政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/38835
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50940334      線上人數 : 970
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38835


    題名: 不動產價格之估值認知與調整－估價行為、大量估價與估值機率之研究
    作者: 江穎慧
    Chiang,Ying Hui
    貢獻者: 張金鶚
    Chang,Chin Oh
    江穎慧
    Chiang,Ying Hui
    關鍵詞: 不動產估價
    估價行為
    大量估價
    分量迴歸
    估值機率
    real estate appraisal
    behavior appraisal
    mass appraisal
    quantile regression
    probability valuation
    日期: 2008
    上傳時間: 2010-04-09 18:29:24 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 長期以來，不動產估價相關研究皆著重在估價理論與技術的改進，以使最後估值能更為精確。然而實際上，估價人員的行為才是影響價格評定的本質因素；尤其國內、外對於市場比較法的相關研究，皆發現估價人員有偏離理論規範的現象。故本文第一部份是分析估價人員系統行為偏誤問題；第二部分探討特徵價格模型的偏誤，並應用分量迴歸改進不同高低價格的估價模型準確度；第三部分比較估價師個別估價與大量估價模型之偏誤與差異；為提升客觀估價方法，第四部分探討以估價師估值樣本產生最可能價格與機率的方式。本研究藉由估價師估價行為與大量估價模型不同面向的研究，重新檢視市場比較法的各種偏誤現象。

    一、市場比較法估價之系統行為偏誤
    市場比較法是估價人員最常使用的方法，但在估價過程中主觀判斷部分相對較多也最易引起爭議。過去市場比較法研究著重在估價理論與技術改進，以減少主觀判斷造成的隨機偏誤，然而，研究指出行為偏誤造成的系統偏誤，其持續性的偏誤對於估價偏誤有重要影響。過去探討估價行為的研究，受限於資料樣本取得，幾乎都是以問卷或實驗得到結果，而非實證結果。本文則是以實際估價報告書進行實證分析，以鄒檢定(Chow Test)及似無相關檢定(Seemingly Unrelated Regression)，發現勘估標的估值與比較標的市場成交值兩模型係數有顯著差異，表示估價人員估值模型起始點高於市場成交值模型，估價人員對於使用類型有高估現象，對於面積估計有低估現象，支持估價人員有系統行為偏誤。此外，也發現評估不同市場時，行為偏誤程度亦不同，估價人員於評估拍賣價格時，因估價經驗與比較案例較少，較傾向參考比較案例，行為偏誤亦較小，僅面積係數有差異；但於評估正常市場價格時，估價行為偏誤較大，區位、使用類型及面積係數皆有差異。

    二、不同高低價格不動產估價模型之偏誤改進－分量迴歸模型之應用
    隨著國內不動產市場M型化推案趨勢，非典型住宅（如：高總價豪宅和低總價小套房）類型逐漸增多，對於此類型產品的估價精準度也需要提升。從過去研究發現，最小平方迴歸估計忽略各特徵屬性對價格條件分配的差異。本研究乃以分量迴歸方法建立住宅大量估價模型，藉以瞭解住宅特徵對於不同價格分量的差異，實證結果發現以最小平方迴歸模型估計相較於分量迴歸，對於一樓、頂樓、車位、區位等變數有高估或低估的情形。比較估值模型預測精確度，本文透過30次重複實驗，發現分量迴歸對於兩側尾端樣本有較佳的預測能力。從實證方法而言，本文改進以最小平方迴歸模型對兩尾端價格高估或低估問題；就實務應用方面，隨著不動產產品差異度增加，以及新版巴塞爾協定（Basel Ⅱ）實施對不動產價值更新的需求，分量迴歸模型可提升兩尾端估計精確度，並提供住宅大量估價系統另一種資產重估方法。

    三、大量估價與個別估價之差異分析
    不動產估價研究可分為個別估價與大量估價兩類，過去有關個別估價研究多為估價行為或估價方法改進，而大量估價研究則多是運用數量方法建立模型，由於兩者建構方式不同，欲同時進行兩者實證比較並不容易。本文藉由相同勘估標的，取得估價師個別估價資料，與資料庫建立的自動估價系統，進行案例選取、權重調整及最後估值三階段的比較分析。經本文差異比較發現，前二個階段的比較結果，皆是自動估價系統優於個別估價，從估價行為觀點，顯示自動估價系統具有較客觀且符合估價理論程序優點。然而第三階段的估值比較，發現自動估價系統的表現並不如預期，此結果與過去研究結論不同，分析兩者差異值大的案例，發現資料庫樣本較少地區以及非典型住宅類型（面積過大或過小），是造成個別估價估值與自動估價系統估值差異大的原因，顯示自動估價系統有其適用限制，未來若增加資料庫樣本或次市場模型，兩者估值差異將可獲得改善。

    四、不動產估值認知與估值機率
    本章以估價師估值資料為樣本，藉由蒙地卡羅模擬估值機率模型，其模擬結果可客觀估計最可能價格（the most probable price）與機率。由於資料樣本來自於專業估價師的判斷，估值分配代表的是估價師所估計的可能估值結果；相較於過去僅以單一估值決定資產價值，藉由多位專業估價師所判斷結果而建立的估值區間與最可能價格及機率，應該是更具客觀性且接近市場價值，而且估值機率的呈現將有助於估價報告書使用者評估存在於資產價值的上方（upside risk）及下方風險（downside risk）。
    In the real estate appraisal research, appraisers and mass appraisal are the two methods most often used in the sales comparison approach. Past studies focused on appraisers behavior and mass appraisal model, lack of compared the difference by appraisers for the same objects as well as mass.

    The first essay reviews the behavior literature regarding real estate appraisers and summarizes the two hypotheses for departure from normative models. The study is based on appraisers’ reports analyzes for the appraisal valuation and the market transaction by hedonic price models. Among the 112 appraisal reports of the transaction data of 230 comparables and the valuations of 224 subjects, the results reveal the effect of the variables on the appraisal valuation are not consistent with those of the market transaction. In addition, comparing the appraisers’ behavior on the general market with the auction market, the result found is the differences between the valuation models and the transaction models are less than the models on the auction market. The empirical evidences support the two hypotheses and can be explained plausibly by the appraisers’ behavioral contention.

    The second essay analize the current domestic trend of residential types, it is easy to find that high-priced dwelling units and low-priced dwelling units keep gaining popularity. Thus, the estimation of these two types of residences should be more precise. Since ordinary least square regression can not signify the variation caused by different quantile functions of a conditional distribution, this study estimates the housing price by quantile regression. We compare the models by using ordinary least square regression and quantile regression. The empirical results show that the distributions of some variables, such as first floor, top floor, parking lot, location, are different between two models. These are easily to be underestimated or overestimated when ordinary least square regression is applied. Based on thirty repeated experiments using random sampling, the results of hit rate and mean absolute percentage error show that quantile regression estimates more accurately on two-tailed distribution. For mass appraisal application, a quantile regression advances the estimate on two-tailed price and provides a new method on assets reevaluation of banks.
    參考文獻: 江穎慧，2009，「不動產自動估價與估價師個別估價之比較-以比較法之案例選取、權重調整與估值三階段差異分析」，『住宅學報』，（已接受）。
    李月華，1999，「台北市住宅價格模型之研究」，淡江大學管理科學學系博士論文：台北。
    李易璇、陳奉瑤，2005，「不動產估價科學嗎？心中有價行為與偏誤之研究」，〈2005第三屆土地研究學術研討會〉，逢甲大學土地管理學系。
    李建興，2008，「台灣IPO折價因素的探討--分量迴歸分析法」，『證券市場發展季刊』，20(1)：47-100。
    汪駿旭、陳奉瑤，2005，「客戶對不動產估價人員影響之研究」，〈2005第三屆土地研究學術研討會〉，逢甲大學土地管理學系。
    林秋瑾，1996，「穩健性住宅租金模式之探討---異常點之分析」，『住宅學報』，4：51-72。
    林秋瑾、楊宗憲、張金鶚，1996，「住宅價格指數之研究－以台北市為例」，『住宅學報』，4：1-30。
    林英彥，2003，「假設條件下之土地估價」，『土地問題研究季刊』，2(1)：77-78。
    林英彥，2003，『不動產估價理論』第九版，台北：文笙書局。
    林祖嘉、馬毓駿，2007，「特徵方程式大量估價法在台灣不動產市場之應用」，『住宅學報』，16(2)：1-22。
    林祖嘉，1992，「台灣地區房租與房價關係之研究」，『台灣銀行季刊』，43(1):279-312。
    林素菁，2004，「台北市國中小明星學區邊際願意支付之估計」，『住宅學報』，13(1)：15-34。
    洪鴻智、張能政，2006，「不動產估價人員之價值探索過程：估價程序與參考點的選擇」，『建築與規劃學報』，7(1)：71-90。
    張小燕、林子欽，2005，「從行為觀點檢視不動產估價中的市場比較法」，〈2005第三屆土地研究學術研討會〉，逢甲大學土地管理學系。
    張金鶚、王健安、陳憶茹，2008，「The Puzzle of the Discount Price for the Foreclosed House: Does the Factor of Competition Explain」，『交大管理學報』，28(2)。
    張金鶚、劉秀玲，1993，「房地產品質、價格與消費者物價指數之探討」，『國立政治大學學報』，67：369-400。
    張怡文、江穎慧、張金鶚，2009，「分量迴歸在大量估價模型之應用-非典型住宅估價之改進」，『都市與計劃』，（已接受）。
    梁仁旭、陳奉瑤，2006，「不動產估“價”？～價值、價格或市場價值」，『土地問題研究季刊』，5(3)：90-99。
    莊家彰、管中閔，2005，「台灣與美國股市價量關係的分量迴歸分析」，『經濟論文』，33(4)：379-404。
    陳奉瑤、楊依蓁，2007，「個別估價與大量估價之準確性分析」，『住宅學報』，16(2)：67-84。
    陳建良，2007，「1980年至2000年台灣擁屋家戶儲蓄行為之變遷：分量迴歸分析的新發現」，『住宅學報』，16(1)：57-78。
    陳建良、管中閔，2006，「台灣工資函數與工資性別歧視的分量迴歸分析」，『經濟論文』，34(4)：435-468。
    陳彥仲、林國民，1998，「臺灣都市住宅屬性隱含需求分析－以高雄市為例」，『成功大學學報』，33(人文．社會篇)：303-320。
    彭芳琪、張金鶚、陳明吉，2008，「不同拍賣機制對不良資產價格之影響」，『中山管理評論』，16(3)。
    彭建文、吳森田、吳祥華，2007，「不動產有效稅率對房價影響分析-以臺北市大同區與內湖區為例」，『台灣土地研究』，10(2)：49-66。.
    彭建文、楊宗憲，2007，「自動估價系統對不動產估價師之潛在衝擊分析」，『住宅學報』，16(1)：79-98。
    黃淑惠，2000，「地價指數編制方法及應用結果之研究」，『台中技術學院學報』，1:261-280。
    黃勝榮，1989，「風險情況下台北市不動產開發投資決策之研究」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
    鄒克萬、張秀玲、張曜麟，2002，「整合空間統計技術之土地大量估價方法之研究」，『都市與計劃』，29(3)：395-420。
    廖仲仁、張金鶚，2006，「不對稱的仲介服務價格效果：分量迴歸法之檢驗」，『都市與計劃』，33(1)：1-16。
    廖咸興、張芳玲，1997，「不動產評價模式特徵價格法與逼近調整法之比較」，『住宅學報』，5：17-35。
    蔡芬蓮、林秋瑾、張金鶚，1997，「法拍屋價格影響因素之研究—以台北市為例」，〈中華民國住宅學會第六屆年會研討會論文集〉。
    賴碧瑩，2007，「應用類神經網路於電腦輔助大量估價之研究」，『住宅學報』，16(2)：43-65。
    龔永香、江穎慧、張金鶚，2007，「客觀標準化不動產估價之可行性分析─市場比較法應用於大量估價」，『住宅學報』，16(2)：23-42。
    Adair, A., Berry, J. and McGreal, S., 1996, “Valuation of Residential Property: Analysis of Participant Behavior”, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 14(1):20-35.
    Adelman, I. and Griliches, Z., 1961, “On an Index of Quality Change”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56:535-546.
    Appraisal Institute, 2001, The Appraisal of Real Estate, Chicago, IL:Appraisal Institute.
    Black, R., 1997, “Expert Property Negotiators and Pricing Information, Revisited”, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 15(3):274–81.
    Black, R. and Diaz, J. III., 1996, “The Use of Information Versus Asking Price in the Real Property Negotiation Process”, Journal of Property Research, 13(2):287–97.
    Black, R, Brown, M.G., Diaz, J., Gibler, K. M. and Grissom, T. V., 2003, “Behavioral Research in Real Estate: A Search for the Boundaries”, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 6(1):85-112.
    Brown, G., Matysiak, G. A. and Shepherd, M., 1998, “Valuaton Uncertainty and the Millison Report”, Journal of Property Research, 15:1-13.
    Byrne, Peter, 1996, Risk, Uncertainty and Decision-Making in Property development, London: E & FN SPON.
    Calhoun, Charles A., 2001, “Property Valuation Methods and Data in the United States”, Housing Finance International, 16(2):12-23.
    Cannaday, R. E. and Sunderman, M.A., 1986, “Estimation of Depreciation for Single-Family Appraisal”, Real Estate Economics, 14(2):255-273.
    Carbone, Robert and Longini, Richard L., 1977, “A Feedback Model for Automated Real Estate Assessment”, Management Science, 24(3):241-248.
    Colwell, F. Peter, Cannaday, Roger E. and Wu, Chunchi, 1983, “The Analytical Foundations of Adjustment Grid Methods”, Real Estate Economics, 11(1):11–29.
    Crosby, N., Lavers, A. and Murdoch, J., 1998, “Property valuation variation and the ‘margin of error’ in the UK”, Journal of Property Research, 15(4):305-30.
    Dell, G.., 2004, “AVMs: The Myth and the Reality: the Problem and the Solution”, Valuation Insights and Perspectives, 9(3):12-17.
    Detweiler, H. John and Radigan, Ronald E., 1999, “Computer-assisted Real Estate Appraisal：A Tool for The Practicing Appraiser,” The Appraisal journal, 67:280-286.
    Diaz, Julian Ⅲ., Zhao ,R. and Black, R. ,1999, “Does Contingent Reward Reduce Negotiation Anchoring?”, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 17(4):374–79.
    Diaz, Julian Ⅲ., 1990a, “How Appraisers Do Their Work: A Test of the Appraisal Process and the Development of a Descriptive Model”, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 5(1):1-15.
    Diaz, Julian Ⅲ., 1990b, “The Process of Selecting Comparable Sales”, The Appraisal Journal, 58(4):535-540.
    Diaz, Julian Ⅲ., 1997, “An Investigation into the Impact of Previous Expert Value Estimates on Appraisal Judgement”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 13(1):57-66.
    Diaz, JulianⅢ., 1999, “The First Decade of Behavioral Research in the Discipline of Property”, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 17(4):326-332.
    DiPasquale, D. and Wheaton, W. C., 1996, Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Efron, Bradley, 1982, “The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and other resampling plans”, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics No.38, Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
    Fabozzi, F., 1998, Streamlining the Appraisal Process Using Automated Valuation Models. NY: New York.
    Fisher, J., Miles, M. and Webb, R., 1999, “How Reliable are Commercial Property Appraisals? Another Look”, Real Estate Finance, 16(3):9-15.
    Fisher, J. D., 2002, “Real Time Valuation”, Journal of Property Investment and Finanace, 20(3): 213-222.
    Fisher, J.D., Smith, B.C., Stern, J. and Webb, R.B., 2006, “Analysis of Economic Depreciation for multi-family Propty”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(4):1-24
    Follain, J. R. and Malpezzi, S., 1980, Dissecting Housing Value and Rent, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
    Frew, J. amd Jud, G. D.,. 2003, “Estimating the Value of Apartment Building”, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 25(1):77-86.
    Gallimore, P., Hansz, J. and Gray, A., 2000, “Decision Making in Small Property Companies”, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 18(6):602–12.
    Gallimore, Paul and Wolverton, Marvin L., 1997, “Price-Knowledge-induced Bias: A Cross-Cultural Comparison”, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 15(3):261-273.
    International Association of Assessing Officers, IAAO, 2003, Standard on Automated Valuation Models, Chicago: IAAO.
    International Valuation Standards Committee, 2005, International Valuation Standards ,7th .
    Ibrahim, M. F., Cheng, F. J. and Eng, K. H., 2005, “Automated Valuation Model: An Application to the Public Housing Resale Market in Singapore,” Property Management, 23(5):357-373.
    Jonas, Drivers/IPD, 1990, “The Variance in Valuations”, London: Investment Property Databank.
    Kelliher, Charles F. and Mahoney, Lois S., 2000, ”Using Monte Carlo Simulation to Improve Long-Term Investment Decisions”, The Appraisal Journal, Jan, 68(1):44-56.
    Kinnard, W. N. and Boyce, B. N., 1978, An Introduction to Appraising Real Property, Chicago: Society of Real Estate Appraisers.
    Kinnard, William N, 2001, “New thinking in appraisal theory“, The Appraisal Journal, 69(3):235-244.
    Kirby, A., 1997, “Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal: The Queensland experience”, pp. 198-209in Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal: An International Review,.
    Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. W., 1978, “Regression Quantiles”, Econometrica, 46(1):211-244.
    Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. W., 1982, “Robust Tests for Heteroscedasticity Based on Regression Quantiles”, Journal of Derivatives, 50(1):43-62.
    Koenker, R. and Hallock, K. F., 2000, “Quantile Regression An Introduction”, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
    Koenker, R. and Hallock, K. F., 2001,“Quantile Regression”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4):143-156.
    Kuan, C. M., 2003, “An Introduction To Quantile Regression”, Institute of Economics Academia Sinica.
    Kummerow, M., 2000, “Thinking Statistically About Valuation”, The Appraisal Journal ,68(3):318-326.
    Kummerow, Max, 2002, ” A Statistical Definition of Value”, The Appraisal journal, 70(4):407-416.
    Lancaster, K., 1965, “The Theory of Qualitative Linear Systems”, Econometrica, 33(2):395-409.
    Li, Ling Hin, 2000, ”Simple Computer Applications Improve the Versatility of Discounted Cash Flow Analysis”, The Appraisal journal, 68:86-92.
    Lusht, K.M., 1996, “A Comparison of Prices Brought by English Auction and Private Negotiations”, Journal of Real Estate Economics, 24(5):17-530.
    Malpezzi, S., 2003, “Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review”, in Housing Economics and Public Policy: Essays in Honor of Maclennan, D., Sullivan, T. O. and Gibbs, K. (Eds.), Blackwell.
    Malpezzi, S., Ozanne, L. and Thibodeau, T., 1980, “Characteristic Prices of Housing in Fifty-Nine Metropolitan Areas”, Research Report, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
    Man, K. F. and Ng, C.W., 2007, “An Empirical Study of Valuation Accuracy and Variation in Hong Kong Land Auctions”, The Appraisal Journal, 75(3):253-263.
    Matysiak, G. and Wang, P., 1995, “Commercial Property Market Prices and Valuation: Analyzing the Correspondence”, Journal of Property Research, 12(3):181-202.
    Miller, N. G., 1982, “Residential Property Hedonic Pricing Models: A Review”, Research in Real Estate, 2(1):31-56.
    Moore, J. Wayne, 2005, “Performance Comparison of Automated Valuation Models”, Journal of Property Tax Assessment and Administration, 3(1):43-60.
    Northcraft, G.. and Neale, M., 1987, “Experts, Amateurs, and Real Estate: an Anchoring Perspective on Property Pricing Decisions”, Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1):84-87.
    Pagourtzi, Elli, Assimakopoulos, Vassilis, Hatzichristos, Thomas and French, Nick, 2003, “Real Estate Appraisal: A Review of Valuation Methods”, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 21(4):383-401.
    Quan, D. C., and Quigley, J. M., 1991, “Price Formation and the Appraisal Function in Real Estate Markets”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4:127-146.
    Ratcliff, R. U., 1972, Valuation for Real Estate Decisions, Santa Cruz, CA: Democrat Press,.
    Reck, C., 2003, “Heterogeneity and Black-white Labor Market Differences: Quantile Regression with Censored Data 1979-2001”, UIUC:Dept of Economics.
    Sirmans, G Stacy, Macpherson, David A and Zietz, Emily N., 2005, “The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models ”,Journal of Real Estate Literature; 13(1):3-41.
    Soderberg, B., 2002, “A Note on the Hedonic Model Specification for Income Properties”, Research in Real Estate Monograph Series: Real Estate Valuation Theory. K Wang & M L Wolverton (Eds),Kluwer., Boston.
    Todora, J. and Whiterell, D., 2002, “Automating the Sales Comparison Approach”, Assessment Journal, 9(1):25-33.
    Waller, D. Bennie, 1999, “The Impact of AVMs on the Appraisal Industry”, The Appraisal Journal, 67(3): 287-292.
    Weaver, William and Michelson, Stuart, 2003, ”A Practical Tool to Assist in Analyzing Risk Associated with Income Capitalization Approach Valuation or Investment Analysis,” The Appraisal journal, 71(4):335-343.
    Webb, B., 1994, “On the Reliability of Commercial Appraisals: An Analysis of Properties Sold from the Russell-NCREIF Index (1978-1992)”, Real Estate Finance , 11(1):62-65.
    Wolverton, Marvin L., 1996, “Investigation into Price Knowledge Induced Comparable Sale Selection Bias”, Dissertation, Georgia State University,.
    Yeoman, John C. and Eichenblatt, David L., 1999, ”Monte Carlo Simulation: Impact of Tenant Size and Credit Quality on Office Building Risk and Return,” Real Estate Review, Fall, 47-51.
    Yiu, C. Y., Tang, B.S., Chiang, Y. H. and Choy, L. H. T., 2006, “Alternative Theories of Appraisal Bias “, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 14(3):321-344.
    Zietz, Joachim, Zietz, Emily Norman and Sirmans, G. Stacy, 2008, “Determinants of House Prices: A Quantile Regression Approach”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 37(4):317-333
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    91257505
    97
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091257505
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    25750501.pdf93KbAdobe PDF21305檢視/開啟
    25750502.pdf136KbAdobe PDF21496檢視/開啟
    25750503.pdf316KbAdobe PDF21385檢視/開啟
    25750504.pdf393KbAdobe PDF21810檢視/開啟
    25750505.pdf358KbAdobe PDF23301檢視/開啟
    25750506.pdf461KbAdobe PDF23054檢視/開啟
    25750507.pdf531KbAdobe PDF24363檢視/開啟
    25750508.pdf479KbAdobe PDF22932檢視/開啟
    25750509.pdf368KbAdobe PDF22096檢視/開啟
    25750510.pdf279KbAdobe PDF21448檢視/開啟
    25750511.pdf359KbAdobe PDF22217檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋