English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51060639      Online Users : 842
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37436


    Title: 最適仿冒品查緝率的制定
    Establishment of the optimal enforcement rate of counterfeit
    Authors: 陳盈竹
    Contributors: 王智賢
    陳盈竹
    Keywords: 仿冒查緝率
    智慧財產權
    遊說
    the optimal enforcement rate of counterfeit
    intellectual property
    lobby
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 13:48:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在這多元化社會,資訊及科技的高度發展除了帶給全民便利以及更充足完整的資訊外,卻也帶來了侵權與犯罪。本文根據王智賢與楊敦雅 (2008) 一文做進一步的延伸,採用 Grossman and Helpman (1994) 的菜單式拍賣模型,探討當智慧財產權等無形資產為外國正版商所擁有時,外國正版廠商、國內仿冒商,以及國內部份消費者所組成的團體,三者的利益分配相互衝突時,本國政府將如何制定國內的仿冒查緝率。此外,我們將模型設定了外生變數查緝率下限以盼能更貼近現實社會,透過本研究我們可以發現在增加查緝率下限後,雙方共同遊說之下均衡查緝率可能由原先的零大幅提高至仿冒商品剛好可以生存的門檻,並且在均衡時只會有一方願意提供給本國政府政治獻金。
    In this multiple society, although highly developing information and technology not only make all the people more convenient but also earn more sufficient information, it has brought the tort and crime as well. In this essay, we extend the essay written by Jue-Shyan Wang & Tun-Ya Yang (2008) and adapt a simple framework based on the Menu-auction Model of Grossman and Helpman (1994). Discussing about how a domestic government decides optimal enforcement rate of counterfeit when intellectual property is held by a foreign company and foreign company、domestic consumers and domestic illegally copied company had a conflict between their benefit distribution. Furthermore, we are going to add a lower bound of enforcement rate as an external variable to close reality. After this study, we found that under the lobby of both foreign company and domestic consumers, the equilibrium of enforcement rate may change from zero to the entry barrier; what’s more, only one of the sides will be willing to pay political contributions to domestic government under equilibrium.
    Reference: 中文部分
    王智賢、蔡坤良 (2005),「政治獻金限額與關稅遊說」,經濟研究,第 41 卷 2 期,207-247。
    王智賢、翁永和 (2006),「最適自製率與政治獻金」,人文與社會科學集刊,第 18 卷 2 期,269-291。
    王智賢、楊敦雅 (2008),「仿冒查緝與政治獻金」,經濟研究,第 44 卷 1 期,107-138。
    吳芝文、周建富 (2004),「智慧財產權與經濟效率」,經濟論文,第 32 卷 2 期,335-361。
    吳依芳、王智賢 (2005),「勞資遊說賽局與關稅保護模型」,經社法制論叢,第 36 期,199-241。
    林奇蓉 (2004),「政治遊說與策略性貿易政策」,經濟論文叢刊,第 32 輯 3 期,347-367。
    賴育邦 (2005a),「全球經濟整合對地方環境政策之衝擊-一個共同代理人模型的應用」,經社法制論叢,第35期,259-284。
    賴育邦 (2005b),「利益團體、工資談判與環境政策」,農業與經濟,第 35 期,87-118。
    賴育邦 (2006),「污染許可交易與利益團體」,經濟論文叢刊,第 34 輯 3 期,264-284。
    蔡明芳、邱俊榮 (2006),仿冒與政府政策,未發表論文。
    英文部分
    Adit, T. S. (1997), “Cooperative Lobbying and Endogenous Trade Policy, ” Public Choice, 93(3-4), 455-475.
    Banerjee, D. S. (2003), “Software Piracy: A Strategic Analysis and Policy Instruments, ”International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 97-127.
    Bernheim, B. D. and M. D. Whinston (1986), “Menu Auction, Resource Allocation,and Economic Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 1-31.
    Besen, S. M. and S. N. Kirby (1989), “Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties,” Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 255-280.
    Conner, K. and R. P. Rumelt (1991), “Software Piracy : An Analysis of Protection Strategies,” Management Science, 37, 125-139.
    Dahm, M. and N. Porteiro (2005), “Informational Lobbying under the Shadow of Political Pressure,” Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Discussion Papers: 1409.
    Dixit, A., G. M. Grossman and E. Helpman (1997), “Common Agency and Coordination: General Theory and Application to Government Policy Making,” Journal of Political Economy, 105, 752-769.
    Encaoua, D. and Y. Lefouili (2006), “Choosing Intellectual Protection: Imitation, Patent Strength and Licensing,” CESifo GmbH, CESifo Working Paper Series: CESifo Working Paper: 1715.
    Freedman, D. H. (1999), “Fakers Paradise,” Forbes, 5, Special Supplement, 48-55.
    Gallini, N. (1992), “Patent Policy and Costly Imitation,” Rand Journal Economics, 23, 52-63.
    Glass, A. J. and K. Saggi. (2002), “Intellectual Property Right and Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 56, 387-410.
    Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1994), “Protection for Sale,” American Economic Review, 84, 833-850.
    Helpman, E. (1993), “Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Right,” Econometrica, 61, 1247-1280.
    Higgins, R. S. and P. H. Rubin (1986), “Counterfeit Goods,” Journal of Law and Economics, 29, 211-230.
    Johnson, W. R. (1985), “The Economics of Copying,” Journal of Political Economy, 93, 158-174.
    Kee,H. L.,M. Ollareaga and P. Silva (2007), “Market Access for Sale,” Journal of Development Economics, 82(1), 79-94.
    Konishi, H., K. Saggi, and S. Weber (1999), “Endogenous Trade Policy under Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 49, 289-308.
    Krugman, P. R. (1979), “A model of Innovation Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income,” Journal of Political Economy, 87, 253-266.
    Lai, Y. B. (2003), “Interest Groups, Economic Competition, and Endogenous Public Policy,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 159(2), 342-61.
    Lai, Y. B. (2006), “Interest Groups, Trade Liberalization, and Environmental Standards,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 34(2), 269-90.
    Lai, Y. B. (2007), “The Optimal Distribution of Pollution Rights in the Presence of Political Distortions,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 36(3), 367-88.
    Ludema, R. D. (2001), “Market Collusion and the Politics of Protection,” European Journal of Political Economy, 17(4), 817-833.
    Magee, C. (2002), “Endogenous Trade Policy and Lobbying Formation: An Application to the Free-rider Problem,” Journal of International Economics, 57(2), 449-471.
    Maggi, G. and A. Rodriguez-Clare (1998), “The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures,” Journal of Political Economy, 106(3), 574-601.
    McCalman, P. (2004), “Protection for Sale and Trade Liberalization: An Empirical Investigation,” Review of International Economics, 12(1), 81-94.
    Mitra, D. (2002), “Endogenous Political Organization and the Value of Trade Agreements,” Journal of International Economics, 57, 473-485.
    Mondal, D. and M. R. Gupta (2006), “Innovation, Imitation and Intellectual Property Right: A Note on Helpman’s model ,” Journal of Economics, 87(1), 29-53.
    Nascimento, F. and W. R. Vanhonacker (1988), “Optimal Strategic Pricing of Reproducible Consumer Products” Management Science, 34, 921-935.
    Novos, I. E and M. Waldman (1984), “The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection: An Analytic Approach,” Journal of Political Economy, 92, 236-246.
    Panagariya, A. and R. Duttagupta (2002), “Politics of Free Trade Area: Tarffs versus Quotas,” Journal of International Economics, 58, 413-427.
    Rama, M. and G. Tabellinni (1998), “Lobbying by Capital and Labor over Trade and Labor Market Policies,” European Economic Review, 42, 1295-1316.
    Shy, O. and J. F. Thisse (1999), “A Strategic Approach to Software Protection,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8, 163-190.
    Takalo, T. and V. Kanniainen (2000), “Do Patent Slow Down Techonological Progress? Real Options in Research, Patenting, and Market Introduction,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 1105-1127.
    Takeyama, L. N. (1994), “The Welfare Implications of Unauthorized Reproduction of Intellectual Property in the Presence of Demand Network Externalities,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 155-166.
    Teata, C. (2001), “Reform, Lobbies and Welfare: A Common Agency Approach ” Departmemt of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, Royal Holloway University of London ,Discussion Paper in Economics: 01/6.
    Wang, J.-S., H.-W. Koo and T.-J. Chen (2006), “Resource Rivalry and Endogenous Lobby,” Japan and the World Economy, 18(4), 488-511.
    Yang, G. and K. E. Maskus (2001), “Intellectual Property Right, Licensing and Innovation in an Endogenous Product-Cycle Model,” Journal of International Economics, 53, 169-187.
    You, K. and S. Katayama (2005), “Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Imitation: An Empirical Examination of Japanese F.D.I. in China,” Pacific Economic Review, 10(4), 591-604.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政研究所
    96255002
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0962550021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    002101.pdf91KbAdobe PDF2857View/Open
    002102.pdf130KbAdobe PDF2815View/Open
    002103.pdf131KbAdobe PDF2864View/Open
    002104.pdf92KbAdobe PDF2738View/Open
    002105.pdf206KbAdobe PDF2988View/Open
    002106.pdf230KbAdobe PDF2881View/Open
    002107.pdf345KbAdobe PDF2879View/Open
    002108.pdf151KbAdobe PDF2817View/Open
    002109.pdf212KbAdobe PDF2873View/Open
    002110.pdf132KbAdobe PDF21005View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback