政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/38749
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113313/144292 (79%)
造访人次 : 50947757      在线人数 : 1007
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38749


    题名: 《威尼斯商人》中的禮物交換
    Gift Exchange in The Merchant of Venice
    作者: 李筱釩
    Lee, Hsiao Fen
    贡献者: 胡錦媛
    Hu, Chin-yuan
    李筱釩
    Lee, Hsiao Fen
    关键词: 禮物交換
    威尼斯商人
    非對稱交換關係
    友誼
    gift exchange
    The Merchant of Venice
    asymmetrical reciprocity
    friendship
    日期: 2009
    上传时间: 2010-04-09 15:43:42 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 數世紀以來，《威尼斯商人》(The Merchant of Venice, 1596-1598)的批評總聚焦在「猶太人問題」(the Jewish question) 與「女人問題」(the woman question) 上：劇中放高利貸的夏洛 (Shylock) 體現了猶太人的原型，而富有、機智的波黠 (Portia) 則是強勢女性的代表。然而，這種閱讀方式將兩個問題分開處理，忽略了兩者在劇中密切的關聯，僅只以審判一景聯繫兩個角色所代表的問題。
    　　本論文嘗試以「禮物交換」(gift exchange) 重新閱讀《威尼斯商人》。牟斯 (Marcel Mauss) 的著作《禮物》(The Gift, 1925) 初步定義原始社會中的交換行為與其涵意，奠定了禮物研究的基礎。禮物交換所建構的社會關係複雜多變，因此，除牟斯外，本論文亦援引佳寶 (Jacques T. Godbout) 與楊 (Iris Marion Young) 的理論，以期透視《威尼斯商人》中的角色在禮物交換之下的互動與劇情發展。
    　　根據喜福特 (Alan D. Schrift) 所言，禮物描繪了「主體間的互動」(intersubjective interaction)。立基於此概念，並以上述等人的理論為架構，本論文由三個面向逐步探討《威尼斯商人》中基督男性的「自我」(self) 與猶太／女性「他者」(other) 間的禮物交換：（一）禮物交換的基礎；（二）禮物交換的聯繫與風險；（三）非對稱交換關係與重建關係。劇中安東尼 (Antonio) 與巴薩紐 (Bassanio) 的友情為禮物交換的基礎，進一步展現禮物特色，牽連／牽絆夏洛與波黠，發揮禮物效應，帶出多重「非對稱」(asymmetry) 的要素，終致重建四人的關係。　
    For centuries, the Jewish question and the woman question have always been the salient concerns for criticisms of The Merchant of Venice (1596-1598): whereas Shylock the usurer embodies a Jewish archetype, Portia the clever heiress presents a powerful female figure. Nevertheless, treating the Jewish question and the woman question separately, this kind of reading ignores the close relationship between the two in the play, and connects them loosely only with the trial scene.
    This thesis reads The Merchant of Venice in the perspective of gift exchange. Founding the studies of the gift, Marcel Mauss’s The Gift (1925) firstly defines the reciprocity and the significance of gift exchange in archaic societies. Since social relationship established by gift exchange is subject to change, this thesis also draws on Jacques T. Godbout’s and Iris Marion Young’s theories to probe into the interaction of characters and the movement of The Merchant of Venice.
    According to Alan D. Schrift, the gift depicts “intersubjective interaction” (18). Based on this concept and structured with the above theories, the thesis examines gift exchange between the Christian male “self” and its Jewish/female other in The Merchant of Venice step by step in three dimensions: (1) the basis of gift exchange; (2) bond and risk in gift exchange; (3) asymmetrical reciprocity and reestablished relation. In the play, gift exchange brings its effect of bond and feature of asymmetry into full play. Grounded on the friendship between Antonio and Bassanio, gift exchange links/restrains Shylock and Portia, and reestablishes the characters’ relationships as a result.
    參考文獻: Aristotle. The Ethics of Aristotle. Trans. D. P. Chase. New York: Dutton, 1950.
    Barton, Anne. “The Merchant of Venice.” The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans and J. J. Tobin. Boston: Houghton, 1997.
    Bataille, Georges. Consumption. New York: Zone, 1988. Vol. 1 of The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy. 3 vols. 1988-93.
    “Bond.” Def. Encarta® World English Dictionary. North American Ed. Microsoft, 2009 <http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults. aspx?lextype=3&search=bond>
    Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. London: Routledge, 1986.
    ---. “Marginalia—Some Additional Notes on the Gift.” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. Routledge: Routledge, 1997. 231-41.
    ---. “Selections from The Logic of Practice.” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. Routledge: Routledge, 1997. 190-230.
    Brown, John Russell. Introduction. The Merchant of Venice. By William Shakespeare. London: Methuen, 1955. xi-lviii.
    Caputo, John D. Deconstruction in a Nutshell: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press, 1997.
    Derrida, Jacques. The Gift of Death. Trans. David Wills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
    ---. Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
    ---. “The Politics of Friendship.” Journal of Philosophy 85.11 (1988): 632-44.
    Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Gifts.” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. Routledge: Routledge, 1997. 25-27.
    Engle, Lars. “‘Thrift Is Blessing’: Exchange and Explanation in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 37.1 (1986): 20-37.
    Godbout, Jacques T. “The Moral of the Gift.” Journal of Socio-Economics 27.4 (1998): 557-70.
    ---, and Alain Caillé. The World of the Gift. Trans. Donald Winkler. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998.
    Halio, Jay L. General Introduction. The Merchant of Venice. By William Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
    Hammond, Paul. Love between Men in English Literature. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1996.
    Hunter, G. K. “English Folly and Italian Vice: The Moral Landscape of John Marston.” Jacobean Theatre. Eds. John Russell Brown and Bernard Harris. London: Arnold, 1960.
    Komter, Aafke E. Social Solidarity and the Gift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
    La Caze, Marguerite. “Seeing Oneself through the Eyes of the Other: Asymmetrical Reciprocity and Self-respect.” Hypatia 23.3 (2008): 118-35.
    Lampert, Lisa. Gender and Jewish Difference from Paul to Shakespeare. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.
    Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon,
    1969.
    Lewalski, Barbara K. “Biblical Allusion and Allegory in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 13.3 (1962): 327-43.
    Lucy, Niall. A Derrida Dictionary. Malden: Blackwell, 2004.
    Mauss, Marcel. “Gift, Gift.” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Ed. Alan D. Schrift. Routledge: Routledge, 1997. 28-32.
    ---. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. W. D. Halls. London: Routledge, 1990.
    McLean, Susan. “Prodigal Sons and Daughters: Transgression and Forgiveness in The Merchant of Venice.” Papers on Language and Literature 32.1 (1996): 45-62.
    Newman, Karen. “Portia’s Ring: Unruly Women and Structures of Exchange in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 38.1 (1987): 19-33.
    Roberts, Sarah Elizabeth. “Rethinking Justice with Kierkegaard, Levinas, and Derrida.” Diss. Purdue University, 2000.
    Rubin, Gayle. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” Women, Culture, and Society. Eds. Michelle Zimbalist Rosaldo and Louise Lamphere. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974. 157-210.
    Schrift, Alan D. “Introduction: Why Gift?” The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. Routledge: Routledge, 1997.
    Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.
    Shakespeare, William. The Merchant of Venice. Ed. Jay L. Halio. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
    Shapiro, James. Shakespeare and the Jews. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
    Sharp, Ronald A. “Gift Exchange and the Economies of Spirit in The Merchant of Venice.” Modern Philology 83 (1986): 250-65.
    Tennenhouse, Leonard. “The Counterfeit Order of The Merchant of Venice.” Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays. Eds. Murray M. Schwartz and Coppelia Kahn. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
    Thompson, Bruce Allen. “The Archaic Present: The Social Thought of Marcel Mauss and His Successors.” Diss. Stanford University, 1987.
    Weiner, Annette. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
    Young, Iris Marion. Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學研究所
    95551002
    98
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0955510021
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2603检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈