政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/38736
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50950933      Online Users : 949
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38736


    Title: 臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南建構之研究
    Developing Guidelines for Library and Information Science Educational Programs in Taiwan
    Authors: 蔡佳縈
    Tsai, Chia-Ying
    Contributors: 王梅玲
    Wang, Mei-Ling
    蔡佳縈
    Tsai, Chia-Ying
    Keywords: 圖書資訊學教育
    圖書資訊學教育評鑑
    圖書資訊學教育指南
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2010-04-09 15:30:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 教育部於2006年委託高等教育評鑑中心統一對全國公私立大學院校進行評鑑，評鑑工作主要以學門為分類單位，目前共分為47個學門，以因應各大學院校系所性質之多樣性，並做為遴聘評鑑委員之依據。高等教育評鑑中心僅依據學門訂定相關參考效標，並未對各專業學科發展相關標準與指南；此外，目前之評鑑作業中，各圖書資訊學系所隸屬於不同學門進行評鑑，不僅難以確保訪視委員之專業背景、各圖書資訊學系所評鑑結果之客觀性，亦使得圖書資訊學教育品質缺乏ㄧ致標準。
    面對上述危機，本論文擬研究臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南，使臺灣圖書資訊學之教育評鑑活動具備更健全、更符合系所專業教育發展的衡量基礎架構，提升臺灣圖書資訊學教育品質，亦成為臺灣圖書資訊學教育品質保證依據。
    本論文主要參考英美之圖書資訊學教育標準與指南，以及我國相關研究，利用內容分析法訂定臺灣圖書訊學教育指南芻議；再採焦點團體法進行研究，共舉行4場焦點團體討論會，對象分別為圖書資訊學系所教師、圖書資訊學系所主任、圖書資訊學系所研究生與圖書館館員；各場次參與者對圖書資訊學教育指南芻議進行討論，凝聚臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南所應具備之要件與內涵共識。
    本研究最後所形成之圖書資訊學教育指南草案共分為圖書資訊學定義與範圍、教育任務與目標、課程、教師團隊、學生、行政管理、教學資源與設施等7大項，27小項，40個分項指標；教育指南草案適用範圍涵蓋大學部、研究所(碩士班、博士班)、專業學程與繼續教育。研究建議包括中華圖書資訊學教育學會舉辦論壇討論草案再行公佈、舉辦圖書資訊學學門意涵與教育工作坊、專案研究圖書資訊學教育評鑑制度、推動圖書資訊學教育評鑑與指南之實施。
    In 2006, the Ministry of Education commended the higher education evaluation to Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan. Higher education evaluation divided all universities into 47 colleges, to respond to schools’ variegation and to choose the evaluation members. Higher education evaluation center only sets related guidelines according to different colleges, but doesn’t provide related standards or guidelines to professional disciplines. In addition, library and information science schools are attached to different colleges in current evaluation, and that may cause unfair assessments and impact evaluation results.
    Faced with the crises above, this thesis on guidelines for library and information science educational programs in Taiwan is to make the educational evaluation of library and information science develop better, fit the professional needs, and enhance the quality of education.
    This paper refers library and information science education standards and guidelines of Britain and the United States, as well as related researches in Taiwan. We used the content analysis to develop draft of guidelines for library and information science educational programs in Taiwan, and then held four focus group interviews which were aimed at different targets of the Department of Library and Information Science: teachers, directors, students and librarians, to discuss the draft of guidelines and cohere the content and elements of guidelines.
    The final form of guidelines for library and information science educational programs in Taiwan is divided into 7 parts, including the definition, goals and objectives, curriculum, faulty, students, administration, and physical resources and facilities. There are 27 indicators, and 40 sub-indicators. The guidelines offered here are primarily applied to the undergraduate, graduate(Master classes and PhD), professional programs and continuing education level. Finally, we suggested that the Association of Library and Information Science Education of Republic of China should hold discussion of the guidelines, and other related associations should hold workshops on education of library and information science as well as research in evaluation system of library and information science, and promote the educational evaluation and implementation of library and information science.
    Reference: 一、 中文
    (一) 專書
    Krueger, Richard A.著；洪志成、廖梅花譯。焦點團體訪談。嘉義市：濤石文化，民92。
    Stewart, David W.等著；歐素汝譯。焦點團體：理論與實務。臺北市：弘智文化，民88。
    丁友貞。美國圖書館學教育認可制度之探討。台北市：漢美圖書有限公司，民83。
    王梅玲。英美圖書館與資訊科學碩士教育之比較研究。臺北市：漢美圖書，民85。
    王梅玲。英美與亞太地區圖書資訊學教育。臺北市：文華圖書管理，民94。
    王梅玲。中華民國九十二年圖書館年鑑。臺北市：國家圖書館，民92。
    王梅玲。二十一世紀我國學術圖書館館員應具備的知識與技能的研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告，民90。
    李德竹。資訊科學與圖書館學。台北市：文華圖書館理，民89。
    胡述兆、吳祖善合著。圖書館學導論。臺北市：漢美，民78。
    胡述兆。圖書資訊學導論。台北市：漢美，民94。
    周寧森。圖書資訊學導論。台北市：三民書局，民80。
    胡述兆主編。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。臺北：國立編譯館，民84。
    柯雲娥。「傳播學門大學生資訊素養能力的研究」。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，碩士論文，民93。
    陳雪華。教育部人文社會科學第三期中成教育改進計畫—圖書資訊學門規劃報告。台北市：臺灣大學圖書資訊學系，民88。
    蘇錦麗。高等教育評鑑：理論與實務。臺北市：五南，民86。
    (二) 期刊論文
    王梅玲。「圖書資訊學教育標準之探討」。中國圖書館學會會報63期(民88年12月)：105-118。
    王梅玲。「從教育標準探討圖書資訊學核心課程」。圖書與資訊季刊61期(民96年5月)：57-74。
    王梅玲。「圖書資訊學教育之評鑑」。中華圖書資訊學教育學會會訊16期(民90年6月)：3-9。
    王梅玲。「臺灣圖書館教育史(1954-2007年)」。臺灣圖書館事業與教育史研討會論文集(民96年5月)：67-88。
    李德竹。「教育部和本系新修訂之圖書館學必修課程」。書府11期：7-8。
    李德竹、莊道明。「圖書館學與資訊科學課程革新之探討」。資訊傳播與圖館學4：1(民86年9月)：17-25。
    邱子恆。「美國地區圖書資訊學教育之認可制度」。國立中央圖書館台灣分館館刊6：6 (民89年12月)：8-19。
    胡述兆、王梅玲。「英美圖書資訊學碩士教育之比較」。圖書館學與資訊科
    學20：2(民83年10月)：40-63。
    吳美美。「重新定義圖書館與圖書資訊學」。中華圖書資訊學教育學會會訊19期(民91)：10-14。
    高博銓。「教育研究法：焦點團體訪談法」。教育研究月刊103期(民91)：101-110。
    陳雪華等。「圖書館學系核心課程之規劃研究」。中華圖書資訊學教育學會
    會訊 12期(民88年6月)：1-6。
    楊美華。「圖書館學碩士教育之檢討與展望」。中國圖書館學會會報58期(民86年6月)：27-35。
    楊美華。「我國圖書資訊學教育的省思」。圖書館學與資訊科學30：2(民93 年10月)：46-58。
    蔡明月。「從圖書館與資訊科學的遞嬗反省圖書館的定義」。圖書館新定義(民94)：64。
    盧秀菊。「談圖書館學與資訊科學教育大學部學程及學科專長問題」。圖書與資訊學刊 23期(民86年11月)：1-8。
    (三) 網路資源
    高等教育中心。「系所評鑑介紹」。<http://www.heeact.org.tw/>(檢索日期：2007年9月18日)。
    盛杏湲。「焦點團體法」。 <http://www.scenariolab.com.tw/project/pfn/ upload/%E7%84%A6%E9%BB%9E%E5%9C%98%E9%AB%94%E6% B3%95-%E7%9B%9B%E6%95%99%E6%8E%88.pdf >(檢索日期：2007年12月5日)。
    劉維琪。「維基式評鑑，彌補現行評鑑制度盲點」。 <http://news.sina.com.tw/
    edu/cna/tw/2007-09-03/141612687459.shtml> (檢索日期：2007年9月18日)。
    「台師大等11系所評鑑結果」。 <http://news.sina.com.tw/edu/cna/tw/2007-09-03/141612687459.shtml> (檢索日期：2007年9月18日)。
    「私立世新大學資訊傳播學系」。<http://ic.shu.edu.tw/>(檢索日期：2007年8月31日)。
    「世新大學資訊傳播學系課程規劃」。<http://ic.shu.edu.tw/index.php? code=list&ids=13&menu_id=15 > (檢索日期：2008年3月1日)。
    「私立玄奘大學圖書資訊學系」。<http://www.hcu.edu.tw/hcu3/content/ lis01/content/act/act01.asp?sn=10>(檢索日期：2007年8月31日)。
    「私立淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系所」。<http://www.dils.tku.edu.tw/>(檢索日期：2007年8月31日)。
    「私立輔仁大學圖書資訊學系所」。<http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/>(檢索日期：2007年8月31日)。
    「輔仁大學文學院中國古籍整理學程」。 <http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/ lins/portal/main.html> (檢索日期：2008年3月1日)。
    「國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所」。<http://www.nchu.edu.tw/~gilis/> (檢索日期：2007年8月31日)。
    「國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所」。<http://www.lias.nccu.edu.tw/> (檢索日期：2007年8月31日)。
    「國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系所」。<http://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/>(檢索日期：2007年8月31日)。
    「國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系」。<http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/ace/>(檢索日期：2007年8月31日)。
    「國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所」。<http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/GLIS/> (檢索日期：2007年8月31日)。
    「國立交通大學電機學院/資訊學院在職專班數位圖書資訊組」。<http://dlp.lib.nctu.edu.tw/> (檢索日期：2007年8月31日)。
    「國立臺灣大學知識管理學程修習辦法」。<http://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/>(檢索日期：2008年3月1日)。
    二、 西文
    (一) 專書
    ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science. Chicago: American Library Association, 1983.
    ALA Glossary of Library Terms. Chicago: American Library Association, 1943.
    American Library Association. Standards for Accreditation, 1951. Chicago: American Library Association, 1951.
    American Library Association. Standards for Accreditation, 1972. Chicago:American Library Association, 1972.
    Bramley, Gerald. A History of Library Education in the United Kindom. London: Bingley, 1981.
    Carroll, C Edward. The Professionalization of Education for Librarianship. Metuchen, N.J. : Scarecrow Press, 1970.
    Dalkey, Norman C. Predicting the Future. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.,Oct. 1968.
    David, Lim. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Study of Developing Countries. Hants: Ashgate, 2001.
    Doyle, Christina S. Development of a Model of Information Literacy Outcome Measures With National Education Goals of 1990. Ph. D.Theses, Northern Arizona University, 1992.
    Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. The Program Evaluation Standards. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage, 1994.
    John Richardson. The State of Library and Information Science Education. Greenwich, CO: JAI Press, 1994.
    Jones, D. British Librarianship and Information Work 1981-1985. London: Library Association, 1988.
    Josephine Yu Chen Sche. Education Systems for Librarianship in the Federal Republic of Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States of America: A Comparative Study. Ph. D. diss., University of Florida State University, 1983.
    John S Brubacher. Education For the Professionals: The Sixty-first Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
    Library Advisory Council and Library Advisory Council. A Report on the Supply and Training of Librarians. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office,1968.
    Library Association. Procedures for the Approval of Course at Full-Time School of Librarianship in the United Kingdom. London: Library Association, 1993.
    Lilly,D.B. and Trice, R.W. A History of Information Science, 1945-1985. New York: Academic Press, 1989.
    Morgan, David L. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research Methods Series 16. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pub., 1997.
    Nasri, William Z. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Vol. 7eds. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1972.
    Philip. Whiteman. Public libraries since 1945 : the impact of the McColvin report. London : C. Bingley, 1986.
    Quality Assurance Agenc. Final Phase 1 Subject Standards Statement in 22 Subjects. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 2000.
    Quality Assurance Agenc. Final Phase 2 Subject Standards Statement in 25 Subjects. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 2002.
    Rossi,P. H. and Freeman, H. E. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.
    Schur, H. and Saunders, W. L. Education and Training for Scientific and Technological Library and Information Work. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1986.
    Shera, Jesse H. Introduction to Library Science. Littelton, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1976.
    Shera, Jesse H. The Foundations of Education for Librarianship. New York: Becker and Hayes, 1972.
    Stewart, David W. Shamdasani, Prem N. Rook, Dennis W. Focus groups : theory and practice. Thousand Oaks : SAGE Publications, 2007.
    Swan, J. Developing a New Quality Assurance Model for Higher Education: Update on Trials. London: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 1999.
    Tylaor, Robert S. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1966.
    Williamson, Charles C. Training for Library Service: A Report Prepared for the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Boston, MA: The Merrimount Press, 1923.
    World encyclopedia of library and information services. Chicago : American Library Association, 1993.
    Young, Kenneth E. Understanding Accreditation. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, 1983.
    Yu Chen, Josephine. Education Systems for Librarianship in the Federal Republic of Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. PhD. Thesis: Florida State University, 1983.
    (二) 期刊論文
    Borko, H. “ Information Science: What is it?” American Documentation 19 (January 1968):3-4.
    Bush,V. “As We may Think.” Atlantic Monthly176:1(1945):101-108.
    Diljit Singh. “Accreditation of Library and Information Science Education Programs: The Malaysian Experience.” The 2ed International Conference on Asia-Pacific Library and Information Education and Practice (2007):87-112.
    Holley, Edward G. “One Hundred Years of Progress: The Growth and Development of Library Education.” The ALA Yearbook of Library and Information Services11(1986):23-28.
    Hurt, C.D. “The Future of Library Science in Higher Education：A Crossroads for Library Science and Librarianship.” Advances in Librarianship (New York : Academic Press, 1992): 157-158.
    Kajberg, Leif. “ European LIS Curriculum Project-Developing and E-book as an Integrated Process among 100 Academic Colleagues.” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology(January 2007):9-15.
    Library Association. “Statement on Policy of Education for Librarianship.” Library Association Record 66(August 1964)：358-359.
    Lorring, Leif. “European LIS Curriculum Project-Content, Reflections and Curricular Questions.” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (January 2007):16-20.
    MacDougall, Jennifer and Brittain, J. Michael. “Library and Information Science Education in the United Kingdom.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 28(1993):367-378.
    McCrossan, J. A. “Schools of Library and Information Science in the United States and the United Kingdom: A Comparison.” Journal of Education Media and Library Science 26:4(1989):316-324.
    McGrath,William E. “Explanation and Prediction: Building a Unified Theory of Librarianship Concept and Review.” Library Trends 50:3(Winter 2002):350-370.
    Robbins, Carter Jane and Seavey,Charles A. “The Master’s Degree: Basic Preparation for Professional Practice.” Library Trends 34(Spring 1986): 563-565.
    Shera, Jesse H. “Librarianship, Documentation and Information Science.” UNESCO Bulletin for Libraries(1986)22:58-65.
    The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. “Standards for Library Schools, 1976.” IFLA Journal 2 (1976):212.
    (三) 網路資源
    65th IFLA Council and General Conference.“Standards for Library Schools, 1976: Update: A Preliminary Report to the Standing Committee on Education and Training, 64th IFLA General Conference, Amsterdam, August 1998.” <http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla65/papers/085-159e.htm> (Retrieved 2008/3/15).
    American Library Association. “Accreditation Process Policies & Procedures.”
    <http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/accredstandards/ap3.htm#Overview>(Retrieved 2007/9/30).
    American Library Association. “Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies, 1992.” <http://eric.ed.gov/RICWebPortal/custom/portlets/
    recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_
    SearchValue_0=ED358852&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=eric_accno&accno=ED358852>(Retrieved 2007/6/10).
    American Library Association. “Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies, 2008.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/accre
    dstandards/standards_2008.pdf> (Retrieved 2008/3/
    15).
    American Library Association. “Overview: Accreditation under the 1992 Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies, 1992.” <http://www. ala.org/alaorg/oa/overview.html>(Retrieved 2007/8/30).
    American Library Association. “Accredited Library and Information Studies Masters Programs From 1923 Through.” <Presenthttp://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/
    historical/historicallist.htm > (Retrieved 2007/6/10).
    American Library Association Committee on Accreditation. “Accreditation Process Policies & Procedures Second Edition, 2006.” <http://www.ala. org/ala/accreditation/accredstandards/AP3_2nd_ Edition_1-15-2007.pdf>(Retrieved 2007/9/30).
    American Library Association. “Draft- Statement of Core Competences.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditationb/
    Draft_Core_Competencies_07_05.pdf>(Retrieved 2007/10/30).
    American Library Association. “Updating the 1992 Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/
    accreditation/accredstandards/StandardsChangesOver.pdf> (Retrieved 2007/10/30).
    American Library Association. “Core Values of Librarianship.” <http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/
    statementspols/corevaluesstatement/corevalues.htm> (Retrieved 2007/10/30).
    American Library Association. “2007-2008 Directory of Institutions Offering ALA-Accredited Master`s Programs in Library and Information Studies.”
    <http://www.ala.org/ala/accreditation/lisdirb/lisdirectory.cfm#Guidelines> (Retrieved 2007/8/30).
    Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. “Procedures for the Accreditation of Courses 2002.” <http://www. la-hq.org.uk/directory/
    careers/jai.pdf> (Retrieved 2007/6/10).
    Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. “Courses in Library and Information Studies Currently Accredited by CILIP 2007.” <http://www.cilip.org.uk/qualificationschartership/Wheretostudy> (Retrieved 2007/8/30).
    Medical Library Association. “The Educational Policy Statement of the Medical Library Association.” < http://mlanet.org/education/platform/index.html> (Retrieved 2007/10/30).
    Quality Assurance Agency. “Librarianship and Information Management Quality Assurance Agency 2000.” <http://www.la-hq.org.uk/directory/careers/jai.pdf >(Retrieved 2007/6/10).
    Special Libraries Association. “Competencies for Information Professionals of the 21st Century.” <http://www.sla.org/content/learn/comp2003/index.cfm
    (Retrieved 2007/10/30).
    The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. “Guidelines for Library / Information Educational Programs-2000.”<http://www.ifla.org/VII/
    s23/bulletin/guidelines.htm> (Retrieved 2007/6/10).
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
    95155002
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095155002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    500212.pdf540KbAdobe PDF21652View/Open
    500211.pdf163KbAdobe PDF21384View/Open
    500210.pdf212KbAdobe PDF21000View/Open
    500209.pdf313KbAdobe PDF2951View/Open
    500208.pdf336KbAdobe PDF21098View/Open
    500207.pdf230KbAdobe PDF23246View/Open
    500206.pdf306KbAdobe PDF22411View/Open
    500205.pdf192KbAdobe PDF21000View/Open
    500204.pdf114KbAdobe PDF2805View/Open
    500203.pdf121KbAdobe PDF2800View/Open
    500202.pdf125KbAdobe PDF2770View/Open
    500201.pdf94KbAdobe PDF2810View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback