政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/39160

政大典藏 > College of Education > Master of Education in School Administration > Theses > Item 140.119/39160

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/39160

Title:	國中英語教學創意團隊之個案研究 the Case Study on the Creative Team of English Teaching
Authors:	王淑芬
Contributors:	鄭同僚王淑芬
Keywords:	創意教學創意團隊創意團隊發展創意團隊發展因素 Creative Teaching the Characteristics of the Creativity Team the Development of the Creative Team the Factors of Creative Team Development
Date:	2007
Issue Date:	2010-04-25 16:01:22 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究乃以台北市一所國中的英語團隊為研究對象，藉由訪談與觀察，就團隊的英語創意教學、英語創意團隊的特質、英語創意團隊的發展歷程及影響英語創意團隊發展內外相關因素四個面向進行分析，並得到以下的結論：一、英語創意教學（一）營造優質英語學習環境，從校園中雙語環境的建構開始，讓學生能自然而然學習英文。（二）每日一句與闖關活動，透過提供學生每天一個英文句子的構想，逐漸累積學生的英語學習基礎。（三）推展英語閱讀風氣，由老師規劃選定英文書籍，提供學生進行選讀。（四）建置線上測驗題庫，擴展學生更寬廣的學習空間。（五）舉辦各項英語競賽，提供學生一個表現與揮灑的舞台。（六）有效的英語教學策略，堅持符合學生個別差異，發展適合的教學方式。（七）彙編英語學習護照，將學校推展的各項英語課程設計與活動進行統整。二、英語創意團隊的特質（一）團隊成員間充分合作精神，無論在創意活動的討論、或工作分配都是完全配合。（二）對於工作的認真投入與付出，已是成員間的一種共識。（三）沉重工作量所造成的負擔，並未使成員們卻步，反而讓老師們基於對教育專業的堅持，更加努力與投入。三、英語創意團隊的發展歷程（一）團隊成員的生態重組，正好資深教師退休，英語團隊成員彼此年齡接近且想法接近。（二）由於對新的九年一貫教育政策不了解，英語團隊成員轉而依賴領域會議的討論與彼此的支持。（三）召集人兼具規劃與帶領的角色，引導著團隊創意教學的研發。（四）領域工作量劇增所帶來的疲備感，團隊成員會私下抱怨並相互打氣，只是這樣的聲音卻不曾影響到團隊的運作。（五）隨著團隊人員數量的變動，例如缺乏實習教師的編制，召集人亦針對英語領域的創意活動進行調整，以適度減輕成員的工作負荷。四、影響英語創意團隊發展內外相關因素（一）教師專業進修的充實，奠定英語團隊的基礎資訊能力，。（二）行政全力的配合與協助，以及公開場合對英語團隊公開讚賞與支持，給予團隊成員莫大的鼓勵。（三）學生在學習態度上積極認真，且整體聽說讀寫能力亦大有進步。（四）校內其他領域教師未對英語領域給與過多的關注與壓力，讓英語團隊有著更寬闊的空間。（五）領域召集人對教育的堅持及領導風格，是帶動團隊發展的一個關鍵。（六）教育政策上的頒布，提供老師一個進修及合作的機會點。（七）隨著創意教學的落實，學生在英語表現漸有成果與進步時，家長的支持力量也展現出來。根據研究發現與結論，本研究從以下三方面提出建議：一、學校行政人員：學校領導者應統整學校本位課程課程，行政處室主動提供協助並促進各領域交流及對話。二、學校領域團隊：應慎於團隊領導人的選定，且其角色功能應重於領導與協調；而團隊其他成員，則可從其教育熱忱的強化著手。三、後續研究：對於未來相關研究的建議，首先在研究向度可加入學校教師文化的探討，另可將創意團隊與創意個人的表現作一比較。 The research focuses on a junior high school in Taipei. Analyzing the presentation of English creative teaching, the characters of the creative team, the development of the creative team and the factors that affects the development of the team. And the researcher gets the conclusions as the following, A.The presentation of English creative teaching includes providing a good environment of English learning with bilingual signs and posters, inventing activities like “one English sentence every day” to let students accumulate their English sentences, promoting the students’ ability of English extracurricular readers, redacting the English tests on line to afford the students wide space of learning, holding various kinds of English contests, making the effective strategies of English learning according to the difference between students, and compiling an “ English Passport” to integrate all of the curriculum and activities. B.The characteristics of the English creative team consist of complete cooperation, earnest work and the insistence of educational profession. C.the Development of the Creative Team At first, some English teachers retired, and the members left in the team are similar in ages and thought. Second, the teachers got the need of forming a team because of the new educational policy, like “the Nine-Year Integrated Curriculum.” The leader of the team plays the role of the guidance and coordination. The members keep the enthusiasm and they encourage one another even feeling tired. At last, the team comes to modification based on the comprehensive opinions. D. The factors of creative team development are divided into the ones of the inner and outer school. The inner factors are the support and assistance of the administration, the students’ progress, the attitude of the other teachers in the school, the leadership of the team chief and the teamwork of the whole members. Besides, the outer factors are the educational policy and the alimentation of students’ parents. According to the exploration and conclusion, the researcher addresses the advice, A.A principal should be the leader of the curriculum in order that he can conduct the teachers to develop the school-based curriculum. And the administrative staffs have to give the most assistance to all the teachers. B.The leader of the team is a very important role, especially his leadership style. And about the members, we need to cultivate their enthusiasm. C.They can be added into the further research like the exploration of teachers’ culture and the discrepancy of creativity between individuals and teams.
Reference:	一、中文部分子玉（譯）（2004）。傑夫‧默吉(Jeff Mauzy), 理察‧哈里曼(Richard Harriman)原著。創意無限公司。台北：藍鯨出版。史美奐（2004）。教師創新教學的類型與可能。課程與教學季刊，1，4。吳志衍（2005）。創意教學相關研究之初探。國立雲林科技大學設計研究，5，73-83。吳芝儀、李奉儒（譯）（1995）。派頓‧麥可坤（Patton, Michael Quinn）原著。質的評鑑與研究。台北：桂冠。吳清山（2002）。創意教學的重要理念與實施策略。台灣教育，614， 2-8。吳清山（2003）。知識經濟與教育發展。台北市：師大書苑。吳靖國（2003）。創新教學如何可能—從「創造」意涵的哲學思維談起。載於國立海洋大學教育研究所主編，創新教學理論與實務，49-80。台北：師大書苑。李麗香（2004）國小教師創意教學與學生自我概念、學習動機、學習策略及學習成效之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。林偉文（2002）。國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能予創意教學之關係。國立政治大學教育系博士論文，未出版，台北市。林雅玲（2003）。國中小創意教師教學策略與成效之研究。台師大工業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。洪懿妍（2001）。世界向美走。天下雜誌2001年教育特刊，24-30。洪毓孜（2003）。個人玩興與團隊玩興氣氛對團隊創造力績效之影響。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。涂嘉峪（2003）。團隊情感對團隊歷程的影響。國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮市。高希均(2000)。知識經濟之路。台北：天下遠見。陳淳麗（1999）。國小英語師資訓練手冊。台北：師德。陳詩雯（ 2005）。國立清華大學外國語文學系「幸福快樂的日子」---創意童話與英語學習。台北：教育部顧問室數位化創意智庫計畫。陳龍安（1988）。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北：心理。陳龍安（2000）。創意教學工作坊講稿，香港教育學院母語教學教師支援中心。曾望超（2003）。國小教師創意教學與學生後設認知能力、創造力、與問題解決能力之相關研究。高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。張玉成（1988）。開發腦中金礦的教學策略。台北：心理。張菁萍（2004）。創新團隊特質與多元績效衡量系統之探討。東海大學會計學系碩士論文，未出版，台中市。張湘君（2003）。鵝媽媽英文童謠故事創意工作室。國立台北師範學院兒童英語教育研究所暨學系, 台北：教育部顧問室創造力教育中程發展計畫。教育部（2002）。創造力教育白皮書。台北：教育部。教育部（2004）。教育部教學卓越獎評選及獎勵要點。台北：教育部。黃琬琪（2002）。淺談創意教學。台灣教育，614，51-53。黃湘媛（2001）。談創意教學與創意教師。國教天地，90.04 ，39。黃維（譯）（2003）。愛丁納‧溫格（Etienne Wenger）、理察‧麥代謀（Richard mcDermott）、威廉‧施耐德（William M. Snyder）原著。實踐社群：推動學習型組織之輪。台北：天下。鄭宇樑（2002）。營造富創造思考的教育環境。師友，426，82-85。廖曉青（2004）。英語教學法。台北：五南。蔡美玲（2005）。實踐社群在國民中學應用之行動研究-以品德教育推動為例。中正大學成人及繼續教育所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。駱藝瑄（2005）。國立澎湖科技大學應用外語學系在地化的英語科創意教學行動研究---以澎湖地區為例。台北：教育部顧問室創造力教育中程發展計畫。羅綸新（2003）。創造力與創意教學活動之探討與實務。載於國立海洋大學教育研究所主編，創新教學理論與實務，P3—27。台北：師大書苑。毛連溫、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。台北：心理。魏惠娟，吳明烈（2003）。綜合活動輔導團創意團隊與創新教學之研究。台北：教育部顧問室創造力教育中程發展計畫。二、西文部份 Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. NY:Springer-Verlag. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Oxford: Westview Press. Amabile, T. M. (2001). Beyond Talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist, 56, 333-336. Bowen, J.,Madsen,H & Hilferty,A.（1985）.TESOL Techniques and Procedures. Cambridge, Mass.:Newbury House Publishers. Callahan, C. M.（1978）.Developing Creativity in the Gifted and Talented. Virginia: The Council for Exceptional Children. Celece-Murica, M .（2001）.Language teaching approaches：An overview. In Celece-Murica, M（ed）.Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language.（3rd edition）.Boston:Heinle&Heinle. Csiksentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. NY: Harper Collins. Curran, C.（1972）.Counseling- Learning: A whole- Personal Model for Education. New York: Grune & Stratton. Davis, P., J.Roberts & R. Rossner.（1975）.Situational Lesson Plans: Ahandbook for Teachers of English. London:Macmillan. Eileen, P. K. (2000). When sparks fly: Igniting creativity in groups. The Academy of Management Executive. 14(1), 157-159. Fryer, M.（1996）Creative Teaching and Learning. London :Chapman. Gallagher, J.J.（1975）Teaching the gifted child（2nd ed.）.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Gardner, H.（1983）.Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence.（10th Anniversary edition,1999）New York: Basic Books. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. NY: Basic Books. Goodman,K.（1986）.What’s Whole in Whole Language? Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann. Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin,52, 267-293. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530-557. Larsen-Freeman, D.（1986）.Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, Oxford American English. Larsen-Freeman, D（2000）. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, （2nd edition）.Oxford ：Oxford University Press Lewis, J. P. (1993). How to build and manage a winning project team. NY:American Management Association. Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. NY: Scribners Quick, T. L. (1992). Successful team building. New York: American Management Association Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310. Richards, J. &Rodgers, T.（1986）, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: A Description and Analysis. Cambridge University Press. Simberg,A. L.（1964）.Creativity at work; the practical application of a complete program. Boston：Industrial Education Institute. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity（5）, 116-133.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Smith, R. D. A. & Ainsworth, R. B.（1989）. Hummocky cross-stratification in the Downton of the Welsh Borderland. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 146: 897-900. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. NY: Simon & Schuster. Treffinger, D.J.,& Isaksen, S.G.（1992）. Creative problem solving: An introduction. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Thinking. Treffinger, D.J.,& Isaksen, S.G.（2001）. Teachig for creative learning and problem solving. In A.L. Costa（Ed.）, Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking（3rd ed.）（pp.442-445）.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Torrance, E.P.（1988）.The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R.J. Sternberg （Ed）,The Nature of Creativity（pp.43-75）. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tuckman, B.,& Jensen, M.（1977）. Stages of small group development. Group and organizational studies, 2, 419-427. Vista,C. (2000). Teaching classroom educators how to be more effective and creative teacher. Education, 120(4), 675-680. Woodman, R.W., Sawyeer, J.E.&Griffin, R.W.（1993）, Toward A Theory Of Organizational Creativity, Academy Of Management Review, 18（4）, 293-321.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班 93911005 96
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093911005
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Master of Education in School Administration] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
91100501.pdf	117Kb	Adobe PDF2	753	View/Open
91100502.pdf	129Kb	Adobe PDF2	841	View/Open
91100503.pdf	177Kb	Adobe PDF2	865	View/Open
91100504.pdf	67Kb	Adobe PDF2	777	View/Open
91100505.pdf	125Kb	Adobe PDF2	839	View/Open
91100506.pdf	210Kb	Adobe PDF2	1187	View/Open
91100507.pdf	303Kb	Adobe PDF2	3092	View/Open
91100508.pdf	227Kb	Adobe PDF2	2029	View/Open
91100509.pdf	530Kb	Adobe PDF2	1696	View/Open
91100510.pdf	229Kb	Adobe PDF2	946	View/Open
91100511.pdf	181Kb	Adobe PDF2	1472	View/Open
91100512.pdf	185Kb	Adobe PDF2	884	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...