政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/4383
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50831910      線上人數 : 792
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/4383


    題名: 司法行政權的定位與組織研究
    其他題名: On Nature and Status of Judicial Administration from the Constitutional Perspective
    作者: 蘇永欽
    關鍵詞: 司法行政;審判獨立;司法責任;司法受益權;司法院;司法會議;法官;檢察官;案件負擔;一元化;多元化
    日期: 2004
    上傳時間: 2007-04-18 16:52:01 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 臺北市：國立政治大學法律學系
    摘要: 司法行政權的本質是行政權，但因為行政的對象是司法人員和司法決定，難 免涉及審判獨立的制度性保障，因此如何經由行政權的適當行使，使司法人員能 以最負責的態度來行使其審判權，而讓人民的訴訟權（司法受益權）得到最高的 滿足，國家的法律秩序也得到最大的維護，在此同時，卻又能給予審判獨立最大 的尊重，很重要的關鍵，即在司法行政權的正確定位，並在此基礎上建立合理的 組織。各國司法行政權的組織與功能強弱，有相當大的差異，反映了各該國司法 權的不同歷史條件，從而產生不同的挑戰，與回應挑戰的制度設計，往往也表現 於對效率與獨立優先次序的決定。歐陸國家近年有把司法行政權從一般行政權中 獨立出來的趨勢，和台灣自一九八零年起由司法院掌理全國司法行政，可謂不謀 而合。不同的是，各國檢察機關刑事訴訟程序中的角色功能雖與法院涇渭分明， 但歐陸國家在組織上幾乎都由同一機關掌理審判和檢察的行政，而非如我國分隸 兩個個機關。大法官第一七五號解釋又賦予司法院獨立提出法律案的職權，使其 實質上主導了司法決策與制度改革，也為各國少見。至於我國未來在「司法院審 判機關化」的政策下，走向由單一的終審法院兼理司法行政，更是十分獨特的設 計，且不論其對憲法審判和行政訴訟的影響如何，對於司法行政功能即將產生重 大的影響，究竟利弊如何，值得深入探究。由於司法行政作用的特殊，觸及幾項 憲法基本原則的敏感神經，到目前為止甚少受到國內行政法學者的關注，近年司 法組織的變革雖引起若干討論，但討論的面向也多限於審判權的分合，未從司法 行政的面向深入研究。司法院大法官在第五三○、五三九號解釋中，以對於司法 行政權做了憲法上的定位，深值注意，申請人即擬在此一基礎上，從各國制度發 展最新趨勢、我國司法制度的演進，更進一步的探討司法行政權的應有內涵與相 關組織、程序問題。
    The essence of judicial administration should be executive, instead of judicative. However, since the exertion of this power could easily encroach upon the realm of judicial power, which should be kept so much independent as possible according to the Constitution, it is therefore a rather crucial issue, how to administer properly the judiciary, especially how to organize this administrative power. Different models in response to this issue can be found in countries where rule of law is followed as a principle. Behind these models are quite different historical conditions, which again reflect state-society relations of each country. Depending on that, priority is given to either independence, efficiency, or accountability. Yet a tendency is more and more ostensible in European countries, that this power of judicial administration be drawn out of general executive power. This makes the very unique status of our Judicial Yuan look no more so unique. Still, judges and prosecutors in Taiwan are put under different systems of judicial administration, while their counterpart in Europe are not set apart. The Judicial Yuan also maintains the power to propose bills having to do with judicial affairs to the Parliament, independently or jointly –so long it is related to criminal lawwith the Executive Yuan, which is not imaginable in Europe. In future the Judicial Yuan would deviate further from this model, due to the Interpretation No.530, which requires this originally executive power to merge with the three last instance courts, to exert judicial power at the same time. This would again make the Judicial Yuan very unique. This project intends to explore, from historical perspective and comparative perspective as well, the content of judicial administrative power of the Judicial Yuan and tries to make suggestions as to its organization and procedure, so that it could more adaptively respond to the demands of the judiciary and the people.
    Judicial administration;judicial independence;judicial accountability;Judicial Yuan;judicial conference;judges;prosecutors;case load;monism;dualism
    描述: 核定金額：120000元
    資料類型: report
    顯示於類別:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    932414H004044.pdf552KbAdobe PDF22372檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋