政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/39168

政大典藏 > College of Education > Master of Education in School Administration > Theses > Item 140.119/39168

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/39168

Title:	高級中學學校自我評鑑指標建構之研究
Authors:	劉鈞銓
Contributors:	吳政達劉鈞銓
Keywords:	學校自我評鑑概念構圖法學校評鑑指標
Date:	2007
Issue Date:	2010-04-25 16:15:38 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	「學校自我評鑑」係指學校自發性針對學校行政、教學(育)、設備、師資等全方位之評估與檢視，藉以全面瞭解辦學成效，俾利改進缺失、克服困難，發揮學校經營優勢，導引校務發展。本研究的主要重點可以分成下列三點來說明：（一）透過文獻分析的方式探討高級中學自我評鑑的方法及模式，並透過此模式研訂學校自我評鑑指標及評鑑指標規準。（二）研究方法係利用概念構圖原理(concept mapping)，研擬學校校務自我評鑑指標。（三）建立校務自我評鑑檢核表、指標權重的統計方式及整體自我評鑑評結果分數的呈現。透過此方式，學校評鑑參與人員，根據學校組織情境與需求所診斷的結果為本位，在自發、自主的內在動機下，發揮自身的潛能，確其優勢，以解決問題與缺失，促進改善，並在所面臨的外在環境可能擁有的機會下，發揮學校最大效能，以發展其特色的一種學校評鑑的歷程。關鍵字：學校自我評鑑概念構圖法學校評鑑指標 The school self-evaluation refers to the omni-directional evaluation and inspection coming from the school spontaneity in view of school administration, teaching, equipment and teachers. By means of the appraisal, we may comprehensively realize the school effect in order to improve flaw, overcome difficulties, display the superiority of the school management and guide the school development. The primary intention of the research is redacting the index of school self-evaluation. The research technique uses the Concept Mapping to draw up the self-evaluation index of the school and transfer the index as the questionnaire survey tool about school self- evaluation meter. It could be the important reference for school self-evaluating and school improvement in senior high school. Through the way, the participates in self-evaluation, according to the diagnostic result from the school organization situation and the demand, do themselves justice in potential under spontaneous and independent intrinsic motives, determine its superiority and solve problems and flaws to promote improvement. Besides, bring as much potency as school can into play and develop school characteristic as a kind of school evaluation under the possible opportunity in the external environment. Keywords：School self-evaluation Concept Mapping Indicator of School self-evaluation
Reference:	中文部分丁文玲（2003）。學校自我評鑑之探討。研習資訊，20(3)，67-75。王保進（2002）。國民中小學校務評鑑現況與重要議題之省思。現代教育論壇，8，279-291。吳政達（2004）。教育政策分析：概念、方法與應用。臺北：高等教育。吳政達、郭昭佑（1997）。概念構圖法在國民小學教科書評鑑標準建構之應用。教育與心理研究，20(2)，217-242。吳清山、林天祐（2002）。校務評鑑。教育資料與研究，44，132-133。吳清山、林天祐（2003）。教育小辭書。臺北：五南。卓意屏（2006）。臺北市國民小學校務自我評鑑之研究。臺北市立教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，末出版，臺北。林天佑（2002）。校務評鑑的理念與作法。教師天地，117，15-20。徐鳳禎（2002）。大學校院主管推動學校自我評鑑態度之探討一以高屏地區大學校院為例。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所在職專班碩士論文，末出版，高雄。秦夢群（1997）。教育行政-實務部分。臺北：五南。秦夢群（2000）。教育行政-理論部分。臺北：五南。教育部中部辦公室（2007）。高級中學評鑑。上網日期：2007年10月13日。網址：http://qoi.tnfsh.tn.edu.tw/default.asp。梁暖茱（2002）。學校自我評鑑觀念的釐析。商業職業教育季刊，87，15-20。郭昭佑（1999b）。學校層級評鑑的新趨勢-學校本位的觀點。研習資訊，16(5)，69-79。郭昭佑（2000）。概念構圖法在評鑑指標建構上之應用--以國民中學校務評鑑指標建構為例。教育政策論壇，3(2)，173-203。郭昭佑（2000）。學校本位評鑑。臺北：五南。郭昭佑（2006）。當評鑑遇上教育-教育評鑑意涵探討。教育行政與評鑑學刊，2，19-42。陳海雄（2006）。學校自我評鑑之研究～以一所高職為例。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文，末出版，嘉義。陳漢強（1992）。學校評鑑。台灣教育，504，1-4。陳劍賢（2002）。國民中小學校務評鑑之研究－以台東縣為例。台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文，末出版，臺東。凱爾士(H.R.Kells)（2002）。大學自我評鑑（Self-Study Processes: A Guide for Postsecondary and Similar Service-Oriented Institutions and Programs,4th）（王保進譯）。臺北：正中。（原著出版年：1995年）彭玉宜（2005）。桃園縣國民小學校務自我評鑑之研究。新竹師範學院學校行政碩士班論文，未出版，臺北。曾淑惠（2006）。高職教職員對學校自我評鑑能力建立之知覺。教育行政與評鑑學刊，2，1-18。游家政（2000）。學校本位課程發展的評鑑。中華民國教材研究發展學會，邁向課程新紀元(二)，頁229-241。游進年（2003）。中小學教育評鑑之評析。教育研究月刊，112，47-61。湯志民（2002）。臺北市國民中學校務評鑑之評析。初等教育學刊，11，25-50。湯志民（2005）。學校評鑑理論與實務：北桃三縣市國民中學校務評鑑之探析。載於潘慧玲主編，敎育評鑑的回顧與展望，251-299。臺北︰心理出版社。黃秀芳（2002）。技專校院評鑑實施現況之研究。國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文，末出版，臺北。廖玉珠（2004）。建構我國中小學教師評鑑規準之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。潘慧玲（2003）。從學校評鑑談到學校本位課程評鑑。北縣教育，46，32-36。盧增緒（1995）。論教育評鑑觀念之形成。載於中國教育學會主編，教育評鑑，3-59。臺北：師大書苑。謝文全（1996）。教育行政-理論與實務。臺北：文景。譚以敬（2004）。學校自我評鑑可行途徑。中等教育，55（2），16-27。蘇秀花（2003）。臺北市國民小學校務評鑑實施成效及整合之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。英文部分 American Council on Education, Washington, DC. (1969). Evaluative criteria for the evaluation of secondary schools (4th ed.). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED034312) Chelimsky, E. (1997). The coming transformations in evaluation. In E. Chelimsky　&　W. R. Shadish (Eds.). Evaluation for the 21st century(pp 1-26). CA: SAGE. Cheng, Y. C. (1997). A framework of indicators of education quality in Hong Kong primary schools: Development and application. Paper Presented at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Education Forum on School-based Indicators of Effectiveness. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED407729). Cress, C. (1996). Assessment and testing: Measuring up to expectations. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED391559) Education and Manpower Bureau, Secretariat, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2003). Enhancing School Development and Accountability through School Self-evaluation and External School Review. Retrieved July 7 2003, from http://www.emb.gov.hk/EDNWHP/resource/sch-eval-rew/English/home.htm. Gay, L. R. (1985). Educational evaluation and measurement; Competencies for analysis and application (2nd ed.). Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co. Kells, H. R. (1988). Self-Study Process; A Guide for Postsecondary and Similar Service-Oriented Institutions and Programs（3rd ed.）. New York: The American Council on Education and Macmillan Publishing Company. Marcus, L. R. & Others. (1984). Self-study in higher education : The path to excellence. ERIC Digest84-1. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED284510) Mathison, S.（1996）. Evaluation as a democratizing force in schools. International Journal of Social Education, 11(1), 40-47, Spr-Sum. Nevo, D. (1995). School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement. Tarrytown, New York: Elsevier Science Inc. Nevo, D.（1994）. Combining internal and external evaluation: A case for school-based evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, 87-98. Nuttall, D. L. (1990). The functions and limitations of international education indicators. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American educational research Association, Boston. Peter, R. (2001). Self-evaluation for school improvement. (www document). http://www.isasa.org/resourcws/self-valuation. Reynolds, H. W. & Others. (1967). Evaluative criteria for vocational technical programs. P.A: Pennsylvania State Dept. of Public Instruction. Harrisburg. Bureau of Curriculum Planning and School Evaluation,（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED022861） Rogers, G. & Badham, L. (1992). Evaluation in school: Getting started on training and implementation. New York: Ghapman and Hall. Inc. Rudd & Davies. (2000). Evaluating School Self-Evaluation. Retrieved July 7 2003, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/document/00001641,htm The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Valentine, J. (1992). Principals and practices for effective teacher evaluation. USA: Practice Hall. Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidance. White Plains, New York: Long man.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班 93911018 96
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093911018
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Master of Education in School Administration] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
91101801.pdf	45Kb	Adobe PDF2	715	View/Open
91101802.pdf	128Kb	Adobe PDF2	1132	View/Open
91101803.pdf	140Kb	Adobe PDF2	1406	View/Open
91101804.pdf	375Kb	Adobe PDF2	1756	View/Open
91101805.pdf	211Kb	Adobe PDF2	1595	View/Open
91101806.pdf	793Kb	Adobe PDF2	1110	View/Open
91101807.pdf	133Kb	Adobe PDF2	964	View/Open
91101808.pdf	123Kb	Adobe PDF2	1640	View/Open
91101809.pdf	174Kb	Adobe PDF2	1105	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...