Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37396
|
| Title: | 入住自費安養機構老人對其居住環境依附情形之初探--人生歸途中最後能掌控的一方天地
Attachment to place: A case study of the elderly living in congregate housing |
| Authors: | 黃萃文
Huang, Tsui-Wen |
| Contributors: | 呂寶靜
Lu, Pau-Ching
黃萃文
Huang, Tsui-Wen |
| Keywords: | 老人
自費安養機構
地方依附
家的意義
elderly
congregate housing
place attachment
meaning of home |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-19 13:33:52 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在高齡化社會中，老人居住安養的議題愈形重要。長久以來，「與子女同住」一直是國人心目中最理想的老年居住安排方式，但隨著老年人生活自主性與教育程度的提升，傾向不與子女同住的比例亦逐年上升，而選擇「自費安養」型態的老年人口也逐漸增加。本研究希望藉由入住自費安養機構老人本身的觀點，深入瞭解他們與此一居住環境的互動經驗及情感依附，並思考如何使居住環境有「像家」的感受。據此，本論文之研究目的在於：一、探討老人遷住自費安養機構的決策過程。二、分析入住自費安養機構老人與居住環境的互動關係。三、探索入住自費安養機構老人對居住環境的依附情形。四、依據研究結果，提供建議作為推動老人住宅政策與實務工作之參考。
本研究使用質性取向的研究方法，以台北市某家自費安養機構作為研究場域，採用半結構式的深度訪談法進行資料蒐集，共計訪談十三位老人，年齡介於七十一至九十二歲之間。主要的研究結果如下：
一、老人入住自費安養機構是一連串的過程，包括需求的引發、資訊的取得、貨比三家與考量要件、以及最終的決定，而其中遷居過程的參與程度和做決定的自主程度愈高之老人，對於新居的看法愈為正面。
二、在實質環境方面，安養機構最大的特色在於具有多元化的空間設施，老年住民可在個人寢室空間從事獨立活動，在公共空間有較多人際接觸的活動，至於機構外部的活動則受限於老人的行動能力、害怕外部環境潛藏的危險性或是擔心跌倒意外。此外，安養機構經常安排各種休閒活動和社會活動，是入住老人相當有利之處，並為老人帶來許多正面的功能與感受。在社會環境方面，「功能距離的鄰近性」與「社會人口背景的同質性」是老年住民互動關係之主要影響因素；而工作人員是協助老年住民維持獨立生活的支持者；原先的社會支持網絡則是提供老年住民情感支持的主要來源。
三、老年住民對於居住環境多數感到喜歡和滿意，但是否將居住環境視同為「家」，則受到「老人對家的定義或觀念」以及「是否仍擁有原本的住家」兩個因素所影響。綜合而論，老年住民的依附類型主要可歸納為三類：（1）我找到一個理想的地方，將在這裡終老餘生；（2）這裡是一個適合居住的地方，可以協助我維持獨立生活；（3）缺乏情感，希望將來有機會重新安排居住環境。
On an aging society, it has become an important issue that how people live in their old age. For a long time, “living with children,” to Taiwanese people, has been the best way of living arrangement in later life. However, with the enhancement of autonomy and the upgrading of educational level, more and more elderly tend not to live with their children, and some of them choose to live in congregate housing. From the viewpoint of the elderly living in congregate housing, this study aims to understand their interaction with the living environment, their emotional attachment to it, and how to make the environment feel like a home. Accordingly, the purposes of this study are as following: first, examine the decision-making processes of older adults relocating from home to congregate housing; second, analyze the interactive relationship between the elderly residents and their living environment; third, explore the emotional attachment of the elderly residents to their living environment; forth, based on research findings, provide suggestions for the elderly housing policy and the practitioners.
This study employs qualitative research approach, and data collection is gotten from a congregate housing in Taipei, including semi-structured in-depth interviews with thirteen elderly residents aging from 71 to 92. The study findings are listed below:
First, relocation is a series of process, including the demand for initiation, information acquisition, comparison, consideration, and the final decision. In this process, the more participation and the more autonomy the elderly have, the more positive their comments for the new residence will be.
Second, in physical environment, a wide range of space is the most prominent feature of congregate housing. The elderly residents could engage in independent activities in the individual dwelling units. They would have more interpersonal contacts in the public space. As for outdoor activities, the elderly might be restricted by their mobility, for fear of the potential dangers of the external environment, or falling accidents. Besides, the elderly get many benefits from the leisure and social activities in congregate housing. In the social environment, the interactive relationship between the elderly is influenced by the vicinity of the functional distance and the homogeneity of residents. Staff members of congregate housing help the elderly maintain independence, and original social support networks provide main emotional support to them.
Third, most elderly residents are fond of and satisfied with their living environment. Nevertheless, not all of them consider this environment as their home. Viewing it as a home depends on how they define the meaning of home and whether they have self-owned housing. Overall, the attachment type of these elderly residents can be divided into three categories: (1) I found an ideal place to stay throughout my lifetime; (2) this is a suitable place for me to live, and it can help me maintain independence; (3) I have no affection for this place. If given the opportunity, I will try to rearrange my dwelling place. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
王立信，1986，《我國老人自費安養居住型態之探討：翠柏新村個案硏究》。台北：淡江大學建築硏究所碩士論文。
內政部，2005，老人狀況調查摘要分析。http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp，取用日期：民國96年8月20日。
王雅臣，1998，《自費安養老人經濟支持與生活適應之研究：以頤苑為例》。高雄：中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
王鴻楷，1983，《老人社區住宅規劃與設計規範硏究》。內政部委託研究報告。
王麗芳，1985，《我國老年生活型態之發展趨勢：頤苑自費安養方式個案研究》。台北：臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
行政院主計處，2006，老人居住安排概況。http://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Data/6741881271.pdf，取用日期：民國96年10月6日。
行政院經濟建設委員會，2008，中華民國臺灣97年至145年人口推計。
危芷芬譯，Francis T. McAndrew著，1995，《環境心理學》。台北：五南。
吳芝儀、李奉儒譯，1995，《質的評鑑與研究》。台北：桂冠。
呂怡儒，2001，《台北近郊森林地方感之研究》。台北：台灣大學森林學研究所碩士論文。
李弘英、林朝飲，1997，〈地方情感概念在戶外遊憩研究上之探討〉。頁281-294，收錄於中華民國戶外遊憩學會編，《休閒遊憩行為 : 1997休閒、遊憩、觀光硏究成果硏討會》。台北市：田園文化。
李政賢譯，2006，《質性硏究：設計與計畫撰寫》。台北市：五南。
李莉，2007，《安養機構老人休閒參與與憂鬱因素：遞迴關係之探討》。台北：國立台北護理學院長期照護研究所碩士論文。
李婉容，1997，《從使用者觀點探討高齡者住宅環境使用之研究－以老人公寓為例》台北：淡江大學建築學系碩士論文。
吳淑瓊編輯，2003，《照顧住宅服務營運手册》。台北市：行政院社會福利推動委員會長期照護專案小組。
李開敏等譯，Abraham Monk編，1996，《老人福利服務》。台北市：心理。
吳謝芳，2005，《安養機構老人之居住行為硏究 : 以台中縣市為例》。台中：逢甲大學土地管理硏究所碩士論文。
呂寶靜，1995，《老人福利政策之研究》。內政部社會司委託研究報告。
呂寶靜，1998，〈老人安養政策〉。頁241-262，收錄於財國法人孫運璿學術基金會、中央研究院經濟研究所主辦，《老人問題與政策研討會論文集》。
呂寶靜，2001，《老人照顧 : 老人、家庭、正式服務》。台北市：五南。
周玉慧、楊文山、莊義利，1998，〈晚年生活壓力、社會支持與老人身心健康〉。《人文與社會科學集刊》10（2）：227-265。
周京安，1995，〈台灣老年人遷入安養機構之感受分析〉。台北市：行政院國科會科資中心。
林冠穎，2008，《台灣老人休閒參與之轉變：成因及影響》。台北市：政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
周家華，2000，《老人學研究：理論與實務》。台北市：正中書局。
林淑娟，2005，《老人住宅居室使用行為傾向之研究－以大台北地區三家老人住宅為例》。桃園：中原大學建築研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
邱清榮，1997，《我國老年婦女自主性之初探：以台北市居住於社區中的老年婦女為例》。台北：政治大學社會學硏究所碩士論文。
林歐貴英、郭鐘隆譯，2002，《社會老人學》。台北：五南。
胡幼慧，1995，《三代同代：迷思與陷阱》。台北市：巨流。
胡幼慧、姚美華，1996，〈一些質性方法上的思考〉。頁141-158，收錄於胡幼慧主編，《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北市：巨流。
姚美華，1995，《機構自費安養老人代間關係之探討》。嘉義：中正大學社會福利硏究所碩士論文。
施教裕，2003，〈從社會福利觀點談老人住宅政策及居處安排相關措施〉。《台灣家庭照顧者關懷總會季刊》，第六期，http://member.ehato.com.tw/orther/ familycare/季刊6-1.doc。
高迪理，1993，〈老人的文康休閒活動〉。《社區發展季刊》64：84-86。
郭玉燕，1993，《機構老人生活滿意度與社會支持之硏究：以臺灣省仁愛之家自費安養老人為例》。嘉義：中正大學社會福利硏究所碩士論文。
陳正芬，2004，《從老人居住安排及未滿足需求論我國長期照顧政策》。嘉義：中正大學社會福利硏究所博士論文。
陳向明，2002，《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。
張英陣，1995，《質化研究設計》。中華民國社會工作人員專業協會舉辦「質化研究研習營」。
畢恆達，1990，〈東西的意義與環境轉變〉。《臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報》1：41-56。
畢恆達，1993，〈物的意義：一個交互論的觀點〉。《臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報》7：97-110。
畢恆達，1995，〈生活經驗研究的反省：詮釋學的觀點〉。《本土心理學研究》4：224-259。
畢恆達，1997，〈環境心理學發展的歷史〉。《人與環境關係研究學會通訊》1：3-9。
陳樂屏，1989，《臺灣老人自費安養機構「機構化」問題之探討》。台中：東海大學建築硏究所碩士論文。
陳麗春，2002，〈台灣地區老人住宅計畫之推動〉。《台灣土地金融季刊》39（2）：175-194。
曾思瑜，1995，〈高齡者自費居住設施的生活空間設計與規畫研究－以老人公寓為例〉。台北市 : 行政院國科會科資中心。
黃郁然，2006，《住宅社區外部空間規劃設計與使用者地方依附之關係研究》。台南：成功大學建築研究所碩士論文。
黃耀榮，1993，《老人安養機構建築規劃設計準則硏究》。台北市：內政部建築硏究所籌備處主辦。
詹火生，1992，《台灣地區老人安養服務之研究》。台北：行政院研究發展委員會。
楊國樞、余安邦主編，1993，《中國人的心理與行為—理念及方法篇（一九九二）》。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
葉淑娟等，2004，〈社會支持系統與老人生活滿意度之關係－以高雄市老人為例〉。《中山管理評論》12（2）：299-427。
葛雅琴，2001，《台灣地區老年人遷居安養、養護機構生活適應之研究》。台中：東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
鄭安玲，2002，《安養機構內老人人際關係、自尊及機構情感依戀之研究》。高雄：中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
蔡幸樺，2006，《老人公寓入居者與獨居老人生活行為模式之比較—以高雄地區為例》。雲林：雲林科技大學空間設計系碩士班碩士論文。
鄭凱文，2002，《老人公寓公共空間中高齡者社交行為之建築計畫研究》。桃園：中原大學建築學系碩士論文。
潘桂成譯1998，Yi-Fu Tuan著，《經驗透視中的空間和地方》。臺北市：編譯館。
潘淑滿，2002，《質性研究理論與應用》。台北：心理。
謝采秀，1998，《在新、舊漁房之間：由一個搬遷的過程探討人與地方關係的轉變》。台北：台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
謝美娥，2007，〈一個對臺灣照顧住宅使用的質化觀點〉。《東吳社會工作學報》17：65-94。
蕭惠文，2007，《台灣老人對高齡者住宅的需求》。台北：台灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。
蕭郁芬，2003，《自費安養設施高齡者休閒行為的活動領域探討－以台南地區三家自費安養設施為例》。台北：雲林科技大學空間設計系碩士論文。
聶筱秋、胡中凡譯，Paul A. Bell等著，2003，《環境心理學》。台北：桂冠。
關華山，1992，〈台灣「老人自費安養」：以人與環境互動角度探究其理念與實際〉。台北市：行政院國科會科資中心。
關華山，1996，《台灣老人的居住環境》。台北：田園城市文化。
二、英文部分
Altman, I. & Low, S. M. eds. 1992, Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press.
Antonucci, T. C., 1990, “Social Supports and Social Relationships.” In Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (3rd ed.), edited by R. H. Binstock & L. K. George. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc .
Austin, D. M & Baba, Y., 1990, “Social Determinants of Neighborhood Attachment.” Sociological Spectrum 10: 59-78.
Ball, M. M. et al., 2000, “Quality of Life in Assisted Living Facilities: Viewpoints of Residents.” Journal of Applied Gerontology 19(3): 304-325.
Ball, M. M. et al., 2004, “Independence in Assisted Living.” Journal of Aging Studies 18: 467-483.
Belk, R. W., 1992, “Attachment to Possessions.” Pp. 37-62 in Place Attachment, edited by I. Altman & S. Low. New York: Plenum.
Brown, B. B. & C. M. Werner, 1985, “Social Cohesiveness, Territoriality, and Holiday Decoration.” Environment and Behavior 17: 539-565.
Buttimer, A & Seamon, D. eds., 1980. The Human Experience of Space and Place. London: Croom Helm.
Cutchin, M. P., Steven V. Owen & Pei-Fen J. Chang, 2003, “Becoming ‘at Home’ in Assisted Living Residences: Exploring Place Integration Processes.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 58: S234-S243.
Farrell, S. J., Aubry, T. & Coulombe D., 2004. Neighborhoods and Neighbors: Do They Contribute to Personal Well-being? Journal of Community Psychology 32(1): 9-25.
Feldman, R. M., 1996, “Constancy and Change in Attachments to Types of Settlements.” Environment and Behavior 28(4): 419-445.
Gerson, K., Stueve, C. A. & C. S. Fischer, 1977, “Attachment to Place.” Pp. 139-161 in Networks and Places, edited by C. S. Fischer et al. New York: The Free Press.
Giuliani, M. V. ＆ Feldman, R., 1993, “Place Attachment in a Developmental and Cultural Context.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 13: 267-274.
Giuliani, M. V., 2003, “Theory of Attachment and Place Attachment.” Pp. 137-170 in Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues, edited by M. Bonnes, T. Lee, & M. Bonaiuto. Aldershot: Ashgate publishing limited.
Hammitt, W. E. & David, N. C., 1998, Wildland Recreation: Ecology and Management. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Hay, R., 1998, “Sense of Place in Developmental Context.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 18: 5-29.
Higgins, J., 1989, “Defining Community Care: Realities and Myths.” Social Policy and Administration 23: 3-16.
Howell, S. C., 1983, “The Meaning of Place in Old Age.” Pp.97-106 in Aging and Milieu: Environment Perspectives on Growing Old, edited by G. D. Rowles & R. J. Ohta. New York: Academic Press.
Hufford, M., 1992, “Thresholds to an Alternate Realm: Mapping the Chaseworld in New Jersey’s Pinie Barrens.” Pp. 231-251 in Place Attachment, edited by I. Altman & S. Low. New York: Plenum.
Hummon, D. M., 1992, “Community Attachment: Local Sentiment and Sense of Place.” Pp. 253-278 in Place Attachment, edited by I. Altman & S. Low. New York: Plenum.
Kasarda, J. P. & Janowitz, M. 1974, “Community Attachment in mass society.” American Sociological Review 39: 328-339.
Leith, K. H., 2006, “Home is Where the Heart is...or Is It: A phenomenological Exploration of the Meaning of Home for Older Women in Congregate Housing.” Journal of Aging Studies 20: 317-333.
Lewin, F. A., 2001, “The Meaning of Home among Elderly Immigrants Directions for Future Research and Theoretical Development.” Housing Study 16(3): 353-370.
Low, S., “1992, Symbolic Ties that Bind: Place Attachment in the Plaza.” Pp. 165-184 in Place Attachment, edited by I. Altman & S. Low. New York: Plenum.
Low, S. & Altman, I. 1992, “Place Attachment: A Conceptual Inquiry.” Pp. 1-12 in Place Attachment, edited by I. Altman & S. Low. New York: Plenum.
Lundgren, E., 2000, “Homelike Housing for Elderly People: Materialized Ideology.” Housing, Theory and Society 17: 109-120.
McAndrew, F. T., 1998, “The Measurement of ‘Rootedness’ and the Prediction of Attachment to Home-towns in College Students.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 18: 409-417.
Mesch, G. S. & Manor, O., 1998, “Social Ties, Environmental Perception, and Local Attachment.” Environment and Behavior 30: 504-519.
Newsom, J. T., & Schulz, R., 1996, “Social Support as a Mediator in the Relation between Functional Status and Quality of Life in Older Adults.” Psychology and Aging 11(1): 34-44.
Norris-Baker, C. & Scheidt, R. J. 1990, “Place Attachment among Older Residents of a ‘Ghost Town’: A Transactional Approach.” Pp. 333-342 in Coming of Age, edited by R. I. Selby, K. H. Anthony, J. Choi & B. Orland. Oklahoma City: Environmental Design Research Association.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K. & Kaminoff, R., 1983, “Place-identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3: 57-83.
Proshansky, H. M.,1990, “The Pursuit of Understanding: An Intellectual History. In Environment and Behavior Studies: Emergence of Intellectual Traditions, edited by I. Altman & K. Christensen. New York: Plenum.
Rapoport, A., 1982, The meaning of the built environment : a nonverbal communication approach. Beverly Hills : Sage Publications.
Relph, E., 1976, Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
Ringel, N. B. & Finkelstein, J. C., 1991, “Differentiating Neighborhood Satisfaction and Neighborhood Attachment among Urban Residents.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 12: 177-193.
Rivlin, L. G., 1982, “Group Membership and Place Meanings in an Urban Neighborhood.” Journal of Social Issues 38: 75-93.
Rowles, G. D., 1980, “Growing old ‘inside’: Aging and Attachment to Place in an Appalachian Community. Pp. 153-170 in Transitions of Aging, edited by N. Datan & A. Lahmann. New York: Academic Press.
Rowles, G. D., 1983, “Geographical Dimensions of Social Support in Rural Appalachia”. Pp.111-130 in Aging and Milieu: Environment Perspectives on Growing Old, edited by G. D. Rowles & R. J. Ohta. New York: Academic Press.
Rubinstein, R. L., 1989, “The Home Environments of Older People: A Description of the Psychosocial Processes Linking Person to Place. Journal of Gerontology: Social Science 44: S45-S53.
Rubinstein, R. L. & Parmelee, P. A., 1992, “Attachment to Place and the Representation of the Life Course by the Elderly.” Pp.139-163 in Place Attachment, edited by I. Altman & S. Low. New York: Plenum.
Shumaker, S. A. & Taylor, R. B., 1983, “Toward a Clarification of People-place Relationships: A Model of Attachment to Place.” Pp. 219-251 in Environmental Psychology: Directions and Perspectives. New York: Praeger.
Sixsmith, A. J., 1990, “The meaning and experience of `home` in later life.” pp. 172-192 in Welfare and the ageing experience, edited by B. Bytheway, & J. Johnson. Aldershot, England: Avebury.
Street, D., Burge, S., Quadagno, J. & Barrett, A., 2007, “The Salience of Social Relationships for Resident Well-Being in Assisted Living.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 62B: S129-S134.
Sugihara, S. & G. W. Evans., 2000, "Place Attachment and Social Support at Continuing Care retirement Communities." Environment and Behavior 32(3): 400-409.
Swenson, M. M. 1998, “The Meaning of Home to Five Elderly Women.” Health Care for Women International 19: 381-393.
Tracy, J. P & Young, S. D., 2004, “Moving to an Assisted Living Facility: Exploring the Transitional Experience of Elderly Individuals.” Journal of Gerontological Nursing 30(10): 26-33.
Tuan, Yi-Fu., 1977, Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Tsui, A. S., Farh, J. L., & Xin, K., 2000, “Guanxi in the Chinese context.” In Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, edited by J. T. Li and A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon. London: MacMillan.
Twigger-Ross, C. L. & Uzzell, D. L., 1996, “Place and Identity Processes.” Journal Environmental Psychology 16: 205-220.
Twigger-Ross, C. L., Bonaiuto, M., & Breakwell, G., 2003. “Identity Theories and Environmental Psychology.” Pp. 203–233 in Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues, edited by M. Bonnes, T. Lee, & M. Bonaiuto. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochoou, X., & Breakwell, G. M., 2000, “The Distinctiveness Principle: Identity, Meaning and the Bounds of Cultural Relativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4: 337-354.
Young, H. M., 1998, “Moving to Congregate Housing: The Last Chosen Home.” Journal of Aging Studies 12(2): 149-165. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
94254020
97 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094254020 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
