政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/37419
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51150128      線上人數 : 849
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37419


    題名: 稅制改革之可計算一般均衡分析-Ramsey與Overlapping Generation model 之比較
    The Effect of Tax Reform in a Computable General Equilibrium Framework - Ramsey vs. Overlapping Generation Model
    作者: 廖如敏
    貢獻者: 朱雲鵬
    廖如敏
    關鍵詞: 稅制改革
    動態可計算一般均衡模型
    跨代模型
    Overlapping Generation模型
    Ramsey模型
    Tax reform
    Dynamic CGE
    Overlapping Generation model
    Ramsey model
    日期: 2005
    上傳時間: 2009-09-19 13:46:07 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究利用台灣2001年資料以Ramsey與OLG假設分別建立區分四部門別與八部門別之動態可計算一般均衡模型，進行「提高間接稅（消費稅、環境稅）、降低直接稅（資本、勞動所得稅）」之稅制改革模擬分析。結果發現若以單一時點比較靜態方式分析可能迥異於動態長期分析結果；其次以Ramsey分析所欠缺的代際分配影響結果在OLG分析中可以察見，特別是進行以消費稅或環境稅替代資本所得稅模擬時；再者OLG因代際傳遞效果可能較Ramsey假設下反應緩慢，故也可觀察到Ramsey模型面對衝擊後若干變數增減幅度會較OLG模型陡峭。最後特別在環境稅替代所得稅模擬中經由替代稅率變化發現，活在初期世代雖可享受所得稅下降好處但卻也面臨排放稅課徵，因此福利水準增減變化不大，惟屆至排放稅課徵瀕至臨界點需使用原所得稅來平衡稅收時，此為另一波必須為減量政策付出代價的時點與世代。
    Based on a thorough comparison of the basic assumptions and economic underpinning of the Ramsey and Overlapping generation (OLG) model, this study builds both static and dynamic computable general equilibrium tax policy models to analyze the effect of tax reform on Taiwan’s economy. The new tax structure considers mainly a replacement of some parts of direct tax - labor and capital income taxes by indirect tax- consumption tax or environment tax. The benchmark year of the model is 2001, and the economy is divided into four and eight sectors. The modeling framework is implemented on top of MPSGE, which is a special module within the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS).Our simulation results show differential outcomes for static and dynamic models. The slower speed of transition inherent in OLG model has caused variables such as welfare, capital stock, and replacement consumption tax rate change less than that in the Ramsey model when the tax reform policy is imposed. And the intergeneration effects of different tax burden between young and old generations can be found in the OLG model but not in the Ramsey model. Finally, we find as the income tax rate coming lower and the environment tax going up when simulation of tax replacement, causing the welfare does not change much at the beginning of shock, and generations especially born in the near future when environment tax does not grow and revenue neutrality needs to be meet are another cost payers of abatement policy.
    參考文獻: 1. 李堅明、林幸樺、林師模、黃宗煌、楊晴雯、蘇漢邦(2005)，”溫室氣體減量模式、減量情境、減量成本及其影響評估：TAIGEM-III的應用”，台灣經濟論衡，第3卷第2期，頁1-50，行政院經濟建設委員會。
    2. 李堅明、李涵茵(2002)，”我國綠色財政改革之規劃研究”,綠色租稅改革研討會,國立台灣大學法學院。
    3. 郭迺鋒、周濟、方文秀、陳美琇（2005），”東亞經濟整合對臺灣經濟的影響：2005年至2010年遞迴動態GTAP模型分析”, 經濟情勢暨評論 ，第10卷4期，頁1-41
    4. 林國榮、徐世勳、張靜貞、李秉正、黃宗煌（2001），”入會對臺灣農業就業衝擊之動態一般均衡分析”, 農業經濟叢刊，第7卷1期，頁101-140。
    5. 周嫦娥、李繼宇（2002），”歐美綠色租稅改革經驗之探討”,綠色租稅改革研討會，國立台灣大學法學院。
    6. 周濟(2005)，”全球區域化經濟整合對臺灣經濟的影響--遞迴動態CGE模型之應用”，財稅研究 ，第37卷第2期，頁68-80。
    7. 黃宗煌、李秉正，徐世熏、林師模、劉錦龍(1999)《溫室氣體減量成本效益分析 – TAIGEM模型建構暨減量策略之經濟評估》，行政院環保署委託計劃，EPA-88-FA31-03-0006
    8. 黃耀輝（1997），”財政調整與稅制改革”, 經濟前瞻，第12卷第1期，頁80-83
    9. 黃耀輝（2002），”稅制改革的全盤規劃”,綠色租稅改革研討會，國立台灣大學法學院。
    10. 孫克難（2002），”稅制改革的政治經濟分析”,經濟前瞻，2002年7月，頁42-47
    11. 孫克難（2003），”稅制改革應有的理念與作為”,經濟前瞻 ，2003年11月，頁42-47
    12. 楊子菡、蘇漢邦、徐世勳（2002）”綠色租稅改革的租稅福利成本與結構效果”，綠色租稅改革研討會研討會，國立台灣大學法學院。
    13. 楊浩彥、郭迺鋒、朱澤民（2002）”以課徵碳稅抵減產業雇主健保負擔之綠色稅制改革的CGE實證研究：編制社會會計矩陣及減碳模擬分析”， 綠色租稅改革研討會研討會，國立台灣大學法學院。
    14. 溫麗琪、郭迺鋒、黃耀輝（2002）” 空氣污染防制費與相關賦稅之整合研究”，綠色租稅改革研討會研討會，國立台灣大學法學院。
    15. Aaron, Henry J., and William G. Gale, editors(1996).”Economic Effect of Fundamental Tax Reform.” Washington, D.C.: Brooking Institution Press.
    16. Altonji, Joseph G. ,Fumio Hayashi and Laurence J. Kotlikoff(1992) “Is the Extended Family Altruistically Linked? Direct Tests Using Micro Data”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 82, No. 5. pp. 1177-1198.
    17. Armington, P. (1969)”A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production”, IMF Staff Paper 16:pp.159-178.
    18. Auerbach, Alan J. and Laurence J. Kotlikoff (1987a)”Dynamic Models of Taxation -Evaluating Fiscal Policy with a Dynamic Simulation Model”The American Economic Review, Vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 49-55.
    19. Auerbach, Alan J. and Laurence J. Kotlikoff (1987b), Dynamic Fiscal Policy, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    20. Auerbach, Alan J.（1996） “Tax Reform, Capital Allocation, Efficiency and Growth.” In Economic Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform, edited by Henry J. Aaron and William G. Gale. Washington, D.C.：The Brookings Institution.
    21. Auerbach, Alan J.(1997)” The Future of Fundamental Tax Reform”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp.143-146
    22. Auerbach, Alan J., Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Kent A. Smetters, and Jan Walliser.（1997）”Fundamental Tax Reform and Macroeconomic Performance.” Paper presented as part of the Joint Committee on Taxation’s Tax Modeling Project, Washington, D.C.
    23. Auerbach, Alan J. and Joel Slemrod (1997)”The Economic Effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 589-632.
    24. Balistreri, Edward J.(1997)” A Few Simple Examples of Dynamic Calibration in MPSGE” , 2006年5月16日,http://www.mines.edu/~ebalistr/dyncalib/dyncal.html
    25. Ballard, C.L. and L.H. Goulder,(1985),”Consumption taxes, foresight, and welfare: a computable general equilibrium analysis”, in J. Piggott and J. Whalley, New developments in applied general equilibrium analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    26. Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin, (1995) “Economic growth”, McGraw-Hill.
    27. Bergman, Lars.(1990)”Energy and Environmental Constraints on Growth: A CGE Modeling Approach”Journal of Policy Modeling. New York: Vol. 12, Iss. 4; p. 671-691
    28. Bosquet, Benoît(2000)”Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence” Ecological Economics Volume: 34, Issue: 1,pp. 19 - 32
    29. Bovenberg, A. Lans and Ben J.Heijdra(1998) ”Environmental tax policy and intergenerational distribution” Journal of Public Economics Volume: 67, Issue: 1, pp. 1-24
    30. Bovenberg, A. Lans;and Ruud A. de Mooij(1994)” Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No.4, pp. 1085-1089
    31. Bovenberg, A. Lans and Sjak A. Smulders(1996)” Transitional Impacts of Environmental Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model”International Economic Review, Vol. 37, No. 4 , pp. 861-893.
    32. Dellink, Rob. (2000)”Pollution and abatement in dynamic applied general equilibrium modeling”, Paper prepared for the ISEE conference, Canberra, July 5-8 2000.
    33. Dellink, Rob. (2005)”Modeling the cost of environmental policy:A dynamic appilied general equilibrium assessment”.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
    34. Dellink ,Rob., Marjan Hofkes, Ekko van Ierland, Harmen Verbruggen.(2004)” Dynamic modelling of pollution abatement in a CGE framework”Economic Modelling. Amsterdam: Vol. 21, Iss. 6; p. 965
    35. Dellink, Rob; van Ierland, Ekko(2006)”Pollution abatement in the Netherlands: A dynamic applied general equilibrium assessment” Journal of Policy Modeling Volume: 28, Issue: 2, pp. 207-221
    36. Engen, Eric M., and William G. Gale（1996） “The Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform on Savings.” In Economic Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform, edited by Henry J. Aaron and William G. Gale. Washington, D.C.：The Brookings Institution
    37. Engen, Eric M., and William G. Gale（1997）“Some Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform: Switching From a Hybrid income-Consumption Tax in an Uncertain Economic Environment.” Paper presented as part of the Joint Committee on Taxation’s Tax Modeling Project. Washington, D.C..
    38. Engen Eric, Jane Gravelle & Kent Smetters.(1997)”Dynamic tax models: Why they do the things they do”National Tax Journal. Washington: Vol. 50, Iss. 3; p. 657-682
    39. Fullerton, Don, and Diane Rogers.(1996）“Lifetime Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform.” In Economic Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform, edited by Honry J. Aaron and William G. Gale. Washington, D.C: The Brookings Institution
    40. Gerlagh, R.(1999)”The efficient and sustainable use of environmental resource systems”, Ph.D. thesis，Vrije Universiseit, Amsterdam Cambridge.
    41. Gerlagh, Reyer and B.C.C.van der Zwaan (2000)”Overlapping generations versus infinitely-lived agents: the case of global warming” in The long-term Economics of climate change, Volume: 3, pp. 301-327. edited by Richard Howarth and Darwin Hall
    42. Gerlagh, Reyer and Michiel A. Keyzer,(2001) ”Sustainability and the intergenerational distribution of natural resource entitlements” Journal of Public Economics Volume: 79, Issue: 2,pp. 315-341
    43. Ginsburgh, V. and M.A. Keyzer(1997)”The structure of applied general equilibrium models, MIT-Press
    44. Gravelle, Jane G.(1997)”Simulation of Economic Effect for Flat Rate Income and Consumption Tax Proposal.” Paper prepared as part of the Joint Committee on Taxation’s Tax Modeling Project. Washington, D.C
    45. Goulder, Lawrence H.(1995)” Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Volume: 29, Issue: 3, pp. 271-297
    46. Goulder, Lawrence H, & Lawrence H. Summers, (1989)”Tax Policy, Asset Prices, and Growth - A General Equilibrium Analysis” Journal of Public Economics. Amsterdam: Apr 1989. Vol. 38, Iss. 3; p. 265-296
    47. Hall, Robert E.(1997)”Prospects for Fundamental Tax Reform-Potential Disruption from the Move to a Consumption Tax”The American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, , pp. 147-150.
    48. Hall, Robert and Alvin E.Rabushka.(1995),The Flat Tax, Stanford:Hoover Institution Press.
    49. Heckman, James J.(1993)”What Has Been Learned About Labor Supply in the Last Twenty Years?” The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No.2, , pp. 116-121
    50. Heijdra, Ben J.; Kooiman, Jan Peter; Ligthart, Jenny E.(2006)”Environmental quality, the macroeconomy, and intergenerational distribution” Resource and Energy Economics Volume: 28, Issue: 1, pp. 74-104
    51. Howarth, Richard B.＆ Richard B. Norgaard.(1992)”Environmental Valuation Under Sustainable Development”,The American Economic Review. Nashville: May 1992. Vol. 82, Iss. 2; p. 473-477
    52. Hubbard,R Glenn (1997)”How different are income and consumption taxes?”,The American Economic Review. Nashville: Vol. 87, Iss. 2; p.138
    53. Jensen, Jesper (2000)“How valuable are delayed cutbacks in Danish carbon emission?” In: Harrison,G.W., Jensen, S.E.H.,Pedersen, L. H.,Rutherford, T.F. (Eds.), Using Dynamic General Equilibrium Models for Policy Analysis,.Amsterdam,North Holland.,pp.53-78
    54. Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Congress. Restructring Proposals, Washington, DC：U.S. Government Printing office , August 1996。
    55. Jorgenson, Dale W.& Peter J.Wilcoxen. (1990)”Intertemporal General Equilibrium Modeling of U.S. Environmental Regulation” Journal of Policy Modeling. New York: Vol. 12, Iss. 4; p.715-744
    56. Jorgenson,Dale W.& Kun-Young Yun(1990)”Tax Reform and U.S. Economic Growth”The Journal of Political Economy ,Vol. 98, No. 5, Part 2: The Problem of Development: A Conference of the Institute for the Study of Free Enterprise Systems, pp. S151-S193
    57. Jorgenson, Dale W. (1996)”The Agenda for U.S. Tax Reform”,The Canadian Journal of Economics. Vol. 29, Special Issue: Part 2, pp. S649-S657
    58. Jorgenson, Dale W. & Peter J Wilcoxen.(1997a)” The long-run dynamics of fundamental tax reform” The American Economic Review. Namshville: May 1997. Vol. 87, Iss. 2; p. 126 -132
    59. Jorgenson, Dale W.& Peter J. Wilcoxen. (1997b)”Fundamental U.S. tax reform and energy markets”,The Energy Journal. Cleveland:, Vol. 18, Iss. 3; p. 1-29
    60. Jorgenson, Dale W.& Peter J. Wilcoxen. (1997c)”The Effect of Fundamental Tax Reform and the Feasibility of Dynamic Revenue Estimation.” Paper presented as part of the Joint Committee on Taxation’s Tax Modeling Project. Washington, D.C
    61. Kalvelagen, Erwin(2003)” An Elementary Ramsey Growth Model” 2006年5月16日，http://www.gams.com/~erwin/micro/ramsey.pdf
    62. Kotlikoff, L. J. (2000)”The A-K OLG model: Its past present and future.” In: Harrison,G.W., Jensen, S.E.H.,Pedersen, L. H.,Rutherford, T.F. (Eds.), Using Dynamic General Equilibrium Models for Policy Analysis,.Amsterdam,North Holland.
    63. Lau, Morten I.; Pahlke, Andreas; Rutherford, Thomas F.(2002)” Approximating infinite-horizon models in a complementarity format: A primer in dynamic general equilibrium analysis” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Volume: 26, Issue: 4,pp. 577-609
    64. Manne A.S.”Equity,efficiency,and discounting(1999)”in Discounting and intergenerational equity, Ch12. edited by P.R.Portney and J.P.Weyant.Resources for future,Washington.
    65. Manne, A.S., R.O. Mendelsohn, and R.G. Richels, (1995): MERGE—a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy, 23(1), 17-34.
    66. Nieuwkoop,Renger van( 2001)”Ramsey model”version 3, 2006年5月16日，http://home.datacomm.ch/rengervnieuwkoop/downloadables/ramseynotes.pdf
    67. Nordhaus, William D (1993)”,Optimal greenhouse-gas reductions and tax policy in the `DIC”. The American Economic Review. Nashville: Vol. 83, Iss. 2; p. 313-317
    68. Nordhaus, W.D. and Z. Yang (1996)”RICE: a regional dynamic general equilibrium model of optimal climate-change policy.” American Economic Review, 86(4), 741-765.
    69. Okamoto, Akira(2005)”Simulating progressive expenditure taxation in an aging Japan”, Journal of Policy Modeling Volume: 27, Issue: 3, pp. 309-325
    70. Paltsev Sergey(2004)”Moving from Static to Dynamic General Equilibrium Economic Models (Notes for a beginner in MPSGE)”MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Technical Note No.4
    71. Peck, Stephen C.& Teisberg, Thomas J.(1992).”. CETA: A Model for Carbon Emissions Trajectory Assessment”, The Energy Journal. Cleveland: Vol. 13, Iss. 1; p. 55-77
    72. Rasmussen, Tobias N.(2003)” Modeling the economics of greenhouse gas abatement: An overlapping generations perspective” Review of Economic Dynamics ,Volume: 6, Issue: 1,pp. 99-119
    73. Rasmussen, Tobias N.;and Rutherford, Thomas F.(2004) “Modeling overlapping generations in a complementarity format” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Volume: 28, Issue: 7,pp. 1383-1409
    74. Robbins,Gary, and Aldona Robbins(1997)”Tax Reform Simulation Using the Fiscal Associates General Equilibrium Model.” Paper prepared as part of the Committee on Taxation’s Tax Modeling Project. Washington, D.C.
    75. Rogers, Diana Lim.(1997) ”Assessing the Effect of Fundamental Tax Reform with the Fullerton Rogers General Equilibrium Model”, Paper prepared as part of the Committee on Taxation’s Tax Modeling Project. Washington, D.C.
    76. Rutherford, Thomas F.(1995)”Extension of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economic analysis”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Volume: 19, Issue: 8, pp. 1299-1324
    77. Rutherford, T.F (2000)”Carbon abatement, technical change and intergenerational burden sharing” In: Harrison,G.W., Jensen, S.E.H.,Pedersen, L. H.,Rutherford, T.F. (Eds.), Using Dynamic General Equilibrium Models for Policy Analysis,.Amsterdam,North Holland.,pp.79-118
    78. Rutherford, Thomas(2004)”Dynamic General Equilibrium with GAMS/MPSGE”, 2006年5月16日，www.mpsge.org/dynamics.pdf
    79. Schelling, Thomas C (1995)”Intergenerational discounting, ”Energy Policy Volume: 23, Issue: 4-5, pp. 395-401
    80. Stephan G., G.Muller-Furstenberger,and P.Prevdoli.(1997)”Overlapping generations or infinitely-lived agents:intergenerational altruism and the economics of global warming” Environmental and Resource Economics, Volume:10:,pp. 27-40.
    81. “The overlapping generations model”(2002)，2006年5月16日，http://www.economics.soton.ac.uk/courses/ECON3010/notes5.pdf
    82. Ventura, Gustavo(1999)”Flat tax reform: A quantitative exploration”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Volume: 23, Issue: 9-10, pp. 1425-1458
    83. Wendner, Ronald(2001)”An applied dynamic general equilibrium model of environmental tax reforms and pension policy”, Journal of Policy Modeling Volume: 23, Issue: 1,pp. 25-50
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    財政研究所
    86255501
    94
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0086255501
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[財政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    25550101.pdf47KbAdobe PDF2787檢視/開啟
    25550102.pdf77KbAdobe PDF2698檢視/開啟
    25550103.pdf133KbAdobe PDF2815檢視/開啟
    25550104.pdf99KbAdobe PDF2813檢視/開啟
    25550105.pdf412KbAdobe PDF2850檢視/開啟
    25550106.pdf439KbAdobe PDF21133檢視/開啟
    25550107.pdf555KbAdobe PDF21247檢視/開啟
    25550108.pdf406KbAdobe PDF21077檢視/開啟
    25550109.pdf451KbAdobe PDF2779檢視/開啟
    25550110.pdf572KbAdobe PDF21082檢視/開啟
    25550111.pdf151KbAdobe PDF2726檢視/開啟
    25550112.pdf181KbAdobe PDF2796檢視/開啟
    25550113.pdf399KbAdobe PDF21169檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋