Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/39218
|
| Title: | 在低結構化口試情境下應試者人格特質與口試結果之關係 --從五大人格、自我監控、自我效能談起 |
| Authors: | 陳淑慧 |
| Contributors: | 胡悅倫
陳淑慧 |
| Keywords: | 口試結構化
教師甄選
人格特質
口試結果
structured interview
teacher selection
personality
interview outcome |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-04-25 17:17:20 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究目的為檢驗在低結構化口試情境中，應試者的人格特質，如五大人格、自我監控、自我效能與口試結果之關係。
本研究採取問卷調查法進行，分成研究一與研究二，研究場域為北部某縣市高中職教師甄選，研究一的研究對象為該場教師甄選的口試委員，共27名，所採用的研究工具為「中等學校教師甄選口試現況調查問卷」；研究二的研究對象為參加教師甄選第二階段口試的應試者，共216名，有效問卷214份，研究工具為「性格自評量表」、「自我監控量表」、「一般自我效能量表」。
研究結果指出在本研究場域教師甄選口試屬低結構化狀態，應試者自評的五大人格、自我監控、自我效能分數與口試結果未達顯著相關。
研究建議在辦理教師甄選實務工作上，朝提高口試結構化方向努力；在未來研究上，應注意社會期許效應的控制、擴大樣本的特性及人格測量方法的檢證。
關鍵詞：口試結構化、教師甄選、人格特質、口試結果
The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between the interviewee’s interview outcome and his/her personalities presented in such measures as Big Five, Self-Monitoring, and Self-Efficacy. The interview in which the interviewees are involved is a low-structured situation.
The data of the research are collected from a senior/vocational high school teacher test in one of Taiwan northern counties. The research is divided into two sub-researches—Sub-research 1 and Sub-research 2, and different questionnaires are used to collect research data in the sub-researches. The subjects of Sub-research 1 are 27 committee interviewers, who are asked to do the “Questionnaire for investigating the applicants’ interview performance in the senior school teacher test.” The subjects of Sub-research 2 are 216 applicants, who are approved to interviews. The measures used in this sub-research include “The Scale of Big Five,” “Revised Self-Monitoring Scale,” and “General Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale.” Of all the applicants, 214 samples are collected.
The findings show that in the low-structured interview situation there is no significant relation between the interviewee’s interview outcome and his/her scores gained from the chosen measures.
For the future programs in selecting new teachers, a high-structured interview is suggested. For the future research on this topic, the effects of the social expectation, the characteristics of the subjects, and the personality measures should be paid attention to.
Key word：structured interview、teacher selection、personality、interview outcome |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分：
王偉華（1998）。人力資源面試遴選之研究—以資訊從業人員為例。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
考選部試題研究中心（2003）。國家考試口試參考手冊。臺北：考選部。
李友煌、胡靖宇、郭漢辰（民94年6月28日）。缺額僧多粥少教師甄試擠爆。民生報，CR2版。
李幸穗（2003）。應徵者面談過程所呈現的訊息對面談評價的影響—以企業員工的招募甄選為實驗情境。國防大學國防管理學院後勤管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
呂秋萍（2005）。國中教師甄選口試決策歷程之研究—以結構方程模式檢驗。國立政治大學教育學院學校行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
林育瑋（2001）。應徵者印象管理策略對甄選面談決策的影響。國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
林怡婷（民94年6月27日）。3年考 73次花50萬終當老師。聯合報，A6版。
林淑梨、王若蘭、黃慧真譯（1997）。人格心理學（原作者：E. J. Phares）。臺北：心理。
胡悅倫、陳世芬、呂秋萍（2005）。結構化教師甄試口試之相關系列研究（Ⅰ）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（報告編號：NSC93-2413-H-004-006），未出版。
洪光遠、鄭慧玲譯（1988）。人格心理學（原作者：L. A. Pervin）。臺北：桂冠。
許敏溶、胡世澤（民94年6月7日）。北市教師甄試15000人搶200個名額。自由時報，A9版。
莊耀嘉、李雯娣（2001）。兒童性格結構：五大模型的本土化檢驗。中華心理學刊，43，65-82。
黃美真（民94年7月22日）。紅包文化老師流浪？。星報，第22版。
張仁勇（1999）。甄選面談結構性對應徵者反應之影響：中介歷程之探討。國立台灣科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
張世昌（1992）。面談目的、訊息組型對面談結果及決策之影響。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
張春興（2002）。張氏心理學辭典。臺北：臺灣東華。
張適年（2004）。面談結構及面談者行為對求職者之影響：程序正義及人與組織契合知覺之中介角色。私立中原大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
楊宜音、張志學、彭泗清譯校（1997）。性格與社會心理測量總覽（上）（原作者：J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman主編）。臺北：遠流。
楊庭懿（2002）。應徵者印象管理策略對甄選面談決策之影響：以面談訓練為干擾變數。國立台灣科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
詹志禹（1993）。The internal structures and external implications of two self-monitoring scales。國立政治大學學報，66，203-216。
葉光輝譯（2005）。性格心理學：理論與研究（原作者：L. A. Pervin, D. Cervone, & O. P. John）。臺北：雙葉書廊。
陳胤樺（2003）。甄選面談問題類型之相關因素探討：一個探索性的研究。國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
陳馨蘭（1998）。教師人格特質、自我效能、學生行為信念與班級經營風格之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
韓青秀（民94年6月30日）。全教會：教師甄選有內定。聯合晚報，第4版。
鄧慧文（1996）。主管性別、應徵者性別與晉升潛能—對甄選決定的影響。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
二、英文部分：
Anderson, N., & Ones, D. S. (2003). The construct validity of three entry level personality inventories used in the UK: Cautionary findings from a multiple-inventory investigation. European Journal of Personality, 17, S39-S66.
Anderson, N., Silvester, J., Cunningham-Snell, N., & Haddleton, E. (1999). Relationships between candidate self-monitoring, perceived personality, and selection interview outcomes. Human Relations, 52, 1115-1131.
Arvey, R. D., & Campion, J. E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.
Arvey, R. D., Strickland, W., Drauden, G., & Martin, C. (1990). Motivational components of test taking. Personnel Psychology, 43, 695-716.
Azen, S. P., Snibbe, H. M., & Montgomery, H. R. (1973). A longitudinal predictive study of success and performance of law enforcement officers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 190-192.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
Baron, R. A. (1989). Impression management by applicants during employment interviews: The “too much of a good thing” effect. In R. W. Eder & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 204-215). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 111-118.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996). Effect of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 261-272.
Barrick, M. R., Parks, L., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Self-monitoring as a moderator of the relationships between personality traits and performance. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 745-767.
Barrick, M. R., Patton, G. K., & Haugland, S. N. (2000). Accuracy of interviewer judgements of job applicant personality traits. Personnel Psychology, 53(4), 925-951.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 43-51.
Binning, J. F., LeBreton, J. M., & Adorno, A. J. (1999). Assessing personality. In R. W. Eder & M. M. Harris (Eds.). The employment interview handbook (pp. 105-123). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Blackman, M. C. (2002). Personality judgment and the utility of the unstructured employment interview. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(3), 241-250.
Bobko, P., Roth, P. L., & Bobko, C. (2001).Correcting the effect size of d for range restriction and unreliability. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 46-61.
Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 147-158.
Caldwell, D. F., & Burger, J. M. (1998). Personality characteristics of job applicants and success in screening interviews. Personnel Psychology, 51, 119-136.
Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655-702.
Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 25-42.
Conway, J. M., & Peneno, G. M. (1999). Comparing structured interview question types: construct validity and applicant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(4), 485-506.
Cortina, J. M., Goldstein, N. B., Payne, S. C., Davison, H. K., & Gilliland, S. W. (2000). The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 325-351.
Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1988).From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 258-265.
Delli, D. A., & Vera, E. M. (2003). Psychological and contextual influence on the teacher selection interview: A model for future research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(2), 137-155.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Digman, J. M., & Inouye, J. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 116-123.
Dipboye, R. L. (1992). Selection interviews: Process perspectives. Cincinnati, OH: SouthWestern.
Dipboye, R. L., Stramler, C. S., & Fontenelle, G. A. (1984). The effects of the application on recall of information from the interview. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 561-575.
Eder, R. W., & Harris, M. M. (1999). The employment interview handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ferris, G.R., & Judge, T. A. (1991). Personnel/Human Resources Management: A Political Influence Perspective. Journal of Management, 17(2), 447-488.
Fletcher, C. (1990). The relationships between candidate personality, self-presentation strategies, and interviewer assessments in selection interviews: An empirical study. Human Relations, 43, 739-749.
Frayne, C. A., & Latham, G. P. (1987). Application of social learning theory to employee self-management of attendance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 387-392.
Furnham, A. F. (1997).Knowing and faking one’s five-factor personality score. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69（1）, 229-243.
Gatewood, R. D., & Feild, H. S. (1994). Human resource selection. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.
Gilmore, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (1989). The effects of applicant impression management tactics on interviewer judgments. Journal of Management, 15(4), 557-564.
Gilmore, D. C., Stevens, C. K., Harrell-Cook, G., & Ferris, G. R. (1999). Impression management tactics. In R. W. Eder & M. M. Harris (Eds.). The employment interview handbook (pp. 321-336). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gist, M. E. (1989). The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers. Personnel Psychology, 42, 787-804.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 884-891.
Harris, M. M. (1989). Reconsidering the employment interview: A review of recent literature and suggestions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 42, 691-726.
Harris, M. M. (1999). What is being measured？. In R. W. Eder & M. M. Harris (Eds.). The employment interview handbook (pp. 143-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions. American Psychologist, 51(5), 469-477.
Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100-112.
Hough, L. M. (1992). The “Big Five” personality variables—construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5(1/2), 139-155.
Hough, L. M. (1998). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11, 209-244.
Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 581-595.
Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W., Jr. (1994). Hunter and Hunter(1984) revisited: interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 184-190.
Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L. & Stone, N. J. (2001). Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 897-913.
Huffcutt, A. I., Roth, P. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 459-473.
Huffcutt, A. I., Weekley, J. A., Wiesner, W. H., DeGroot, T. G., & Jones, C. (2001).Comparison of situational and behavior description interview questions for higher-level positions. Personnel Psychology, 54(3), 619-644.
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72-98.
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869-879.
Jackson, D. N., Peacock, A. C., & Holden, R. R. (1982). Professional Interviewers’trait inferential structures for diverse occupational groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 29, 1-20.
Jackson, D. N., Peacock, A. C., & Smith, J. P. (1980). Impressions of personality in the employment interview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 294-307.
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits--self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92.
Keenan, A. (1978). Selection interview performance and intolerance of ambiguity. Psychological reports, 42, 353-354.
Landy, F. J. (1976). The validity of the interview in police officer selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(2), 193-198.
Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(4), 422-427.
Lennox, R. D., & Wolfe, R. N. (1984). Revision of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1349-1364.
Liden, R. C., Martin, C. L., & Parsons, C. K. (1993). Interviewer and applicant behaviors in employment interviews. Academy of Management Journal , 36(2), 372-386.
Linn, R. L., Harnisch, D. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1981). Corrections for range restriction: An empirical investigation of conditions resulting in conservative corrections. Journal of Applied Psychology , 66(6), 655-663.
Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 241-251.
Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.). Self-efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application. (pp. 3-33). New York: Plenum Press.
Mager, R. F. (1992). No self-efficacy, no performance. Training, 29(4), 32-35.
Maurer, S. D., Sue-Chan, C., & Latham, G. P. (1999). The situational interview. In R. W. Eder & M. M. Harris (Eds.). The employment interview handbook (pp. 159-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 586-595.
McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 599-616.
Moscoso, S. (2000). Selection Interview: A review of validity evidence, adverse impact and applicant reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 237-247.
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-Factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11(2/3), 145-165.
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 272-280.
Murray, H. G., Rushton, P., & Paunonen, S. V. (1990). Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 250-261.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574-583.
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). The effects of social desirability and faking on personality and integrity assessment for personnel selection. Human Performance, 11(2/3), 245-269.
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 660-679.
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
Osborn, S. M., Feild, H. S., & Veres, J. G. (1998). Introversion-extraversion, self-monitoring, and applicant performance in a situational panel interview: A field study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(2), 143-156.
Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., & Oberman, S. M. (1987). Personnel selection decisions: Effects of applicant personality and the letter of reference. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 96-114.
Posthuma, R. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2002). Beyond employment interview validity: A comprehensive narrative review of recent research and trends over time. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 1-81.
Rafaei, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1987). Expression of emotion as part of the work role. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 23-37.
Rosse, J. G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J.L., & Levin, R.A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634-644.
Sadri, G., & Robertson, I. T. (1993). Self-efficacy and work-related behavior: A review and meta-analysis. Applied Psychology : An International Review, 42(2), 139-152.
Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 30-43.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.
Schmidt, F. L., & Rader, M. (1999).Exploring the boundary conditions for interview validity: Meta-analytic validity findings for a new interview type. Personnel Psychology, 52, 445-464.
Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The big five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 966-974.
Schmitt, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interview decision: Implications for employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 29, 79-101.
Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Metaanalyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407-422.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs(pp.35-37). Windsor, UK:NFER-NELSON.
Shechtman, Z., & Sansbury, D. (1989). Validation of a group assessment procedure for the selection of teacher-education candidates. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(3), 653-661.
Smither, J. W., Reilly, R. R., Millsap, R. E., Pearlman, K., & Stoffey, R. W. (1993). Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49-76.
Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 85-128). New York: Academic Press.
Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, Matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125-139.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261.
Stevens, C. K., & Kristof, A. L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(5), 587-606.
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44(4), 703-742.
Ulrich, L., & Trumbo, D. (1965). The selection interview since 1949. Psychology Bulletin, 63(2), 100-116.
Van Iddekinge, C. H., Raymark, P. H., & Roth, P. L. (2005). Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 536-552.
Watson, D. (1989). Strangers’ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of a surprising convergence with self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 120-128.
Wiesner, W. H., & Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 275-290.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
Wright, P. M., Lichtenfels, P. A., & Pursell, E. D. (1989). The structured interview: Additional studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 191-199. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
929110191
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929110191 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
