shefrin, Hersh M. and Richard H. Thaler (1988), “The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis,” Economic Inquiry, Vol.26 (4), p.609-643.
    ______, and Richard H. Thaler (1992), “Mental Accounting, Saving, and Self Control,” In G. Loewenstein and J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (p.287-330). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
    Sinha, Indrajit, Chandran Rajan, and Srini S. Srinivasan (1999), “Consumer Evaluations of Price and Promotional Restrictions－A Public Policy Perspective,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Vol.18 (1), p.37-52.
    Strack, Fritz and Thomas Mussweiler (1997), “Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.73 (3), p.437-446.
    Tat, Peter K, William Cunningham, and Emin Babakus (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Rebates,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.28 (Aug), p.45-50.
    Thaler, Richard H. (1980), “Toward a positive theory of consumer choice,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol.1, p.39-60.
    ______ and Hersh M. Shefrin (1981), “An economic theory of self-control,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol.89 (2), p.392 – 406.
    ______ (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, Vol.4, p.199-214.
    ______ (1999), “Mental Accounting Matters,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol.12, p.183-206.
    Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1974), “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Bias,” Science, Vol.185, p.1124-1131.
    Urbany, Joe E., William O. Bearden, and Dan C. Weilbake (1988), “The Effect of Plausible and Exaggregated Reference Price on Consumer Perceptions and Price Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15 (June), p.95-110.
    ______ and Peter R. Dickson (1991), “Consumer Normal Price Estimation: Market vs. Personal Standards,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.18 (June), p.45-51.
    Von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern (1947), “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior,” 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Watson, David, Lee A. Clark, and Auke Tellegen (1988), “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.54 (6), p.1063-1070.
    Wansink, Brian, Robert J. Kent, and Stephen J. Hoch (1998), “An Anchoring and Adjustment Mood of Purchase Quantity Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.35, p.71-81.
    Wilson, Timothy D., Christopher E. Houston, Kathryn M. Etling, and Nancy Brekke (1996), “A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and Its Antecedents,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol.125 (4), p.387-402.
    Winer, Russell S. (1986), “A Reference Price Model of Brand Choice for Frequently Purchased Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.13, p.250-256.
    Yoon, Sukki (2005), “When What You Might Have Purchased Misguides You: Dysfunctional Counterfactual Thinking in Consumer Affect and Cognition,” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 133 pages.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    93355509
    98
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093355509
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋