政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/48370
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51212309      線上人數 : 954
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/48370


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48370


    題名: 表見證明之研究
    其他題名: An Investigation of “Anscheinsbeweis”
    作者: 姜世明
    Chiang, Shyf-Ming
    關鍵詞: 表見證明;經驗法則;舉證責任;證據評價;證明度降低;舉證責任減輕
    Anscheinsbeweis;Rule of thumb;Burden of proof;Evaluation of evidence;Low degree of proof
    日期: 2008.08
    上傳時間: 2010-11-20 00:48:02 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 表見證明係民事證據法之重要制度，其在德國法上發展已久，無論實務資料或學說爭論，均有可觀。該制度對於德國民事責任程序中當事人於舉證責任領域之風險，有重大影響；尤其在交通事件、海難事件、公害事件、產品責任事件等，此一制度之作用特別顯著。在我國，對於表見證明制度亦有學者加以關注，但專論仍屬不多，雖論者相關研究成果，對我國證據法學發展，均有重大貢獻；惟或因個別專論不足，其於實務上並未有充分及適當之反應。就此，實可視為係我國證據法學發展上之缺塊，應有補足之必要與實益。本文為此，擬以德國部分文獻為主，就表見證明議題為較深入之研究。對於其意義、本質、要件、作用、可否上訴第三審及德國實務運作狀況等問題，為詳細之分析，用供參考。另對於我國實務及理論發展，亦為介紹，並作評估。希有助於此一制度，在我國能有更進一步之發展。
    Anscheinsbeweis is a significant system in the Civil Evidence Act, which has developed in German Jurisprudence over a long period of time. Therefore, the relevant practices and theories are numerous. This system has a great impact on the risks of litigants when taking the burden of proof in German civil procedure. Its influences are particularly obvious in cases such as traffic accidents, sea disasters, medical disputes, environmental pollution, and product liability.In Taiwan, although Anscheinsbeweis has caught the attention of scholars, only a few monographs have discussed this issue. Even though the contributions of these researches to the development of the Taiwanese evidence law system are undeniable, the depth of these researches is unfortunately insufficient, which explains why their influence on current practices are limited. In order to build up a better evidence law system in Taiwan, more in-depth studies are definitely needed.Therefore, this paper plans to conduct a deeper analysis of “Anscheinsbeweis” based on German literature. It is intended to analyze thoroughly its meanings, essence features, conditions, functions, possibilities to appeal to the Supreme Court, as well as relevant practices in Germany. Moreover, this paper also introduces and evaluates the relevant theories and practices in Taiwan, hoping to contribute to the development of “Anscheinsbeweis” in Taiwan.
    關聯: 法學評論, 104 , 183-276
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[法律學系] 期刊論文
    [政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    183-276.pdf970KbAdobe PDF23498檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋