Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37410
|
| Title: | 台灣工具機廠商教育訓練績效分析-模糊資料包絡分析法之應用 |
| Authors: | 陳宥翔 |
| Contributors: | 李文福
陳宥翔 |
| Keywords: | 工具機
教育訓練
模糊DEA
machine tool
training
fuzzy DEA |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-19 13:40:28 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 工具機不僅在機械產業占有一席之地，在製造業更是扮演舉足輕重的
角色，生活周遭所使用的物品，許多都是由工具機所製造。工具機產業的
核心技術，仰賴資深員工的經驗傳承，因此教育訓練是工具機廠商營運的
流程中重要的一環。傳統DEA 要求所有的投入、產出資料必須為量化的數
據，然而現實生活中有很多重要的變數難以量化，Likert 量表發明後，學
者們大量使用Likert 量表量化這些變數，但是Likert 量表尺度的公平性
是許多學者質疑的重點。模糊DEA 透過模糊理論，改善Likert 量表尺度
公平性的問題，因此本研究使用模糊DEA 進行工具機廠商教育訓練績效的
分析，並比較Likert 量表尺度下的DEA 與模糊DEA 實證結果的不同，研
究對象為民國96 年的台灣地區85 間工具機廠商。
幾項重要的實證分析結果如下：
1. 整體技術效率差者，多為訓練積極的廠商。
2. 部分規模效率差的廠商，純技術效率表現尚在中等水平，表示這些廠商
只是因為訓練較為積極，使得投入在生產規模遞減的水準。
3. 工具機產業的教育訓練普遍有浪費的現象，顯示只要投入少許資源即可
達到相當的成效，若要突破某個瓶頸，就要增加相當多的資源。
4. 整體而言使用Likert 量表尺度或是模糊DEA 的結果沒有顯著差異，但
是對於效率較佳的廠商來說，模糊DEA 具有較高的鑑別力。
The machine tool plays an important role in not only machinery industry but also
the whole manufacturing industry. Most of goods around us are made by the machine
tool. The core technologies hold by experienced employees depends on training to
pass down. Therefore, training is an essential process in machine tool factories. In
traditional DEA, all inputs and outputs need to be numeric data. But in reality, there
are many key variables are hard to be measured in numeric. After Likert scale being
invented, the scholars widely use the scale to evaluate these key variables. However,
there is criticism of the equity in Likert scale. Fuzzy DEA corrects this disadvantage
of Likert scale with fuzzy theory. As a result, this study evaluates the training
efficiency of 85 Taiwanese machine tool manufacturers in 2007 with fuzzy DEA and
comparers the result between fuzzy DEA and the method of Likert scale.
Some important conclusions are shown as follow:
1. Most of the inefficient DMUs are active about training.
2. Although some DMUs are bad in scale efficiency, they are fair in pure technical
efficiency. It explains that these DMUs just input at decrease return to scale
(DRTS) level.
3. Generally, there is waste of training in this industry. The empirical result tells us
they can obtain certain effects with little input. If they want to break through some
bottle neck of training effects, they have to input tremendous resources.
4. As a whole, there is no difference between the result of fuzzy DEA and the
method of Likert scale. However, there is better discrimination of efficient DMUs
in fuzzy DEA. |
| Reference: | 工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心兩岸工具機產業專題研究. 2001.
王為勤「2003 企業教育訓練大調查」管理雜誌. 臺北市: 哈佛企業管理顧問
股份有限公司, 2003, 68~72.
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局「九十六年度協助企業人力資源提升個別型計
畫」2007.
阮佩芬「技職教育與建教合作訓練探討」網路社會學通訊, 2007, 67.
張紹勳硏究方法. 台中市: 滄海, 1990.
許駿煒「高科技產業員工教育訓練成效評估之個案研究」國立台北科技大學碩
士論文, 1999.
陳世璋「當前產業人力政策」政治大學演講資料, 2007.
劉仁傑「Business Architecture 與兩岸企業競合策略」東海大學演講資
料, 2003.
蔡新源. 「高值化機械兆元產業發展策略」機械資訊, 2008, 611.
Peters, Thomas J. and Waterman, Robert H. 追求卓越: 美國傑出企
業成功的祕訣.台北市: 天下文化, 1993.
Banker, R.D.; Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. "Some Models for
Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data
Envelopment Analysis." Management Science, 1984, 30,
pp. 1078~92.
Brinkerhoff, Robert O. "Training Impact Evaluation That
Senior Managers Believe and Use: The Success Case
Method," ASTD 2007 International Conference and
Exposotion. 2007.
Bushnell, David S. "Input, Process, Output: A Model for
Evaluating Training." Training & Development Journal,
1990, 44, pp. 41~43.
Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. "Measuring the
Efficiency of Decision Making Units." European Journal of
Operational Research, 1978, 2, pp. 429~44.
Chen, Chie B. and Klein, Cerry M. "A Simple Approach to
Ranking a Group of Aggregated Fuzzy Utilities." IEEE
Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, 1997, 27,
pp. 26~35.
Chen, Shu-Jen. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making :
Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
Farrell, M.J. "The Measurement of Productivity Efficiency."
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1957, 120,
pp. 253~90.
Gardner Publications, Inc. "The 2008 World Machine-Tool
Output and Consumption Survey." 2008.
Kao, C. and Liu, S. T. "Fuzzy Efficiency Measures in Data
Envelopment Analysis." Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000a,
113, pp. 427~37.
____. "Data Envelopment Analysis with missing data: An
Application to University Libraries in Taiwan." Journal
of the Operational Research Society, 2000b, 51,
pp.897~905.
Kirkpatrick, Donald L. "Technique for Evaluating Training
Programs." Training & Development Journal, 1959, 13(11),
pp. 3~9.
Koopmans, T.C. An Analysis of Production as an Efficient
Combination of Activities. New York: Wiley, 1951.
Nadler, Leonard. Every Manager`s Guide to Human Resource
Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
Ouyang, Li S. and Lee, Hwey C. "Fuzzy Efficiency in the
Life Insurance Industry in Taiwan," 2008 Asia-Pacific
Productivity Conference. 2008.
Shelton, Sandra and Alliger, George. "Who`s Afraid of Level
4 Evaluation?" Training & Development Journal, 1993,
47(6), pp. 43~46.
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. and Shinkfield, Anthony J.
"Systematic Evaluation : A Self-Instructional Guide to
Theory and Practice." Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1985.
Zadeh, L. A. "Fuzzy Sets." Information and Control, 1965,
8, pp. 338~53. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟研究所
95258033
97 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095258033 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經濟學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
